PagerDuty (PD)
Market Price (1/13/2026): $12.5 | Market Cap: $1.2 BilSector: Information Technology | Industry: Application Software
PagerDuty (PD)
Market Price (1/13/2026): $12.5Market Cap: $1.2 BilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: Application Software
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 14%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 9.5%, FCF Yield is 9.6% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -93%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -132% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -10 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -2.1% |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -12% | Expensive valuation multiplesP/EBITPrice/EBIT or Price/(Operating Income) ratio is 105x | |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 25%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 22% | Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 21% | |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -26% | Key risksPD key risks include [1] intense competition from larger, Show more. | |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, and Automation & Robotics. Themes include Software as a Service (SaaS), Show more. |
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 14%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 9.5%, FCF Yield is 9.6% |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -12% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 25%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 22% |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -26% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, and Automation & Robotics. Themes include Software as a Service (SaaS), Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -93%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -132% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -10 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -2.1% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/EBITPrice/EBIT or Price/(Operating Income) ratio is 105x |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 21% |
| Key risksPD key risks include [1] intense competition from larger, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Lowered Full-Year Guidance and Customer Budget Caution: PagerDuty revised its full fiscal year guidance downwards on November 25, 2025, explaining that customer budget caution and seat-based reductions led to a larger-than-forecast contraction in dollar value. This news resulted in a significant stock drop of approximately 23.3% on November 26, 2025.
2. Disappointing Q3 Fiscal 2026 Revenue Performance: While the company's Q3 fiscal 2026 earnings per share (EPS) exceeded expectations, PagerDuty's reported revenue of $124.5 million slightly missed the estimated $125.4 million, contributing to investor concerns.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -23.7% change in PD stock from 10/31/2025 to 1/12/2026 was primarily driven by a -24.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 10312025 | 1122026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 16.06 | 12.26 | -23.66% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 483.61 | 489.21 | 1.16% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.08 | 2.33 | -24.34% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 92.60 | 92.84 | -0.25% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -23.66% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 1/12/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PD | -23.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 1.9% | 5.8% |
| Sector (XLK) | -2.4% | 5.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -23.9% change in PD stock from 7/31/2025 to 1/12/2026 was primarily driven by a -24.8% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 7312025 | 1122026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 16.12 | 12.26 | -23.95% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 476.13 | 489.21 | 2.75% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.09 | 2.33 | -24.79% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 91.37 | 92.84 | -1.60% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -23.96% |
Market Drivers
7/31/2025 to 1/12/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PD | -23.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 10.3% | 20.9% |
| Sector (XLK) | 11.9% | 15.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -33.8% change in PD stock from 1/31/2025 to 1/12/2026 was primarily driven by a -37.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 1312025 | 1122026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 18.52 | 12.26 | -33.80% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 457.17 | 489.21 | 7.01% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.70 | 2.33 | -37.19% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 91.44 | 92.84 | -1.53% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -33.82% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2025 to 1/12/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PD | -33.8% | |
| Market (SPY) | 16.5% | 50.6% |
| Sector (XLK) | 27.8% | 47.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -58.8% change in PD stock from 1/31/2023 to 1/12/2026 was primarily driven by a -69.5% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 1312023 | 1122026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 29.79 | 12.26 | -58.85% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 348.34 | 489.21 | 40.44% |
| P/S Multiple | 7.64 | 2.33 | -69.53% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 89.28 | 92.84 | -3.98% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -58.91% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2023 to 1/12/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PD | -58.8% | |
| Market (SPY) | 77.4% | 47.9% |
| Sector (XLK) | 120.3% | 44.0% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| PD Return | -17% | -24% | -13% | -21% | -28% | -6% | -70% |
| Peers Return | 37% | -50% | 63% | 12% | -24% | -7% | -11% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 2% | 85% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| PD Win Rate | 42% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 57% | 28% | 60% | 53% | 35% | 0% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 100% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| PD Max Drawdown | -26% | -44% | -26% | -25% | -36% | -8% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -19% | -58% | -15% | -25% | -34% | -7% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | 0% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: NOW, TEAM, DDOG, DT, GTLB. See PD Returns vs. Peers.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 1/12/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | PD | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -65.4% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 189.0% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -49.3% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 97.2% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 60 days | 148 days |
Compare to NOW, TEAM, DDOG, DT, GTLB
In The Past
PagerDuty's stock fell -65.4% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 2/12/2021. A -65.4% loss requires a 189.0% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-2 brief analogies for PagerDuty:- ADT for your company's digital infrastructure. (Monitors for critical issues and alerts the right people immediately.)
