Marcus (MCS)
Market Price (12/30/2025): $15.62 | Market Cap: $485.1 MilSector: Communication Services | Industry: Movies & Entertainment
Marcus (MCS)
Market Price (12/30/2025): $15.62Market Cap: $485.1 MilSector: Communication ServicesIndustry: Movies & Entertainment
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 12% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -35%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -61% | Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 69% |
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 37% | Expensive valuation multiplesP/EPrice/Earnings or Price/(Net Income) is 63x | |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Experience Economy & Premiumization. Themes include Out-of-Home Entertainment, and Premium Hospitality. | Weak revenue growthRev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -9.7% | |
| Key risksMCS key risks include [1] profitability challenges and financial instability, Show more. |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 12% |
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 37% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Experience Economy & Premiumization. Themes include Out-of-Home Entertainment, and Premium Hospitality. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -35%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -61% |
| Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 69% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/EPrice/Earnings or Price/(Net Income) is 63x |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -9.7% |
| Key risksMCS key risks include [1] profitability challenges and financial instability, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Marcus Corporation reported its third-quarter fiscal 2025 results on October 31, 2025, with earnings per share (EPS) of $0.42, which missed the consensus estimate of $0.43. Additionally, quarterly revenue came in at $210.15 million, falling short of analyst estimates of $214.14 million.
2. Stock Repurchase Program
On October 31, 2025, Marcus announced the initiation of a stock buyback program, authorizing the repurchase of 4,000,000 outstanding shares. The company had already repurchased nearly $10 million in shares during the third quarter of fiscal 2025, signaling management's confidence in the company's valuation.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 1.7% change in MCS stock from 9/29/2025 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a 93.5% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| 9292025 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 15.34 | 15.60 | 1.71% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 775.79 | 753.27 | -2.90% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 1.91% | 1.02% | -46.29% |
| P/E Multiple | 32.43 | 62.75 | 93.48% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 31.30 | 31.06 | 0.79% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 1.70% |
Market Drivers
9/29/2025 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MCS | 1.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.6% | 13.5% |
| Sector (XLC) | -0.6% | 30.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -6.5% change in MCS stock from 6/30/2025 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -9.0% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6302025 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 16.69 | 15.60 | -6.51% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 745.78 | 753.27 | 1.00% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.71 | 0.64 | -9.02% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 31.60 | 31.06 | 1.71% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -6.53% |
Market Drivers
6/30/2025 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MCS | -6.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 11.6% | 24.2% |
| Sector (XLC) | 9.0% | 32.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -25.8% change in MCS stock from 12/29/2024 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a -32.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12292024 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 21.03 | 15.60 | -25.82% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 708.77 | 753.27 | 6.28% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.95 | 0.64 | -32.17% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 31.95 | 31.06 | 2.81% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -25.88% |
Market Drivers
12/29/2024 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MCS | -25.8% | |
| Market (SPY) | 16.6% | 46.3% |
| Sector (XLC) | 21.2% | 45.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 14.3% change in MCS stock from 12/30/2022 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a 84.8% change in the company's Net Income Margin (%).| 12302022 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 13.64 | 15.60 | 14.34% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 683.50 | 753.27 | 10.21% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 0.55% | 1.02% | 84.80% |
| P/E Multiple | 113.39 | 62.75 | -44.66% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 31.51 | 31.06 | 1.43% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 14.32% |
Market Drivers
12/30/2023 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MCS | 11.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 47.9% | 33.2% |
| Sector (XLC) | 65.5% | 31.0% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| MCS Return | -57% | 32% | -19% | 3% | 50% | -27% | -48% |
| Peers Return | 16% | 38% | -12% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 151% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 17% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| MCS Win Rate | 42% | 67% | 33% | 58% | 58% | 25% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 65% | 42% | 68% | 57% | 52% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| MCS Max Drawdown | -78% | -5% | -24% | -2% | -31% | -38% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -5% | -26% | -7% | -9% | -23% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/29/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | MCS | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -42.9% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 75.3% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -79.0% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 375.4% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -30.3% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 43.6% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 168 days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -74.1% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 285.5% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2,793 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL
In The Past
Marcus's stock fell -42.9% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 3/15/2021. A -42.9% loss requires a 75.3% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Imagine a company that's a blend of AMC Theatres (for movies) and a luxury hotel operator like Hyatt Hotels.
- Essentially, it's a company that runs both movie theaters (similar to Cinemark) and upscale hotels (like Marriott), but on a smaller, regional scale.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Movie Theatres: Operates and manages a chain of movie theatres primarily under the Marcus Theatres brand, offering film exhibition, food, and beverage services.
