Oxford Industries (OXM)
Market Price (12/30/2025): $33.74 | Market Cap: $501.7 MilSector: Consumer Discretionary | Industry: Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
Oxford Industries (OXM)
Market Price (12/30/2025): $33.74Market Cap: $501.7 MilSector: Consumer DiscretionaryIndustry: Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 7.8%, Dividend Yield is 8.4%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 3.7%, FCF Yield is 5.1% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -109%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -139% | Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 111% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 11% | Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 19% | Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2.4%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -0.2% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Experience Economy & Premiumization, and E-commerce & Digital Retail. Themes include Experiential Retail, Luxury Consumer Goods, Show more. | Key risksOXM key risks include [1] significant costs from Chinese tariffs during its ongoing supply chain realignment and [2] weaker performance and margin pressures impacting certain brands in its portfolio. |
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 7.8%, Dividend Yield is 8.4%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 3.7%, FCF Yield is 5.1% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 11% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Experience Economy & Premiumization, and E-commerce & Digital Retail. Themes include Experiential Retail, Luxury Consumer Goods, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -109%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -139% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 19% |
| Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 111% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2.4%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -0.2% |
| Key risksOXM key risks include [1] significant costs from Chinese tariffs during its ongoing supply chain realignment and [2] weaker performance and margin pressures impacting certain brands in its portfolio. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Disappointing Q3 Fiscal 2025 Earnings Report
Oxford Industries reported consolidated net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 (ended November 1, 2025) that were slightly below the previous year's figures and missed analyst expectations on the top line. The company also reported a significant deepening of its GAAP and adjusted net loss per share compared to the prior year, despite adjusted EPS slightly beating consensus estimates.
2. Substantially Lowered Full-Year Guidance for Fiscal 2025
Following the Q3 results, Oxford Industries sharply reduced its net sales and adjusted earnings per share (EPS) guidance for the full fiscal year 2025. The revised outlook projected significantly lower sales and profitability than both prior company forecasts and analyst consensus, indicating a challenging period ahead.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -15.3% change in OXM stock from 9/29/2025 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -15.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 9292025 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 39.84 | 33.75 | -15.28% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1494.54 | 1493.85 | -0.05% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.40 | 0.34 | -15.26% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 14.88 | 14.87 | 0.03% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -15.28% |
Market Drivers
9/29/2025 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OXM | -15.3% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.6% | 22.5% |
| Sector (XLY) | 0.4% | 42.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -13.2% change in OXM stock from 6/30/2025 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -14.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6302025 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 38.89 | 33.75 | -13.22% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1511.28 | 1493.85 | -1.15% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.39 | 0.34 | -14.23% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 15.22 | 14.87 | 2.31% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -13.26% |
Market Drivers
6/30/2025 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OXM | -13.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 11.6% | 28.9% |
| Sector (XLY) | 11.4% | 45.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -54.0% change in OXM stock from 12/29/2024 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -55.4% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12292024 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 73.42 | 33.75 | -54.03% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1530.52 | 1493.85 | -2.40% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.75 | 0.34 | -55.38% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 15.70 | 14.87 | 5.26% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -54.16% |
Market Drivers
12/29/2024 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OXM | -54.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 16.6% | 39.8% |
| Sector (XLY) | 5.9% | 50.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -59.5% change in OXM stock from 12/30/2022 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -66.0% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12302022 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 83.34 | 33.75 | -59.51% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1328.96 | 1493.85 | 12.41% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.99 | 0.34 | -65.96% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 15.74 | 14.87 | 5.52% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -59.63% |
Market Drivers
12/30/2023 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OXM | -63.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 47.9% | 39.3% |
| Sector (XLY) | 37.2% | 47.6% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| OXM Return | -11% | 58% | -6% | 10% | -19% | -54% | -46% |
| Peers Return | 16% | 38% | -12% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 151% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 17% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| OXM Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 58% | 42% | 42% | 33% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 65% | 42% | 68% | 57% | 52% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| OXM Max Drawdown | -58% | -4% | -21% | -8% | -25% | -57% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -5% | -26% | -7% | -9% | -23% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/29/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | OXM | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -31.2% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 45.3% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -58.9% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 143.5% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 341 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -32.2% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 47.6% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 885 days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -93.5% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 1432.2% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1,058 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL
In The Past
Oxford Industries's stock fell -31.2% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 2/2/2023. A -31.2% loss requires a 45.3% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-2 brief analogies for Oxford Industries (OXM):
- Similar to VF Corp. (The North Face, Vans) but for a portfolio of premium lifestyle apparel brands like Tommy Bahama and Peter Millar.