- Ring for your company's servers and applications. (Provides immediate, actionable alerts to on-call teams when something goes wrong in your digital environment.)
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Incident Management: A SaaS platform that centralizes the detection, diagnosis, and resolution of critical IT incidents, enabling rapid response and service restoration.
- On-Call Management: A service that enables teams to create flexible on-call schedules, automate alerting, and escalate critical issues to the right personnel to ensure 24/7 coverage.
- Event Intelligence: A service leveraging machine learning to filter operational noise, correlate related events, and provide actionable insights, reducing alert fatigue and accelerating incident identification.
- Automation: A service offering automated response playbooks and workflows to proactively address recurring problems, accelerate incident resolution, and improve operational efficiency.
AI Analysis | Feedback
PagerDuty (PD) primarily sells its incident management and digital operations platform to other companies (B2B). It serves a broad range of industries, including technology, financial services, retail, media, and healthcare, helping organizations manage and resolve critical incidents quickly and efficiently.
While PagerDuty typically serves thousands of customers, and no single customer generally accounts for a substantial portion of its revenue, the company frequently highlights various prominent organizations that utilize its platform. Here are some examples of its well-known public company customers:
- Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZM)
- Shopify Inc. (NYSE: SHOP)
- T-Mobile US, Inc. ( (NASDAQ: TMUS)
- Datadog, Inc. (NASDAQ: DDOG)
- Okta, Inc. (NASDAQ: OKTA)
These companies represent the diverse enterprise customer base that relies on PagerDuty for maintaining uptime and operational health.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Amazon Web Services (parent: Amazon.com, Inc. - AMZN)
- Twilio Inc. - TWLO
AI Analysis | Feedback
Jennifer Tejada, Chief Executive Officer & Chairperson
Jennifer Tejada has served as CEO of PagerDuty since 2016 and is also the Chairperson. She brings 25 years of experience across mass consumer products, cloud, and software solutions. Prior to PagerDuty, Ms. Tejada was CEO of Keynote Systems, which she led to strong growth before its acquisition by Dynatrace. She also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer at Mincom, which was acquired by ABB. Ms. Tejada has held senior positions at Procter & Gamble and i2 Technologies. She is an active tech investor and serves on the board of The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Howard Wilson, Chief Financial Officer
Howard Wilson is the Chief Financial Officer at PagerDuty, where he leads the company's internal and strategic execution. He joined PagerDuty as Chief Commercial Officer in early 2017 and became CFO in September 2018, helping to take the company public in April 2019. Mr. Wilson has over 20 years of experience in software, services, and operational management. Before PagerDuty, he oversaw the SaaS business at Dynatrace and was Chief Operating Officer at Keynote Systems. He also spent 14 years in various senior leadership roles at Oracle.
Jeff Hausman, Chief Product Development Officer
Jeff Hausman is the Chief Product Development Officer at PagerDuty, responsible for the company’s product strategy, product management, engineering, design, and user experience. He joined PagerDuty from Samsara, where he was Chief Product Officer. Previously, Mr. Hausman served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Operations Management Portfolio at ServiceNow. He has over 25 years of experience leading product development as a senior executive at companies such as McAfee, Symantec, Hewlett-Packard, and Veritas.
Tim Armandpour, Chief Technology Officer
Tim Armandpour is the Chief Technology Officer at PagerDuty, bringing over 20 years of experience in applying technological innovation. In his role, he leads the company's long-term technology strategy. Before joining PagerDuty, Mr. Armandpour led product management and engineering teams at Yapstone, and global engineering teams at PayPal. He also served as Vice President of Engineering at Zong prior to its acquisition by PayPal.
Katherine Post Calvert, Chief Marketing Officer
Katherine Post Calvert is an experienced Chief Marketing Officer in B2B software and SaaS, with over 20 years of leadership in global marketing strategy. She joined PagerDuty from Khoros, where she served as CMO for four years and was instrumental in designing and implementing its global marketing strategy. Ms. Calvert previously served as CMO of Advent Software and was a Director of Marstone Inc., a digital wealth management platform.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to PagerDuty's business include intense competition, a history of operating losses with challenges to achieving sustained profitability, and potential equity dilution from stock-based compensation and convertible notes.
- Increased Competition: PagerDuty faces significant and intensifying competition from both established observability companies and larger technology firms that are entering the incident response market or offering similar functionalities as part of broader IT management suites. This competitive landscape could pressure PagerDuty's market share, pricing power, and overall growth trajectory. Companies like Datadog and ServiceNow are identified as major threats, with Datadog, in particular, demonstrating superior growth and a strong potential to integrate incident management into its existing offerings.
