Anfield Energy (AEC)
Market Price (11/6/2026): $2.94 | Market Cap: $58.7 MilSector: Energy | Industry: Coal & Consumable Fuels
Anfield Energy (AEC)
Market Price (11/6/2026): $2.94Market Cap: $58.7 MilSector: EnergyIndustry: Coal & Consumable Fuels
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Battery Technology & Metals, US Energy Independence, and Datacenter Power. Themes include Advanced Battery Components, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -79%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -128% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -26 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -3468% Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 72x Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 477% Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2348%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2963% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -59% Key risksAEC key risks include [1] the substantial shareholder dilution required to raise capital comparable to its market capitalization needed to restart the Shootaring Canyon Mill and develop its key mines. |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Battery Technology & Metals, US Energy Independence, and Datacenter Power. Themes include Advanced Battery Components, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -79%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -128% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -26 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -3468% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 72x |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 477% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2348%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -2963% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -59% |
| Key risksAEC key risks include [1] the substantial shareholder dilution required to raise capital comparable to its market capitalization needed to restart the Shootaring Canyon Mill and develop its key mines. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Anfield Energy (AEC) stock has lost about 25% since 7/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Shareholder dilution from a significant public offering.
Anfield Energy priced an underwritten public offering of 1,491,305 common shares at US$4.00 per share on July 30, 2026, raising aggregate gross proceeds of US$6.0 million. This capital raise, which closed on July 31, 2026, significantly contributed to shareholder dilution and exerted downward pressure on the stock price during fiscal Q3 2026 (July-September 2026).
2. Increased net losses reported in fiscal Q2 2026.
The company reported a net loss of -8.98 million CAD for fiscal Q2 2026, which ended on June 30, 2026. This marked an increase in losses compared to -7.05 million CAD in the preceding fiscal Q1 2026. This trend of growing net losses, reported in mid-August 2026, likely impacted investor confidence regarding the company's financial performance.
Show more
Anfield Energy (AEC) stock has lost about 25% since 7/31/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Shareholder dilution from a significant public offering.
Anfield Energy priced an underwritten public offering of 1,491,305 common shares at US$4.00 per share on July 30, 2026, raising aggregate gross proceeds of US$6.0 million. This capital raise, which closed on July 31, 2026, significantly contributed to shareholder dilution and exerted downward pressure on the stock price during fiscal Q3 2026 (July-September 2026).
2. Increased net losses reported in fiscal Q2 2026.
The company reported a net loss of -8.98 million CAD for fiscal Q2 2026, which ended on June 30, 2026. This marked an increase in losses compared to -7.05 million CAD in the preceding fiscal Q1 2026. This trend of growing net losses, reported in mid-August 2026, likely impacted investor confidence regarding the company's financial performance.
3. Underperformance relative to a strengthening uranium market.
Anfield Energy's stock significantly underperformed, declining by -42.16% against the Toronto Stock Exchange 300 Composite Index over the six months leading up to October 2026. This occurred despite a generally positive trend in the uranium market during fiscal Q3 2026, where the U3O8 spot price increased by 4.17% and the long-term uranium price reached an 18-year high of US$97.00 per pound. The long-term uranium price further strengthened to US$99.00 per pound by October 31, 2026, suggesting that company-specific challenges outweighed favorable sector tailwinds.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -25.4% change in AEC stock from 7/31/2026 to 11/5/2026 was primarily driven by a null change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 7312026 | 11052026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.94 | 2.94 | -25.4% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0 | 1 | 9.2233720368547763E17% |
| P/S Multiple | ∞ | 72.0 | |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 17 | 18 | -4.4% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 0.0% |
Market Drivers
7/31/2026 to 11/5/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| AEC | -25.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | -1.9% | 27.4% |
| Sector (XLE) | 3.5% | -6.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -41.2% change in AEC stock from 4/30/2026 to 11/5/2026 was primarily driven by a null change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302026 | 11052026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 5.00 | 2.94 | -41.2% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0 | 1 | 9.2233720368547763E17% |
| P/S Multiple | ∞ | 72.0 | |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 16 | 18 | -13.1% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 0.0% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2026 to 11/5/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| AEC | -41.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 2.3% | 34.9% |
| Sector (XLE) | 4.1% | -15.4% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -64.5% change in AEC stock from 10/31/2025 to 11/5/2026 was primarily driven by a null change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 10312025 | 11052026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 8.29 | 2.94 | -64.5% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0 | 1 | 9.2233720368547763E17% |
