Swarmer (SWMR)
Market Price (9/14/2026): $39.13 | Market Cap: $639.1 MilSector: Information Technology | Industry: Systems Software
Swarmer (SWMR)
Market Price (9/14/2026): $39.13Market Cap: $639.1 MilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: Systems Software
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Automation & Robotics, Advanced Aviation & Space, and Artificial Intelligence. Themes include Swarm Robotics, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -14%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -44% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -13 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -2734% Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 1,332x Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 306% Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2588%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2680% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -6.3% High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 204% Key risksSWMR key risks include [1] an over-reliance on the conflict in Ukraine for its unique operational dataset and [2] the potential loss of its competitive advantage in rapid, Show more. |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Automation & Robotics, Advanced Aviation & Space, and Artificial Intelligence. Themes include Swarm Robotics, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -14%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -44% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -13 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -2734% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 1,332x |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 306% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2588%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2680% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -6.3% |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 204% |
| Key risksSWMR key risks include [1] an over-reliance on the conflict in Ukraine for its unique operational dataset and [2] the potential loss of its competitive advantage in rapid, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Swarmer (SWMR) stock has lost about 30% since 5/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Swarmer experienced a significant widening of its net loss in fiscal Q2 2026, which ended June 30, 2026. The company reported a net loss of $7.3 million, a substantial increase from $1.6 million in fiscal Q2 2025. This was primarily driven by operating expenses surging 777% to $7.5 million from $854,847 in the prior year, attributed to investments in personnel, engineering, product development, and public-company costs, including $1.2 million in non-cash stock-based compensation. This wider loss, exceeding analyst expectations by $0.31 per share, contributed to an 8.37% after-hours stock drop following the August 13, 2026 earnings announcement.
2. Despite a 56% year-over-year revenue increase to $216,413 in fiscal Q2 2026, Swarmer missed analyst revenue estimates by $783,590. While demonstrating growth from $138,206 in fiscal Q2 2025, the significant miss on expected revenue signals slower-than-anticipated commercial traction or market adoption, which negatively impacted investor confidence for this newly public company.
Show more
Swarmer (SWMR) stock has lost about 30% since 5/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Swarmer experienced a significant widening of its net loss in fiscal Q2 2026, which ended June 30, 2026. The company reported a net loss of $7.3 million, a substantial increase from $1.6 million in fiscal Q2 2025. This was primarily driven by operating expenses surging 777% to $7.5 million from $854,847 in the prior year, attributed to investments in personnel, engineering, product development, and public-company costs, including $1.2 million in non-cash stock-based compensation. This wider loss, exceeding analyst expectations by $0.31 per share, contributed to an 8.37% after-hours stock drop following the August 13, 2026 earnings announcement.
2. Despite a 56% year-over-year revenue increase to $216,413 in fiscal Q2 2026, Swarmer missed analyst revenue estimates by $783,590. While demonstrating growth from $138,206 in fiscal Q2 2025, the significant miss on expected revenue signals slower-than-anticipated commercial traction or market adoption, which negatively impacted investor confidence for this newly public company.
3. The company's substantial cash burn rate and reliance on equity financing during the period raised concerns about capital efficiency. Swarmer’s cash and cash equivalents increased to $25.3 million by June 30, 2026, primarily due to $16.0 million from its IPO and $8.8 million from an equity line of credit in the first half of fiscal 2026. An additional $17.9 million was collected through the equity line after the quarter end. This aggressive capital raising, alongside widening losses, suggested a high burn rate necessary to fund operations and growth, potentially indicating future dilution risks to shareholders.
