Oxford Industries (OXM)
Market Price (9/7/2026): $30.98 | Market Cap: $462.8 MilSector: Consumer Discretionary | Industry: Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
Oxford Industries (OXM)
Market Price (9/7/2026): $30.98Market Cap: $462.8 MilSector: Consumer DiscretionaryIndustry: Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 7.7%, Dividend Yield is 9.2%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 3.3%, FCF Yield is 11% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Experience Economy & Premiumization, and E-commerce & Digital Retail. Themes include Experiential Retail, Luxury Consumer Goods, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -97%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -136% Meaningful short interestShort Interest Days-to-CoverDTC = (Short Interest Share Quantity) / (Average Daily Trading Volume). Reflects how many days it would take to cover (close out) the short interest based on average volumes. High DTC can signify an increased risk of a short squeeze. is 12.99 | Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 112% Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -1.8%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -1.5%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -2.2% Significant short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 21% Key risksOXM key risks include [1] significant costs from Chinese tariffs during its ongoing supply chain realignment and [2] weaker performance and margin pressures impacting certain brands in its portfolio. |
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 7.7%, Dividend Yield is 9.2%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 3.3%, FCF Yield is 11% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Experience Economy & Premiumization, and E-commerce & Digital Retail. Themes include Experiential Retail, Luxury Consumer Goods, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -97%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -136% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest Days-to-CoverDTC = (Short Interest Share Quantity) / (Average Daily Trading Volume). Reflects how many days it would take to cover (close out) the short interest based on average volumes. High DTC can signify an increased risk of a short squeeze. is 12.99 |
| Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 112% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -1.8%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -1.5%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -2.2% |
| Significant short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 21% |
| Key risksOXM key risks include [1] significant costs from Chinese tariffs during its ongoing supply chain realignment and [2] weaker performance and margin pressures impacting certain brands in its portfolio. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Updated on 9/4/2026
Oxford Industries (OXM) stock has lost about 30% since 5/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Cut to Fiscal 2026 Outlook Post-Q2 Results.
On September 3, 2026, following the release of its fiscal Q2 2026 results, Oxford Industries drastically lowered its full-year fiscal 2026 guidance. The company now anticipates net sales to be between $1.430 billion and $1.470 billion, a reduction from its previous range of $1.47 billion to $1.5 billion. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) guidance was also cut to a range of $1.60 to $2.00, significantly below the prior analyst consensus of $2.61 and below fiscal 2025's adjusted EPS of $2.11. This revised outlook, implying a low single-digit negative comparable sales for the total company, triggered a sharp decline in the stock.
2. Underperformance and "Softness" in Key Brands, Particularly Lilly Pulitzer.
A core reason for the lowered guidance and overall sales decline stems from the weak performance of specific brands within Oxford Industries' portfolio. In fiscal Q2 2026 (ended August 1, 2026), Lilly Pulitzer sales decreased by 5.6% to $85.2 million, and Johnny Was sales dropped by 8.8% to $41.4 million. Management attributed the Lilly Pulitzer weakness primarily to "addressable product and marketing challenges" and "operational hurdles and persistent promotional pressures." A full assortment reset for the Lilly Pulitzer brand is not expected to be actionable until Spring 2027.
Show more
Oxford Industries (OXM) stock has lost about 30% since 5/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Cut to Fiscal 2026 Outlook Post-Q2 Results.
On September 3, 2026, following the release of its fiscal Q2 2026 results, Oxford Industries drastically lowered its full-year fiscal 2026 guidance. The company now anticipates net sales to be between $1.430 billion and $1.470 billion, a reduction from its previous range of $1.47 billion to $1.5 billion. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) guidance was also cut to a range of $1.60 to $2.00, significantly below the prior analyst consensus of $2.61 and below fiscal 2025's adjusted EPS of $2.11. This revised outlook, implying a low single-digit negative comparable sales for the total company, triggered a sharp decline in the stock.
2. Underperformance and "Softness" in Key Brands, Particularly Lilly Pulitzer.
A core reason for the lowered guidance and overall sales decline stems from the weak performance of specific brands within Oxford Industries' portfolio. In fiscal Q2 2026 (ended August 1, 2026), Lilly Pulitzer sales decreased by 5.6% to $85.2 million, and Johnny Was sales dropped by 8.8% to $41.4 million. Management attributed the Lilly Pulitzer weakness primarily to "addressable product and marketing challenges" and "operational hurdles and persistent promotional pressures." A full assortment reset for the Lilly Pulitzer brand is not expected to be actionable until Spring 2027.
Show more
Updated on 9/4/2026
Oxford Industries (OXM) stock has lost about 30% since 5/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Cut to Fiscal 2026 Outlook Post-Q2 Results.
On September 3, 2026, following the release of its fiscal Q2 2026 results, Oxford Industries drastically lowered its full-year fiscal 2026 guidance. The company now anticipates net sales to be between $1.430 billion and $1.470 billion, a reduction from its previous range of $1.47 billion to $1.5 billion. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) guidance was also cut to a range of $1.60 to $2.00, significantly below the prior analyst consensus of $2.61 and below fiscal 2025's adjusted EPS of $2.11. This revised outlook, implying a low single-digit negative comparable sales for the total company, triggered a sharp decline in the stock.