| P/S Multiple | ∞ | 72.0 | |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 15 | 18 | -15.9% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 0.0% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 11/5/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| AEC | -64.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 8.4% | 38.6% |
| Sector (XLE) | 43.0% | -5.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
10/31/2023 to 11/5/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| AEC | ||
| Market (SPY) | 81.3% | 29.1% |
| Sector (XLE) | 58.1% | -9.3% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| AEC Return | - | - | - | - | -4% | -43% | -45% |
| Peers Return | 76% | -5% | 801% | -7% | 44% | -33% | 1264% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 12% | 105% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| AEC Win Rate | - | - | - | - | 25% | 18% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 38% | 65% | 47% | 63% | 31% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 45% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| AEC Max Drawdown | - | - | - | - | - | -71% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -26% | -35% | -28% | -38% | -43% | -54% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: NC, EU, UROY, CCJ, NXE.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 11/5/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
AEC has limited trading history. Below is the Energy sector ETF (XLE) in its place.
| Event | XLE | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -16.3% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 19.5% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 169 days | 79 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -14.5% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 16.9% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 145 days | 31 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -56.3% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 128.7% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 352 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -29.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 42.6% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1117 days | 105 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -24.3% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 32.0% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 98 days | 62 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -45.4% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 83.0% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2233 days | 15 days |
In The Past
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -16.3% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 19.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AEC has limited trading history. Below is the Energy sector ETF (XLE) in its place.
| Event | XLE | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -56.3% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 128.7% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 352 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -29.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 42.6% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1117 days | 105 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -24.3% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 32.0% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 98 days | 62 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -45.4% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 83.0% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2233 days | 15 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -28.8% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 40.5% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 484 days | 123 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -52.0% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 108.4% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 717 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -16.3% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 19.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Anfield Energy (AEC)
Anfield Energy Inc. (AEC) is a mineral development and production company primarily engaged in exploring for and developing deposits of critical metals across the United States and Canada. The company's core focus is on uranium, vanadium, and copper, essential materials used in various industrial and energy applications.
AEC holds interests in significant uranium exploration properties located in Utah, Wyoming, and Arizona, alongside uranium and vanadium projects situated in Colorado. The company further expands its uranium portfolio with a 100% interest in the Upper Maybelle River project within Canada's resource-rich Athabasca Basin. Diversifying its asset base, Anfield Energy also owns the Newsboy gold and silver project in Maricopa County, Arizona.
As a developer of raw mineral resources, Anfield Energy's primary output would be refined forms of these metals, serving industrial and energy markets. Its "customers" would typically be processors, refiners, and manufacturers who utilize uranium for nuclear energy, vanadium for steel alloys and batteries, copper for electrical components, and gold and silver for investment, jewelry, and various industrial applications.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies for Anfield Energy (AEC):
- Like an earlier-stage Cameco, focused on discovering and developing uranium deposits.
- A junior mining company, akin to a gold exploration firm, but primarily for uranium and other critical minerals like vanadium.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Uranium: Anfield Energy Inc. explores for and develops uranium deposits.
- Vanadium: The company explores for and develops vanadium deposits.
- Copper: Anfield Energy Inc. engages in the exploration for copper deposits.
- Gold: The company holds interests in gold exploration projects.
- Silver: Anfield Energy Inc. holds interests in silver exploration projects.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Based on the provided company description, Anfield Energy Inc. (AEC) is primarily engaged in mineral exploration and development activities for uranium, vanadium, copper, gold, and silver deposits. As an exploration and development company, it is typically focused on identifying, defining, and advancing mineral resources rather than large-scale commercial production and sales of those minerals. Therefore, Anfield Energy Inc. is unlikely to have established major customers generating significant revenue from product sales at its current stage.