4. A key leadership change introduced uncertainty. On July 26, 2026, Swarmer co-founder Serhiy Kuprienko stepped down as global CEO, with co-founder Alex Fink, CEO of Swarmer's U.S. office, taking over the chief officer duties. Such a transition at the helm, particularly for a company that only went public in March 2026 and reported its first full quarter as a public entity in Q2 2026, can introduce investor apprehension regarding strategic direction and operational stability.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -29.6% change in SWMR stock from 5/31/2026 to 9/13/2026 was primarily driven by a 0.0% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 5312026 | 9132026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 56.21 | 39.59 | -29.6% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | � | � | 0.0% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | � | � | 0.0% |
| P/E Multiple | � | � | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 0.0% |
Market Drivers
5/31/2026 to 9/13/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| SWMR | -29.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 1.0% | 20.4% |
| Sector (XLK) | -1.8% | 31.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
2/28/2026 to 9/13/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| SWMR | ||
| Market (SPY) | 11.7% | -5.1% |
| Sector (XLK) | 35.4% | 7.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
8/31/2025 to 9/13/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| SWMR | ||
| Market (SPY) | 19.5% | -5.1% |
| Sector (XLK) | 43.6% | 7.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
8/31/2023 to 9/13/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| SWMR | ||
| Market (SPY) | 75.7% | -5.1% |
| Sector (XLK) | 117.7% | 7.1% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| SWMR Return | - | - | - | - | - | 16% | 16% |
| Peers Return | 1% | 4% | 24% | 285% | 47% | -14% | 531% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 11% | 102% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| SWMR Win Rate | - | - | - | - | - | 43% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 38% | 55% | 57% | 58% | 55% | 38% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 44% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| SWMR Max Drawdown | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -41% | -38% | -27% | -27% | -36% | -51% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: AVAV, KTOS, RCAT, NOC, LMT.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 9/11/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
SWMR has limited trading history. Below is the Information Technology sector ETF (XLK) in its place.
| Event | XLK | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -25.7% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 34.5% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 65 days | 79 days |
| 2024 Yen Carry Trade Unwind | ||
| % Loss | -17.0% | -7.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 20.4% | 8.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 92 days | 18 days |
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -10.0% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 11.2% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 15 days | 24 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -33.1% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 49.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 246 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -31.2% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 45.2% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 78 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -23.8% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.2% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 100 days | 105 days |
In The Past
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -25.7% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 34.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
SWMR has limited trading history. Below is the Information Technology sector ETF (XLK) in its place.
| Event | XLK | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -25.7% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 34.5% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 65 days | 79 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -33.1% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 49.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 246 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -31.2% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 45.2% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 78 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -23.8% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.2% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 100 days | 105 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -51.5% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 106.2% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 797 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -25.7% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 34.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Swarmer (SWMR)
Swarmer (SWMR) is a defense technology company specializing in software for autonomous warfare. The company develops and licenses its proprietary Trident Embedded Drone Operating System (Trident OS), which enables military forces to deploy and coordinate drone swarms at significant scale. Positioning itself as a critical software layer, Swarmer’s vendor-agnostic platform is designed to integrate with drones from any manufacturer, providing essential interoperability in an increasingly fragmented hardware market.
Swarmer primarily serves global military forces, targeting the rapidly expanding military drone market. A core competitive advantage stems from its combat-proven experience; the Trident OS has been continuously deployed in Ukraine since 2023, executing over 100,000 combat missions. This operational deployment generates a unique and comprehensive dataset, fostering rapid capability enhancements and delivering an unmatched pace of innovation that traditional defense contractors cannot replicate.
The company operates on a per-unit software licensing model, which offers highly attractive unit economics with expanding gross margins as market volume increases. Swarmer is actively pursuing a multi-domain expansion strategy, extending its software capabilities from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to include unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), unmanned surface vessels (USVs), and planned integration with missiles, thereby significantly broadening its addressable market and capturing value across the full spectrum of unmanned military systems.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies to describe Swarmer:
- Swarmer is like the Android operating system for military drones, making them smart and interoperable across different hardware manufacturers.
- Swarmer is the 'Intel Inside' for military drone swarms, providing the embedded operating system that powers their autonomous capabilities.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The major product offered by Swarmer (SWMR) is:
- Trident Embedded Drone Operating System (Trident OS): A combat-proven software operating system that enables military forces to deploy and coordinate drone swarms and other unmanned systems across air, ground, and maritime domains.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Swarmer (SWMR) primarily sells to other companies. Its major customers are:
-
Drone Manufacturers: Swarmer licenses its Trident Embedded Drone Operating System (Trident OS) to drone manufacturers. The company positions itself as a strategic partner to these manufacturers, helping them integrate autonomous software to differentiate their products and defend margins in a competitive market. The background information states: "By designing our software to integrate with drones from any manufacturer, we partner with leading manufacturers" and "As drone manufacturers face margin compression, we believe our software becomes an increasingly critical value differentiator, positioning us as a strategic partner able to help manufacturers defend margins and win competitive procurements."
While the company states it partners with "leading manufacturers," the provided background information does not list the specific names or symbols of these customer companies.
