Forge Nano (NANO)
Market Price (11/2/2026): $4.12 | Market Cap: $530.1 MilSector: Information Technology | Industry: Semiconductor Materials & Equipment
Forge Nano (NANO)
Market Price (11/2/2026): $4.12Market Cap: $530.1 MilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: Semiconductor Materials & Equipment
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Advanced Materials, Battery Technology & Metals, and Renewable Energy Transition. Themes include Nanomaterials, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -131%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -181% | High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 114% Key risksNANO key risks include [1] successfully commercializing its proprietary Atomic Armor technology at an industrial scale, Show more. |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Advanced Materials, Battery Technology & Metals, and Renewable Energy Transition. Themes include Nanomaterials, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -131%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -181% |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 114% |
| Key risksNANO key risks include [1] successfully commercializing its proprietary Atomic Armor technology at an industrial scale, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Forge Nano (NANO) stock has lost about 100% since 7/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Stock price stability inherent to SPAC dynamics prior to merger completion. Forge Nano is in the process of becoming a publicly listed company through a merger with Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co. (NASDAQ: ATII), which was announced on April 21, 2026, with the transaction expected to close in the second half of 2026. The stock of a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) often trades near its trust value, typically around $10.00 per share, until the de-SPAC transaction is finalized. The $23 million in PIPE financing secured on July 14, 2026, at $10.00 per share further anchored the stock price of ATII. This characteristic tends to keep the share price relatively stable as investors await the definitive merger.
2. Long-term horizon for key operational expansions, tempering immediate stock re-rating. Despite significant company-specific announcements, the full operational and revenue-generating impacts are still some time away. Forge Nano broke ground on its "America's Battery Gigafactory" in Morrisville, North Carolina, in August 2026, which is expected to scale domestic battery manufacturing capacity to up to 3 GWh annually. However, production at this expanded facility is not scheduled to begin until 2028. While the partnership with Samsung SDI and a conditional procurement agreement for battery cells starting in 2028 are significant, the deferred timeline for these major revenue streams can lead to a more muted, stable stock performance in the short term.
Show more
Forge Nano (NANO) stock has lost about 100% since 7/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Stock price stability inherent to SPAC dynamics prior to merger completion. Forge Nano is in the process of becoming a publicly listed company through a merger with Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co. (NASDAQ: ATII), which was announced on April 21, 2026, with the transaction expected to close in the second half of 2026. The stock of a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) often trades near its trust value, typically around $10.00 per share, until the de-SPAC transaction is finalized. The $23 million in PIPE financing secured on July 14, 2026, at $10.00 per share further anchored the stock price of ATII. This characteristic tends to keep the share price relatively stable as investors await the definitive merger.
2. Long-term horizon for key operational expansions, tempering immediate stock re-rating. Despite significant company-specific announcements, the full operational and revenue-generating impacts are still some time away. Forge Nano broke ground on its "America's Battery Gigafactory" in Morrisville, North Carolina, in August 2026, which is expected to scale domestic battery manufacturing capacity to up to 3 GWh annually. However, production at this expanded facility is not scheduled to begin until 2028. While the partnership with Samsung SDI and a conditional procurement agreement for battery cells starting in 2028 are significant, the deferred timeline for these major revenue streams can lead to a more muted, stable stock performance in the short term.