However, if Anfield Energy Inc. were to achieve commercial production and sell its extracted minerals, its customers would primarily be other companies (business-to-business). Based on the minerals it explores for, potential major customer categories would include:
- Uranium Customers: These would primarily be nuclear utility companies, uranium converters, enrichers, or specialized commodity trading firms that supply the nuclear fuel cycle for energy generation.
- Vanadium Customers: Industrial companies such as steel manufacturers (where vanadium is used as an alloying agent), chemical producers, and manufacturers of grid-scale energy storage solutions, particularly those using vanadium redox flow batteries.
- Copper, Gold, and Silver Customers: These would typically be metal smelters, refiners, commodity trading houses, and industrial users who process these raw materials for various applications, including manufacturing, electronics, jewelry, and investment products.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Corey Dias, CEO, Co-Founder, & Director
Corey Dias is the Co-Founder and CEO of Anfield Energy, bringing over 20 years of experience in capital markets. He started his career in institutional equity research at CIBC and gained further experience at boutique investment firms in Toronto. Notably, Mr. Dias served as Vice President at Fortress Investment Group, a prominent U.S.-based hedge fund, where he was involved in managing a $400 million investment portfolio. Prior to his capital markets career, he worked as a management consultant for The Monitor Group in Stockholm. Mr. Dias holds an MBA from the Richard Ivey School of Business. He was instrumental in orchestrating Anfield's acquisition of the Shootaring Canyon Mill in 2015 from Uranium One.
Lubica (Luba) Niemann, Chief Financial Officer
Lubica Niemann was appointed Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2026. She is a seasoned financial professional with fifteen years of experience in accounting and financial reporting, primarily within the public company sector. Ms. Niemann has held senior finance positions, including controller for several TSXV-listed companies, such as Kutcho Copper Corporation and MineHub Technologies Inc. She holds a Bachelor of Technology in Accounting from the British Columbia Institute of Technology.
Ken Mushinski, Chairman
Ken Mushinski brings extensive nuclear-related knowledge and expertise, with a 33-year career at General Atomics Corporation and its subsidiaries. His roles included Vice President of Corporate Planning and Acquisitions at General Atomics, President of uranium producer Quasar Resources, President of uranium developer Cotter Corporation, Vice President of General Atomics Uranium Resources, and President of rare-earth technology developer Synchron. Mr. Mushinski has served as Board Chairman for Cotter Corporation, Diazyme Shanghai, and Miltec Inc., and as a management committee member for the Honeywell/General Atomics ConverDyn partnership. His expertise spans mergers and acquisitions, operational and financial planning for uranium production, regulatory affairs, and governmental interactions.
Douglas Beahm, Chief Operating Officer
Douglas Beahm, an engineering graduate of the Colorado School of Mines, has 50 years of professional and managerial experience in natural resource exploration, mine and mill development, mine and processing facility operations, environmental permitting, and mine reclamation. He held senior positions with mining companies such as Homestake Mining, Union Carbide Corporation, and AGIP, prior to establishing his engineering consulting firm, BRS, Inc. Anfield Energy acquired BRS, Inc. in December 2025.
Joshua Bleak, Co-Founder and Director
Joshua Bleak is a fourth-generation miner from a reputable Arizona mining family, possessing a deep understanding of resource development. He has extensive experience in developing gold, silver, copper, and uranium projects in the southwestern United States. Mr. Bleak has served as a director for several Canadian junior mining exploration companies and as President of North American Environmental Corp. His expertise includes mining project management, encompassing drilling, transportation, permitting, and land tenure.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Anfield Energy Inc. (AEC) are primarily associated with its nature as a junior mineral exploration and development company, particularly in the uranium and vanadium sectors.