The ultimate end-users of the drones equipped with Swarmer's software are military forces, as indicated by its "combat-proven software that enables military forces to deploy and coordinate drone swarms at significant scale" and its continuous operational deployment in Ukraine.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Serhii Kupriienko, Chief Executive Officer (Global) and Director
Serhii Kupriienko is a co-founder of Swarmer. He previously served as an AI and computer vision leader at Ring and Squad Ukraine. He holds a Master's in Computer Science and an MBA from Stanford GSB.
Alexander Fink, Chief Executive Officer (U.S.), President, and Director
Alexander Fink, also a co-founder of Swarmer, has founded other AI and defense-related ventures. He previously served as CEO of Otherweb and Panopteo, and held prior roles at Ambarella and Zoran. He holds a B.A. from Technion and an MBA from UMass Amherst.
Brooks Ensign, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Brooks Ensign has held senior finance roles as Vice President Controller at Aptose and Global Corporate Controller at Silvaco. He is a U.S. Navy veteran and holds an MBA and BA from Harvard.
Jennifer DeTrani, Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel, and Secretary
Jennifer DeTrani previously served as Chief Legal and Corporate Affairs Officer at Nisos and was co-founder and General Counsel at Wickr. Earlier in her career, she was an Assistant U.S. Attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice. She holds a J.D. from the University of Michigan.
Erik Prince, Non-Executive Chairman
Erik Prince is the founder of Blackwater and is known as a private equity investor with extensive global defense and logistics experience. He also has a background as a U.S. Navy SEAL.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The primary key risk to Swarmer's business is its over-reliance on the continuous combat deployment in Ukraine since 2023 for its operational dataset and competitive advantage.
The company explicitly states that this deployment has generated a "key strategic asset: a comprehensive operational dataset" and enables "compressed iteration cycles in active combat" that are unachievable by competitors. If the conflict in Ukraine were to significantly de-escalate, end, or change in a way that reduces Swarmer's continuous operational access, its ability to gather critical data, validate performance, and maintain its claimed competitive advantages in autonomous capability maturity and rapid innovation velocity would be severely impacted.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Expansion into New Military Domains: Swarmer's systematic expansion from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to multi-domain operations, including unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), unmanned surface vessels (USVs), and planned integration with missiles and guidance kits, is expected to significantly broaden its addressable market and drive future revenue growth by addressing the full spectrum of unmanned systems requirements.
- Increased Market Penetration and Adoption driven by Combat-Proven Software and Data Advantage: The continuous combat deployment of Swarmer's Trident Embedded Drone Operating System (Trident OS) in Ukraine since 2023, coupled with the generation of a comprehensive operational dataset and rapid capability enhancement cycles, provides a significant competitive advantage. This combat-proven experience and data superiority are expected to lead to broader deployment and increased licensing of its software across military forces.
- Capitalizing on Global Military Drone Market Growth via a Vendor-Agnostic Platform: Swarmer is strategically positioned to capture value from the projected global military drone market growth, which is expected to exceed 12% compound annual growth through 2030. Its vendor-agnostic architecture allows integration with drones from any manufacturer, enabling the company to benefit from the entire market's expansion and secure strategic partnerships, rather than being limited by proprietary hardware platforms.
- Scalable Per-Unit Software Licensing Model: The company's business model, based on per-unit software licensing fees, is designed for attractive unit economics. As the market scales and the volume of licensed units increases, the stable per-unit fees combined with incremental costs approaching zero for additional licenses are expected to drive substantial revenue growth and expanding gross margins.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Issuance
- Swarmer completed its Initial Public Offering (IPO) on March 17, 2026, offering 3,000,000 shares of common stock at $5.00 per share and raising approximately $15 million in gross proceeds.
- The underwriters were granted a 30-day option to purchase an additional 450,000 shares of common stock at the IPO price.
Inbound Investments
- Swarmer raised a $2.7 million seed round in September 2024.
- The company secured a $15 million Series A funding round in September 2025, led by Broadband Capital Investments.
Capital Expenditures
- For the six months ended December 2025, Swarmer reported capital expenditures of approximately $246,990, primarily allocated to the purchase of property, plant, and equipment.
- Net proceeds from the IPO are intended for ongoing operations, including expanding capabilities and product offerings, hiring, integrating with drone manufacturers' hardware, and general corporate purposes.