3. Balancing of positive company developments with broader market cautiousness in the SPAC and battery sectors. The period saw strong positive news for Forge Nano, including a strategic partnership with Samsung SDI involving a $20 million investment in July 2026, and up to $100 million in non-dilutive funding from the U.S. Department of Energy for its battery manufacturing expansion. These company-specific achievements are significant. However, the overall market for SPACs has experienced a general slowdown since 2021, which could temper upside movement. Additionally, while the lithium market saw prices rebound in fiscal Q2 2026, the global lithium battery supply chain also experienced disruptions, including a 15% decline in output due to operational challenges and reduced recovery rates, which could introduce a degree of market caution despite Forge Nano's specific advancements. Forge Nano's fiscal Q2 2026 ended on June 29, 2026, and its fiscal Q3 2026 ends on September 29, 2026.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
7/31/2026 to 10/31/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| NANO | -98.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 1.2% | -16.1% |
| Sector (XLK) | 2.4% | -44.2% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
4/30/2026 to 10/31/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| NANO | -98.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 5.4% | 41.5% |
| Sector (XLK) | 12.7% | 40.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 10/31/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| NANO | -96.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 11.7% | 32.6% |
| Sector (XLK) | 19.9% | 34.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
10/31/2023 to 10/31/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| NANO | -96.3% | |
| Market (SPY) | 86.9% | 44.7% |
| Sector (XLK) | 122.8% | 50.0% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| NANO Return | 113% | -33% | 125% | 9% | -5% | -97% | -91% |
| Peers Return | 37% | -39% | 43% | -17% | 75% | 6% | 86% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 13% | 106% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| NANO Win Rate | 83% | 42% | 75% | 58% | 67% | 30% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 58% | 32% | 57% | 42% | 53% | 54% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| NANO Max Drawdown | -21% | -44% | -22% | -33% | -61% | -99% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -32% | -54% | -36% | -44% | -41% | -54% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: AMAT, LRCX, ALB, VECO, QS.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 10/30/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | NANO | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -48.2% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 93.1% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 241 days | 79 days |
| 2024 Yen Carry Trade Unwind | ||
| % Loss | -33.0% | -7.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 49.4% | 8.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 614 days | 18 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -43.0% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 75.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 224 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -45.9% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 85.0% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 138 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -28.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 40.7% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 128 days | 105 days |
| 2016-2017 Trump Reflation Bond Selloff | ||
| % Loss | -11.9% | -3.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 13.5% | 3.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 25 days | 6 days |
In The Past
Forge Nano's stock fell -48.2% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 93.1% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | NANO | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -48.2% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 93.1% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 241 days | 79 days |
| 2024 Yen Carry Trade Unwind | ||
| % Loss | -33.0% | -7.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 49.4% | 8.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 614 days | 18 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -43.0% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 75.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 224 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -45.9% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 85.0% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 138 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -28.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 40.7% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 128 days | 105 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -27.5% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 38.0% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 209 days | 15 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -28.4% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 39.7% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 168 days | 123 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -91.4% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 1066.9% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 344 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
Forge Nano's stock fell -48.2% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 93.1% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Forge Nano (NANO)
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) Technology: A proprietary coating process that applies ultra-thin, uniform layers of material at the atomic scale to enhance product performance across various industries.
- ALD Equipment and Systems: Specialized reactors and tools designed for industrial-scale application of their ALD technology for material coating.
- Material Coating Services: Contract services offering the application of their ALD coatings to customer-supplied materials for performance enhancement.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Forge Nano primarily sells its atomic layer deposition (ALD) technology and coated materials to other businesses (B2B) across various industrial sectors. Identifying specific major customers can be challenging for B2B companies due to confidentiality agreements. However, publicly disclosed information indicates significant partnerships and customer relationships, particularly in the automotive and battery industries.
One prominent publicly known strategic partner and customer is:
- Volkswagen Group of America (part of Volkswagen AG - VWAGY): Forge Nano has a strategic partnership with Volkswagen to integrate its ALD technology to improve battery materials for electric vehicles.
Beyond this, Forge Nano serves a range of industries including:
- Battery manufacturers: For electric vehicles, consumer electronics, and grid storage.
- Chemical and petrochemical companies: For improved catalysts.
- Aerospace and defense contractors: For lightweight, high-performance materials.
- Medical device companies: For biocompatible and durable coatings.
- Additive manufacturing (3D printing) companies: For enhanced material properties.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Paul Lichty, Chief Executive Officer
Paul Lichty is the Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Forge Nano. He holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Lichty has a strong background in founding several high-tech companies in the energy and surface science fields. He previously led the U.S. division for an international company, where he built a 150+ person sales team and secured distribution across major national retailers, culminating in a successful exit to a publicly listed company in 2013. Lichty invented the method of high throughput material surface engineering (atomic layer deposition, or ALD) and founded Forge Nano as a spin-out from the University of Colorado Boulder in 2011. He is also actively engaged as an investor and advisor to early and growth-stage companies.
