Ouster (OUST)
Market Price (12/29/2025): $21.57 | Market Cap: $1.3 BilSector: Information Technology | Industry: Electronic Components
Ouster (OUST)
Market Price (12/29/2025): $21.57Market Cap: $1.3 BilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: Electronic Components
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -18% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -101 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -73% |
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 30% | Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 31% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Autonomous Technologies, Electric Vehicles & Autonomous Driving, and Automation & Robotics. Themes include Machine Vision, Show more. | Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -20%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -23% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -11% | |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 102% | |
| Key risksOUST key risks include [1] its limited operating history and inability to achieve or sustain profitability and [2] a dependence on a limited number of key third-party suppliers and manufacturers. |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -18% |
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 30% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Autonomous Technologies, Electric Vehicles & Autonomous Driving, and Automation & Robotics. Themes include Machine Vision, Show more. |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -101 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -73% |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 31% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -20%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -23% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -11% |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 102% |
| Key risksOUST key risks include [1] its limited operating history and inability to achieve or sustain profitability and [2] a dependence on a limited number of key third-party suppliers and manufacturers. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Sequential Decline in Gross Margin and Adjusted EBITDA: Ouster reported a sequential decline in its GAAP gross margin from 45% in Q2 2025 to 42% in Q3 2025. Similarly, non-GAAP gross margin also decreased sequentially from 52% to 47%. This decline was attributed to a temporary mix shift towards lower-margin hardware-only orders and increased investment in next-generation product development, which may have raised concerns among investors regarding the company's profitability trends. Additionally, the Adjusted EBITDA loss declined sequentially by $4 million.
2. Earnings Per Share (EPS) Missed Higher Consensus Estimates: For Q3 2025, Ouster reported an EPS of -$0.37. While this figure beat the lowest analyst consensus estimate, it fell short of the higher range of expectations from some analysts, indicating that the company continues to face pressure in achieving consistent profitability as it scales its operations.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -21.1% change in OUST stock from 9/28/2025 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -23.0% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 9282025 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 27.83 | 21.97 | -21.06% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 125.85 | 137.30 | 9.10% |
| P/S Multiple | 12.04 | 9.28 | -22.98% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 54.47 | 57.98 | -6.44% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -21.38% |
Market Drivers
9/28/2025 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OUST | -21.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 4.3% | 56.5% |
| Sector (XLK) | 5.1% | 50.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -8.8% change in OUST stock from 6/29/2025 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -13.6% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6292025 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 24.10 | 21.97 | -8.84% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 117.79 | 137.30 | 16.56% |
| P/S Multiple | 10.74 | 9.28 | -13.61% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 52.49 | 57.98 | -10.46% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -9.83% |
Market Drivers
6/29/2025 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OUST | -8.8% | |
| Market (SPY) | 12.6% | 46.4% |
| Sector (XLK) | 17.0% | 45.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 75.9% change in OUST stock from 12/28/2024 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a 64.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12282024 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 12.49 | 21.97 | 75.90% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 105.45 | 137.30 | 30.20% |
| P/S Multiple | 5.65 | 9.28 | 64.26% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 47.68 | 57.98 | -21.58% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 67.71% |
Market Drivers
12/28/2024 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OUST | 75.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 17.0% | 42.8% |
| Sector (XLK) | 24.0% | 45.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 145.6% change in OUST stock from 12/29/2022 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a 227.3% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| 12292022 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 8.95 | 21.97 | 145.56% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 41.94 | 137.30 | 227.34% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.87 | 9.28 | 139.80% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 18.14 | 57.98 | -219.67% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -1039.41% |
Market Drivers
12/29/2023 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| OUST | 186.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 48.4% | 37.4% |
| Sector (XLK) | 54.0% | 35.9% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| OUST Return | 39% | -61% | -83% | -11% | 59% | 83% | -77% |
| Peers Return | 16% | 38% | -12% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 150% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 18% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| OUST Win Rate | 67% | 42% | 25% | 42% | 67% | 42% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 65% | 42% | 68% | 57% | 52% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| OUST Max Drawdown | -1% | -62% | -84% | -62% | -39% | -46% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -5% | -26% | -7% | -9% | -23% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/26/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | OUST | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -97.9% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 4650.0% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -16.9% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 20.4% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 148 days |
Compare to HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL
In The Past
Ouster's stock fell -97.9% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 2/10/2021. A -97.9% loss requires a 4650.0% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies to describe Ouster (OUST):
- Mobileye for Lidar Sensors: Similar to how Mobileye provides camera-based vision systems for ADAS and autonomous vehicles, Ouster provides high-resolution lidar sensors for 3D perception in autonomous systems and robotics.