Peer Outperformance in Systems Software
null| Industry | Names | 1Y med | 3Y med | 5Y med | Top 3 by 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic Manufacturing Services | 9 | 66.7% | 194.4% | 290.6% | TTMI 835% · FLEX 749% · SANM 443% |
| Semiconductor Materials & Equipment | 27 | 129.7% | 86.1% | 107.7% | AEHR 756% · AXTI 734% · KLAC 432% |
| Technology Distributors | 9 | 33.3% | 78.3% | 101.8% | CLMB 335% · AVT 196% · SNX 147% |
| Electronic Components | 26 | 43.3% | 57.0% | 74.2% | CLS 3920% · BELFA 1373% · COHR 401% |
| Communications Equipment | 36 | 19.4% | 81.2% | 74.1% | AAOI 1361% · FEIM 1055% · LITE 979% |
| Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 21 | 37.9% | 57.2% | 37.0% | DELL 1172% · STX 1065% · SMCI 1012% |
| Semiconductors | 55 | 23.1% | 30.0% | 36.5% | POET 1852% · MU 1261% · NVDA 886% |
| Internet Services & Infrastructure | 6 | 17.9% | 39.5% | 21.5% | DOCN 60% · VRSN 34% · GDDY 32% |
| Electronic Equipment & Instruments | 27 | -12.8% | 7.6% | -9.5% | PI 229% · ACFN 120% · OSIS 119% |
| IT Consulting & Other Services | 28 | -24.3% | -15.2% | -30.4% | CHRN 499900% · APLD 1221% · TSSI 712% |
| Application Software | 122 | -27.1% | -16.0% | -43.0% | VIDA 193536% · INLX 5416% · PLTR 537% |
| Systems Software ← | 66 | -19.3% | 1.3% | -58.2% | QNC 472% · PAYS 377% · ZETA 352% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 96.70 |
| Mkt Cap | 8.8 |
| Rev LTM | 1,522 |
| Op Inc LTM | 23 |
| FCF LTM | -13 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 1,232 |
| CFO LTM | -13 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 2,077 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 16.4% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 10.6% |
| Rev Chg Q | 20.5% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 5.1% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 14.4% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 9.5% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 1.5% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 5.7% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.4% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | -2.6% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 5.7% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | -8.5% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 0.8% |
Price Behavior
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.58 | 1.67 | 1.96 | 0.08 | -2.83 | 1.12 |
| Up Beta | 3.24 | 4.43 | 0.93 | -0.91 | -5.60 | -0.61 |
| Down Beta | -9.88 | -0.26 | 3.74 | 3.37 | -0.06 | -2.62 |
| Up Capture | -48% | 7% | 17% | -32% | -14% | -1% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 10 | 21 | 32 | 68 | 138 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 9 | 18 | 25 | 48 | 48 | 48 |
| Down Capture | 189% | 213% | 242% | -108% | -67% | -37% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 21 | 32 | 59 | 113 | 324 |
| Stock -ve Days | 12 | 24 | 39 | 67 | 67 | 67 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with SWMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWMR | 27.8% | 204.2% | 1.11 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 39.7% | 26.3% | 1.24 | 7.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 18.3% | 12.8% | 1.03 | -5.1% |
| Gold (GLD) | 19.0% | 29.2% | 0.59 | -3.5% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 48.3% | 20.6% | 1.80 | 27.7% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 7.6% | 13.6% | 0.29 | -0.5% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -32.4% | 43.8% | -0.77 | -17.5% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with SWMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWMR | 5.0% | 204.2% | 1.11 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 19.7% | 25.9% | 0.68 | 7.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.5% | 17.2% | 0.55 | -5.1% |
| Gold (GLD) | 18.7% | 18.8% | 0.81 | -3.5% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 11.4% | 19.5% | 0.46 | 27.7% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 0.7% | 18.9% | -0.07 | -0.5% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 9.4% | 52.6% | 0.36 | -17.5% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with SWMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWMR | 2.5% | 204.2% | 1.11 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 24.4% | 25.0% | 0.88 | 7.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.2% | 17.9% | 0.72 | -5.1% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.3% | 16.3% | 0.62 | -3.5% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.7% | 18.1% | 0.39 | 27.7% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 4.7% | 20.7% | 0.19 | -0.5% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 63.2% | 66.2% | 1.03 | -17.5% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Industry Resources
| Information Technology Resources |
| TechCrunch |
| Wired |
| CIO |
| MIT Technology Review |
| Gartner Insights |
| Ars Technica |
| Systems Software Resources |
| CNET |
| ZDNet |
| Gartner |
| Software Development Times |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.