- History of Operating Losses and Challenges to Achieve Profitability: PagerDuty has consistently reported operating losses and faces ongoing challenges in achieving and sustaining profitability. The company anticipates increased costs and expenses, particularly in areas like platform development and international expansion, which could further hinder its path to profitability.
- Equity Dilution through Stock-Based Compensation and Convertible Notes: The company's high stock-based compensation and its practice of issuing senior convertible notes pose a significant risk of equity dilution for shareholders. This dilution could negatively impact future valuations and shareholder returns.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Atlassian's Jira Service Management (JSM) with Opsgenie: Atlassian, a dominant player in developer and IT tools, acquired Opsgenie (a direct competitor to PagerDuty) and has been integrating it tightly into its Jira Service Management platform. This allows Atlassian to offer comprehensive incident management, on-call scheduling, and alerting capabilities directly within an ecosystem already used by millions of developers and IT teams, potentially diminishing the need for a standalone PagerDuty solution.
- Consolidation by Full Observability Platforms: Companies like Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, and Splunk are expanding their offerings beyond monitoring and analytics to include robust AIOps, event management, and increasingly, incident response orchestration. By providing an comprehensive solution from data ingestion to alert generation and incident resolution, these platforms aim to become the single pane of glass for operations teams, potentially reducing the necessity for specialized incident management tools like PagerDuty.
AI Analysis | Feedback
PagerDuty (PD) estimates its total addressable market (TAM) for its software to be $50 billion. This market opportunity is global and encompasses a wide range of users, including developers, infrastructure and operations teams, customer service professionals, and security operations. The company has identified 87 million potential users across these segments. As of late 2025, PagerDuty's current annual revenue run rate is around $0.5 billion, indicating approximately 1% penetration into this overall market.
AI Analysis | Feedback
PagerDuty (PD) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several key initiatives and market trends:
- Expansion and Adoption of AI-Powered Products and the Operations Cloud: PagerDuty is focusing on its AI-powered Operations Cloud as a critical infrastructure component for organizations. A significant driver is PagerDuty Advance, its generative AI offering, which aims to automate repetitive tasks throughout the incident lifecycle and potentially increase average revenue per user. Analysts are closely monitoring the adoption and monetization of these new AI and automation products as catalysts for growth.
- Focus on Enterprise and Mid-Market Customer Acquisition and Expansion: The company is strategically prioritizing the acquisition of new customers in the enterprise and mid-market segments. PagerDuty's management has indicated an increased focus on customer acquisition in these markets, expecting to sustain higher value and growth from these larger accounts. Furthermore, the dollar-based net retention rate for enterprise customers has remained higher than for the commercial segment, highlighting the potential for expansion within this existing base.
- Implementation of New Pricing Models and Optimized Product Packaging: PagerDuty is rolling out new pricing models designed to unlock revenue. The company is also upgrading its product packaging to enable customers to access various aspects of its platform, including incident management, AI, and AIOps, across multiple plans. This strategy aims to provide greater value to customers, potentially mitigating the impact of fewer users by offering access to more products, and is a factor analysts are monitoring for its impact on retention and revenue growth.
- International Market Expansion: PagerDuty has demonstrated growth in its international revenue, which now constitutes a notable portion of its total revenue. This indicates that continued expansion in international markets serves as a driver for overall revenue growth.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- In May 2024, PagerDuty's Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for up to $100 million of common stock, which was completed in November 2024.
- In March 2025, a new share repurchase program for up to $150 million of common stock was authorized by the Board of Directors, replacing the prior program and expected to continue through March 13, 2027.
- PagerDuty repurchased $250 million worth of stock in fiscal year 2025.
Share Issuance
- Share repurchases are noted to underscore PagerDuty's commitment to managing share count growth, implying ongoing share issuance, likely related to employee stock options and other equity-based compensation.
- For the full fiscal year 2026, PagerDuty assumes approximately 93 million diluted shares.
Outbound Investments
- In November 2023, PagerDuty completed the acquisition of Jeli, an incident management startup, to enhance its Operations Cloud with an enterprise-grade, all-in-one incident management solution.
- PagerDuty acquired Catalytic, a no-code automation platform, in March 2022 for an undisclosed amount.
- In October 2020, PagerDuty completed the acquisition of Rundeck, a provider of DevOps automation, for $100 million.
Capital Expenditures
- PagerDuty's capital expenditures were $4.038 million in fiscal year 2021, $3.457 million in fiscal year 2022, $4.637 million in fiscal year 2023, $2.164 million in fiscal year 2024, and $2.791 million in fiscal year 2025.