Michael Kleinberg, Chief Financial Officer
Michael Kleinberg serves as the Chief Financial Officer of Forge Nano, bringing extensive financial leadership experience across high-growth technology and emerging enterprises. Prior to joining Forge Nano, he was the CFO, North America at RS2 Software plc, a global payments technology company operating across more than 35 countries. Kleinberg also served as a Senior Principal at CBIZ CMF, a financial consulting and deal origination firm focused on private equity, indicating a pattern of managing companies backed by private equity firms. His earlier CFO roles were with technology and services businesses in the Denver market, and he possesses deep expertise in debt and equity financing, M&A transactions, operational finance, and due diligence.
Wyman Fang, Chief Operating Officer
Wyman Fang is the Chief Operating Officer of Forge Nano, responsible for leading global operations, driving operational excellence, scaling manufacturing, and enabling rapid revenue growth.
Curtis Zimmermann, Chief Legal Counsel
Dr. Curtis Zimmermann is the Chief Legal Counsel at Forge Nano, where he oversees corporate legal strategy, intellectual property, and compliance. He brings a unique combination of scientific and legal expertise, holding both PhD and JD credentials.
Shane Smith, President, Forge Battery
Shane Smith is the President of Forge Battery, a subsidiary of Forge Nano. He has significant experience in scaling technology companies from the growth stage to public markets. Smith previously held the position of COO at Microvast, Inc., where he successfully guided the company through a $2.8 billion public listing. His prior roles include Senior Vice President of Product Marketing at TransCore (a Roper Technologies subsidiary) and Vice President of Global Marketing for Mobile Devices at TriQuint Semiconductor (now Qorvo).
AI Analysis | Feedback
Key Risks to Forge Nano's Business
- Industrial-Scale Commercialization of Atomic Armor Technology: Forge Nano's core business relies on its proprietary Atomic Armor platform, which uses atomic layer deposition (ALD) to enhance battery materials. A key risk is successfully reproducing these material-level improvements reliably at an industrial scale, ensuring consistent quality, high throughput, and efficient yield in a manufacturing environment. The ability to transition this advanced atomic-scale technology to industrial-scale production determines its commercial viability and competitive strength.
- Execution Risk of Gigafactory Construction and Operations: Forge Nano is undertaking a significant investment of $300 million to $330 million to construct a 3 GWh advanced battery manufacturing facility in Morrisville, North Carolina, with production slated to begin in 2028. This ambitious project, partly subsidized by a $100 million Department of Energy grant, carries inherent risks related to potential construction delays, cost overruns, challenges in equipment installation and commissioning, and difficulties in achieving projected production capacities and operational efficiencies.
- Reliance on Strategic Partnerships and Market Adoption: Forge Nano's growth strategy is significantly bolstered by strategic partnerships with major industry players such as Samsung SDI (for manufacturing expertise and conditional cell purchases) and GM Ventures. While these collaborations provide critical support and validation, the business model's success is dependent on maintaining these relationships and securing sufficient market adoption for its differentiated battery cells, particularly in specialized defense, aerospace, and energy storage applications, amid a competitive and evolving market landscape.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 3-5 expected drivers of future revenue growth for Forge Nano over the next 2-3 years:
- Growing Demand in AI-Era Chip Manufacturing: Forge Nano's proprietary Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) technology and advanced materials are critical for artificial intelligence (AI)-era chip manufacturing. As the demand for AI technologies continues to accelerate, Forge Nano is well-positioned to capitalize on the need for high-performance components in the semiconductor industry.
- Expansion in Defense and Lithium-ion Battery Applications: The company's ALD nanocoating technology is used in defense battery applications and to enhance lithium-ion battery cathode materials, improving stability and cycle life. Policy tailwinds and increasing U.S.-based manufacturing requirements for defense technology are expected to drive significant revenue growth in these sectors.
