Glass House Brands (GLAS)
Market Price (8/7/2026): $9.67 | Market Cap: $818.7 MilSector: Health Care | Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Glass House Brands (GLAS)
Market Price (8/7/2026): $9.67Market Cap: $818.7 MilSector: Health CareIndustry: Pharmaceuticals
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Health & Wellness Trends. Themes include Organic & Natural Products, and Functional Foods & Beverages. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -24% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -26 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -15% Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -18%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -13% Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -1.6%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -15% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -8.6% Key risksGLAS key risks include [1] operational disruptions and substantial production cuts stemming from immigration raids at its cultivation sites and [2] poor financial performance characterized by negative cash flow and a cash runway of less than one year. |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Health & Wellness Trends. Themes include Organic & Natural Products, and Functional Foods & Beverages. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -24% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -26 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -15% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -18%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -13% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -1.6%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -15% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -8.6% |
| Key risksGLAS key risks include [1] operational disruptions and substantial production cuts stemming from immigration raids at its cultivation sites and [2] poor financial performance characterized by negative cash flow and a cash runway of less than one year. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Glass House Brands (GLAS) stock has remained largely at the same level since 4/30/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Fiscal Q1 2026 Financial Underperformance and Reduced Full-Year Profitability Outlook.
Glass House Brands reported a miss on both EPS and revenue for fiscal Q1 2026, with an actual EPS of -$0.20 against a consensus of -$0.17 and actual revenue of $39.56 million against an expected $40.15 million. The company subsequently reduced its full-year fiscal 2026 gross margin guidance from approximately 48% to the mid-40% range and adjusted EBITDA guidance from the high $40 million range to the high $30 million range. This revision indicated higher-than-expected production costs in fiscal Q1 2026, which reached $175 per pound, contributing to margin compression, and resulted in a lowered year-end cash expectation.
2. Accelerated Warrant Expiry Leading to Potential Selling Pressure.
Glass House Brands accelerated the expiry date of approximately 30.7 million outstanding warrants to July 23, 2026. This acceleration was triggered by the company's share price closing at US$12.00 or more for 10 trading days out of 15 consecutive trading days as of June 18, 2026. This event, occurring within the analysis period, likely resulted in a significant number of warrant exercises, potentially leading to increased share supply and subsequent selling pressure on the stock.
Show more
Glass House Brands (GLAS) stock has remained largely at the same level since 4/30/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Fiscal Q1 2026 Financial Underperformance and Reduced Full-Year Profitability Outlook.
Glass House Brands reported a miss on both EPS and revenue for fiscal Q1 2026, with an actual EPS of -$0.20 against a consensus of -$0.17 and actual revenue of $39.56 million against an expected $40.15 million. The company subsequently reduced its full-year fiscal 2026 gross margin guidance from approximately 48% to the mid-40% range and adjusted EBITDA guidance from the high $40 million range to the high $30 million range. This revision indicated higher-than-expected production costs in fiscal Q1 2026, which reached $175 per pound, contributing to margin compression, and resulted in a lowered year-end cash expectation.
2. Accelerated Warrant Expiry Leading to Potential Selling Pressure.
Glass House Brands accelerated the expiry date of approximately 30.7 million outstanding warrants to July 23, 2026. This acceleration was triggered by the company's share price closing at US$12.00 or more for 10 trading days out of 15 consecutive trading days as of June 18, 2026. This event, occurring within the analysis period, likely resulted in a significant number of warrant exercises, potentially leading to increased share supply and subsequent selling pressure on the stock.