- A PVH Corp. (Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger) for premium casual and resort wear brands such as Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Tommy Bahama: Offers men's and women's apparel, swimwear, accessories, footwear, and home furnishings, alongside operating restaurants and bars.
- Lilly Pulitzer: Provides women's resort wear, apparel, footwear, and accessories distinguished by signature vibrant prints.
- Peter Millar: Specializes in luxury men's sportswear, tailored apparel, golf attire, and accessories.
- Southern Tide: Features coastal-inspired lifestyle apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and children.
- DUXIANA: Manufactures and sells high-end beds, mattresses, and bedding accessories.
AI Analysis | Feedback
For the public company Oxford Industries (symbol: OXM), it primarily sells to individuals through its own branded retail stores, e-commerce websites, and its Tommy Bahama restaurants. For fiscal year 2023, approximately 65% of its net sales were direct-to-consumer.
The up to three categories of individual customers that Oxford Industries serves are:
- Premium Lifestyle Apparel Shoppers: Individuals who seek high-quality, distinctive apparel, accessories, and home goods embodying leisure, resort, or classic preppy aesthetics. This includes customers of brands like Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, and Southern Tide, who often value brand experience and unique style.
- Outdoor and Active Lifestyle Enthusiasts: Individuals who prefer comfortable, durable, and style-conscious apparel suitable for casual outdoor activities, golfing, or everyday wear with a focus on quality and heritage, characteristic of brands such as Southern Tide and Duck Head.
- Parents and Gift-Givers for Children: Primarily individuals purchasing luxury, traditional children's apparel and accessories, particularly for The Beaufort Bonnet Company brand, focusing on high-end fashion for infants and children.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Thomas C. Chubb III, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Thomas C. Chubb III joined Oxford Industries as a summer intern in 1988 and became a full-time in-house attorney in 1989. He was promoted to general counsel in 1999, executive vice president in 2004, president in 2009, and assumed the role of CEO and President in 2013, later becoming Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President in 2015. Mr. Chubb played a critical role in Oxford Industries' strategic transformation from a private label manufacturer to a company focused on lifestyle brands, leading key acquisition and divestiture activities, including the purchases of Tommy Bahama in 2003 and Lilly Pulitzer in 2010. He has also served as an independent director for Flowers Foods, Inc. since 2020.
K. Scott Grassmyer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
K. Scott Grassmyer is a Certified Public Accountant with over 30 years of financial experience in public accounting and industry. He began his career with Ernst & Young, LLC and later served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Duck Head Apparel Company, Inc., a publicly-traded apparel wholesaler and retailer. Mr. Grassmyer joined Oxford Industries as Controller in 2002, was named Chief Financial Officer in 2008, and promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller in 2011. In March 2022, he was further promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer. He has been instrumental in the company's growth and played a significant role in the acquisitions and integrations of brands such as Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Southern Tide, and The Beaufort Bonnet Company.
Douglas B. Wood, Chief Executive Officer, Tommy Bahama
Douglas B. Wood serves as the Chief Executive Officer for the Tommy Bahama brand, one of Oxford Industries' key lifestyle brands.
Michelle Kelly, Chief Executive Officer, Lilly Pulitzer
Michelle Kelly is the Chief Executive Officer of Lilly Pulitzer, another prominent brand within Oxford Industries' portfolio.
Carey Ann Campbell, Chief Executive Officer, Southern Tide
Carey Ann Campbell holds the position of Chief Executive Officer for Southern Tide, a lifestyle brand under Oxford Industries.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Oxford Industries (OXM) primarily revolve around macroeconomic pressures impacting consumer behavior, ongoing challenges from tariffs and supply chain disruptions, and the highly competitive nature of the apparel industry.
-
Macroeconomic Conditions and Consumer Discretionary Spending
Oxford Industries' financial performance is highly sensitive to general economic and market conditions, particularly consumer sentiment and discretionary spending. Recent reports indicate that consumers are becoming more cautious and value-driven in their spending, significantly impacting the sales of discretionary items like apparel, which fundamentally includes all of Oxford Industries' products. This caution has led to reduced sales and profit forecasts for the company.
-
Tariffs and Supply Chain Disruptions
Tariffs, particularly those on Chinese imports, represent a substantial and ongoing risk to Oxford Industries, resulting in increased costs and adverse effects on profitability. The company has explicitly stated that new tariffs are expected to add significant expenses, impacting earnings per share. While Oxford Industries is actively working to realign its supply chain and reduce reliance on Chinese manufacturing, the full benefits of these changes are not expected to materialize immediately. Broader global supply chain disruptions also pose a risk to operations.