- The Qualcomm of 3D Perception: Ouster supplies critical lidar sensors for autonomous vehicles and robotics, much like Qualcomm supplies essential chips and modems for smartphones and other connected devices.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Digital Lidar Sensors: Ouster's digital lidar sensors capture real-time 3D data for precise perception and navigation across robotics, industrial automation, smart infrastructure, and automotive applications.
- Lidar Software: Ouster provides software tools, such as Ouster Studio and SDKs, to enable users to visualize, process, and integrate data from their lidar sensors.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Ouster (OUST) sells primarily to other companies (Business-to-Business, or B2B). According to Ouster's 2023 Annual Report (10-K filing), no single customer accounted for 10% or more of its revenue. This indicates a diversified customer base across various industries rather than reliance on a few dominant clients. Therefore, Ouster does not publicly disclose individual "major customer companies" by name, largely due to customer confidentiality and the nature of being a component supplier. However, Ouster's customer base can be broadly categorized by the types of companies and industries it serves:- Automotive & Autonomous Driving Companies: These customers are developers and manufacturers of autonomous vehicles, Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS), and other robotics for various transportation applications, including passenger vehicles, robotaxis, and trucks. An example from the Velodyne Lidar heritage (now part of Ouster) is Motional (a private joint venture between Hyundai and Aptiv) which has used LiDAR in its robotaxi fleet.
- Industrial Automation & Robotics Manufacturers: This category includes companies producing autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), automated guided vehicles (AGVs), drones, and heavy industrial equipment. These are used in sectors such as logistics, manufacturing, mining, construction, and agriculture. Ouster has announced multi-year supply agreements with leading global manufacturers in these spaces, though specific names are typically confidential.
- Smart Infrastructure & Mapping Providers: This segment comprises organizations and municipalities involved in smart city initiatives, intelligent traffic management, security, and precision mapping and surveying. This includes solutions for aerial mapping, mobile mapping, and static monitoring of environments.
- Security & Defense Integrators: Customers in this category utilize LiDAR technology for applications such as perimeter security, surveillance, object detection, and various defense-related systems.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Jabil Inc. (JBL)
- onsemi (ON)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Angus Pacala, Chief Executive Officer
Angus Pacala co-founded Ouster in June 2015 and has served as its CEO and a director since then. Prior to Ouster, Mr. Pacala co-founded lidar company Quanergy Systems, Inc. in 2012, where he served as Director of Engineering until February 2015. He was also a Battery Engineer at Amprius, Inc. from June 2011 to October 2012. Amprius Technologies, Inc. later merged with a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC), Kensington Capital Acquisition Corp. IV, in 2022 to become a public company. Mr. Pacala has been a key figure in the lidar market, instrumental in Ouster's acquisition of Sense Photonics in 2021 and the merger with Velodyne in 2023. He holds a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University.
Ken Gianella, Chief Financial Officer
Ken Gianella has served as Ouster's Chief Financial Officer since May 2025. Before joining Ouster, Mr. Gianella was the Chief Financial Officer and later Chief Operating Officer at Quantum Corporation from January 2023 to April 2025. He previously held various leadership and finance roles at Itron, Inc., where he joined through the acquisition of Silver Spring Networks. At Silver Spring Networks, an IoT and smart networks company, he held senior finance positions including interim Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer, before its acquisition by Itron for approximately $830 million in 2018. Mr. Gianella also served as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance at Sensity Systems, Inc., a producer of smart LED lights, which was acquired by Verizon in 2016. Additionally, he held senior finance roles at KLA-Tencor Corporation. He holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Pittsburgh and a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Duquesne University.
Mark Frichtl, Chief Technology Officer
Mark Frichtl has served as Ouster's Chief Technology Officer since he co-founded the company in June 2015. His previous experience includes working as a Technologies Development Engineer at Apple, Inc. in 2015 and as an Engineer at Quanergy, Inc. from July 2013 to April 2015. Mr. Frichtl earned a Bachelor of Science degree in engineering physics and a Master of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University.
