PagerDuty (PD)
Market Price (3/30/2026): $6.005 | Market Cap: $528.5 MilSector: Information Technology | Industry: Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
PagerDuty (PD)
Market Price (3/30/2026): $6.005Market Cap: $528.5 MilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 33%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 29%, FCF Yield is 19% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -95%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -143% | Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 20% |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -11% | Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 11% | Key risksPD key risks include [1] intense competition from larger, Show more. |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 23%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 21% | ||
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -66% | ||
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, and Automation & Robotics. Themes include Software as a Service (SaaS), Show more. |
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 33%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 29%, FCF Yield is 19% |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -11% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 23%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 21% |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -66% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, and Automation & Robotics. Themes include Software as a Service (SaaS), Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -95%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -143% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 11% |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 20% |
| Key risksPD key risks include [1] intense competition from larger, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Weak Q1 FY27 and Full-Year FY27 Revenue Guidance.
PagerDuty provided a disappointing outlook for future revenue, significantly missing analyst expectations. For Q1 FY27, the company guided revenue to $119 million at the midpoint, which was 3.9% below analyst estimates of $123.8 million. Furthermore, PagerDuty projected flat revenue growth for the full fiscal year 2027 at the midpoint, in contrast to the prior consensus that anticipated 4% growth.
2. Deteriorating Customer Metrics.
The company's customer-related performance showed signs of weakness, with Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) growth slowing to just 1% year-over-year in Q4 FY26 and missing Street estimates by 60 basis points. Additionally, the dollar-based net retention rate, a key indicator of customer spending, fell by 2 percentage points sequentially to 98% in Q4 FY26, indicating existing customers are spending less.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -49.9% change in PD stock from 11/30/2025 to 3/29/2026 was primarily driven by a -57.5% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 11302025 | 3292026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 12.00 | 6.01 | -49.9% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 489 | 493 | 0.7% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 31.7% | 35.2% | 10.9% |
| P/E Multiple | 7.2 | 3.1 | -57.5% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 93 | 88 | 5.5% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -49.9% |
Market Drivers
11/30/2025 to 3/29/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PD | -49.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | -5.3% | 21.2% |
| Sector (XLK) | -9.1% | 26.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -64.1% change in PD stock from 8/31/2025 to 3/29/2026 was primarily driven by a -66.6% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 8312025 | 3292026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 16.74 | 6.01 | -64.1% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 476 | 493 | 3.4% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.2 | 1.1 | -66.6% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 91 | 88 | 3.8% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -64.1% |
Market Drivers
8/31/2025 to 3/29/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PD | -64.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 0.6% | 18.9% |
| Sector (XLK) | -0.7% | 19.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -66.1% change in PD stock from 2/28/2025 to 3/29/2026 was primarily driven by a -69.7% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 2282025 | 3292026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 17.72 | 6.01 | -66.1% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 457 | 493 | 7.7% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.5 | 1.1 | -69.7% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 91 | 88 | 3.9% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -66.1% |
Market Drivers
2/28/2025 to 3/29/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PD | -66.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 9.8% | 46.9% |
| Sector (XLK) | 15.9% | 45.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -79.9% change in PD stock from 2/28/2023 to 3/29/2026 was primarily driven by a -86.0% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 2282023 | 3292026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 29.86 | 6.01 | -79.9% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 348 | 493 | 41.4% |
| P/S Multiple | 7.7 | 1.1 | -86.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 89 | 88 | 1.5% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -79.9% |
Market Drivers
2/28/2023 to 3/29/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PD | -79.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 69.4% | 45.5% |
| Sector (XLK) | 94.5% | 42.0% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| PD Return | -17% | -24% | -13% | -21% | -28% | -52% | -85% |
| Peers Return | 37% | -50% | 63% | 12% | -24% | -31% | -35% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | -5% | 72% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| PD Win Rate | 42% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 57% | 28% | 60% | 53% | 35% | 13% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 33% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| PD Max Drawdown | -26% | -44% | -26% | -25% | -36% | -52% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -19% | -58% | -15% | -25% | -34% | -37% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | -5% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: NOW, TEAM, DDOG, DT, GTLB. See PD Returns vs. Peers.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 3/27/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | PD | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -65.4% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 189.0% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -49.3% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 97.2% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 60 days | 148 days |
Compare to NOW, TEAM, DDOG, DT, GTLB
In The Past
PagerDuty's stock fell -65.4% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 2/12/2021. A -65.4% loss requires a 189.0% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About PagerDuty (PD)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies to describe PagerDuty:
- It's like ADT for your company's software, constantly monitoring for critical issues and alerting the right team immediately.