- Hotels & Resorts: Owns and manages a portfolio of hotels and resorts, providing lodging, dining, meeting, and event services to business and leisure travelers.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (symbol: MCS) is a commercial real estate brokerage firm. Its core business involves facilitating the purchase, sale, and financing of commercial properties. Due to the transactional nature of its business, it does not typically have "major customers" in the sense of a few large, recurring corporate clients who consistently account for a significant portion of its revenue. Instead, its revenue is derived from commissions generated across a broad base of diverse clients involved in numerous individual transactions.
Marcus & Millichap primarily serves clients within the commercial real estate investment market, which can be categorized as follows:
- Private Investors: This category encompasses high-net-worth individuals, family offices, and smaller private partnerships that are actively engaged in buying, selling, or exchanging various types of commercial real estate assets (e.g., multifamily properties, retail centers, office buildings, industrial facilities, self-storage, hospitality).
- Institutional Investors & Funds: This segment includes larger, sophisticated investment entities such as Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), pension funds, private equity firms, and other institutional capital sources. These clients typically engage in larger-scale and often more complex commercial property transactions.
- Developers & Corporate Users: This category comprises companies involved in the development of new commercial properties, as well as businesses and corporations that are acquiring, disposing of, or leasing real estate for their operational needs rather than purely for investment purposes.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Gregory S. Marcus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Gregory S. Marcus joined The Marcus Corporation in 1992, was elected president in January 2008, and became chief executive officer in January 2009. He is the third generation of the Marcus family to lead the company, which was founded by his grandfather, Ben Marcus, in 1935. Throughout his career at The Marcus Corporation, he has been involved in nearly all facets of the company. He previously served as Senior Vice President of Operations & Development at Woodfield Suites and Interim Chief Operating Officer at Baymont Inns & Suites. Additionally, he is a Principal at Marcus Investments LLC, a private equity firm established in 1999 that operates as a subsidiary of The Marcus Corporation.
Chad M. Paris, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Chad M. Paris was promoted to Chief Financial Officer upon Douglas A. Neis's retirement in May 2022, having joined The Marcus Corporation in October 2021 as corporate controller and treasurer. Before his tenure at Marcus Corporation, Paris was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Jason Group, Inc. (formerly Jason Industries, Inc.), a global manufacturing company, where he oversaw accounting, financial planning, tax, treasury, investor relations, and information technology. He also held various leadership roles in corporate and business unit finance at Jason prior to becoming CFO in 2017, and earlier in his career, he worked as an audit senior manager for Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Michael R. Evans, President, Marcus Hotels & Resorts
Michael R. Evans became the President of Marcus Hotels & Resorts in January 2020.
Mark A. Gramz, President, Marcus Theatres Corporation
Mark A. Gramz was promoted to President of Marcus Theatres on October 1, 2022. He began his career with the company in 1971 as a part-time associate and has since held various positions, including general manager, district manager, vice president of operations for southern Wisconsin, and executive vice president of Marcus Theatres.
Kim M. Lueck, Chief Information Officer, The Marcus Corporation
Kim M. Lueck joined The Marcus Corporation's corporate IT team in 2000 and rejoined Marcus Theatres in 2006. She was promoted to chief information technology officer for Marcus Theatres in 2008 and continues to serve in that role, in addition to her position as Chief Information Officer for the Marcus Corporation.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The Marcus Corporation (MCS) faces several significant risks to its business, primarily stemming from the cyclical nature of its core industries and ongoing profitability challenges.The most significant risk to Marcus Corporation is the **cyclical nature of the entertainment and hospitality industries and the inherent dependence on film slate for its theatre division**. Both the theatre and hotel segments are highly susceptible to economic downturns, which can lead to reduced consumer spending on leisure activities and impact revenues. More specifically, the performance of the theatre division, which is a primary revenue driver, is heavily reliant on the quality and quantity of film releases. A less favorable film lineup, such as that experienced in Q3 2025, can lead to substantial decreases in attendance and revenue for the theatre segment, highlighting this as a "structural risk for any theatre operator".
Secondly, Marcus Corporation faces **profitability and financial stability concerns**. Despite demonstrating robust revenue growth, the company has reported challenges in profitability, including a negative net margin in the past. The Altman Z-Score, a measure of financial health, has placed the company in the distress zone, indicating potential financial vulnerability. Analysts also forecast slower revenue growth for Marcus compared to its industry peers, which contributes to a lower price-to-sales ratio and suggests investor skepticism regarding future earnings growth and profit margins. Rising interest rates could also exacerbate these concerns by increasing financing costs.