3. Persistent Regulatory Uncertainty and Industry Headwinds in the Cannabis Sector.
Despite the positive development of Glass House Brands' uplisting to the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2026, an event tied to the proposed reclassification of medical cannabis to Schedule III, broader regulatory uncertainty persisted in the sector. Discussions surrounding federal cannabis rescheduling faced mixed signals, including public warnings from a former U.S. Attorney General against the move, citing concerns over public safety and potential economic impacts. Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to resolve conflicts regarding states' abilities to favor in-state cannabis businesses, leaving interstate commerce regulations unclear. The overall cannabis industry is also experiencing market maturation, characterized by price compression and a demand for increased operational discipline, which can exert downward pressure on stock performance.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 0.5% change in GLAS stock from 4/30/2026 to 8/6/2026 was primarily driven by a 5.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302026 | 8062026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 9.63 | 9.68 | 0.5% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 182 | 176 | -3.3% |
| P/S Multiple | 4.4 | 4.7 | 5.3% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 84 | 85 | -1.3% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 0.5% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2026 to 8/6/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GLAS | 0.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 6.9% | 13.6% |
| Sector (XLV) | 12.6% | -6.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 5.2% change in GLAS stock from 1/31/2026 to 8/6/2026 was primarily driven by a 20.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 1312026 | 8062026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 9.20 | 9.68 | 5.2% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 196 | 176 | -10.3% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.9 | 4.7 | 20.2% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 83 | 85 | -2.4% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 5.2% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 8/6/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GLAS | 5.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 11.4% | 25.5% |
| Sector (XLV) | 6.7% | 2.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 93.2% change in GLAS stock from 7/31/2025 to 8/6/2026 was primarily driven by a 158.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 7312025 | 8062026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 5.01 | 9.68 | 93.2% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 216 | 176 | -18.4% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.8 | 4.7 | 158.9% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 77 | 85 | -8.6% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 93.2% |
Market Drivers
7/31/2025 to 8/6/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GLAS | 93.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 22.6% | 12.8% |
| Sector (XLV) | 27.7% | 9.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 222.7% change in GLAS stock from 7/31/2023 to 8/6/2026 was primarily driven by a 111.9% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 7312023 | 8062026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.00 | 9.68 | 222.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 83 | 176 | 111.9% |
| P/S Multiple | 2.8 | 4.7 | 63.4% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 79 | 85 | -6.8% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 222.7% |
Market Drivers
7/31/2023 to 8/6/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GLAS | 222.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 73.8% | 15.8% |
| Sector (XLV) | 28.3% | 13.5% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| GLAS Return | -62% | -50% | 148% | 23% | 53% | 5% | -8% |
| Peers Return | 26% | 30% | 18% | 7% | 33% | 4% | 185% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 13% | 106% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| GLAS Win Rate | 33% | 33% | 67% | 58% | 33% | 62% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 53% | 67% | 50% | 44% | 64% | 48% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| GLAS Max Drawdown | -74% | -70% | -30% | -46% | -44% | -32% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -17% | -13% | -15% | -22% | -24% | -15% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: OPTH, TRLV, LLY, JNJ, MRK.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 8/6/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | GLAS | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -37.0% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 58.8% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 17 days | 79 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -16.8% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 20.2% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1 days | 31 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -48.2% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 93.0% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 129 days | 427 days |
In The Past
Glass House Brands's stock fell -37.0% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 58.8% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | GLAS | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -37.0% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 58.8% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 17 days | 79 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -48.2% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 93.0% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 129 days | 427 days |
In The Past
Glass House Brands's stock fell -37.0% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 58.8% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Glass House Brands (GLAS)
Glass House Brands (GLAS) is a prominent vertically integrated cannabis company, primarily focused on the California market. The company operates across the entire cannabis supply chain, from large-scale cultivation and manufacturing to brand development and retail distribution. This comprehensive approach allows Glass House Brands to control quality and efficiency throughout its operations.
The company's core activities include cultivating high-quality cannabis flower in some of the largest greenhouse facilities in California. Beyond cultivation, Glass House Brands processes this cannabis into a diverse array of finished products, such as flower, pre-rolls, vapes, edibles, and concentrates. It also develops and markets a portfolio of its own established brands, including Glass House Farms, Plus Products, FIOR, and Mama Sue, catering to various consumer segments within the cannabis industry.
Glass House Brands primarily serves the adult-use and medicinal cannabis markets within California, which represents the largest legal cannabis market globally. Its customer base includes both wholesale partners, such as other licensed dispensaries, and direct-to-consumer sales through its owned and operated retail locations, known as The Glass House Dispensary, ensuring extensive market penetration and direct engagement with end-consumers across the state.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Glass House Brands is like:
- The Tyson Foods of cannabis, focusing on massive, low-cost cultivation and processing to supply the market.