2. Underperformance and "Softness" in Key Brands, Particularly Lilly Pulitzer.
A core reason for the lowered guidance and overall sales decline stems from the weak performance of specific brands within Oxford Industries' portfolio. In fiscal Q2 2026 (ended August 1, 2026), Lilly Pulitzer sales decreased by 5.6% to $85.2 million, and Johnny Was sales dropped by 8.8% to $41.4 million. Management attributed the Lilly Pulitzer weakness primarily to "addressable product and marketing challenges" and "operational hurdles and persistent promotional pressures." A full assortment reset for the Lilly Pulitzer brand is not expected to be actionable until Spring 2027.
3. Initial Weak Fiscal Q2 Guidance Following Q1 2026 Earnings.
Even though Oxford Industries reported stronger-than-expected fiscal Q1 2026 results on June 10, 2026, with adjusted EPS of $1.39 surpassing estimates of $1.27, the forward guidance was a major disappointment. The company projected fiscal Q2 2026 sales to be approximately $390 million, falling about 5.8% short of Wall Street consensus estimates at the time. This initial cut in guidance caused the stock to drop approximately 17% following the announcement.
4. Broader Macroeconomic Consumer Pressures.
Oxford Industries cited "ongoing macroeconomic consumer pressure" as a contributing factor to the reduced fiscal 2026 guidance. This suggests that a challenging overall economic environment is impacting consumer discretionary spending, affecting the apparel industry and, consequently, OXM's sales performance across its brands.
5. Analyst Downgrades and Price Target Reductions.
Following the disappointing guidance, several investment analysts revised their ratings and price targets for OXM. For instance, Citigroup cut its price target from $36 to $33, while Telsey Advisory Group lowered its target from $44 to $35. Truist Financial also reduced its price objective from $40 to $33. The consensus analyst rating moved towards "Reduce" or "Hold," with an average price target of $35.25, reflecting diminished confidence in the company's near-term prospects.
Show less
Oxford Industries (OXM) stock has lost about 30% since 5/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Cut to Fiscal 2026 Outlook Post-Q2 Results.
On September 3, 2026, following the release of its fiscal Q2 2026 results, Oxford Industries drastically lowered its full-year fiscal 2026 guidance. The company now anticipates net sales to be between $1.430 billion and $1.470 billion, a reduction from its previous range of $1.47 billion to $1.5 billion. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) guidance was also cut to a range of $1.60 to $2.00, significantly below the prior analyst consensus of $2.61 and below fiscal 2025's adjusted EPS of $2.11. This revised outlook, implying a low single-digit negative comparable sales for the total company, triggered a sharp decline in the stock.
2. Underperformance and "Softness" in Key Brands, Particularly Lilly Pulitzer.
A core reason for the lowered guidance and overall sales decline stems from the weak performance of specific brands within Oxford Industries' portfolio. In fiscal Q2 2026 (ended August 1, 2026), Lilly Pulitzer sales decreased by 5.6% to $85.2 million, and Johnny Was sales dropped by 8.8% to $41.4 million. Management attributed the Lilly Pulitzer weakness primarily to "addressable product and marketing challenges" and "operational hurdles and persistent promotional pressures." A full assortment reset for the Lilly Pulitzer brand is not expected to be actionable until Spring 2027.
3. Initial Weak Fiscal Q2 Guidance Following Q1 2026 Earnings.
Even though Oxford Industries reported stronger-than-expected fiscal Q1 2026 results on June 10, 2026, with adjusted EPS of $1.39 surpassing estimates of $1.27, the forward guidance was a major disappointment. The company projected fiscal Q2 2026 sales to be approximately $390 million, falling about 5.8% short of Wall Street consensus estimates at the time. This initial cut in guidance caused the stock to drop approximately 17% following the announcement.
4. Broader Macroeconomic Consumer Pressures.
Oxford Industries cited "ongoing macroeconomic consumer pressure" as a contributing factor to the reduced fiscal 2026 guidance. This suggests that a challenging overall economic environment is impacting consumer discretionary spending, affecting the apparel industry and, consequently, OXM's sales performance across its brands.
5. Analyst Downgrades and Price Target Reductions.
Following the disappointing guidance, several investment analysts revised their ratings and price targets for OXM. For instance, Citigroup cut its price target from $36 to $33, while Telsey Advisory Group lowered its target from $44 to $35. Truist Financial also reduced its price objective from $40 to $33. The consensus analyst rating moved towards "Reduce" or "Hold," with an average price target of $35.25, reflecting diminished confidence in the company's near-term prospects.
Show less
Holding a concentrated position? Know your true downside before the momentum shifts.