Finally, the **capital-intensive nature of renovations and property upgrades** presents an ongoing operational risk. While strategic investments in hotel and theatre renovations are intended to enhance customer experience and drive long-term value, they can lead to short-term disruptions and increased expenses. For example, the renovation of the Hilton Milwaukee negatively impacted revenue per available room (RevPAR) due to reduced capacity during seasonally high-demand periods. These significant capital expenditures can also affect profitability in the short term, as seen with increased depreciation expenses following renovations.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The ongoing strategic shift by major film studios to prioritize their direct-to-consumer streaming platforms and to continuously re-evaluate and shorten the exclusive theatrical release windows. This erosion of exclusivity diminishes the unique value proposition of the moviegoing experience and allows audiences quicker access to new content at home, directly impacting attendance and revenue for exhibitors like Marcus Theatres. This is an emerging threat because the exact long-term balance between theatrical and streaming distribution is still being negotiated and defined, with studios consistently testing and adjusting their release strategies.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The Marcus Corporation (MCS) primarily operates in two business segments: movie theaters and hotels & resorts. The addressable markets for their main products and services in the U.S. are as follows:Movie Theaters: The U.S. movie theater market size is estimated to be approximately $16.0 billion in 2025.
Hotels & Resorts: The U.S. hotels market size is projected to reach approximately $280.63 billion to $286.5 billion in 2025.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Marcus Corporation (MCS) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several key initiatives across its theatre and hospitality segments:
- Strong Film Slate for Marcus Theatres: The company anticipates a robust lineup of films, particularly for 2026, which is projected to be rich in franchises and family-oriented movies. This expected strong content is likely to boost attendance and, consequently, admission revenue.
- Premium Cinema Upgrades and Enhanced Food & Beverage Offerings: Marcus has been investing in upgrading its cinema experiences, including premium offerings and expanded food and beverage options. These enhancements are expected to increase per-patron spending and generate higher ancillary income. Strategies such as targeted surcharges for blockbuster showings and optimized matinee pricing are also designed to create incremental revenue streams.
- Growth in Group Bookings for Marcus Hotels & Resorts: Forward-looking statements indicate significant momentum in group hotel room bookings. Group room pace for 2026 is reportedly running approximately 14% to 20% ahead of the previous year's levels, with banquet and catering revenues showing similar positive trends. This increase in group business is expected to contribute to higher, more predictable, and higher-margin revenues for the hospitality division.
- Benefits from Hotel Renovations: The completion of major hotel renovation projects is anticipated to lead to increased occupancy and higher Revenue Per Available Room (RevPAR). These investments are designed to unlock previously constrained revenue and allow the properties to generate better returns.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- On October 31, 2025, the Board of Directors approved an increase of 4,000,000 shares to its existing share repurchase authorization, bringing the total current authorization to 4.7 million shares.
- During the first quarter of fiscal 2025, the company repurchased approximately 424,000 shares of common stock for $7.1 million in cash.
- Over the last four fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2025, Marcus repurchased 1.1 million shares for $16.7 million.
Outbound Investments
- Marcus reported long-term investments of $5 million in 2024, $2 million in 2023, $2 million in 2022, $2 million in 2021, and $2 million in 2020.
Capital Expenditures
- Expected capital expenditures for fiscal 2025 are projected to be between $70 million and $85 million.
- Preliminary expectations for fiscal 2026 indicate a step down in capital expenditures to approximately $50 million to $55 million, following a period of heavy reinvestment in hotel assets.
- Recent capital expenditures have focused on upgrading theaters with amenities like DreamLounger seating, SCREENX auditoriums, and enhanced food and beverage offerings, as well as significant renovations at hotel properties such as the Hilton Milwaukee.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to MCS. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11302025 | PINS | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | 0.1% | 0.1% | -1.4% | |
| 11212025 | TMUS | T-Mobile US | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | -3.6% | -3.6% | -6.4% |
| 11212025 | Z | Zillow | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | -1.9% | -1.9% | -5.1% |
| 11072025 | IRDM | Iridium Communications | Dip Buy | DB | CFO/Rev | Low D/EDip Buy with High Cash Flow MarginsBuying dips for companies with significant cash flows from operations and reasonable debt / market cap | 3.4% | 3.4% | -5.6% |
| 10032025 | TTD | Trade Desk | Dip Buy | DB | CFO/Rev | Low D/EDip Buy with High Cash Flow MarginsBuying dips for companies with significant cash flows from operations and reasonable debt / market cap | -25.7% | -25.7% | -29.8% |
| 10312018 | MCS | Marcus | Quality | Q | Momentum | UpsideQuality Stocks with Momentum and UpsideBuying quality stocks with strong momentum but still having room to run | -3.5% | -5.9% | -16.9% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Marcus
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 51.06 |
| Mkt Cap | 159.0 |
| Rev LTM | 56,496 |
| Op Inc LTM | 7,584 |
| FCF LTM | 7,327 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 7,366 |