- It's like Google Maps for your company's IT operations, providing real-time visibility into problems and guiding teams to solutions.
- It's like AccuWeather for your software systems, using machine learning to predict potential outages and help you prevent them.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Incident Management Platform: Enables real-time detection, triaging, and resolution of critical incidents across IT systems and applications.
- AIOps: Utilizes machine learning to correlate digital signals, identify patterns, predict issues, and reduce alert noise for proactive operations.
- Automation: Provides automated workflows and runbooks to streamline incident response, operational tasks, and accelerate problem resolution.
- Customer Service Operations: Extends real-time operational visibility and response capabilities to enhance customer support and experience by connecting support teams with operational incidents.
AI Analysis | Feedback
PagerDuty primarily sells its digital operations management platform to other companies (Business-to-Business or B2B). Some of its major customers, which span various industries, include:
- Zoom Video Communications (Symbol: ZM)
- Netflix (Symbol: NFLX)
- Shopify (Symbol: SHOP)
- Atlassian (Symbol: TEAM)
- Salesforce (Symbol: CRM)
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) - (for Amazon Web Services)
- Twilio Inc. (TWLO)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Jennifer Tejada, Chairperson and CEO
Jennifer Tejada has a successful track record in product innovation, optimizing operations, and scaling public and private enterprise technology companies over 25 years. Prior to her role at PagerDuty, she was CEO of Keynote Systems, where she led the company to strong, profitable growth before its acquisition by Dynatrace. She was also Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer at Mincom, leading its global strategy up to its acquisition by ABB. She has held senior positions at Procter & Gamble and i2 Technologies. Tejada is also an active tech investor.
Howard Wilson, Chief Financial Officer
Howard Wilson leads PagerDuty's internal and strategic execution, building and directing the finance organization to support the company's growth. He brings more than 20 years of experience in software, services, and operational management to his role. Before becoming CFO in 2018 (after serving as acting CFO from December 2017), he was PagerDuty's Chief Commercial Officer. Prior to joining PagerDuty, he oversaw the SaaS business at Dynatrace and was the Chief Operating Officer at Keynote Systems. Wilson also served as Senior Vice President of Field Operations at Ventyx and spent 14 years in various senior leadership roles at Oracle.
Jeff Hausman, Chief Product Development Officer
Jeff Hausman joined PagerDuty in February 2024, where he is responsible for the company's product strategy, product management, engineering, design, and user experience. Before PagerDuty, Hausman was the Chief Product Officer at Samsara. He previously served as ServiceNow Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Operations Management Portfolio and has over 25 years of experience leading product development as a senior executive across a wide range of products at McAfee, Symantec, Hewlett-Packard, and Veritas.
Katherine Post Calvert, Chief Marketing Officer
Katherine Post Calvert joined PagerDuty as Chief Marketing Officer in May 2022. She has over 20 years of leadership experience in global marketing strategy, branding, product marketing, campaign management, demand generation, and marketing automation. Prior to PagerDuty, Calvert served as CMO at Khoros, a customer engagement platform provider, where she led the global marketing strategy. She also served as CMO of Advent Software.
Tim Armandpour, Chief Technology Officer
Tim Armandpour is the Chief Technology Officer at PagerDuty, where he leads the company's long-term technology strategy, architecture vision, security, and technology research. He brings a 20-year history of applying technological innovation to maximize value to users. Before joining PagerDuty, Tim led product management and engineering teams at Yapstone, a global payment solutions provider, and global engineering teams at PayPal.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to PagerDuty's business are primarily centered around its decelerating revenue growth, intense market competition, and reliance on its core incident management product.