-
Funding and Capital Requirements, and Shareholder Dilution: As a pre-revenue company engaged in capital-intensive exploration and development, Anfield Energy faces significant challenges in securing consistent funding. Junior mining companies generally find it difficult to access capital due to the high-risk nature of their projects. Anfield Energy has historically operated at a loss, leading to substantial shareholder dilution as it issues new shares to meet its financial obligations and fund its operations. The company's access to significant equity funding remains uncertain, and its liquidity risk is explicitly acknowledged.
-
Project Execution, Exploration Risk, and Development Delays: The probability of successfully converting exploration efforts into commercially viable producing mines is very low, with industry data suggesting only about 1 in 1,000 exploration programs result in a producing mine. Even projects that reach the development stage face considerable execution risks, including potential cost overruns, delays, or even abandonment. Anfield's valuation is highly sensitive to the successful execution of its projects, meaning delays in mine rehabilitation, dewatering, permitting, infrastructure development, or mill preparation could negatively impact its value. The company has acknowledged that some key development decisions for projects, such as Velvet-Wood, are not yet supported by full feasibility studies, introducing a high degree of uncertainty.
-
Commodity Price Volatility: Anfield Energy's core business revolves around uranium and vanadium. The company's financial prospects are heavily dependent on the fluctuating market prices of these commodities. A downturn in uranium or vanadium prices, particularly during the critical development phase, could render projects uneconomic and force their postponement or abandonment, regardless of the geological potential.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Anfield Energy Inc. is engaged in the exploration and development of uranium, vanadium, copper, gold, and silver deposits. The addressable markets for these commodities are sized as follows:
Uranium
- The global uranium market size is projected to reach between USD 5.3 billion and USD 5.7 billion by 2025. It is expected to grow from US$9.73 billion in 2025 to US$13.59 billion by 2033, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.86% from 2026 to 2033.
- The uranium ore market specifically was valued at USD 0.74 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 0.97 billion by 2030.
- In the United States, civilian nuclear power reactor operators purchased 51.6 million pounds of uranium concentrate in 2023. The U.S. is a major consumer of uranium, with North America being a significant market due to its established nuclear power infrastructure and investments in new nuclear technologies.
Vanadium
- The global vanadium market size was valued at approximately USD 3.62 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 5.33 billion by 2034, exhibiting a CAGR of 4.40% during the forecast period. Other estimates indicate the global market size was US$3.57 billion in 2025, projected to reach US$5.46 billion by 2034.
- North America is a significant market for vanadium, primarily driven by its extensive steel production sector. In 2023, 94% of vanadium consumption in the U.S. was for steel alloying applications, with total apparent consumption increasing from under 10,000 metric tons to over 14,000 metric tons between 2019 and 2023.
Copper
- The global copper market size was valued at USD 248.2 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow from USD 260.2 billion in 2026 to USD 388.8 billion by 2033, at a CAGR of 5.9%. Another estimate places the global market at USD 265.08 billion in 2026, forecast to expand at a CAGR of 6.8% to reach USD 511.78 billion by 2036.
- The U.S. copper market size was estimated at USD 14.39 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 19.68 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 6.0%. North America accounted for 21% of the global copper market in 2025. The U.S. consumes approximately 2,200 kilotons of refined copper annually. The U.S. copper mining market alone was valued at USD 474.33 million in 2022.
Gold
- The global gold market size in terms of tonnage stood at 4,890.0 tons in 2025 and is expected to grow to 7,424.4 tons by 2034. In terms of value, the global gold market was worth USD 555 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 835 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 7.05%. Another source indicates the global gold market size was valued at USD 249.5 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach USD 263.97 billion by 2026.
- The North American gold market recorded a size of USD 23.22 billion in 2025, projected to reach USD 24.24 billion in 2026. The United States gold bullion market size was valued at USD 23.5 billion in 2024, projected to grow to USD 38.6 billion by 2032.