Protect Your Wealth →
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -29.6% change in OXM stock from 5/31/2026 to 9/6/2026 was primarily driven by a -28.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 5312026 | 9062026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 43.86 | 30.87 | -29.6% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,478 | 1,468 | -0.7% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.4 | 0.3 | -28.9% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 15 | 15 | -0.4% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -29.6% |
Market Drivers
5/31/2026 to 9/6/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OXM | -29.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Sector (XLY) | -4.9% | 9.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -19.4% change in OXM stock from 2/28/2026 to 9/6/2026 was primarily driven by a -17.6% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 2282026 | 9062026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 38.31 | 30.87 | -19.4% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,494 | 1,468 | -1.8% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.4 | 0.3 | -17.6% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 15 | 15 | -0.5% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -19.4% |
Market Drivers
2/28/2026 to 9/6/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OXM | -19.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 12.6% | 19.8% |
| Sector (XLY) | -1.5% | 21.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -25.0% change in OXM stock from 8/31/2025 to 9/6/2026 was primarily driven by a -24.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 8312025 | 9062026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 41.18 | 30.87 | -25.0% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,511 | 1,468 | -2.9% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.4 | 0.3 | -24.2% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 15 | 15 | 1.9% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -25.0% |
Market Drivers
8/31/2025 to 9/6/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OXM | -25.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 20.4% | 22.2% |
| Sector (XLY) | -0.3% | 28.2% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -64.7% change in OXM stock from 8/31/2023 to 9/6/2026 was primarily driven by a -66.0% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 8312023 | 9062026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 87.56 | 30.87 | -64.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,479 | 1,468 | -0.8% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.9 | 0.3 | -66.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 16 | 15 | 4.6% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -64.7% |
Market Drivers
8/31/2023 to 9/6/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OXM | -64.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 77.1% | 35.7% |
| Sector (XLY) | 37.7% | 41.2% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| OXM Return | 58% | -6% | 10% | -19% | -54% | 12% | -32% |
| Peers Return | 21% | -23% | 14% | 18% | 24% | -14% | 34% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 13% | 106% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| OXM Win Rate | 75% | 58% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 67% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 55% | 38% | 48% | 55% | 53% | 40% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 56% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| OXM Max Drawdown | -19% | -27% | -30% | -34% | -62% | -27% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -24% | -49% | -38% | -35% | -45% | -32% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: RL, PVH, TPR, CPRI, VFC.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 9/4/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | OXM | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -19.8% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 24.7% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 126 days | 24 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -19.5% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 24.3% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 72 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -52.7% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 111.5% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 286 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -24.1% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.8% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 805 days | 105 days |
| 2016-2017 Trump Reflation Bond Selloff | ||
| % Loss | -21.7% | -3.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 27.7% | 3.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 259 days | 6 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -37.9% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 61.1% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 875 days | 62 days |
In The Past
Oxford Industries's stock fell -19.8% during the Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 24.7% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | OXM | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -52.7% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 111.5% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 286 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -24.1% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.8% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 805 days | 105 days |
| 2016-2017 Trump Reflation Bond Selloff | ||
| % Loss | -21.7% | -3.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 27.7% | 3.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 259 days | 6 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -37.9% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 61.1% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 875 days | 62 days |
| 2010 Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis / Flash Crash | ||
| % Loss | -23.4% | -15.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 30.5% | 18.2% |
| Time to Breakeven | 8 days | 125 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -86.7% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 649.4% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 277 days | 1085 days |
| Summer 2007 Credit Crunch | ||
| % Loss | -23.4% | -8.6% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 30.6% | 9.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1334 days | 47 days |
In The Past
Oxford Industries's stock fell -19.8% during the Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 24.7% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Oxford Industries (OXM)
Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM) is a lifestyle apparel company that designs, sources, markets, and distributes products through a portfolio of distinct, premium brands worldwide. The company's core business revolves around creating and selling men's, women's, and children's sportswear, dresses, and a variety of related accessories, targeting consumers who appreciate quality and aspirational brand identities.
The company's key brands include Tommy Bahama, recognized for its island-inspired men's and women's sportswear and resort wear, and Lilly Pulitzer, which offers vibrant women's and girl's dresses, sportswear, and accessories. Southern Tide is another prominent brand, providing men's and now women's and youth apparel with a classic, coastal lifestyle aesthetic. Oxford Industries also owns The Beaufort Bonnet Company for premium childrenswear and Duck Head for men's apparel. Beyond direct product sales, OXM strategically licenses its major brands for a wide range of complementary goods, such as furniture, home linens, fragrances, and spirits, extending its brand presence into various lifestyle categories.
Oxford Industries employs a comprehensive omnichannel distribution strategy to reach its customers. Products are sold through its own extensive network of brand-specific full-price retail stores, including Tommy Bahama food and beverage locations, and dedicated e-commerce websites for each brand. Additionally, the company distributes its merchandise through department stores, specialty boutiques, and multi-branded online retailers, primarily serving consumers globally who seek high-quality, distinctive apparel and accessories aligned with particular lifestyle aesthetics.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-2 brief analogies to describe Oxford Industries (OXM):
- A **VF Corporation** (Vans, The North Face) for premium, resort-style apparel.
- Like a more premium **Gap Inc.** (Gap, Banana Republic) for distinct lifestyle brands.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Apparel: A diverse range of men's, women's, girls', and children's clothing, including sportswear, dresses, shirts, pants, shorts, outerwear, and swimwear, distributed across multiple brands.
- Footwear and Accessories: Products such as shoes, sandals, scarves, bags, jewelry, belts, headwear, and hosiery complementing their apparel lines.
- Home Furnishings and Linens: Licensed products including indoor and outdoor furniture, bedding, bath linens, and other home goods.
- Personal Care and Fragrances: Licensed goods such as shampoo, toiletries, and various fragrances.
- Distilled Spirits: Licensed alcoholic beverages offered under specific brands.
- Food and Beverage Services: Restaurant and bar services provided at certain brand-specific locations.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Major Customers of Oxford Industries (OXM)
Oxford Industries, Inc. primarily sells its products directly to individual consumers through its extensive network of owned retail stores (including full-price stores, food and beverage locations, and outlet stores) and its e-commerce websites for brands such as Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Southern Tide, The Beaufort Bonnet Company, and Duck Head. While the company also distributes products wholesale to other retailers, its direct-to-consumer channels represent a significant portion of its sales.