1. Decelerating Revenue Growth and Customer Retention Challenges
PagerDuty has been experiencing slowing growth rates, with concerns raised by analysts regarding high churn rates and stagnant revenue growth. The company faces increased challenges in expanding within existing customer accounts and attracting new ones, particularly in a tighter IT spending environment. This risk indicates that revenue growth may continue to decelerate, fluctuate, or decline, which could negatively affect the company's stock price.
2. Intense Market Competition and Need for Technological Adaptation
The digital operations management market in which PagerDuty operates is highly competitive. The company faces substantial competition from both established players and new entrants, particularly those leveraging emerging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. PagerDuty's ability to compete effectively, retain and attract new customers, and continuously adapt its platform to rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, and changing customer needs is critical to its operating results.
3. Reliance on a Single Product Line
A significant majority of PagerDuty's revenue is derived from its incident management product. This concentration makes the company vulnerable to competitive threats and technological shifts. If demand for this core product were to decline due to factors like increased competition, evolving technology, or changing customer preferences, it could adversely affect PagerDuty's revenue and overall financial performance.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The clear emerging threat for PagerDuty is the increasing integration of incident management, on-call automation, and AIOps capabilities directly into larger, existing IT operations management (ITOM), observability, and IT service management (ITSM) platforms offered by major competitors.
Companies like Datadog, Splunk, and ServiceNow are actively expanding their platforms with features that directly compete with PagerDuty's core offerings. For instance, observability platforms are adding sophisticated incident response and on-call scheduling, while ITSM giants are enhancing their AIOps and workflow automation. This trend towards platform consolidation could reduce the need for PagerDuty as a standalone solution, especially for enterprises that prefer a single, integrated vendor for their operational tooling.
AI Analysis | Feedback
PagerDuty (symbol: PD) estimates its total addressable market to be $50 billion globally.
This market opportunity encompasses several key areas:
- Developers, driven by digital services and software-driven innovation, account for an estimated 30 million users.
- Infrastructure and Operations, undergoing modernization with digital transformation, cloud adoption, and DevOps, represent approximately 23 million users.
- Customer Service, with a push for improving cost-efficiency and productivity through self-service and automation, has about 28 million users.
- SecOps, a smaller but influential population focused on protecting technology, data, employees, and customers, includes an estimated 6 million users.
PagerDuty believes it has approximately 1% penetration worldwide within these markets. The company serves over 20,000 customers globally, including more than 65% of the Fortune 100.
AI Analysis | Feedback
PagerDuty (PD) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several key strategic initiatives and product expansions.
-
Product Expansion with AI and Automation Capabilities: PagerDuty is focusing on broadening its digital operations management platform beyond core incident alerting to include advanced AI operations (AIOps), automation, customer service operations (CSOps), and comprehensive incident response solutions. The company is actively integrating generative AI capabilities, such as Incident Workflows, Incident Roles and Tasks, and Incident Types, as well as developing Agentic AI offerings like Agentic Site Reliability Engineer and Operational Insights. This expansion aims to address a wider range of workflows and personas, creating significant upsell and cross-sell opportunities for existing customers.
-
Enterprise and Multi-Product Customer Expansion: A significant driver of revenue growth is the continued focus on expanding PagerDuty's presence within large enterprise accounts. Management emphasizes securing multi-year, multi-product strategic deals with these customers. This strategy aims to increase the number of customers contributing over $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) and to boost the adoption of multiple PagerDuty products, fostering durable net expansion.
-
Transition to Consumption-Based "Flex" Pricing Models: PagerDuty is strategically shifting away from traditional seat-based licensing to more flexible, consumption-led pricing models. This "flex" pricing is designed to reduce friction for customers, allowing the platform to scale more efficiently across human responders, automated solutions, and various agents. This transition is expected to enable customers to explore new use cases beyond traditional digital operations, potentially including areas like manufacturing and broader AI operations, thereby driving gradual ARR improvement.
-
Strategic Partnerships and Ecosystem Integrations: PagerDuty is actively pursuing and leveraging strategic partnerships with major technology companies, including Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and ServiceNow. These alliances, along with over 700 integrations across cloud, observability, IT service management (ITSM), and security ecosystems, are crucial for expanding market reach and driving new customer acquisition. A notable partnership involves integrating PagerDuty Advance with Amazon Q Business and Amazon Bedrock to enhance AI capabilities and expand the customer base.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- PagerDuty's Board of Directors approved an increase in the company's share repurchase program to $200 million on August 28, 2025.