-
Highly Competitive Industry and Evolving Consumer Preferences
Operating in a highly competitive apparel market, Oxford Industries faces significant pricing pressures and constantly evolving customer expectations. The company's ability to compete successfully relies heavily on its proficiency in anticipating and adapting to changing fashion trends and consumer preferences, as well as maintaining the reputation and value of its diverse brand portfolio. Some of Oxford Industries' brands have recently experienced weaker performance and margin pressures, highlighting the challenges of maintaining brand relevance and profitability in this dynamic environment.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM) operates in the apparel and lifestyle products market, with key brands including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, and Southern Tide. The addressable markets for their main products can be identified as the broader global and U.S. apparel industries.
The global apparel market is estimated to be valued between approximately $1.8 trillion and $1.84 trillion in 2025. This market is projected to experience continued growth, with some estimates suggesting it will reach $2.26 trillion by 2030 and $2.97 trillion by 2033.
For the United States, which is a significant region for Oxford Industries, the apparel market is estimated to be between $365.70 billion and $395 billion in 2025. Other sources indicate the U.S. apparel market was valued at $370.4 billion in 2024, with projections to reach $482.1 billion by 2032. Another report states the U.S. apparel market reached nearly $353.20 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to nearly $447.73 billion by 2034.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Expected Drivers of Future Revenue Growth for Oxford Industries (OXM)
Over the next two to three years, Oxford Industries (OXM) is expected to drive revenue growth through several strategic initiatives:
-
Continued Retail Expansion: Oxford Industries plans to increase its physical retail footprint, specifically through the execution of new stores, including Tommy Bahama Marlin Bars. This expansion also encompasses adding store locations for brands such as Lilly Pulitzer, Southern Tide, and The Beaufort Bonnet Company.
-
Product Innovation and Strategic Brand Management: The company is focused on introducing "newness and compelling products" that resonate with consumers. This strategy has already shown positive results with brands like Lilly Pulitzer delivering positive comparable sales and the "Emerging Brands" group achieving notable year-over-year revenue increases. New product launches, such as Tommy Bahama's Indigo Palms denim collection and Luxe Sweater offerings, are examples of this focus.
-
Enhancement of Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Channels: Oxford Industries emphasizes strengthening its direct-to-consumer model by enhancing the customer experience across its flagship stores and engaging digital platforms. The company's "bricks-and-clicks" approach aims to ensure a consistent brand narrative across all direct-to-consumer and wholesale channels, supported by investments in infrastructure like a new distribution center to improve efficiency and reach a wider consumer base.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- In the first half of fiscal 2025, Oxford Industries repurchased approximately $55 million in shares, including a $50 million program completed in Q1 2025.
- The company repurchased approximately $98.32 million in shares during fiscal 2022.
- As of February 3, 2024 (end of Fiscal 2023), there was $30 million remaining under the Board of Directors' share repurchase authorization.
Outbound Investments
- Oxford Industries acquired Johnny Was, a Los Angeles-based private label manufacturer of women's apparel, in September 2022 for $270 million. This acquisition aimed to diversify the company's portfolio and expand its market reach.
Capital Expenditures
- Capital expenditures were approximately $134 million in fiscal 2024.
- For fiscal 2025, expected capital expenditures are projected to be around $120 million to $121 million.