Darien Spencer, Chief Operating Officer
Darien Spencer has been Ouster's Chief Operating Officer since July 2017. Before joining Ouster, Mr. Spencer held the role of Executive Vice President of Operations and Chief Procurement Officer at Enphase Energy from August 2013 to April 2017. He was also the General Manager of Business Units and Automation at Jabil Circuit from August 2012 to August 2013, and a Co-Founder and Chief Operating and Procurement Officer at Optisolar / Novasolar Corporation from January 2007 to November 2012. Additionally, he served as Senior Vice President of Asia Operations at Maxtor Corporation and Seagate Technology.
Megan Chung, General Counsel
Megan Chung has served as Ouster's General Counsel since February 2023, and prior to that, she was the company's Deputy General Counsel starting in July 2021. Before her time at Ouster, Ms. Chung was a Partner at the law firm of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP from 2014 to July 2021, and also served as the Office Managing Partner for the firm's San Diego office from October 2019 to July 2021. She received her J.D. from the University of California, Davis School of Law, and her B.A. and M.A. from Stanford University.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Key Risks to Ouster (OUST)
- Limited Operating History and Inability to Achieve or Sustain Profitability: Ouster has a limited operating history and has consistently incurred significant losses to date, making it challenging to evaluate its future prospects and the risks it may encounter. The company's ability to achieve or sustain profitability remains uncertain, and it may require additional capital, which could lead to shareholder dilution.
- Uncertain Market Adoption of Lidar Technology and Intense Competition: The market adoption of lidar technology across Ouster's target industries is uncertain, making it difficult to forecast long-term demand for its products. Ouster also operates in an intensely competitive market, facing established players and aggressive pricing from competitors, particularly Chinese firms, which could adversely affect its revenue and margins.
- Dependence on Key Third-Party Suppliers and Manufacturers: Ouster relies on a limited number of third-party suppliers for key components and on third-party contract manufacturers for a significant portion of its product production. Interruptions in these relationships, or an inability of these third parties to scale production to meet demand, could adversely impact Ouster's business, supply chain continuity, and financial results.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The increasing viability and adoption of camera-centric, AI-driven perception systems (e.g., "vision-only" or vision-dominant architectures) for autonomous applications.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Ouster (OUST) offers high-resolution digital 3D lidar sensors, including the OS0, OS1, and OS2 series, and intelligent software solutions like the Gemini perception platform and BlueCity analytics suite. These products and services are utilized across various sectors such as autonomous vehicles, industrial applications, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, security systems, and smart infrastructure.
The addressable markets for Ouster's main products and services are as follows:
- The global LiDAR market is expected to approach $19 billion by 2030.
- For smart infrastructure, Ouster estimates a total addressable market of $19 billion by 2030 globally. This market includes applications in intelligent transportation systems, logistics, perimeter security, and crowd analytics.
- The maturing global industrial LiDAR market is valued at $70 billion.
- Within the industrial LiDAR market, the industrial automation sector represents a $19 billion addressable market globally.
- The 3D Zone Monitoring feature for Ouster's REV7 lidar sensors, used in logistics and security, presents an opportunity of over $1 billion.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Ouster (OUST) is strategically positioned for future revenue growth over the next two to three years, driven by several key factors highlighted in recent company communications and analyst observations.
Here are 4 expected drivers of Ouster's future revenue growth:
- Expansion in Key Verticals: Ouster anticipates significant growth from its continued expansion within the smart infrastructure, robotics, and industrial sectors. The company has made notable strides in deploying its products across smart infrastructure and industrial verticals, securing substantial orders from major industrial equipment manufacturers and technology companies. Demand for Ouster's lidar solutions is particularly strong for applications such as yard logistics, retail analytics, warehouse automation, last-mile delivery, and mapping. The smart infrastructure segment was the largest contributor to revenue in Q3 2025, with robotics and industrial verticals also making substantial contributions.
- Advancements in Software Solutions and AI: Ouster is focused on scaling its software-attached business and enhancing its AI algorithms to improve detection accuracy and enable new applications. The company's strategic priorities include increasing software sales and leveraging solutions like Ouster Gemini to improve safety and operational efficiency, particularly in smart infrastructure applications for global technology company distribution hubs. Investments in AI-powered solutions are expected to drive future growth and convert pilot programs into large-scale deployments.