- An Anheuser-Busch for cannabis, growing and distributing a wide array of cannabis products across different brands in a regulated market.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Cannabis Flower: Cultivates and sells various strains of premium cannabis flower for recreational and medicinal use.
- Pre-rolls: Offers ready-to-consume cannabis pre-rolls, often featuring specific strains or blends.
- Edibles: Manufactures and distributes cannabis-infused edibles, such as gummies and chocolates.
- Vaporizer Products: Provides cannabis vape cartridges and disposable vape pens containing concentrated cannabis oil.
- Concentrates: Produces and sells highly potent cannabis concentrates, including live resin and rosin.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Glass House Brands (GLAS) operates as a vertically integrated cannabis company in California, encompassing large-scale cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and retail operations. Based on their business model and revenue disclosures, Glass House Brands primarily sells its wholesale cannabis products to other licensed businesses.
Major Customers:
Glass House Brands' major customers are primarily other licensed businesses within the California cannabis market. Due to the fragmented nature of the cannabis industry and competitive considerations, Glass House Brands does not publicly disclose the specific names of its individual wholesale customer companies. Therefore, specific customer names, especially publicly traded ones, are not available. However, their major customers fall into the following categories:
- Licensed Cannabis Dispensaries: These are retail cannabis stores operating across California that purchase Glass House Brands' wholesale cannabis products (such as flower, pre-rolls, edibles, and vapes) for resale to individual consumers.
- Licensed Cannabis Distributors and Processors: Other businesses in the cannabis supply chain that may purchase Glass House Brands' bulk cannabis or finished products for further distribution to retailers or for use in their own manufacturing processes.
While Glass House Brands also operates its own chain of retail dispensaries (e.g., The Farmacy), selling directly to individual consumers, their significant cultivation capacity and wholesale revenue figures indicate that sales to other businesses constitute their primary customer base.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Kyle Kazan, Co-founder, Chairman & CEO
Kyle Kazan is a seasoned investor and expert manager of private equity funds with over two decades of domestic and international experience, known for growing de novo companies to industry leadership in fund/asset management, property management, and insurance. He began investing in real estate in 1991, eventually launching 23 private equity funds with properties valued above $2.75 billion. Kazan also served on the boards of multiple international investment and hedge funds before transitioning to the regulated cannabis industry in 2016, where he consolidated four funds to establish the vertically integrated Glass House Brands. He is also a co-founder of Beach Front Property Management, Inc. and Beach Front Properties, LLC.
Mark Vendetti, Chief Financial Officer
Mark Vendetti has held roles at iconic enterprises such as Procter and Gamble, Abercrombie and Fitch, Bauer Hockey, and Mattel. Prior to joining Glass House Brands, he served as the CFO of Canndescent, a leading producer of premium cannabis, from 2019 to 2021. From 2013 to 2015, he was the CFO of Francesca's, a women's specialty retailer, during a period of significant annual sales growth and store expansion.
Graham Farrar, Co-founder, President & Board Director
Graham Farrar is a serial entrepreneur who was part of the original team at Software.com, which went public in 1999. He was also a founding team member at Sonos, where he contributed to product design, development, sales, and customer support. Farrar founded and partnered in ebook publishers iStoryTime Inc. and zuuka, and established a luxury rental company in Santa Barbara. His entry into the regulated cannabis industry began with founding Elite Garden Wholesale, an agriculture technology company.
Hilal Tabsh, Chief Revenue Officer
Hilal Tabsh spent fifteen years at Red Bull, where he held positions such as head of sales and marketing strategy for the Middle East, Africa, and Pacific regions, and later oversaw sales, marketing, and distribution strategy for Red Bull North America. He co-founded and helped grow Limitless Beverage company, which was acquired by Keurig Dr. Pepper within three years of its founding. Subsequently, Hilal entered the cannabis industry, serving as Senior VP at BellRock Brands and then as Chief Revenue Officer at SlangWorldWide.
