OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT)
Market Price (9/14/2026): $9.87 | Market Cap: $-Sector: Financials | Industry: Multi-Sector Holdings
OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT)
Market Price (9/14/2026): $9.87Market Cap: $-Sector: FinancialsIndustry: Multi-Sector Holdings
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Key risksOCLT key risks include [1] an inability to complete an initial business combination. |
| Key risksOCLT key risks include [1] an inability to complete an initial business combination. |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| OCLT Return | |||||||
| Peers Return | -0% | -0% | |||||
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 11% | 102% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| OCLT Win Rate | |||||||
| Peers Win Rate | 20% | ||||||
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 44% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| OCLT Max Drawdown | |||||||
| Peers Max Drawdown | |||||||
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: AAC, AMAC, ATLQ, BRTM, EWAV.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 9/11/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
OCLT has limited trading history. Below is the Financials sector ETF (XLF) in its place.
| Event | XLF | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -15.5% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 18.4% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 80 days | 79 days |
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -10.7% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 12.0% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 26 days | 24 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -16.1% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 19.1% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 270 days | 31 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -22.3% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 28.6% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 467 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -42.8% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 74.8% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 289 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -19.7% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 24.5% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 123 days | 105 days |
In The Past
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -15.5% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 18.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
OCLT has limited trading history. Below is the Financials sector ETF (XLF) in its place.
| Event | XLF | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -22.3% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 28.6% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 467 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -42.8% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 74.8% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 289 days | 140 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -21.4% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 27.3% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 272 days | 62 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -26.1% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 35.3% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 162 days | 123 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -78.3% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 359.8% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2329 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -15.5% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 18.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT)
OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT) is a newly formed blank check company, also known as a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC). Incorporated in May 2026, its sole purpose is to identify and execute a business combination, such as a merger, acquisition, or share exchange, with one or more private operating businesses. Essentially, OCLT raises capital from public investors to acquire a private company, thereby taking the acquired company public.
As a SPAC, OCLT does not currently have any active business operations, products, or services. Its primary "service" is to find a suitable target company and facilitate its public listing through the acquisition process. The company is actively seeking prospective target businesses without limiting its search to a specific geographic region or industry.
OCLT currently has no specific acquisition target under consideration and has not engaged in any substantive discussions with potential businesses. The company acknowledges that its ability to identify and evaluate a suitable target may be influenced by significant competition from other SPACs also seeking business combination candidates.
AI Analysis | Feedback
OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT) is like a private equity firm that has raised capital with the sole purpose of finding and acquiring one private company to take public.
Alternatively, think of it as a real estate developer that has secured funding but is still actively searching for the perfect property to acquire and develop into its first major project.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Major Services of OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT)
- Business Combination Facilitation: Identifying and executing mergers, acquisitions, or similar transactions with one or more private businesses to facilitate their public listing.
AI Analysis | Feedback
OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT) is a newly formed blank check company (Special Purpose Acquisition Company or SPAC). Its purpose is to effect a business combination with one or more businesses or entities. As stated in its description, OCLT does not currently have any specific business combination under consideration and has not yet identified or contacted any prospective target businesses.
Therefore, OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT) does not currently have major customers as it is not an operating company selling products or services. Its primary function at this stage is to identify and acquire a target company.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Ping Zhang, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
Ping Zhang has served as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of OceanLight Acquisition Corporation since its formation in May 2026. He also holds the title of General Manager at Green Leaf Air Freight Inc., a U.S.-based investment and air freight company, a position he has held since November 2020. Earlier in his career, Mr. Zhang founded and served as the General Manager of Shanghai Tongli Advertising Co., Ltd., an advertising company, from February 2006 to November 2020. Prior to that, he founded and was the General Manager of Hunan Silver Fox Advertising Company, an advertising company in China, from March 1999 to December 2002. Mr. Zhang has a significant history of involvement with Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs), having served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and director of Quantumsphere Acquisition Corporation (Nasdaq: QUMS) since July 2024, and GalaxyEdge Acquisition Corporation (NYSE: GLED) since January 2026. He has also been a director for several other SPACs, including Quartzsea Acquisition Corporation (Nasdaq: QSEA) since March 2025, QuasarEdge Acquisition Corporation (NYSE: QRED) since April 2026, Yotta Acquisition Corporation (Nasdaq: YOTA) since May 2025, and Quetta Acquisition Corporation (Nasdaq: QETA) since May 2025. His significant economic interest in OceanLight Capital Sponsor Ltd., the company's sponsor, aligns him with the financial backing of the SPAC.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Key Risks to OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT)
- Risk of inability to complete an initial business combination.
- Risk from significant competition among other SPACs in pursuing business combination transaction candidates, which may impact the attractiveness of acquisition terms.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Significant competition among other SPACs in pursuing business combination transaction candidates, which may impact OCLT's ability to identify and evaluate a target company and the attractiveness of acquisition terms it can negotiate.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
For OceanLight Acquisition (OCLT), as a blank check company formed to effect a business combination, its future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years will emerge from the successful completion of an acquisition and the subsequent performance of the acquired entity. Therefore, the expected drivers of this future revenue growth for OCLT are:
- Successful Identification and Acquisition of a High-Growth Target Company: A primary driver will be the ability of OceanLight Acquisition to identify and successfully merge with a private operating company that possesses strong inherent revenue growth potential within its specific industry and market.
- Strategic Selection of a Target with Robust Market Position: Future revenue growth will be significantly influenced by the strategic selection of a target company that holds a defensible market position, offers innovative products or services, or operates in a sector with favorable long-term growth trends.