Silver
- The global silver market size was valued at USD 21.91 billion in 2025 and is anticipated to reach USD 22.64 billion in 2026, further growing to USD 29.37 billion by 2034. In terms of volume, the global silver market is expected to grow from 37.78 kilotons in 2025 to 39.53 kilotons in 2026, reaching 49.54 kilotons by 2031.
- North America was a significant contributor to the global silver market, holding an estimated share of 18.3% in 2024. The U.S. silver market was valued at USD 2.53 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 3.6 billion by 2035.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Restart of the Shootaring Canyon Mill: Anfield Energy's flagship asset, the Shootaring Canyon Mill, is one of only three licensed and constructed conventional uranium mills in the United States. The company is actively working towards converting its license from care-and-maintenance to operations, with production targeted for 2027, which is expected to be a significant driver of revenue.
- Production from the Velvet-Wood Mine: The Velvet-Wood uranium and vanadium project is advancing towards active dewatering and has completed its first underground blast in nearly 40 years. Phase One construction has been completed, with production targeted by the end of 2026.
- Implementation of the Hub-and-Spoke Production Strategy: Anfield Energy's strategy involves feeding uranium and vanadium ore from multiple deposits, including the Velvet-Wood and West Slope projects, into the central Shootaring Canyon Mill. This "hub-and-spoke" model is designed to increase mill throughput and overall production, leading to significant value creation.
- Rising Uranium Prices: The company's updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) incorporates higher uranium price assumptions, specifically $100 per pound, which significantly contributes to the projected economics and Net Present Value (NPV) of its projects. A sustained or increasing uranium price environment would directly enhance revenue from production.
- Advancement and Integration of Additional Uranium-Vanadium Projects: Anfield Energy is actively expanding its land holdings and advancing permitting for other projects, such as the JD-8, JD-5, and Slick Rock projects in Colorado. These additional projects are expected to feed into the hub-and-spoke model, further increasing the volume of material processed and contributing to revenue growth.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- Anfield Energy Inc. announced a share repurchase program on June 3, 2024, authorizing the repurchase of up to 4,361,555 common shares, with the program set to expire on June 6, 2025.
Share Issuance
- On July 31, 2026, Anfield Energy completed an underwritten public offering, issuing 1,715,000 common shares at US$4.00 per share, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of US$6.9 million.
- The company closed a non-brokered private placement (LIFE Offering) on January 13, 2026, issuing 1,345,292 common shares at US$4.46 each, raising US$6,000,000.
- As part of a US$10,000,000 financing, Anfield also closed a concurrent non-brokered private placement on January 12, 2026, issuing 896,861 Subscription Receipts to UEC (a subsidiary of Uranium Energy Corp.) at US$4.46 per share for US$4,000,000.
Inbound Investments
- Strategic investor Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has increased its stake in Anfield Energy, demonstrating confidence in the company. UEC's subsidiary acquired Subscription Receipts for US$4,000,000 in January 2026, leading to a 28.8% non-diluted ownership for Uranium Energy post-offering.
Outbound Investments
- In May 2026, Anfield Energy acquired B.R.S. Inc. (BRS Engineering) to integrate dedicated in-house engineering expertise to accelerate refurbishment of the Shootaring Canyon Mill and mining project development.
- On July 1, 2026, Anfield's wholly-owned subsidiary, Highbury Resources Inc., entered into a Mining Lease Agreement with Gold Eagle Mining Inc. for two additional patented mining claims in southwestern Colorado, expanding land holdings for the JD-5 and Slick Rock projects.
Capital Expenditures
- An updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) filed in June 2026 estimated pre-production capital expenditures of approximately US$97 million (including contingency) over a 12-month period.
- Mine-related capital expenditures, covering engineering, facilities, equipment, and shaft work at Velvet, Wood, and Slick Rock, are projected to be a combined total of US$37.5 million, including a 10% contingency.
- The net proceeds from the US$6.9 million public offering in July 2026 are intended to fund capital commitments for the Paradox Complex, Velvet-Wood Project, Slick Rock Complex, and the Shootaring Canyon Mill, in addition to working capital and general corporate purposes.