- Entry into New Strategic Market Verticals: Forge Nano plans to diversify its revenue streams by expanding into new market verticals, including data centers and pharmaceuticals. This strategic expansion will allow the company to apply its Atomic Armor™ ALD nanocoating platform to a broader range of products and industries, opening up new avenues for growth.
- Broader Commercialization and Adoption of Atomic Armor™ Platform: Forge Nano develops and produces high-performance materials and devices using its proprietary Atomic Armor™ ALD nanocoating platform technology. Increased commercialization and widespread adoption of this scalable and adaptable nano-scale coating system across various industries will be a key driver of revenue through equipment sales and coating services.
- Strategic Backing and Government Initiatives: Forge Nano has secured significant capital, including a $100 million U.S. Department of Energy grant, and has strategic equity investors such as General Motors Ventures, Hanwha Aerospace, Volkswagen, Air Liquide, and LG Technology Ventures. This strong financial and strategic backing, coupled with policy tailwinds supporting U.S.-based advanced manufacturing, is expected to accelerate market penetration and secure substantial contracts, contributing to revenue growth.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Inbound Investments
- Forge Nano secured $40 million in new funding in April 2025, co-led by RockCreek and Ascent Funds, which increased total capital investment in the company to over $140 million.
- In July 2026, Forge Nano closed its Series D funding round at $97 million and secured an additional $23 million in Private Investment in Public Equity (PIPE) financing, bringing the total PIPE financing to $123 million.
- The July 2026 PIPE financing included a $20 million strategic investment from Samsung SDI, with $10 million allocated to the PIPE and $10 million to Forge Nano's Series D financing.
Share Issuance
- As part of its pre-public listing capital formation, Forge Nano has issued equity in its Series D round, which closed at $97 million in July 2026.
- The company also issued shares in a PIPE financing round, with new commitments totaling $23 million priced at $10.00 per share in July 2026.
- Upon the closing of its definitive business combination agreement with Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co., Forge Nano's common stock and warrants are expected to trade on NASDAQ.
Capital Expenditures
- The $40 million funding raised in April 2025 was intended for further domestic manufacturing expansion and workforce development.
- Forge Nano recently installed a new state-of-the-art battery manufacturing line and a cleanroom production facility for semiconductor ALD tool production at its Colorado headquarters.
- Capital raised through the Series D and PIPE financing in July 2026 is earmarked to accelerate the commercialization of its ALD semiconductor equipment platform and expand domestic production of advanced lithium-ion battery materials.
Peer Outperformance in Semiconductor Materials & Equipment
| Industry | Names | 1Y med | 3Y med | 5Y med | Top 3 by 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic Manufacturing Services | 10 | 23.5% | 116.3% | 232.6% | FLEX 597% · TTMI 526% · JBL 362% |
| Technology Distributors | 9 | 46.6% | 83.2% | 82.4% | AVT 162% · SNX 140% · CNXN 100% |
| Semiconductor Materials & Equipment ← | 28 | 41.2% | 75.7% | 59.3% | AXTI 574% · LRCX 346% · KLAC 345% |
| Communications Equipment | 36 | 2.6% | 86.8% | 51.0% | LITE 918% · AAOI 803% · ANET 559% |
| Electronic Components | 26 | 0.4% | 67.9% | 46.8% | CLS 2604% · BELFA 1204% · APH 332% |
| Semiconductors | 55 | 1.3% | 55.8% | 16.4% | MU 1211% · NVDA 704% · AVGO 570% |
| Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 21 | 3.7% | 100.8% | 2.6% | WDC 841% · SMCI 831% · DELL 744% |
| Electronic Equipment & Instruments | 27 | -6.9% | 33.7% | -1.1% | PI 158% · OSIS 114% · MIR 73% |
| Internet Services & Infrastructure | 6 | 5.8% | 60.2% | -10.1% | GDDY 69% · VRSN 40% · DOCN -8% |
| IT Consulting & Other Services | 30 | -26.7% | 2.5% | -24.6% | CHRN 378321% · APLD 280% · IBM 160% |
| Application Software | 126 | -17.2% | -2.8% | -49.0% | PLTR 611% · FROG 189% · AGYS 143% |
| Systems Software | 69 | -10.0% | 25.5% | -51.8% | ZETA 277% · CRWD 255% · CVLT 169% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 65.16 |
| Mkt Cap | 10.7 |
| Rev LTM | 5,908 |
| Op Inc LTM | 811 |
| FCF LTM | 1,342 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 43 |
| CFO LTM | 1,800 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 1,186 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 13.0% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 3.0% |