- In March 2025, a new share repurchase program of up to $150 million of common stock was authorized.
- A $100 million share repurchase program was completed in May 2024.
Outbound Investments
- In November 2023, PagerDuty completed the acquisition of Jeli, Inc., a cloud-based business intelligence and incident analysis platform, to enhance its incident management solution.
- PagerDuty acquired Catalytic for no-code workflows in 2022.
Capital Expenditures
- PagerDuty's latest twelve months capital expenditure was $6.93 million as of June 2025.
- Capital expenditures reached their peak in 2023.
- In the most recent quarter, capital expenditures totaled -$0.74 million USD.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| Cash Machine Trading Cheap - PagerDuty Stock Set to Run? | 01/17/2026 | |
| PagerDuty Earnings Notes | 12/16/2025 | |
| Is PagerDuty Stock Built to Withstand More Downside? | 11/27/2025 | |
| Time To Buy PagerDuty Stock? | 11/27/2025 | |
| PD Dip Buy Analysis | 07/10/2025 | |
| Day 10 of Gains Streak for PagerDuty Stock with 15% Return (vs. -12% YTD) [7/8/2025] | 07/09/2025 | |
| PagerDuty Total Shareholder Return (TSR): -21.8% in 2025 and -17.5% 3-yr compounded annual returns (below peer average) | 03/07/2025 | |
| PagerDuty vs. S&P500 Correlation | 10/03/2024 | |
| PagerDuty Price Volatility | 09/24/2024 | |
| Fundamental Metrics: ... | 06/19/2024 | |
| ARTICLES | ||
| Stocks Trading At 52-Week Low | 02/20/2026 | |
| PagerDuty Stock: Strong Cash Flow Poised for a Re-Rating? | 01/17/2026 | |
| PagerDuty Stock To $15? | 11/27/2025 | |
| Market Movers | Winners: KTTA, ZYXI, KALA | Losers: GORV, WHLR, PD | 11/27/2025 | |
| PD Stock Up 15% after 10-Day Win Streak | 07/09/2025 |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to PD.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02282026 | BMI | Badger Meter | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 02282026 | VRNS | Varonis Systems | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 02272026 | ITRI | Itron | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 02272026 | FSLR | First Solar | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 02272026 | PEGA | Pegasystems | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 01162026 | PD | PagerDuty | Dip Buy | DB | CFO/Rev | Low D/EDip Buy with High Cash Flow MarginsBuying dips for companies with significant cash flows from operations and reasonable debt / market cap | -37.1% | -37.1% | -44.3% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 50.52 |
| Mkt Cap | 14.0 |
| Rev LTM | 2,679 |
| Op Inc LTM | -19 |
| FCF LTM | 689 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 583 |
| CFO LTM | 774 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 646 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 20.5% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 22.1% |
| Rev Chg Q | 21.9% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 5.1% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -0.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -2.4% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.6% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 25.1% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 26.6% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 23.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 25.4% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 14.0 |
| P/S | 4.6 |
| P/EBIT | 31.5 |
| P/E | 30.8 |
| P/CFO | 16.9 |
| Total Yield | 1.0% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | 2.2% |
| D/E | 0.0 |
| Net D/E | -0.1 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | -10.6% |
| 3M Rtn | -40.8% |
| 6M Rtn | -52.0% |
| 12M Rtn | -47.8% |
| 3Y Rtn | -24.8% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | -4.3% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | -32.2% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | -47.6% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | -62.1% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -86.6% |
Comparison Analyses
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $6.01 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.6 | |
| First Trading Date | 04/11/2019 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -68.0% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $8.09 | $13.28 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -25.7% | -54.7% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 55.8% | 53.7% |
| Downside Capture | 2.12 | 1.56 |
| Upside Capture | -21.79 | 63.06 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 22.0% | 45.7% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.07 | 2.08 | 1.76 | 1.20 | 1.42 | 1.46 |