Peer Outperformance in Coal & Consumable Fuels
null| Industry | Names | 1Y med | 3Y med | 5Y med | Top 3 by 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | 11 | 82.5% | 105.8% | 280.9% | MPC 541% · VLO 426% · PBF 423% |
| Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation | 18 | 35.6% | 101.1% | 159.7% | INSW 749% · TRGP 434% · DHT 394% |
| Integrated Oil & Gas | 7 | 44.6% | 64.2% | 150.3% | IMO 319% · SU 223% · XOM 203% |
| Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | 33 | 4.8% | 13.5% | 51.2% | FTI 749% · SEI 616% · TDW 453% |
| Oil & Gas Drilling | 7 | 37.8% | -3.3% | 42.5% | VAL 122% · NE 88% · RIG 42% |
| Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | 50 | 20.7% | 0.8% | 41.2% | BTE 767% · PR 224% · CNQ 188% |
| Coal & Consumable Fuels ← | 14 | -44.3% | -4.4% | 25.1% | CNR 248% · CCJ 156% · UEC 41% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 5.52 |
| Mkt Cap | 0.3 |
| Rev LTM | 55 |
| Op Inc LTM | -30 |
| FCF LTM | -22 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -20 |
| CFO LTM | -17 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | -12 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 0.5% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 15.9% |
| Rev Chg Q | 5.1% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 1.4% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | -21.5% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | -22.5% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -82.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -15.8% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.2% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | -37.9% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 10.8% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | -60.9% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -8.8% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $2.94 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.1 | |
| First Trading Date | 02/27/2012 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -69.2% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $3.50 | $4.85 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -15.9% | -39.4% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 59.8% | 77.8% |
| Downside Capture | 396.62 | 406.36 |
| Upside Capture | 213.38 | 240.18 |
| Correlation (S&P 500) | 36.6% | 41.1% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.51 | 2.51 | 2.10 | 2.33 | 2.54 | 0.30 |
| Up Beta | -4.79 | -0.53 | -0.89 | 1.11 | 1.58 | 0.57 |
| Down Beta | 0.82 | 1.00 | 1.95 | 1.63 | 1.37 | 1.12 |
| Up Capture | 336% | 238% | 245% | 279% | 483% | 59% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 12 | 18 | 28 | 62 | 130 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 10 | 16 | 28 | 53 | 107 | 126 |
| Down Capture | 348% | 385% | 312% | 248% | 185% | 107% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 10 | 25 | 36 | 64 | 121 | 325 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 24 | 33 | 66 | 134 | 148 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with AEC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEC | -60.7% | 77.8% | -0.87 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 44.8% | 23.4% | 1.50 | -6.2% |
| Equity (SPY) | 9.5% | 13.6% | 0.41 | 38.0% |
| Gold (GLD) | 3.6% | 28.7% | 0.11 | 42.9% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 37.7% | 21.2% | 1.40 | 13.0% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 12.0% | 14.2% | 0.55 | 0.4% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -20.8% | 43.3% | -0.42 | 32.5% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with AEC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEC | -11.2% | 86.2% | -0.23 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 20.4% | 25.6% | 0.70 | -9.3% |
| Equity (SPY) | 11.3% | 17.3% | 0.48 | 29.1% |
| Gold (GLD) | 17.5% | 19.1% | 0.74 | 38.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.0% | 19.6% | 0.29 | 7.5% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 1.2% | 18.9% | -0.05 | -1.7% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 5.9% | 51.5% | 0.29 | 23.9% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with AEC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEC | -5.8% | 86.2% | -0.23 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 10.2% | 29.7% | 0.38 | -9.3% |
| Equity (SPY) | 14.9% | 18.0% | 0.70 | 29.1% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.0% | 16.5% | 0.59 | 38.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 7.6% | 18.1% | 0.33 | 7.5% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.7% | 20.7% | 0.23 | -1.7% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 61.3% | 66.2% | 1.01 | 23.9% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Earnings Returns History
Updated 6/2/2026| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.