Celanese (CE)
Market Price (12/30/2025): $42.89 | Market Cap: $4.7 BilSector: Materials | Industry: Specialty Chemicals
Celanese (CE)
Market Price (12/30/2025): $42.89Market Cap: $4.7 BilSector: MaterialsIndustry: Specialty Chemicals
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 14%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 11% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -117%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -134% | Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 250% |
| Attractive yieldFCF Yield is 22% | Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -7.3%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is 0.7%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -8.6% | |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Advanced Materials, and Circular Economy & Recycling. Themes include Specialty Chemicals for Performance, Advanced Recycling Technologies, Show more. | Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -68% | |
| Key risksCE key risks include [1] high financial leverage with distress-level indicators suggesting potential bankruptcy risk, Show more. |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 14%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 11% |
| Attractive yieldFCF Yield is 22% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Advanced Materials, and Circular Economy & Recycling. Themes include Specialty Chemicals for Performance, Advanced Recycling Technologies, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -117%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -134% |
| Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 250% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -7.3%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is 0.7%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -8.6% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -68% |
| Key risksCE key risks include [1] high financial leverage with distress-level indicators suggesting potential bankruptcy risk, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
2. Significant Q3 2025 GAAP Loss and Revenue Miss.In the third quarter of 2025, Celanese reported a substantial U.S. GAAP diluted loss per share of ($12.39), largely driven by approximately $1.5 billion in non-cash charges, primarily goodwill and intangible asset impairments within its engineered materials segment. Additionally, the company's revenue declined 9% year-over-year to $2.4 billion, missing consensus estimates.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 5.1% change in CE stock from 9/29/2025 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a 7.6% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 9292025 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 40.81 | 42.89 | 5.09% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 9939.00 | 9710.00 | -2.30% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.45 | 0.48 | 7.61% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 109.53 | 109.57 | -0.04% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 5.09% |
Market Drivers
9/29/2025 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| CE | 5.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.6% | 38.4% |
| Sector (XLB) | 2.6% | 58.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -22.4% change in CE stock from 6/30/2025 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -19.5% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6302025 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 55.26 | 42.89 | -22.39% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 10058.00 | 9710.00 | -3.46% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.60 | 0.48 | -19.50% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 109.42 | 109.57 | -0.13% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -22.39% |
Market Drivers
6/30/2025 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| CE | -22.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 11.6% | 31.7% |
| Sector (XLB) | 4.7% | 58.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -37.5% change in CE stock from 12/29/2024 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -32.4% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12292024 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 68.59 | 42.89 | -37.47% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 10479.00 | 9710.00 | -7.34% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.72 | 0.48 | -32.38% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 109.34 | 109.57 | -0.21% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -37.47% |
Market Drivers
12/29/2024 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| CE | -37.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 16.6% | 53.6% |
| Sector (XLB) | 9.3% | 68.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -56.1% change in CE stock from 12/30/2022 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -56.1% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12302022 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 97.61 | 42.89 | -56.06% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 9600.00 | 9710.00 | 1.15% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.10 | 0.48 | -56.10% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 108.43 | 109.57 | -1.05% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -56.06% |
Market Drivers
12/30/2023 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| CE | -71.8% | |
| Market (SPY) | 47.9% | 45.2% |
| Sector (XLB) | 10.5% | 63.7% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| CE Return | 8% | 32% | -38% | 56% | -55% | -38% | -61% |
| Peers Return | 16% | 38% | -12% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 151% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 17% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| CE Win Rate | 67% | 67% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 65% | 42% | 68% | 57% | 52% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| CE Max Drawdown | -52% | -8% | -47% | -2% | -56% | -49% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -5% | -26% | -7% | -9% | -23% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL. See CE Returns vs. Peers.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/29/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | CE | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -49.5% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 97.9% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -52.0% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 108.3% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 236 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -28.5% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 39.9% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 266 days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -85.0% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 564.9% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 798 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL
In The Past
Celanese's stock fell -49.5% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 1/5/2022. A -49.5% loss requires a 97.9% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
```htmlHere are 1-3 brief analogies for Celanese (CE):
- Like a more focused DuPont for specialty chemicals and engineered materials.