The company serves the following categories of individual customers:
- Affluent Consumers Seeking Premium Lifestyle Apparel: This category includes adults who are drawn to Oxford Industries' brands for their distinctive casual, resort, and sophisticated lifestyle offerings. These customers, often with disposable income, value quality, comfort, and unique styles for leisure, vacation, and everyday wear, as exemplified by brands like Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, and Southern Tide.
- Parents of Young Children Seeking High-Quality Childrenswear: This segment consists of parents who prioritize premium, often classic or traditional, apparel and accessories for infants and young children. They are the target demographic for The Beaufort Bonnet Company, valuing craftsmanship, unique designs, and durability.
- Men Valuing Classic, Heritage-Inspired Casual Wear: This category caters to men interested in timeless, refined casual apparel. These customers appreciate traditional styles, quality materials, and a sophisticated yet relaxed aesthetic in their wardrobe, primarily served by brands such as Duck Head and the men's lines of Southern Tide.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
Thomas C. Chubb III, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Thomas C. Chubb III has served as CEO and President of Oxford Industries since 2013, and was elected Chairman in 2015. He has a long tenure with the company, having joined full-time in 1989 as an in-house attorney after interning in 1988. Prior to his current role, he held positions as General Counsel (1999), Executive Vice President (2004), and President (2009). He has been instrumental in the company's strategic and operational evolution, including playing a key role in the acquisitions of brands like Tommy Bahama (2003) and Lilly Pulitzer (2010).
K. Scott Grassmyer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
K. Scott Grassmyer joined Oxford Industries in 2002 as Controller. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2014 and took on the additional role of Chief Operating Officer in 2022. Mr. Grassmyer is a Certified Public Accountant with over 30 years of financial experience. Before joining Oxford Industries, he was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Duck Head Apparel Company, Inc., a publicly-traded apparel wholesaler and retailer, where he started in 1990. He has played a key role in Oxford Industries' acquisitions and integrations of brands such as Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Southern Tide, and The Beaufort Bonnet Company.
Thomas E. Campbell, Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Thomas E. Campbell serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Oxford Industries.
Tracey Hernandez, Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Tracey Hernandez holds the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at Oxford Industries.
Raj Palakshappa, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer and Secretary
Raj Palakshappa (also referred to as Suraj A Palakshappa in some sources) is the Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer, and Secretary for Oxford Industries.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Key Risks to Oxford Industries (OXM)
- Economic Downturns and Shifting Consumer Spending: Oxford Industries, an apparel company with premium lifestyle brands, is highly susceptible to macroeconomic fluctuations and changes in consumer discretionary spending. Recent results show decreasing sales, lower store productivity, and increased promotional activities. The company has significantly reduced its adjusted earnings per share (EPS) guidance for fiscal 2025, underscoring the impact of cautious consumer behavior on its predominantly non-essential product offerings.
- Tariffs and Supply Chain Disruptions: The company faces significant challenges from rising tariffs, particularly on Chinese imports, with an anticipated increase of approximately $40 million in costs for fiscal year 2025. Oxford Industries is actively working to diversify its sourcing away from China to mitigate these impacts, aiming to reduce reliance from 40% in 2024 to under 10% by late 2026. This strategic shift, while necessary, also introduces operational complexities and potential costs. Broader global supply chain issues, including fluctuations in raw material costs, labor, and freight, also pose ongoing risks.
- Brand Performance and Intense Competition: While Oxford Industries possesses a diverse portfolio of lifestyle brands, some key brands, such as Tommy Bahama and Johnny Was, have shown declining profitability and worsening performance trends. The apparel industry is characterized by intense competition and rapidly changing fashion trends, requiring continuous innovation and adaptation to maintain market share and brand relevance. Failure to effectively manage brand portfolios and respond to evolving consumer preferences could negatively impact the company's reputation and financial results.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
Oxford Industries, Inc. operates in several addressable markets through its diverse portfolio of lifestyle brands. The estimated market sizes for their main products and services in 2025 are as follows:
- Global Apparel Market: The global apparel market was estimated at USD 1.84 trillion in 2025.
- U.S. Apparel Market: The United States apparel market was valued at USD 365.70 billion in 2025.
- Global Women's Apparel Market: This market was valued at USD 930 billion in 2025.
- Global Men's Apparel Market: The global men's apparel market was worth USD 587.61 billion in 2025.
- U.S. Men's Apparel Market: The U.S. menswear market size is anticipated to reach USD 154.5 billion in 2025.
- Global Children's Apparel Market: This market was valued at USD 274.25 billion in 2025.
- Global Luxury Apparel Market: The global luxury apparel market size was estimated at USD 70.44 billion in 2025. Separately, the global luxury clothing market was valued at USD 274.8 billion as of 2025. The broader global luxury fashion market was valued at USD 261.0 billion in 2025, with clothing and apparel being the largest product type, holding approximately 50.7% of the market.
- Global Home Furnishings Market: The global home furnishings market is projected to grow from USD 906.74 billion in 2025. The global furniture market size was estimated at USD 786.13 billion in 2025.
- U.S. Home Decor Market: The United States home decor market is expected to reach USD 215.21 billion in 2025.
- U.S. Home Furniture Market: The US furniture market size was USD 173.27 billion in 2025.