Benjamin Vega, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Benjamin Vega is a corporate lawyer with over 20 years of experience in complex business transactions and litigation across a range of industries, including Finance, Private Equity, M&A, Banking, Gaming and Hospitality, Media, Professional Sports, and Construction. Before joining Glass House Brands, he served as Deputy General Counsel for Covetrus, Inc., a public company in the animal health industry.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Glass House Brands (GLAS) business include:
- Regulatory Uncertainty and Evolving Taxation Policies: As a cannabis company, Glass House Brands operates in an industry highly susceptible to changing legislation, compliance requirements, and evolving taxation policies across federal, state, and local levels. This regulatory environment creates uncertainty for business expansion, market access, and operational stability. Recent immigration raids at its cultivation sites, though primarily framed as immigration enforcement, highlight the complex interplay of federal and state regulations and can significantly disrupt operations and production. The company's strategic shifts, such as uplisting to the NYSE and focusing on medical cannabis, are efforts to navigate these regulatory complexities, yet significant execution, regulatory, and capital risks persist.
- Competitive Intensity and Pricing Pressure: Glass House Brands operates in maturing cannabis markets, particularly the saturated California market, leading to intense competition. This environment creates pricing pressure on products and can challenge the company's profit margins, even for low-cost producers. Evidence suggests declining margins and reduced profitability expectations, indicating that the ability to maintain profitability in a highly competitive market with potential oversupply is a significant concern.
- Operational Execution and Financial Performance: The company faces risks related to operational execution, including challenges inherent in large-scale greenhouse cultivation concerning labor, regulation, and biological performance. Past immigration raids at Glass House facilities resulted in substantial cuts to production outlook (estimated at $25-$30 million) and could lead to increased labor costs due to tighter scrutiny and required changes in hiring practices. Financially, Glass House Brands has experienced earnings declines, negative adjusted EBITDA, negative operating cash flow, and has been noted to have less than one year of cash runway based on free cash flow trends, indicating ongoing financial performance and funding availability as critical risks.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Emerging Threats for Glass House Brands (GLAS):
The development of cost-effective, scalable biosynthesis of cannabinoids (e.g., THC, CBD, and minor cannabinoids) could disrupt traditional cannabis cultivation. If cannabinoids can be produced in bioreactors more cheaply and consistently than through plant cultivation, it would diminish the competitive advantage and value proposition of large-scale agricultural operations like Glass House Brands, which rely on extensive plant-based cultivation for their product inputs.
Potential federal policy changes in the U.S., such as the reclassification of cannabis to Schedule III, could pave the way for increased involvement from large pharmaceutical companies or established consumer packaged goods (CPG) giants. These entities possess vastly superior capital, marketing capabilities, research and development resources, and logistical networks. Their entry, particularly if accompanied by regulatory frameworks that allow for interstate commerce or national branding, could fundamentally alter the competitive landscape, making it difficult for state-focused, plant-touching operators like Glass House Brands to compete effectively on scale, price, or market reach.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The primary addressable market for Glass House Brands (GLAS) main products and services is the legal cannabis market in California.
For 2025, California's legal cannabis market generated approximately $4.06 billion in retail sales. Another source indicates that in 2025, California retail stores sold $4.412 billion worth of cannabis products. The California legal cannabis market was valued at $5.37 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow to an estimated $5.4 billion by 2030. Glass House Brands focuses on cultivation, manufacturing, and distribution of raw cannabis, cannabis oil, and various cannabis consumer goods under brands such as Glass House Farms, Forbidden Flowers, PLUS, Allswell, REEFORM, and Mama Sue, primarily within California.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Expected Drivers of Future Revenue Growth for Glass House Brands (GLAS)
- Increased Biomass Production and Cultivation Capacity Expansion: Glass House Brands anticipates significant revenue growth through the expansion of its cultivation capacity. The company has completed the final two-thirds of Greenhouse 2 construction and commenced the buildout of Greenhouse 4, aiming for a full-year 2026 biomass production target of approximately 1 million pounds, representing a roughly 50% increase from 2025. This enhanced production capability is expected to drive higher wholesale cannabis sales.