| Rev Chg Q | 28.0% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 6.9% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 14.8% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 7.8% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 22.4% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 19.8% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 1.3% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 28.1% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 23.6% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 20.5% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 13.6% |
Segment Financials
Revenue by Segment| $ Mil | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Tool Manufacturing & Related Services | 5 |
| Coating Services | 1 |
| Battery Manufacturing | 1 |
| Corporate | 0 |
| Total | 7 |
| $ Mil | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Battery Manufacturing | -1 |
| Tool Manufacturing & Related Services | -4 |
| Coating Services | -5 |
| Corporate | -36 |
| Total | -45 |
| $ Mil | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Battery Manufacturing | -1 |
| Tool Manufacturing & Related Services | -4 |
| Coating Services | -5 |
| Corporate | -34 |
| Total | -43 |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $4.12 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -98.7% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $239.80 | $249.40 |
| DMA Trend | down | up |
| Distance from DMA | -98.3% | -98.3% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 209.9% | 114.5% |
| Downside Capture | 2462.34 | 627.74 |
| Upside Capture | -205.12 | 129.70 |
| Correlation (S&P 500) | 24.1% | 25.6% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 10.13 | 5.52 | 4.15 | 1.68 | 2.26 | 2.32 |
| Up Beta | -8.43 | 1.04 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 1.82 | 2.20 |
| Down Beta | 14.36 | 15.50 | 14.50 | 3.65 | 3.03 | 2.15 |
| Up Capture | -512% | -257% | -160% | -58% | 153% | 1713% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 12 | 18 | 28 | 62 | 130 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 343 |
| Down Capture | 1484% | 806% | 638% | 328% | 193% | 114% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 10 | 25 | 36 | 64 | 121 | 325 |
| Stock -ve Days | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 61 | 297 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with NANO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANO | -17.4% | 83.3% | 0.02 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 18.6% | 27.1% | 0.60 | 36.3% |
| Equity (SPY) | 10.9% | 12.8% | 0.52 | 40.9% |
| Gold (GLD) | -2.0% | 28.6% | -0.08 | 17.5% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 48.2% | 20.6% | 1.79 | -16.1% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 10.2% | 13.7% | 0.45 | 20.7% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -30.0% | 43.5% | -0.70 | 26.1% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with NANO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANO | 8.8% | 60.2% | 0.41 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 18.6% | 26.1% | 0.64 | 63.6% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.2% | 17.1% | 0.53 | 58.6% |
| Gold (GLD) | 16.2% | 19.0% | 0.68 | 10.0% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 9.2% | 19.5% | 0.35 | 8.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 0.9% | 18.9% | -0.06 | 29.7% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 4.9% | 51.6% | 0.28 | 25.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with NANO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NANO | 19.0% | 53.6% | 0.56 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 23.7% | 25.1% | 0.86 | 59.8% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.2% | 17.9% | 0.72 | 55.5% |
| Gold (GLD) | 11.4% | 16.5% | 0.56 | 9.0% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.2% | 18.1% | 0.37 | 15.0% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.3% | 20.7% | 0.21 | 34.4% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 61.8% | 66.2% | 1.02 | 19.1% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Earnings Returns History
Updated 6/11/2026| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2026 | 09/24/2026 | 424B3 |
| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2026 | 09/24/2026 | 424B3 |
Industry Resources
| Information Technology Resources |
| TechCrunch |
| Wired |
| CIO |
| MIT Technology Review |
| Gartner Insights |
| Ars Technica |
| Semiconductor Materials & Equipment Resources |
| SEMI |
| Semiconductor Digest |
| Semiconductor Today |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.