- The primary focus of fiscal 2025 capital expenditures includes the completion of a new distribution center in Lyons, Georgia (approximately $70 million), and investments in new stores and Tommy Bahama Marlin Bars. Capital expenditures are expected to moderate to approximately $75 million annually after 2025.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to OXM. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11302025 | BBWI | Bath & Body Works | Dip Buy | DB | Insider Buys | Low D/EDip Buy with Strong Insider BuyingBuying dips for companies with strong insider buying in the last 1 month, positive operating income and reasonable debt / market cap | 17.3% | 17.3% | 0.0% |
| 11262025 | HRB | H&R Block | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 5.7% | 5.7% | -0.1% |
| 11262025 | LRN | Stride | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 4.4% | 4.4% | -4.4% |
| 11212025 | ABNB | Airbnb | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 19.6% | 19.6% | 0.0% |
| 11212025 | MTN | Vail Resorts | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | -1.7% | -1.7% | -1.7% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Oxford Industries
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 55.77 |
| Mkt Cap | 159.0 |
| Rev LTM | 56,496 |
| Op Inc LTM | 7,584 |
| FCF LTM | 7,327 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 7,366 |
| CFO LTM | 8,590 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 8,697 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 5.2% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 3.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 8.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 2.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 12.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 12.4% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 15.7% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 17.1% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 11.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 12.1% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $33.75 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.5 | |
| First Trading Date | 12/30/1987 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -59.4% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $36.98 | $43.56 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -8.7% | -22.5% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 67.7% | 69.0% |
| Downside Capture | 91.04 | 180.49 |
| Upside Capture | -5.66 | 76.61 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 21.7% | 39.7% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.46 | 1.79 | 2.29 | 2.25 | 1.45 | 1.28 |
| Up Beta | 0.12 | 1.33 | 3.26 | 3.10 | 1.89 | 1.63 |
| Down Beta | -0.94 | 2.41 | 1.66 | 2.16 | 0.76 | 0.85 |
| Up Capture | 252% | 136% | 161% | 113% | 98% | 80% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 13 | 26 | 39 | 74 | 142 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 12 | 24 | 29 | 57 | 107 | 358 |
| Down Capture | 188% | 180% | 249% | 231% | 140% | 109% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 8 | 18 | 34 | 68 | 141 | 392 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of OXM With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OXM | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -55.8% | 6.2% | 16.7% | 65.4% | 7.5% | 4.2% | -7.3% |
| Annualized Volatility | 68.5% | 24.3% | 19.4% | 19.8% | 15.3% | 17.0% | 34.9% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.91 | 0.19 | 0.67 | 2.43 | 0.27 | 0.08 | -0.06 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 49.8% | 39.7% | -6.8% | 11.7% | 38.3% | 22.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLY, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of OXM With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OXM | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -8.5% | 9.5% | 14.8% | 17.7% | 11.2% | 5.1% | 30.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 45.8% | 23.8% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.6% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.04 | 0.36 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.57 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 48.5% | 44.4% | 1.1% | 12.2% | 38.4% | 21.7% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLY, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of OXM With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OXM | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -3.5% | 13.3% | 15.0% | 14.6% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 69.0% |
| Annualized Volatility | 44.5% | 21.9% | 18.0% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.08 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.89 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 49.4% | 46.0% | -3.3% | 17.5% | 40.4% | 15.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLY, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 12/10/2025 | -21.2% | -9.2% | |
| 9/10/2025 | 27.6% | 14.4% | -3.6% |
| 6/11/2025 | -13.9% | -18.6% | -13.4% |
| 3/27/2025 | -5.7% | -12.3% | -19.1% |
| 12/11/2024 | -8.6% | -2.5% | 2.4% |
| 9/11/2024 | 0.5% | 2.9% | -11.1% |
| 6/12/2024 | 0.8% | -0.7% | 0.3% |
| 3/28/2024 | -3.7% | -6.1% | -1.5% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 10 | 6 | 8 |
| # Negative | 14 | 18 | 16 |
| Median Positive | 4.4% | 6.2% | 5.8% |
| Median Negative | -9.0% | -6.5% | -6.4% |
| Max Positive | 27.6% | 14.4% | 19.6% |
| Max Negative | -21.2% | -19.6% | -19.1% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2025 | 12/11/2025 | 10-Q (10/31/2025) |
| 07/31/2025 | 09/11/2025 | 10-Q (07/31/2025) |
| 04/30/2025 | 06/12/2025 | 10-Q (04/30/2025) |
| 01/31/2025 | 03/31/2025 | 10-K (01/31/2025) |
| 10/31/2024 | 12/12/2024 | 10-Q (10/31/2024) |
| 07/31/2024 | 09/12/2024 | 10-Q (07/31/2024) |
| 04/30/2024 | 06/13/2024 | 10-Q (04/30/2024) |
| 01/31/2024 | 04/01/2024 | 10-K (01/31/2024) |
| 10/31/2023 | 12/07/2023 | 10-Q (10/31/2023) |
| 07/31/2023 | 09/01/2023 | 10-Q (07/31/2023) |
| 04/30/2023 | 06/08/2023 | 10-Q (04/30/2023) |
| 01/31/2023 | 03/28/2023 | 10-K (01/31/2023) |
| 10/31/2022 | 12/08/2022 | 10-Q (10/31/2022) |
| 07/31/2022 | 09/02/2022 | 10-Q (07/31/2022) |
| 04/30/2022 | 06/09/2022 | 10-Q (04/30/2022) |
| 01/31/2022 | 03/28/2022 | 10-K (01/31/2022) |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.