| CFO LTM | 8,590 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 8,697 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 6.1% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 3.0% |
| Rev Chg Q | 8.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 2.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 12.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 11.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 16.1% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 17.1% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 11.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 12.1% |
Segment Financials
Revenue by Segment| $ Mil | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theatres | 458 | 408 | 271 | 133 | 557 |
| Hotels/Resorts | 271 | 269 | 187 | 105 | 263 |
| Corporate Items | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 730 | 677 | 458 | 238 | 821 |
| $ Mil | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theatres | 36 | 8 | -28 | -121 | 77 |
| Hotels/Resorts | 18 | 19 | 6 | -44 | 10 |
| Corporate Items | -20 | -19 | -20 | -13 | -19 |
| Total | 34 | 8 | -41 | -178 | 68 |
| $ Mil | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theatres | 696 | 751 | 821 | 872 | 953 |
| Hotels/Resorts | 281 | 278 | 306 | 309 | 337 |
| Corporate Items | 88 | 36 | 62 | 73 | 69 |
| Total | 1,065 | 1,065 | 1,188 | 1,254 | 1,359 |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $15.60 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.5 | |
| First Trading Date | 03/29/1990 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -28.6% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $14.98 | $15.85 |
| DMA Trend | down | up |
| Distance from DMA | 4.1% | -1.6% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 37.6% | 37.0% |
| Downside Capture | 8.24 | 88.27 |
| Upside Capture | 14.99 | 45.18 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 13.7% | 46.5% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.23 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.66 |
| Up Beta | 0.23 | -0.11 | 0.40 | 1.31 | 0.86 | 0.74 |
| Down Beta | -0.84 | 1.21 | 1.05 | 1.60 | 1.13 | 0.79 |
| Up Capture | 341% | 51% | 44% | 18% | 36% | 19% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 13 | 26 | 39 | 74 | 142 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 11 | 18 | 29 | 59 | 119 | 359 |
| Down Capture | 93% | 51% | 52% | 93% | 97% | 82% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 24 | 34 | 65 | 127 | 380 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of MCS With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCS | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -25.4% | 21.1% | 16.7% | 65.4% | 7.5% | 4.2% | -7.3% |
| Annualized Volatility | 36.8% | 18.5% | 19.4% | 19.8% | 15.3% | 17.0% | 34.9% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.73 | 0.89 | 0.67 | 2.43 | 0.27 | 0.08 | -0.06 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 45.9% | 46.4% | -9.6% | 13.5% | 41.7% | 21.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLC, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of MCS With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCS | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 5.3% | 13.0% | 14.8% | 17.7% | 11.2% | 5.1% | 30.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 33.2% | 20.9% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.6% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.22 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.57 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 34.0% | 37.1% | 1.8% | 14.1% | 33.5% | 17.8% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLC, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of MCS With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCS | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -0.6% | 13.2% | 15.0% | 14.6% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 69.0% |
| Annualized Volatility | 44.4% | 22.6% | 18.0% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.15 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.89 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 35.4% | 40.7% | -4.1% | 18.3% | 42.0% | 13.7% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLC, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 10/31/2025 | 8.8% | 14.1% | 17.5% |
| 8/1/2025 | -9.2% | -7.8% | -5.2% |
| 2/27/2025 | -11.2% | -18.8% | -17.8% |
| 10/31/2024 | 9.9% | 30.4% | 32.3% |
| 8/1/2024 | 0.4% | -0.1% | 12.6% |
| 2/29/2024 | -0.8% | -3.0% | -3.1% |
| 11/1/2023 | -1.5% | -1.7% | -10.1% |
| 8/2/2023 | 2.1% | 4.6% | -0.9% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 10 | 9 | 7 |
| # Negative | 9 | 10 | 12 |
| Median Positive | 3.0% | 8.3% | 17.5% |
| Median Negative | -3.0% | -2.5% | -3.4% |
| Max Positive | 9.9% | 40.7% | 71.0% |
| Max Negative | -11.2% | -18.8% | -65.2% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2025 | 10/31/2025 | 10-Q (09/30/2025) |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/01/2025 | 10-Q (06/30/2025) |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/07/2025 | 10-Q (03/31/2025) |
| 12/31/2024 | 02/28/2025 | 10-K (12/31/2024) |
| 09/30/2024 | 10/31/2024 | 10-Q (09/30/2024) |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/01/2024 | 10-Q (06/30/2024) |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/02/2024 | 10-Q (03/31/2024) |
| 12/31/2023 | 03/01/2024 | 10-K (12/31/2023) |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/02/2023 | 10-Q (09/30/2023) |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/03/2023 | 10-Q (06/30/2023) |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/04/2023 | 10-Q (03/31/2023) |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/02/2023 | 10-K (12/31/2022) |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/03/2022 | 10-Q (09/30/2022) |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/05/2022 | 10-Q (06/30/2022) |
| 03/31/2022 | 05/06/2022 | 10-Q (03/31/2022) |
| 12/31/2021 | 03/03/2022 | 10-K (12/31/2021) |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.