- BASF or Dow Chemical, but with a narrower focus on essential industrial chemicals and high-performance plastics.
- The "Intel Inside" for countless manufactured products, supplying foundational chemicals and advanced plastics.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Acetyl Chain Products: Fundamental chemical intermediates such as acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), which are crucial building blocks for a wide range of industrial applications.
- Acetate Tow: Specialized cellulose acetate fibers predominantly used in the manufacturing of cigarette filters.
- Engineered Materials: High-performance thermoplastic polymers and composites, including polyacetal (POM) and liquid crystal polymer (LCP), designed for demanding applications across various industries like automotive, medical, and electronics.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Celanese (symbol: CE) operates primarily on a Business-to-Business (B2B) model, supplying a wide range of chemical products and specialty materials to other manufacturing companies across various industries. Due to the diversified nature of its business and the complexity of its supply chains, Celanese typically does not disclose specific individual major customers in its public filings unless a single customer represents a significant portion (e.g., 10% or more) of its consolidated revenues, which is rare for a company of its type.
Therefore, while specific major customer names are not publicly detailed by Celanese, based on the industries Celanese serves and the applications of its products, its major customers would generally be manufacturers within the following sectors. Below are examples of public companies in those sectors that would likely be significant purchasers of Celanese's products:
- Tobacco Companies: These companies are major customers for Celanese's Acetate Tow products, which are primarily used in cigarette filters.
- Philip Morris International (symbol: PM)
- Altria Group (symbol: MO)
- British American Tobacco (symbol: BTI)
- Automotive Component Manufacturers: Celanese supplies engineered materials (various polymers) used in the production of automotive parts (e.g., interior components, exterior parts, under-the-hood applications). Celanese typically sells to Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers to automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), rather than directly to the car manufacturers themselves.
- Magna International (symbol: MGA)
- Lear Corporation (symbol: LEA)
- Aptiv (symbol: APTV)
- Electronics and Consumer Goods Manufacturers/Suppliers: These companies utilize Celanese's engineered materials for components in electronic devices, home appliances, and various consumer products.
- Flex (symbol: FLEX)
- Jabil (symbol: JBL)
- Paints, Coatings, Adhesives, and Construction Materials Manufacturers: These industries are significant customers for Celanese's acetyl products, such as acetic acid, vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), and emulsion polymers.
- PPG Industries (symbol: PPG)
- Sherwin-Williams (symbol: SHW)
- H.B. Fuller (symbol: FUL)
- Medical Device and Pharmaceutical Packaging Manufacturers: These companies or their suppliers use Celanese's engineered materials in the production of medical devices, diagnostic equipment, drug delivery systems, and pharmaceutical packaging. While direct major customers are not disclosed, companies like Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) or Medtronic (MDT) are examples of end-users whose supply chains would likely involve Celanese's materials.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
Scott A. Richardson
Chief Executive Officer and President
Scott A. Richardson was appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of Celanese Corporation, effective January 1, 2025. He joined Celanese in 2005 and has held various key leadership positions, including Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 2023 to 2025, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2018 to 2023. His tenure at Celanese also includes serving as Senior Vice President of the Engineered Materials business and Vice President and General Manager of the Acetyl Chain. Before joining Celanese, Mr. Richardson held various finance, operational, and leadership roles at American Airlines. As CEO, he announced Celanese's agreement to divest the Micromax® portfolio of products to Element Solutions Inc.