- Operational Execution and Integration of the Acquired Business: Post-acquisition, the effective integration of the target company and its ability to execute its operational and growth strategies, such as expanding its customer base, launching new offerings, or penetrating new geographic markets, will directly drive the combined entity's revenue.
- Leveraging Management Team's Strategic and Operational Expertise: The application of OceanLight Acquisition's management team's experience and strategic insights to the acquired business can accelerate its existing growth initiatives and identify new opportunities for revenue expansion.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Peer Outperformance in Multi-Sector Holdings
null| Industry | Names | 1Y med | 3Y med | 5Y med | Top 3 by 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investment Banking & Brokerage | 13 | 4.4% | 109.9% | 135.9% | IBKR 511% · SNEX 266% · GS 188% |
| Reinsurance | 6 | 18.8% | 73.7% | 132.8% | SPNT 164% · RGA 143% · RNR 133% |
| Diversified Banks | 12 | 37.8% | 127.6% | 118.3% | JPM 157% · CM 153% · RY 143% |
| Life & Health Insurance | 20 | 8.2% | 54.2% | 103.2% | JXN 569% · UNM 321% · FG 203% |
| Multi-Sector Holdings ← | 4 | 3.5% | 53.9% | 82.7% | JONE 361% · BRK-B 84% · VOYA 81% |
| Regional Banks | 265 | 26.8% | 84.7% | 68.7% | GCBC 366% · ESQ 361% · VBNK 332% |
| Property & Casualty Insurance | 42 | 9.4% | 68.6% | 68.2% | ASIC 2746900% · HRTG 471% · UVE 308% |
| Multi-line Insurance | 9 | 8.9% | 78.7% | 64.5% | GNW 193% · L 108% · SLF 91% |
| Consumer Finance | 30 | 5.7% | 87.6% | 33.8% | ENVA 603% · EZPW 379% · FCFS 180% |
| Financial Exchanges & Data | 15 | -6.5% | 11.8% | 30.5% | VIRT 201% · CBOE 142% · CME 80% |
| Diversified Financial Services | 4 | 0.9% | 14.0% | 24.1% | FRHC 174% · EQH 106% · TMS -58% |
| Insurance Brokers | 16 | -17.9% | -3.8% | 20.4% | LIFE 347% · ARX 89% · AJG 75% |
| Asset Management & Custody Banks | 83 | -10.8% | 13.7% | 14.4% | WT 340% · SII 291% · VCTR 280% |
| Commercial & Residential Mortgage Finance | 12 | -48.2% | 28.3% | 2.8% | FNMA 488% · FMCC 458% · ESNT 70% |
| Specialized Finance | 3 | 27.4% | 39.8% | -0.4% | EFC 30% · CACC 0% · HASI -13% |
| Mortgage REITs | 33 | -13.2% | 8.4% | -15.4% | NREF 55% · RITM 48% · DX 37% |
| Transaction & Payment Processing Services | 15 | 2.2% | -8.7% | -41.9% | V 73% · MA 70% · CPAY 60% |
| Diversified Capital Markets | 21 | -33.6% | 2.7% | -43.9% | OPY 215% · LPLA 153% · GOLD 103% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 9.89 |
| Mkt Cap | - |
| Rev LTM | - |
| Op Inc LTM | - |
| FCF LTM | - |
| FCF 3Y Avg | - |
| CFO LTM | - |
| CFO 3Y Avg | - |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | - |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | - |
| Rev Chg Q | - |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | - |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | - |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | - |
| Op Mgn LTM | - |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | - |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | - |
| CFO/Rev LTM | - |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | - |
| FCF/Rev LTM | - |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | - |
Price Behavior
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | ||||||
| Up Beta | � | � | � | � | � | � |
| Down Beta | � | � | � | � | � | � |
| Up Capture | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 10 | 21 | 32 | 68 | 138 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | ||||||
| Down Capture | -0% | -0% | -0% | -0% | -0% | -0% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 21 | 32 | 59 | 113 | 324 |
| Stock -ve Days |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with OCLT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCLT | - | - | - | - |
| Sector ETF (XLF) | 9.0% | 14.6% | 0.37 | - |
| Equity (SPY) | 18.3% | 12.8% | 1.03 | - |
| Gold (GLD) | 19.0% | 29.2% | 0.59 | - |
| Commodities (DBC) | 48.3% | 20.6% | 1.80 | - |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 7.6% | 13.6% | 0.29 | - |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -32.4% | 43.8% | -0.77 | - |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with OCLT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCLT | - | - | - | - |
| Sector ETF (XLF) | 10.2% | 18.4% | 0.42 | - |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.5% | 17.2% | 0.55 | - |
| Gold (GLD) | 18.7% | 18.8% | 0.81 | - |
| Commodities (DBC) | 11.4% | 19.5% | 0.46 | - |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 0.7% | 18.9% | -0.07 | - |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 9.4% | 52.6% | 0.36 | - |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with OCLT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCLT | - | - | - | - |
| Sector ETF (XLF) | 13.2% | 22.1% | 0.54 | - |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.2% | 17.9% | 0.72 | - |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.3% | 16.3% | 0.62 | - |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.7% | 18.1% | 0.39 | - |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 4.7% | 20.7% | 0.19 | - |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 63.2% | 66.2% | 1.03 | - |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Industry Resources
| Financials Resources |
| Federal Reserve Economic Data |
| Federal Reserve |
| FDIC Data |
| American Banker |
| The Banker |
| Banking Technology |
| Multi-Sector Holdings Resources |
| McKinsey & Company Insights |
| Harvard Business Review |
| ValueWalk |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.