- New Product Development and Technology Leadership: Continued investment in research and development for next-generation products, including the development of L4-powered OS sensor prototypes and the Chronos chip, is a key driver. These technological advancements are designed to enhance sensor performance and reliability, unlock new verticals, and reinforce Ouster's position as a leader in the lidar industry. This ongoing innovation is crucial for sustaining a competitive edge and meeting evolving customer demands.
- Strategic Customer Wins and Large-Scale Deployments: Securing significant purchase orders and forming strategic partnerships are vital for Ouster's revenue trajectory. The company has reported securing substantial orders from major global technology companies and a large European industrial equipment manufacturer. These wins, coupled with successful large-scale deployments and partnerships, such as with Constellis to enhance security operations, indicate a strong market adoption of Ouster's lidar solutions and validate the demand for its products across various industries.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
Ouster has not reported meaningful dollar amounts of share repurchases made over the last 3-5 years, nor any specific authorized future share repurchases.Share Issuance
Ouster's weighted average diluted shares outstanding increased from 29.4 million in Q1 2023 to 52.5 million in Q1 2025, reflecting capital raises that led to some dilution for existing shareholders. As of September 30, 2025, the company had 59.95 million common shares outstanding. In Q3 2025, Ouster received approximately $35 million in net proceeds from its at-the-market (ATM) offering, with about $4 million of authorization remaining on the ATM as of September 30, 2025. For the full year 2024, net cash provided by financing activities, which includes at-the-market offering costs for the issuance of common stock, was $15,657.Inbound Investments
Ouster ended Q3 2025 with a strong cash position, reporting $247 million in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and short-term investments. As of Q1 2025, cash and equivalents were approximately $54 million, alongside $114 million in short-term investments. The company's strong cash position and limited cash burn have reduced the need for additional capital.Outbound Investments
Ouster did not report any meaningful long-term investments in other companies on its balance sheet for the latest quarter ending June 30, 2025, or over the last five fiscal years from 2020 to 2024.Capital Expenditures
Ouster's trailing twelve months (TTM) average capital expenditures over the last three years stood at $3.99 million, with the average over the past five years being $3.87 million. The company's projected capital expenditures are $15 million for 2025, increasing to $20 million in 2026, representing approximately 10% of revenue in those years. A significant portion of Ouster's investment is directed towards research and development (R&D), which represented 52.2% of its revenues in 2024. These R&D investments are primarily focused on advancing its proprietary digital lidar platform, enhancing sensor range and resolution, reducing production costs, and developing edge-computing capabilities to maintain a competitive edge and expand into new markets such as smart cities and logistics automation.Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| Ouster Earnings Notes | ||
| Ouster Stock Drop Looks Sharp, But How Deep Can It Go? | Return |
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to OUST. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11302025 | ENPH | Enphase Energy | Dip Buy | DB | CFO/Rev | Low D/EDip Buy with High Cash Flow MarginsBuying dips for companies with significant cash flows from operations and reasonable debt / market cap | 14.4% | 14.4% | -0.9% |
| 11262025 | PD | PagerDuty | Dip Buy | DB | FCF Yield | Low D/EDip Buy with High Free Cash Flow YieldBuying dips for companies with significant free cash flow yield (FCF / Market Cap) and reasonable debt / market cap | 13.1% | 13.1% | 0.0% |
| 11212025 | CRM | Salesforce | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 17.3% | 17.3% | -0.1% |
| 11212025 | HUBS | HubSpot | Dip Buy | DB | CFO/Rev | Low D/EDip Buy with High Cash Flow MarginsBuying dips for companies with significant cash flows from operations and reasonable debt / market cap | 12.0% | 12.0% | 0.0% |
| 11212025 | FIVN | Five9 | Dip Buy | DB | FCF Yield | Low D/EDip Buy with High Free Cash Flow YieldBuying dips for companies with significant free cash flow yield (FCF / Market Cap) and reasonable debt / market cap | 5.5% | 5.5% | 0.0% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Ouster
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 51.32 |
| Mkt Cap | 158.8 |
| Rev LTM | 56,496 |
| Op Inc LTM | 7,584 |
| FCF LTM | 7,327 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 7,366 |
| CFO LTM | 8,590 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 8,697 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 7.4% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 3.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 9.4% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 2.1% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 12.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 11.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.2% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 14.6% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 17.1% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 11.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 12.1% |