Chuck B. Kyrish
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Chuck B. Kyrish assumed the role of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Celanese Corporation on November 8, 2023. He has been with Celanese since 2006, where he previously served as Vice President of Corporate Finance, overseeing accounting, treasury, internal audit, and tax functions. His experience at Celanese also includes positions as Chief Financial Officer of the Acetyl Chain, Vice President of Investor Relations, Vice President of M&A and Integration Finance, and Vice President and Treasurer. Prior to his time at Celanese, Mr. Kyrish held various financial, business, and leadership roles at Sabre Corporation and ExxonMobil Corporation.
Todd L. Elliott
Senior Vice President, Engineered Materials
Todd L. Elliott is rejoining Celanese as Senior Vice President to lead the Engineered Materials business, effective February 3, 2025. He previously retired from Celanese in 2020, having served as Senior Vice President and head of the Acetyls business. During his earlier career at Celanese, Mr. Elliott held multiple leadership roles in Business, Sales, and Corporate Development, including overseeing the Acetate Tow business and the company’s European regional center. He was also instrumental in establishing the customer project pipeline model for value creation. For five years prior to his return, he worked as an independent consultant in the chemicals and polymers industry, offering advisory services on mergers and acquisitions, financial and operational analysis, and commercial strategies.
Ashley B. Duffie
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Ashley B. Duffie was appointed Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Celanese Corporation, effective November 8, 2023. She joined Celanese in 2007 and has held several significant roles, including Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer, President and General Counsel APAC Region, Vice President of the Integration Management Office, Chief Compliance Officer, and Associate General Counsel for global litigation and EHS law. Before joining Celanese, Ms. Duffie was an attorney with Haynes and Boone, LLP, where she specialized in environmental law, internal corporate investigations, and litigation.
Mark C. Murray
Senior Vice President, Acetyls
Mark C. Murray was appointed Senior Vice President, Acetyls in February 2023. He originally joined Celanese in 2002 and held senior commercial and business roles within the Acetyl Chain and Engineered Materials businesses during two separate periods: from May 2002 to March 2007 and from November 2009 through June 2019. Mr. Murray rejoined Celanese in June 2022 as Vice President of Business Strategy and Development. Prior to rejoining Celanese, he served as Executive Vice President, Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies at Avantor, a global materials manufacturer and distributor. His international experience includes leading teams from locations in Amsterdam, Frankfurt, and Maastricht.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Celanese Corporation (CE) faces several significant business risks, primarily stemming from challenging market conditions, its financial leverage, and volatility in input costs.
- Weak Demand and Market Challenges: Celanese is significantly exposed to persistent weak demand across key end-markets such as construction, automotive, paints, coatings, and industrial sectors. This challenging environment has led to reduced sales volumes and pricing pressure on the company's products. Additionally, customer inventory destocking has been identified as a recurring issue, negatively impacting recent financial results and contributing to a decline in net sales. Excess industry capacity, particularly in China, further exacerbates pricing and margin pressures for the company.
- High Leverage and Financial Health: The company's financial profile indicates a high level of leverage, with a reported debt-to-equity ratio of 3.34. Celanese faces substantial refinancing risk with approximately $3.5 billion in debt maturities due by 2027, especially if market conditions do not improve. Indicators like a low Piotroski F-Score and an Altman Z-Score of 1.04 place the company in a "distress zone," suggesting a potential risk of bankruptcy within two years. The company also implemented a significant dividend cut (95%) to prioritize debt reduction.
- Volatility in Raw Material Costs and Supply Chain: As a chemical and specialty materials producer, Celanese is highly susceptible to volatility in the price and availability of raw materials and energy sources, including ethylene, methanol, natural gas, and fuel oil. The company faces challenges in its ability to pass these increased raw material and logistics costs on to its customers, which can adversely impact its margins and overall profitability.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- The accelerating global shift towards a circular economy and sustainable materials, particularly within the plastics industry. This includes increasing regulatory pressure for recycled content, bans on single-use plastics, and growing consumer and corporate demand for bio-based, recycled, and biodegradable polymers. Celanese, as a major producer of engineered materials, faces the challenge of rapidly adapting its product portfolio, R&D, and production processes to meet these evolving requirements, which could disrupt demand for its traditional virgin plastic materials.