- Expected capital expenditures for fiscal year 2026 are $5.884 million.
- Capital expenditures are primarily related to purchases of property and equipment and the capitalization of internal-use software costs.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for PagerDuty
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 84.44 |
| Mkt Cap | 25.6 |
| Rev LTM | 2,532 |
| Op Inc LTM | -27 |
| FCF LTM | 669 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 555 |
| CFO LTM | 748 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 615 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 20.3% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 22.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 21.2% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 4.9% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -1.7% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -3.1% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.8% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 27.6% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 27.8% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 26.7% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 26.6% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 25.6 |
| P/S | 7.0 |
| P/EBIT | 61.8 |
| P/E | 16.3 |
| P/CFO | 25.4 |
| Total Yield | 0.7% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | 1.9% |
| D/E | 0.0 |
| Net D/E | -0.1 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | -9.7% |
| 3M Rtn | -21.0% |
| 6M Rtn | -18.7% |
| 12M Rtn | -30.4% |
| 3Y Rtn | 6.6% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | -12.0% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | -26.4% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | -30.0% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | -49.3% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -64.7% |
Comparison Analyses
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $12.26 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 1.1 | |
| First Trading Date | 04/11/2019 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -37.7% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $13.68 | $15.30 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -10.4% | -19.9% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 57.0% | 51.1% |
| Downside Capture | 69.16 | 136.57 |
| Upside Capture | -87.57 | 75.03 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 8.0% | 49.1% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 1.06 | 1.30 | 1.48 |
| Up Beta | 0.34 | -0.78 | -0.09 | 0.89 | 1.47 | 1.35 |
| Down Beta | 1.80 | 2.20 | 1.03 | 1.37 | 1.30 | 1.39 |
| Up Capture | 106% | -80% | -25% | 49% | 75% | 205% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 11 | 23 | 37 | 72 | 143 | 431 |
| Stock +ve Days | 10 | 19 | 28 | 52 | 117 | 358 |
| Down Capture | -91% | 82% | 98% | 129% | 119% | 111% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 18 | 27 | 55 | 108 | 320 |
| Stock -ve Days | 12 | 22 | 35 | 72 | 131 | 387 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| PD vs. Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -30.0% | 26.1% | 19.1% | 72.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | -6.3% |
| Annualized Volatility | 50.9% | 27.4% | 19.3% | 20.0% | 15.5% | 16.9% | 34.3% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.52 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 2.62 | 0.25 | 0.20 | -0.04 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 45.1% | 49.2% | -5.8% | 10.1% | 36.3% | 18.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLK, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| PD vs. Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -21.5% | 19.0% | 15.0% | 18.3% | 12.0% | 5.6% | 23.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 54.0% | 24.7% | 17.1% | 15.7% | 18.8% | 18.8% | 48.3% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.24 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.94 | 0.52 | 0.20 | 0.49 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 54.8% | 54.2% | 6.1% | 10.4% | 40.7% | 28.9% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLK, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| PD vs. Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -15.6% | 22.8% | 15.1% | 15.2% | 7.2% | 5.4% | 70.7% |
| Annualized Volatility | 58.6% | 24.2% | 18.0% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.7% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.04 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.91 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 51.4% | 48.5% | 5.4% | 13.5% | 36.1% | 26.5% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLK, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2025 | 11/26/2025 | 10-Q (10/31/2025) |
| 07/31/2025 | 09/04/2025 | 10-Q (07/31/2025) |
| 04/30/2025 | 05/30/2025 | 10-Q (04/30/2025) |
| 01/31/2025 | 03/17/2025 | 10-K (01/31/2025) |
| 10/31/2024 | 11/27/2024 | 10-Q (10/31/2024) |
| 07/31/2024 | 09/04/2024 | 10-Q (07/31/2024) |
| 04/30/2024 | 05/31/2024 | 10-Q (04/30/2024) |
| 01/31/2024 | 03/15/2024 | 10-K (01/31/2024) |
| 10/31/2023 | 12/01/2023 | 10-Q (10/31/2023) |
| 07/31/2023 | 09/01/2023 | 10-Q (07/31/2023) |
| 04/30/2023 | 06/02/2023 | 10-Q (04/30/2023) |
| 01/31/2023 | 03/16/2023 | 10-K (01/31/2023) |
| 10/31/2022 | 12/02/2022 | 10-Q (10/31/2022) |
| 07/31/2022 | 09/02/2022 | 10-Q (07/31/2022) |
| 04/30/2022 | 06/03/2022 | 10-Q (04/30/2022) |
| 01/31/2022 | 03/17/2022 | 10-K (01/31/2022) |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.