- U.S. Restaurant and Foodservice Industry Sales: The U.S. restaurant and foodservice industry is projected to generate about USD 1.5 trillion in sales in 2025. The U.S. food service market size was projected to grow from USD 1,286.65 billion in 2025.
- Global Casual Dining Market: The global casual dining market size was valued at USD 333.02 billion in 2025.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Oxford Industries (OXM) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next two to three years through several strategic initiatives:
- Expansion of Retail Footprint and Experiential Stores: Oxford Industries plans to open approximately 15 net new stores in fiscal year 2025, including additional Tommy Bahama Marlin Bars. This physical expansion aims to enhance experiential retail and increase customer traffic.
- Lilly Pulitzer Brand Growth through Product Innovation and E-commerce: The company is focusing on increasing Lilly Pulitzer's "newness quotient" to over 50% in fiscal year 2025, building on its strong e-commerce performance and double-digit retail growth. Analysts project a 7% year-over-year growth in net sales for Lilly Pulitzer.
- Momentum in Emerging Brands: The Emerging Brands group has demonstrated consistent year-over-year sales gains and strong momentum. Analysts anticipate a 3.2% year-over-year increase in net sales for these brands.
- Enhanced Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Capabilities and E-commerce: Oxford Industries is investing in a new distribution center to boost its direct-to-consumer capabilities and is focusing on digital transformation to improve customer experiences and streamline operations. This strategic emphasis on e-commerce aims to expand its consumer base.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Capital Allocation Decisions (Last 3-5 Years) for Oxford Industries (OXM)
Share Repurchases
- Oxford Industries authorized a share buyback plan on December 10, 2024.
- During the first half of fiscal 2025, the company made $55 million in share repurchases.
- In the first nine months of fiscal 2025, share repurchases amounted to $55 million.
Outbound Investments
- In September 2022, Oxford Industries acquired Johnny Was, a private label manufacturer of women's apparel, for $270 million.
Capital Expenditures
- Capital expenditures in fiscal 2024 totaled $134 million.
- For fiscal 2025, capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $120 million to $125 million.
- The primary focus of recent capital expenditures has been the completion of a new distribution center in Lyons, Georgia, and the opening of new stores, including Tommy Bahama Marlin Bars and standalone stores for Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer.
- Capital expenditures are projected to moderate to around $75 million annually in fiscal 2026 and beyond, following the completion of the Lyons, Georgia distribution center, with plans for approximately 15 new store locations.
Peer Outperformance in Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
OXM has trailed 58% of its 26 Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods peers over 5Y. Among the peers that beat it are PVH and COLM. Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods ranks 17th of 23 industries in Consumer Discretionary by median 5Y return. The sector’s gains have largely come from elsewhere.
Share of Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods constituents that OXM has outperformed, by holding period. Peers without a full price history over a given window are excluded from that window.
1Y
29%
of 28 industry peers · -21.6% return
3Y
14%
of 28 industry peers · -63.2% return
5Y
42%
of 26 industry peers · -58.0% return
Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods peers with revenue growth within 4pp of OXM's that beat it on at least 2 of 3 windows, and by at least 20pp over 5Y. Growth is matched by construction, so the gap is largely a re-rating gap. The multiple column is the context for it.
| Ticker | Name | Rev Growth 3Y Avg | P/E | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 5Y Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OXM | Oxford Industries | -1.5% | -67.7x | -21.6% | -63.2% | -58.0% | — |
| PVH | PVH | -0.8% | -20.3x | -15.1% | -6.2% | -33.4% | +25pp |
| COLM | Columbia Sportswear | -1.5% | 14.3x | 4.3% | -15.6% | -37.9% | +20pp |
Price returns, excluding dividends. P/E shown for context only and not used for matching.
Median price return by industry across the Consumer Discretionary sector, ranked by 5Y. Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods is OXM's own industry. Use this to see which corners of the sector have carried the returns.