- The rapid global adoption and increasing market share of alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS), such as e-cigarettes (vaping), heated tobacco products, and oral nicotine pouches. This trend directly threatens the demand for traditional cigarette filters, which are a primary application for Celanese's acetate tow segment, as ANDS either do not utilize filters or use different filtration components.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Celanese Corporation (symbol: CE) operates in several key markets with varying addressable market sizes globally.
For its main products and services, the addressable markets are as follows:
- Acetyls: The global acetyls market was valued between approximately USD 28.2 billion and USD 30.2 billion in 2023-2025. This market is projected to grow to a range of approximately USD 41.4 billion to USD 49.32 billion by 2032-2035, exhibiting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.3% to 5.6% during these periods. Celanese is a leading global producer of acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), which are key components of the acetyls market. The Asia Pacific region held the largest market share in 2022, and North America also represents a significant portion of this market.
- Acetate Tow: The global acetate tow (cellulose acetate tow) market demonstrates conflicting projections across different sources. Some reports indicate the market was valued at approximately USD 5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 7.2 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 4.2%. Other analyses suggest a decline, with the market valued at USD 3.72 billion in 2024 and projected to decrease to USD 2.089 billion by 2031, with a negative CAGR of -8.0%. Another source states a 2024 market size of USD 2.65 billion, growing to USD 3.8 billion by 2032, and a projection of USD 4.66 billion by 2035, with a CAGR of 5.27% from 2025 to 2035. The decline is attributed to shifting consumer preferences and increasing regulations on tobacco products, which is the primary end-use industry. North America is identified as the world's largest market, accounting for nearly 43% of the share, while Asia Pacific is expected to be a major growth driver.
- Medical Engineered Materials (part of Engineered Materials segment): The global market for medical engineered materials, a component of Celanese's Engineered Materials segment, was valued between approximately USD 19.41 billion and USD 23.9 billion in 2024. This market is projected for significant growth, with estimates ranging from USD 67.32 billion by 2034 to USD 82.9 billion by 2033, at a high CAGR of 13.24% to 14.8%. Asia Pacific held the largest market size in 2024, and North America is expected to experience the fastest growth.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Celanese Corporation (CE) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several strategic initiatives focused on its core businesses, operational efficiency, and portfolio optimization.
- Growth in Engineered Materials (EM) Driven by High-Impact Programs and Product Innovation: Celanese anticipates revenue growth from its Engineered Materials segment by focusing on high-impact programs targeting attractive applications such as electric vehicles, medical and pharma, 5G technology, and sustainability solutions. This strategy involves continuous product innovation, creating new materials and technologies, and expanding capacity in key regions like Asia to meet evolving customer needs and enhance its competitive edge.
- Expansion and Optimization of the Acetyl Chain, particularly in Downstream Applications: The company plans to leverage the operational flexibility of its Acetyl Chain through debottlenecking projects and capacity additions, including the acetic acid expansion at Clear Lake. This will enable Celanese to maximize sales opportunities in differentiated downstream products like adhesives, coatings, and food packaging, thereby driving earnings growth as demand improves.
- Strategic Cost Reduction and Operational Efficiency Initiatives: Celanese is committed to strengthening its earnings and cash generation through significant cost reductions and operational improvements. This includes initiatives such as reducing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, realizing productivity savings from footprint optimization (e.g., the closure of the Lanaken acetate tow facility), and implementing additional cost levers. These efforts aim to enhance competitiveness and free up capital for reinvestment.
- Portfolio Optimization through Strategic Divestitures: The company is actively pursuing opportunistic divestitures of non-core assets, such as the Micromax portfolio, to reduce debt and focus resources on its more strategic and higher-growth businesses. This disciplined approach to portfolio management is expected to improve the overall quality and growth potential of Celanese's revenue streams.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- In July 2021, Celanese's Board of Directors approved a new $1.0 billion share repurchase authorization.