- Expansion into New Markets (Interstate Commerce and International Exports): The rescheduling of medical cannabis to Schedule III has created new opportunities for Glass House Brands to expand its market reach. The company has registered its cultivation and processing licenses under Schedule III, opening possibilities for interstate commerce and international exports, particularly targeting European medical cannabis markets. Additionally, the buildout of Greenhouse 4 is intended to target international CBD and hemp markets, further diversifying revenue streams beyond California.
- Growth in Retail Operations and Strategic Joint Ventures: Glass House Brands is focused on strengthening its retail footprint and customer base. The company has achieved six consecutive quarters of same-store retail sales growth through Q2 2025 and has formed a joint venture with Vireo to expand its retail operations in California, which is expected to enhance profitability and market reach.
- Reduced Production Costs: While an efficiency driver, achieving lower production costs is expected to positively impact revenue growth by allowing for more competitive pricing and improved margins. Glass House Brands aims to achieve an annual production cost target of $95 per pound on a quarterly basis in the second half of 2026, with overall production costs expected to decline as the year progresses. This cost reduction strategy is crucial for maintaining competitiveness and enhancing overall financial performance.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Issuance
- Glass House Brands raised $22.5 million of new capital in the third quarter of 2022.
- In the third quarter of 2023, the company recorded a $12.8 million inflow from a Series D Preferred Equity Fund Raise.
- The number of outstanding shares has increased from 23.19 million in 2020 to 81.72 million by the end of 2025 and as of July 2026, indicating ongoing share issuances.
Inbound Investments
- The company raised $22.5 million in new capital during the third quarter of 2022.
- Glass House Brands received a $12.8 million inflow from a Series D Preferred Equity Fund Raise in the third quarter of 2023.
- In December 2023, Glass House Brands closed a transaction to secure $15 million in funding from GH Group, Inc.
Outbound Investments
- In December 2021, Glass House Brands Inc. entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Plus Products Inc. for approximately $25.6 million, utilizing a combination of unsecured convertible debt and equity, along with performance-based consideration.
- The company acquired four retail locations in the third quarter of 2022 and further expanded by acquiring Natural Healing Center retail dispensaries in Grover Beach, Lemoore, and Morro Bay, California in September 2022.
- Glass House Brands completed the acquisition of the Turlock Natural Healing Center Dispensary in April 2023.
Capital Expenditures
- Capital expenditures placed into service led to an increase in depreciation and amortization from $2.8 million in Q2 2022 to $3.4 million in Q3 2022.
- The company spent approximately $5 million on capital expenditures in Q3 2023.
- In Q2 2025, Glass House Brands spent $9.5 million in capital expenditures, primarily focused on Phase III expansion at its Camarillo facility. The company also spent $3.5 million in capex in Q1 2026, mainly for the Phase III expansion at Camarillo.
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 69.03 |
| Mkt Cap | 159.5 |
| Rev LTM | 33,469 |
| Op Inc LTM | 6,559 |
| FCF LTM | 6,892 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 1,738 |
| CFO LTM | 9,084 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 7,389 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 0.8% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 13.8% |
| Rev Chg Q | 5.7% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 1.4% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 7.4% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 46.2% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 16.2% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 14.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 25.5% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 22.7% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 18.1% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 9.2% |
Segment Financials
Revenue by Segment| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wholesale Biomass(B2B) | 114 | 139 | 106 | 41 | |
| Retail (B2C) | 48 | 44 | 39 | 27 | |
| Wholesale consumer packaged goods (CPG) (B2B) | 20 | 18 | 16 | 17 | |
| Corporate and Other | 0 | 0 | |||
| Production and sale of cannabis products | 63 | ||||
| Total | 182 | 201 | 161 | 85 | 63 |
| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wholesale Biomass(B2B) | 22 | 48 | 37 | -7 |
| Retail (B2C) | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Wholesale consumer packaged goods (CPG) (B2B) | 3 | 2 | -2 | -4 |
| Corporate and Other | -47 | -48 | -91 | -48 |
| Total | -17 | 6 | -50 | -56 |
| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wholesale Biomass(B2B) | 249 | 236 | 220 | 215 |
| Corporate and Other | 33 | 36 | 44 | 96 |
| Retail (B2C) | 18 | 26 | 27 | 24 |
| Wholesale consumer packaged goods (CPG) (B2B) | 18 | 13 | 13 | 15 |
| Total | 319 | 311 | 304 | 351 |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $9.68 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.8 | |
| First Trading Date | 07/18/2019 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -28.7% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $11.46 | $9.06 |
| DMA Trend | up | up |
| Distance from DMA | -15.5% | 6.8% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 70.6% | 95.1% |
| Downside Capture | 204.42 | 82.47 |
| Upside Capture | 155.29 | 118.08 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 15.6% | 14.4% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.02 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.26 | 0.93 | 0.76 |
| Up Beta | 1.58 | -1.25 | -0.99 | 0.72 | 0.96 | 0.75 |
| Down Beta | 1.45 | -1.81 | -0.69 | 0.43 | 1.28 | 0.91 |
| Up Capture | -154% | 162% | 134% | 196% | 125% | 65% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 11 | 22 | 35 | 67 | 138 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 9 | 20 | 31 | 59 | 118 | 347 |
| Down Capture | 293% | 214% | 153% | 154% | 64% | 78% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 21 | 28 | 59 | 114 | 326 |
| Stock -ve Days | 13 | 22 | 30 | 64 | 126 | 380 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with GLAS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLAS | -0.4% | 77.3% | 0.31 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 25.8% | 15.6% | 1.27 | 5.4% |
| Equity (SPY) | 23.5% | 12.9% | 1.37 | 18.9% |
| Gold (GLD) | 25.3% | 28.3% | 0.79 | 10.2% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 32.4% | 19.8% | 1.30 | 1.9% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 12.9% | 13.8% | 0.64 | -2.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -43.6% | 43.0% | -1.21 | 12.1% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with GLAS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLAS | 1.7% | 73.3% | 0.33 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 6.1% | 15.0% | 0.22 | 6.4% |
| Equity (SPY) | 13.2% | 17.2% | 0.59 | 11.5% |
| Gold (GLD) | 17.9% | 18.5% | 0.78 | 4.6% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.0% | 19.6% | 0.31 | 4.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 2.3% | 18.9% | 0.02 | 7.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 10.0% | 53.0% | 0.38 | 4.9% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with GLAS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLAS | 2.5% | 70.7% | 0.36 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 10.0% | 16.6% | 0.48 | 6.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.3% | 17.9% | 0.73 | 11.4% |
| Gold (GLD) | 11.8% | 16.2% | 0.59 | 4.5% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 7.4% | 18.0% | 0.33 | 4.0% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 4.9% | 20.7% | 0.20 | 7.2% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 58.3% | 66.2% | 0.98 | 4.2% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/13/2026 | 6-K |
| 12/31/2025 | 03/24/2026 | 40-F |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/12/2025 | 6-K |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/13/2025 | 6-K |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/13/2025 | 6-K |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/25/2025 | 40-F |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/13/2024 | 6-K |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/13/2024 | 6-K |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/14/2024 | 6-K |
| 12/31/2023 | 04/01/2024 | 40-F |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/13/2023 | 6-K |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 6-K |
| 03/31/2023 | 04/01/2024 | 6-K |
| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/13/2026 | 6-K |
| 12/31/2025 | 03/24/2026 | 40-F |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/12/2025 | 6-K |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/13/2025 | 6-K |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/13/2025 | 6-K |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/25/2025 | 40-F |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/13/2024 | 6-K |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/13/2024 | 6-K |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/14/2024 | 6-K |
| 12/31/2023 | 04/01/2024 | 40-F |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/13/2023 | 6-K |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 6-K |
| 03/31/2023 | 04/01/2024 | 6-K |
Industry Resources
| Health Care Resources |
| U.S. National Library of Medicine |
| ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Modern Healthcare |
| Healthcare Dive |
| Fierce Healthcare |
| Health Affairs |
| Health Data Management |
| FDA Tracker |
| Pharmaceuticals Resources |
| Fierce Pharma |
| Pharm Exec |
| Endpoints News |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.




