Stocks Trading At 52-Week Low
As of Thursday, May 21, 15 stocks from the Russell 3000 are trading at their 52-week lows. Among these stocks, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) has corrected the most in the last one month, falling by 41% over this period.
Stocks At 52W Lows
Below is the complete list of these stocks, sorted by market capitalization – highlighting some of the headwinds for these stocks across industries ranging from Packaged Foods & Meats and Integrated Telecommunication Services to Diversified Capital Markets and Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components:
| Tickers | Market Cap |
1D % Chg |
1W % Chg |
1M % Chg |
1Y % Chg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPLA | $22.7 Bil | -1.2% | -5.8% | -12.9% | -26.1% |
| GGG | $12.5 Bil | -0.0% | -1.7% | -13.7% | -12.3% |
| CPB | $6.0 Bil | -1.0% | -1.7% | -4.4% | -40.3% |
| MZTI | $3.1 Bil | -1.7% | -2.0% | -11.9% | -31.5% |
| ELF | $3.0 Bil | -4.3% | -5.6% | -24.3% | -36.3% |
| CALX | $2.5 Bil | -3.7% | -5.0% | -22.6% | -16.9% |
| GT | $1.6 Bil | -0.4% | -4.0% | -22.0% | -47.6% |
| EYE | $1.3 Bil | -0.5% | -0.5% | -33.0% | -12.4% |
| XZO | $1.2 Bil | -6.2% | -4.0% | -22.6% | |
| GTM | $1.1 Bil | -3.7% | -7.3% | -40.9% | -62.9% |
| ABR | $1.1 Bil | -0.5% | -1.7% | -29.2% | -37.5% |
| TRUP | $0.9 Bil | -0.9% | -3.1% | -21.6% | -52.6% |
| GLIBK | $0.9 Bil | -1.7% | -8.7% | -31.3% | |
| GLIBA | $0.9 Bil | -2.2% | -9.4% | -32.3% | |
| GYRE | $0.6 Bil | -3.5% | -17.0% | -23.3% | -45.6% |
What is the point? A 52-week low often reflects deep pessimism but also potential opportunity. This price point can signal capitulation, setting the stage for mean reversion or contrarian entry. It is where risk and reward start to skew interestingly. But of course, a trade at this level requires deep conviction.
Worried that these stocks could fall much more? You could take a look at the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which has a collection of 30 stocks and a track record of comfortably outperforming its benchmark that includes all 3 — the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 indices. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index, less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.