- In the first half of 2021, the company deployed $500 million to repurchase shares under a previous authorization.
- As of June 30, 2021, approximately $560 million remained under the existing share repurchase authorization, which, combined with the new $1.0 billion authorization, was available for future share repurchases.
Share Issuance
- Celanese's 3-Year Share Buyback Ratio was -0.40% as of June 2025, suggesting a slight net issuance of shares or minimal repurchases over the past three years.
- In Q1 2025, the company's CFO indicated that equity issuance was not considered a necessary step due to its dilutive nature and the strength of the debt market.
Outbound Investments
- Celanese completed the acquisition of the majority of DuPont's Mobility & Materials (M&M) business for $11 billion in cash in November 2022, significantly expanding its Engineered Materials segment.
- In December 2021, Celanese completed the acquisition of the Santoprene® TPV elastomers business from ExxonMobil.
- In September 2023, Celanese formed Nutrinova, a Food Ingredients joint venture with Mitsui & Co., Ltd., contributing its Food Ingredients business assets and retaining a 30% stake, while Mitsui acquired 70% for $472.5 million.
Capital Expenditures
- Cash capital expenditures were $543 million in 2022 and $435 million in 2024.
- The capital plan for 2025 has been reduced to $300 million-$350 million, representing a $100 million decrease compared to 2024.
- The primary focus of capital expenditures in 2025 is on cash generation, margin expansion, deleveraging the balance sheet, optimizing the manufacturing footprint, and reducing complexity, particularly within the Engineered Materials business.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to CE. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11212025 | DD | DuPont de Nemours | Dip Buy | DB | FCF Yield | Low D/EDip Buy with High Free Cash Flow YieldBuying dips for companies with significant free cash flow yield (FCF / Market Cap) and reasonable debt / market cap | 7.6% | 7.6% | -0.2% |
| 11212025 | CF | CF Industries | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | -1.4% | -1.4% | -3.1% |
| 11212025 | HL | Hecla Mining | Quality | Q | Momentum | UpsideQuality Stocks with Momentum and UpsideBuying quality stocks with strong momentum but still having room to run | 51.0% | 51.0% | 0.0% |
| 11072025 | CDE | Coeur Mining | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 30.6% | 30.6% | -5.7% |
| 10312025 | ATR | AptarGroup | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 6.2% | 6.2% | -2.5% |
| 08312022 | CE | Celanese | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | 9.4% | 16.9% | -20.8% |
| 02282022 | CE | Celanese | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | -16.5% | -14.5% | -36.2% |
| 06302020 | CE | Celanese | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 49.4% | 79.4% | -2.6% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Celanese
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 60.34 |
| Mkt Cap | 159.0 |
| Rev LTM | 56,496 |
| Op Inc LTM | 7,584 |
| FCF LTM | 7,327 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 7,366 |
| CFO LTM | 8,590 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 8,697 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 5.2% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 2.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 8.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 2.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 13.2% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 12.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 17.5% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 17.7% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 14.3% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 14.0% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 159.0 |
| P/S | 2.7 |
| P/EBIT | 21.1 |
| P/E | 33.0 |
| P/CFO | 16.1 |
| Total Yield | 3.9% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | 6.2% |
| D/E | 0.4 |
| Net D/E | 0.3 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | 0.1% |
| 3M Rtn | 6.4% |
| 6M Rtn | 9.2% |
| 12M Rtn | 11.5% |
| 3Y Rtn | 72.0% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | 0.2% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | 2.7% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | -2.1% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | -4.0% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -5.1% |