| Up Beta | 1.34 | 1.50 | 1.14 | 0.74 | 1.50 | 1.35 |
| Down Beta | 3.51 | 1.77 | 2.13 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 1.35 |
| Up Capture | 86% | -33% | 5% | -10% | 73% | 130% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 9 | 20 | 31 | 70 | 142 | 431 |
| Stock +ve Days | 7 | 12 | 22 | 46 | 109 | 350 |
| Down Capture | 538% | 428% | 297% | 210% | 146% | 112% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 12 | 21 | 30 | 54 | 109 | 320 |
| Stock -ve Days | 13 | 28 | 38 | 76 | 138 | 395 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with PD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | -69.1% | 53.5% | -2.00 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 22.4% | 26.8% | 0.73 | 43.9% |
| Equity (SPY) | 14.5% | 18.9% | 0.59 | 46.1% |
| Gold (GLD) | 50.2% | 27.7% | 1.46 | -11.0% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 17.8% | 17.6% | 0.85 | 6.3% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 0.4% | 16.4% | -0.15 | 30.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -23.7% | 44.2% | -0.49 | 27.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with PD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | -32.3% | 53.6% | -0.52 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 15.4% | 24.6% | 0.56 | 52.9% |
| Equity (SPY) | 11.8% | 17.0% | 0.54 | 53.0% |
| Gold (GLD) | 20.7% | 17.7% | 0.96 | 2.0% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 11.6% | 18.9% | 0.50 | 8.5% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 3.0% | 18.8% | 0.07 | 40.3% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 4.0% | 56.6% | 0.29 | 28.9% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with PD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | -16.9% | 58.7% | -0.21 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 20.8% | 24.3% | 0.79 | 50.9% |
| Equity (SPY) | 14.0% | 17.9% | 0.67 | 48.0% |
| Gold (GLD) | 13.3% | 15.8% | 0.70 | 3.3% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.2% | 17.6% | 0.39 | 12.8% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 4.7% | 20.7% | 0.19 | 35.5% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 66.4% | 66.8% | 1.06 | 24.4% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 3/12/2026 | -2.8% | -5.1% | |
| 11/25/2025 | -23.3% | -20.9% | -12.1% |
| 9/3/2025 | 6.3% | 2.2% | 5.6% |
| 5/29/2025 | -11.4% | -4.5% | -5.1% |
| 3/13/2025 | 17.7% | 20.8% | -0.9% |
| 11/26/2024 | 0.5% | 3.1% | -14.7% |
| 9/3/2024 | -1.1% | -3.3% | -1.7% |
| 3/14/2024 | -7.3% | -0.9% | -8.6% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| # Negative | 14 | 14 | 13 |
| Median Positive | 13.0% | 9.9% | 12.6% |
| Median Negative | -7.5% | -4.8% | -8.6% |
| Max Positive | 26.2% | 34.7% | 40.1% |
| Max Negative | -25.8% | -33.1% | -21.0% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 01/31/2026 | 03/12/2026 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2025 | 11/26/2025 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2025 | 09/04/2025 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2025 | 05/30/2025 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2025 | 03/17/2025 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2024 | 11/27/2024 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2024 | 09/04/2024 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2024 | 05/31/2024 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2024 | 03/15/2024 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2023 | 12/01/2023 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2023 | 09/01/2023 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2023 | 06/02/2023 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2023 | 03/16/2023 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2022 | 12/02/2022 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2022 | 09/02/2022 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2022 | 06/03/2022 | 10-Q |
Recent Forward Guidance [BETA]
Latest: Q4 2026 Earnings Reported 3/12/2026 | Prior: Q3 2026 Earnings Reported 11/25/2025
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| Q1 2027 Revenue | 118.00 Mil | 119.00 Mil | 120.00 Mil | ||||
| Q1 2027 Non-GAAP EPS | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.25 | ||||
| 2027 Revenue | 488.50 Mil | 492.50 Mil | 496.50 Mil | 0.3% | Higher New | Guidance: 491.00 Mil for 2026 | |
| 2027 Non-GAAP EPS | 1.23 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 12.6% | Higher New | Guidance: 1.11 for 2026 | |
Industry Resources
| Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Resources |
| The Verge |
| TechRadar |
| Tom’s Hardware |
| PCMag |
| CNET |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.