| Industry | Names | 1Y med | 3Y med | 5Y med | Top 3 by 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education Services | 14 | -15.4% | 95.2% | 70.9% | LINC 307% · CVSA 244% · PRDO 230% |
| Homebuilding | 18 | -11.3% | 20.3% | 42.7% | GRBK 192% · PHM 148% · TOL 135% |
| Automotive Retail | 18 | -15.9% | 16.0% | 19.1% | MUSA 241% · PAG 187% · ORLY 127% |
| Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines | 22 | 14.7% | 54.0% | 10.4% | RCL 235% · MAR 162% · HLT 156% |
| Home Improvement Retail | 5 | -22.7% | -7.1% | 9.8% | HVT 12% · HD 11% · LOW 10% |
| Specialty Stores | 7 | -7.6% | 34.6% | 8.9% | FIVE 37% · SIG 17% · DKS 16% |
| Distributors | 4 | -7.5% | -21.7% | -4.7% | ARMK 144% · GPC 33% · LKQ -42% |
| Home Furnishings | 4 | -6.4% | 26.5% | -11.6% | SGI 62% · LZB 7% · MHK -30% |
| Restaurants | 34 | -10.5% | -11.2% | -12.0% | EAT 342% · CAKE 169% · RAVE 138% |
| Specialized Consumer Services | 10 | -11.7% | 38.2% | -12.3% | HRB 128% · FTDR 85% · SCI 42% |
| Footwear | 9 | 47.3% | 38.0% | -13.8% | WEYS 164% · DECK 26% · SHOO 24% |
| Apparel Retail | 25 | -4.5% | 15.0% | -24.2% | ANF 335% · DXLG 213% · URBN 154% |
| Leisure Products | 13 | -17.2% | -16.3% | -31.4% | GOLF 88% · HAS 13% · MCFT -6% |
| Automotive Parts & Equipment | 38 | -10.1% | -1.2% | -33.9% | MOD 1530% · GTX 293% · STRT 99% |
| Leisure Facilities | 11 | 2.9% | -9.5% | -34.5% | OSW 122% · JAKK 97% · ESCA 17% |
| Casinos & Gaming | 20 | -11.8% | -23.0% | -35.7% | MCRI 107% · RSI 61% · RRR 53% |
| Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods ← | 27 | -2.7% | 2.6% | -37.9% | RL 244% · TPR 240% · ELA 227% |
| Household Appliances | 18 | 14.4% | 38.0% | -42.4% | KEQU 174% · FLXS 161% · HBB 119% |
| Broadline Retail | 14 | -10.4% | 20.7% | -52.5% | DDS 318% · EBAY 51% · AMZN 47% |
| Computer & Electronics Retail | 3 | -15.3% | 1.4% | -59.6% | BBY 2% · UPBD -60% · GME -61% |
| Automobile Manufacturers | 8 | -63.7% | -45.0% | -70.0% | GM 88% · F 54% · TSLA 41% |
| Other Specialty Retail | 18 | -26.6% | -43.9% | -75.8% | TLF 109% · BBW 97% · WINA 76% |
| Consumer Electronics | 11 | 1.8% | -7.7% | -80.4% | AXIL 2336% · GRMN 76% · MSN -57% |
Median of constituents with a full price history over each window. Top names are unfiltered by size in this render.
Latest Trefis Analyses
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 52.60 |
| Mkt Cap | 4.4 |
| Rev LTM | 8,180 |
| Op Inc LTM | 664 |
| FCF LTM | 648 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 582 |
| CFO LTM | 815 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 743 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 0.9% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | -1.1% |
| Rev Chg Q | -2.7% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | -0.7% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 19.8% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 5.9% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 7.2% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 7.3% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.7% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 9.6% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 10.3% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 7.1% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 6.4% |
Segment Financials
Revenue by Segment| $ Mil | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Bahama | 829 | 870 | 899 | 880 |
| Lilly Pulitzer | 338 | 324 | 343 | 339 |
| Johnny Was | 169 | 195 | 203 | 73 |
| Emerging Brands | 143 | 128 | 127 | 116 |
| Corporate | -0 | -0 | -1 | 3 |
| Lanier Apparel | 0 | |||
| Total | 1,478 | 1,517 | 1,571 | 1,412 |
| $ Mil | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Bahama | 95 | 146 | 161 | 173 |
| Lilly Pulitzer | 52 | 58 | 56 | 67 |
| Emerging Brands | 5 | 10 | 7 | 16 |
| Johnny Was | -9 | 8 | -105 | -2 |
| Corporate | -47 | -35 | -38 | -35 |
| Impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and equity method investments | -61 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | -66 | -68 | ||
| Lanier Apparel | 0 | |||
| Total | -31 | 119 | 81 | 219 |
| $ Mil | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Bahama | 693 | 682 | 556 | 570 | 532 |
| Lilly Pulitzer | 214 | 205 | 195 | 211 | 177 |
| Johnny Was | 161 | 236 | 251 | 335 | |
| Emerging Brands | 122 | 122 | 99 | 91 | |
| Corporate and Other | 118 | 46 | |||
| Corporate | -4 | -18 | 212 | ||
| Lanier Apparel | 0 | ||||
| Southern Tide | 37 | ||||
| Total | 1,309 | 1,290 | 1,098 | 1,189 | 958 |
Price Behavior
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $30.87 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.5 | |
| First Trading Date | 12/30/1987 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -36.0% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $37.13 | $37.71 |
| DMA Trend | indeterminate | down |
| Distance from DMA | -16.9% | -18.1% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 63.0% | 66.1% |
| Downside Capture | 207.75 | 152.80 |
| Upside Capture | 11.43 | 92.19 |
| Correlation (SPY) | -2.1% | 22.0% |
OXM Betas & Captures as of 8/31/2026
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.18 | 1.13 | -0.01 | 0.80 | 1.13 | 1.23 |
| Up Beta | -0.61 | -1.54 | -3.43 | -0.05 | 0.84 | 1.51 |
| Down Beta | 3.66 | 3.08 | 1.13 | 0.63 | 1.32 | 0.85 |
| Up Capture | 164% | 195% | 37% | 104% | 94% | 80% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 10 | 21 | 32 | 68 | 138 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 12 | 23 | 35 | 69 | 131 | 357 |