Comparison Analyses
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $42.89 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 4.7 | |
| First Trading Date | 01/21/2005 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -42.0% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $40.41 | $47.43 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | 6.1% | -9.6% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 55.6% | 64.1% |
| Downside Capture | 179.75 | 168.38 |
| Upside Capture | 173.36 | 96.72 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 38.5% | 53.4% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.79 | 1.89 | 1.83 | 1.70 | 1.46 |
| Up Beta | 0.83 | 1.55 | 2.64 | 1.83 | 1.78 | 1.55 |
| Down Beta | -2.29 | 1.45 | 1.59 | 2.30 | 2.14 | 1.80 |
| Up Capture | 245% | 173% | 105% | 88% | 82% | 75% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 12 | 25 | 38 | 73 | 141 | 426 |
| Stock +ve Days | 9 | 19 | 27 | 58 | 118 | 373 |
| Down Capture | 143% | 203% | 218% | 203% | 132% | 108% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 10 | 22 | 35 | 67 | 130 | 375 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of CE With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -37.9% | 9.1% | 16.7% | 65.4% | 7.5% | 4.2% | -7.3% |
| Annualized Volatility | 63.6% | 20.0% | 19.4% | 19.8% | 15.3% | 17.0% | 34.9% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.49 | 0.32 | 0.67 | 2.43 | 0.27 | 0.08 | -0.06 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 68.4% | 53.3% | -1.3% | 24.4% | 50.9% | 29.9% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLB, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of CE With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -18.7% | 6.9% | 14.8% | 17.7% | 11.2% | 5.1% | 30.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 42.3% | 18.9% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.6% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.35 | 0.27 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.57 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 69.2% | 52.5% | 6.7% | 22.1% | 46.6% | 20.8% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLB, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of CE With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -2.2% | 10.2% | 15.0% | 14.6% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 69.0% |
| Annualized Volatility | 37.6% | 20.7% | 18.0% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.06 | 0.44 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.89 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 72.9% | 60.8% | 0.3% | 30.1% | 51.9% | 15.5% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLB, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 11/6/2025 | 14.4% | 10.7% | 11.3% |
| 8/11/2025 | -13.1% | -9.1% | -6.7% |
| 5/5/2025 | 9.6% | 21.8% | 22.1% |
| 2/18/2025 | -21.5% | -22.1% | -18.1% |
| 11/4/2024 | -26.3% | -36.3% | -42.6% |
| 8/1/2024 | -4.4% | -8.1% | -5.1% |
| 5/8/2024 | -1.1% | -2.9% | -10.3% |
| 2/20/2024 | 0.7% | 0.1% | 10.8% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 11 | 10 | 15 |
| # Negative | 13 | 14 | 9 |
| Median Positive | 2.6% | 5.5% | 11.3% |
| Median Negative | -3.4% | -4.0% | -11.5% |
| Max Positive | 14.4% | 21.8% | 22.1% |
| Max Negative | -26.3% | -36.3% | -42.6% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2025 | 11/07/2025 | 10-Q (09/30/2025) |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/11/2025 | 10-Q (06/30/2025) |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/06/2025 | 10-Q (03/31/2025) |
| 12/31/2024 | 02/21/2025 | 10-K (12/31/2024) |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/12/2024 | 10-Q (09/30/2024) |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/02/2024 | 10-Q (06/30/2024) |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/10/2024 | 10-Q (03/31/2024) |
| 12/31/2023 | 02/23/2024 | 10-K (12/31/2023) |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/08/2023 | 10-Q (09/30/2023) |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/08/2023 | 10-Q (06/30/2023) |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/10/2023 | 10-Q (03/31/2023) |
| 12/31/2022 | 02/24/2023 | 10-K (12/31/2022) |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/04/2022 | 10-Q (09/30/2022) |
| 06/30/2022 | 07/29/2022 | 10-Q (06/30/2022) |
| 03/31/2022 | 04/29/2022 | 10-Q (03/31/2022) |
| 12/31/2021 | 02/10/2022 | 10-K (12/31/2021) |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.