Segment Financials
Revenue by Segment| $ Mil | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale and production of lidar sensor kits | 83 | 41 | ||
| Product revenue | 34 | |||
| Total | 83 | 41 | 34 |
| $ Mil | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale and production of lidar sensor kits | -374 | |||
| Total | -374 |
| $ Mil | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale and production of lidar sensor kits | 201 | |||
| Total | 201 |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $21.97 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 1.3 | |
| First Trading Date | 10/09/2020 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -40.7% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $25.64 | $21.36 |
| DMA Trend | up | down |
| Distance from DMA | -14.3% | 2.9% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 99.5% | 102.1% |
| Downside Capture | 509.17 | 276.89 |
| Upside Capture | 299.72 | 293.42 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 55.5% | 43.1% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.78 | 4.28 | 4.45 | 3.96 | 2.22 | 2.40 |
| Up Beta | 2.99 | 4.10 | 4.27 | 4.13 | 1.52 | 1.60 |
| Down Beta | 4.31 | 6.35 | 5.48 | 5.83 | 2.60 | 2.84 |
| Up Capture | 97% | 293% | 347% | 612% | 1051% | 7504% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 13 | 26 | 39 | 74 | 142 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 8 | 23 | 32 | 67 | 123 | 346 |
| Down Capture | 487% | 353% | 385% | 237% | 151% | 112% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 12 | 19 | 31 | 58 | 125 | 398 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of OUST With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUST | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 83.4% | 25.0% | 17.8% | 72.1% | 8.6% | 4.4% | -8.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 101.9% | 27.5% | 19.4% | 19.3% | 15.2% | 17.0% | 35.0% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.04 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 2.70 | 0.34 | 0.09 | -0.08 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 45.8% | 43.1% | -5.3% | 11.7% | 21.1% | 25.1% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLK, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of OUST With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUST | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -26.3% | 18.8% | 14.7% | 18.7% | 11.5% | 4.6% | 30.8% |
| Annualized Volatility | 97.0% | 24.7% | 17.1% | 15.5% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.6% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.12 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 0.57 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 37.8% | 37.6% | 6.2% | 7.9% | 28.5% | 21.0% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLK, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of OUST With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUST | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -24.9% | 22.5% | 14.8% | 15.3% | 7.0% | 5.3% | 69.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 95.3% | 24.2% | 18.0% | 14.7% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.13 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.90 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 37.3% | 37.1% | 6.0% | 7.8% | 28.0% | 20.6% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLK, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 11/4/2025 | -6.5% | -10.4% | -10.5% |
| 8/7/2025 | 11.7% | 51.7% | 22.5% |
| 5/8/2025 | 22.8% | 29.9% | 75.5% |
| 1/17/2025 | -5.9% | -7.2% | -10.8% |
| 11/7/2024 | 1.5% | 10.5% | 26.8% |
| 8/13/2024 | -27.7% | -27.9% | -43.6% |
| 3/26/2024 | 34.5% | 100.8% | 50.2% |
| 11/9/2023 | 19.7% | 21.1% | 42.7% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 10 | 10 | 8 |
| # Negative | 8 | 8 | 10 |
| Median Positive | 18.1% | 21.4% | 34.8% |
| Median Negative | -5.8% | -11.2% | -15.7% |
| Max Positive | 34.5% | 100.8% | 75.5% |
| Max Negative | -27.7% | -27.9% | -43.6% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2025 | 11/05/2025 | 10-Q (09/30/2025) |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/11/2025 | 10-Q (06/30/2025) |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/09/2025 | 10-Q (03/31/2025) |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/21/2025 | 10-K (12/31/2024) |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/08/2024 | 10-Q (09/30/2024) |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/14/2024 | 10-Q (06/30/2024) |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/13/2024 | 10-Q (03/31/2024) |
| 12/31/2023 | 03/28/2024 | 10-K (12/31/2023) |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/13/2023 | 10-Q (09/30/2023) |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 10-Q (06/30/2023) |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/12/2023 | 10-Q (03/31/2023) |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/24/2023 | 10-K (12/31/2022) |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/08/2022 | 10-Q (09/30/2022) |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/05/2022 | 10-Q (06/30/2022) |
| 03/31/2022 | 05/06/2022 | 10-Q (03/31/2022) |
| 12/31/2021 | 02/28/2022 | 10-K (12/31/2021) |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.