| Down Capture | 242% | 152% | 110% | 127% | 120% | 109% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 21 | 32 | 59 | 113 | 324 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 19 | 29 | 58 | 120 | 393 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with OXM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OXM | -22.6% | 65.9% | -0.12 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLY) | -1.7% | 19.4% | -0.21 | 28.2% |
| Equity (SPY) | 19.7% | 12.8% | 1.13 | 22.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 24.6% | 29.2% | 0.75 | 3.9% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 43.8% | 20.3% | 1.67 | -14.8% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 9.1% | 13.6% | 0.39 | 32.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -28.1% | 43.8% | -0.63 | 11.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with OXM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OXM | -16.9% | 48.2% | -0.22 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLY) | 5.6% | 24.1% | 0.19 | 44.9% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.8% | 17.2% | 0.57 | 40.7% |
| Gold (GLD) | 19.1% | 18.8% | 0.82 | 2.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 10.7% | 19.5% | 0.43 | 4.5% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 1.7% | 18.9% | -0.01 | 37.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 10.2% | 52.6% | 0.38 | 19.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with OXM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OXM | -4.4% | 46.2% | 0.07 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLY) | 12.1% | 22.2% | 0.50 | 46.9% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.3% | 17.9% | 0.72 | 43.9% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.4% | 16.3% | 0.62 | -0.1% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 7.9% | 18.1% | 0.35 | 12.9% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 4.8% | 20.7% | 0.19 | 40.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 63.7% | 66.2% | 1.03 | 14.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Updated 9/7/2026| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 9/3/2026 | -15.7% | ||
| 6/10/2026 | -17.0% | -17.2% | -16.3% |
| 3/26/2026 | 8.7% | 23.3% | 40.3% |
| 12/10/2025 | -21.2% | -9.2% | -5.3% |
| 9/10/2025 | 27.6% | 14.4% | -3.6% |
| 6/11/2025 | -13.9% | -18.6% | -13.4% |
| 3/27/2025 | -5.7% | -12.3% | -19.1% |
| 12/11/2024 | -8.6% | -2.5% | 2.4% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 11 | 7 | 8 |
| # Negative | 14 | 17 | 16 |
| Median Positive | 5.0% | 7.0% | 9.3% |
| Median Negative | -9.0% | -6.1% | -6.3% |
| Max Positive | 27.6% | 23.3% | 40.3% |
| Max Negative | -21.2% | -18.6% | -19.1% |
| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 9/3/2026 | -15.7% | ||
| 6/10/2026 | -17.0% | -17.2% | -16.3% |
| 3/26/2026 | 8.7% | 23.3% | 40.3% |
| 12/10/2025 | -21.2% | -9.2% | -5.3% |
| 9/10/2025 | 27.6% | 14.4% | -3.6% |
| 6/11/2025 | -13.9% | -18.6% | -13.4% |
| 3/27/2025 | -5.7% | -12.3% | -19.1% |
| 12/11/2024 | -8.6% | -2.5% | 2.4% |
| 9/11/2024 | 0.5% | 2.9% | -11.1% |
| 6/12/2024 | 0.8% | -0.7% | 0.3% |
| 3/28/2024 | -3.7% | -6.1% | -1.5% |
| 12/6/2023 | 3.9% | 7.0% | 9.1% |
| 8/31/2023 | 1.1% | -5.6% | -4.0% |
| 6/7/2023 | -5.8% | -5.4% | -5.5% |
| 3/23/2023 | -12.7% | -11.8% | -8.1% |
| 12/7/2022 | -5.9% | -5.2% | -5.2% |
| 9/1/2022 | -9.3% | -10.1% | -15.1% |
| 6/8/2022 | 5.0% | -0.7% | -6.1% |
| 3/23/2022 | 11.2% | 10.2% | 12.7% |
| 12/8/2021 | -3.9% | -6.8% | -6.4% |
| 9/2/2021 | 0.7% | -4.9% | -0.2% |
| 6/9/2021 | 8.2% | 5.3% | 2.5% |
| 3/25/2021 | 7.0% | 3.5% | 9.5% |
| 12/9/2020 | -4.1% | -3.5% | 19.6% |
| 9/3/2020 | -14.3% | -9.3% | -15.6% |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 11 | 7 | 8 |
| # Negative | 14 | 17 | 16 |
| Median Positive | 5.0% | 7.0% | 9.3% |
| Median Negative | -9.0% | -6.1% | -6.3% |
| Max Positive | 27.6% | 23.3% | 40.3% |
| Max Negative | -21.2% | -18.6% | -19.1% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 07/31/2026 | 09/04/2026 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2026 | 06/11/2026 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2026 | 03/27/2026 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2025 | 12/11/2025 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2025 | 09/11/2025 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2025 | 06/12/2025 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2025 | 03/31/2025 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2024 | 12/12/2024 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2024 | 09/12/2024 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2024 | 06/13/2024 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2024 | 04/01/2024 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2023 | 12/07/2023 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2023 | 09/01/2023 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2023 | 06/08/2023 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2023 | 03/28/2023 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2022 | 12/08/2022 | 10-Q |
| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 07/31/2026 | 09/04/2026 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2026 | 06/11/2026 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2026 | 03/27/2026 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2025 | 12/11/2025 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2025 | 09/11/2025 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2025 | 06/12/2025 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2025 | 03/31/2025 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2024 | 12/12/2024 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2024 | 09/12/2024 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2024 | 06/13/2024 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2024 | 04/01/2024 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2023 | 12/07/2023 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2023 | 09/01/2023 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2023 | 06/08/2023 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2023 | 03/28/2023 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2022 | 12/08/2022 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2022 | 09/02/2022 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2022 | 06/09/2022 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2022 | 03/28/2022 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2021 | 12/09/2021 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2021 | 09/03/2021 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2021 | 06/10/2021 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2021 | 03/29/2021 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2020 | 12/10/2020 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2020 | 09/04/2020 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2020 | 06/11/2020 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2020 | 03/30/2020 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2019 | 12/12/2019 | 10-Q |
Recent Forward Guidance
Updated 9/4/2026Latest: Q2 2026 Earnings Reported 9/3/2026
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Source | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| Q3 2026 GAAP Loss Per Share | Reported | -1.47 | -1.37 | -1.27 | ||||
| Q3 2026 Adjusted Loss Per Share | Reported | -1.4 | -1.3 | -1.2 | ||||
| Q3 2026 Revenue | Reported | 280.00 Mil | 290.00 Mil | 300.00 Mil | ||||
| 2026 Revenue | Reported | 1.43 Bil | 1.45 Bil | 1.47 Bil | -2.7% | Lowered | Guidance: 1.49 Bil for 2026 | |
| 2026 EPS | Reported | 3.07 | 3.27 | 3.47 | 72.1% | Raised | Guidance: 1.9 for 2026 | |
| 2026 Adjusted EPS | Reported | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2 | -28.0% | Lowered | Guidance: 2.5 for 2026 | |
| 2026 Capital Expenditures | Reported | 60.00 Mil | 0.0% | Affirmed | Guidance: 60.00 Mil for 2026 | |||
Prior: Q1 2026 Earnings Reported 6/10/2026
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Source | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| Q2 2026 Revenue | Reported | 380.00 Mil | 390.00 Mil | 400.00 Mil | ||||
| Q2 2026 GAAP EPS | Reported | 1.13 | 1.23 | 1.33 | ||||
| Q2 2026 Adjusted EPS | Reported | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | ||||
| 2026 Revenue | Reported | 1.48 Bil | 1.49 Bil | 1.50 Bil | -0.8% | Lowered | Guidance: 1.50 Bil for 2026 | |
| 2026 GAAP EPS | Reported | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.1 | -10.8% | Lowered | Guidance: 2.13 for 2026 | |
| 2026 Adjusted EPS | Reported | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 4.2% | Raised | Guidance: 2.4 for 2026 | |
| 2026 Capital Expenditures | Reported | 60.00 Mil | -7.7% | Lowered | Guidance: 65.00 Mil for 2026 | |||
Q4 2025 Earnings Reported 3/26/2026
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Source | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| Q1 2026 Revenue | Reported | 385.00 Mil | 390.00 Mil | 395.00 Mil | 4.0% | Higher New | Guidance: 375.00 Mil for Q4 2025 | |
| Q1 2026 GAAP EPS | Reported | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.23 | ||||
| Q1 2026 Adjusted EPS | Reported | 1.2 | 1.25 | 1.3 | 1150.0% | Higher New | Guidance: 0.1 for Q4 2025 | |
| 2026 Revenue | Reported | 1.48 Bil | 1.50 Bil | 1.53 Bil | 1.5% | Higher New | Guidance: 1.48 Bil for 2025 | |
| 2026 GAAP EPS | Reported | 1.83 | 2.13 | 2.43 | ||||
| 2026 Adjusted EPS | Reported | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 4.4% | Higher New | Guidance: 2.3 for 2025 | |
| 2026 Capital Expenditures | Reported | 65.00 Mil | -45.8% | Lower New | Guidance: 120.00 Mil for 2025 | |||
Q3 2025 Earnings Reported 12/10/2025
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Source | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| Q4 2025 Revenue | Reported | 365.00 Mil | 375.00 Mil | 385.00 Mil | ||||
| Q4 2025 EPS | Reported | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | ||||
| 2025 Revenue | Reported | 1.47 Bil | 1.48 Bil | 1.49 Bil | -1.0% | Lowered | Guidance: 1.50 Bil for 2025 | |
| 2025 EPS | Reported | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | -23.3% | Lowered | Guidance: 3 for 2025 | |
| 2025 Capital Expenditures | Reported | 120.00 Mil | 0.0% | Affirmed | Guidance: 120.00 Mil for 2025 | |||
Insider Activity
Updated 7/2/2026| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chubb, Thomas Caldecot Iii | CEO and President | Direct | Buy | 6122026 | 36.90 | 2,500 | 92,250 | 1,114,380 | Form |
| 2 | Chubb, Thomas Caldecot Iii | CEO and President | Direct | Buy | 12122025 | 35.12 | 5,000 | 175,585 | 797,472 | Form |
| 3 | Chubb, Thomas Caldecot Iii | CEO and President | Direct | Buy | 8042025 | 38.19 | 318 | 12,130 | 3,591,044 | Form |
| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chubb, Thomas Caldecot Iii | CEO and President | Direct | Buy | 6122026 | 36.90 | 2,500 | 92,250 | 1,114,380 | Form |
| 2 | Chubb, Thomas Caldecot Iii | CEO and President | Direct | Buy | 12122025 | 35.12 | 5,000 | 175,585 | 797,472 | Form |
| 3 | Chubb, Thomas Caldecot Iii | CEO and President | Direct | Buy | 8042025 | 38.19 | 318 | 12,130 | 3,591,044 | Form |
Industry Resources
| Consumer Discretionary Resources |
| Retail Dive |
| Business of Fashion (BoF) |
| WWD (Women's Wear Daily) |
| National Retail Federation (NRF) |
| McKinsey & Company - Consumer |
| Mintel Consumer Trends |
| Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods Resources |
| Vogue Business |
| Jing Daily |
| Luxury Daily |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.
Core Cache Last Updated: 9/6/2026