Aspen Aerogels (ASPN)
Market Price (12/29/2025): $2.91 | Market Cap: $239.8 MilSector: Industrials | Industry: Building Products
Aspen Aerogels (ASPN)
Market Price (12/29/2025): $2.91Market Cap: $239.8 MilSector: IndustrialsIndustry: Building Products
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 15% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -126%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -155% | Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -15%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -38% |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -44% | Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 10% | Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -130% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Advanced Materials, Battery Technology & Metals, and Sustainable & Green Buildings. Themes include Nanomaterials, Show more. | Key risksASPN key risks include [1] an over-dependence on the volatile electric vehicle market, Show more. |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 15% |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -44% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Advanced Materials, Battery Technology & Metals, and Sustainable & Green Buildings. Themes include Nanomaterials, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -126%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -155% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 10% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -15%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -38% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -130% |
| Key risksASPN key risks include [1] an over-dependence on the volatile electric vehicle market, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Q3 2025 Earnings Miss and Revenue Decline: Aspen Aerogels reported its third-quarter 2025 financial results on November 6, 2025, revealing an earnings per share (EPS) loss of $0.08, which missed the consensus forecast of a $0.03 loss. While total revenue of $73.0 million was slightly above analyst expectations, it marked a 6% decrease quarter-over-quarter and a substantial 38% reduction compared to the third quarter of 2024.
2. Lowered Full-Year 2025 Outlook: A primary driver of the stock's decline was the company's significantly reduced full-year 2025 financial guidance. Aspen Aerogels slashed its revenue outlook to a range of $270-$280 million from a prior estimate of $297-$317 million, and dramatically cut its Adjusted EBITDA guidance from $35-$45 million to $7-$15 million, primarily citing challenges in the North American electric vehicle (EV) market.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -58.6% change in ASPN stock from 9/28/2025 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -53.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 9282025 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 7.10 | 2.94 | -58.59% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 397.18 | 352.85 | -11.16% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.47 | 0.69 | -53.27% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 82.18 | 82.40 | -0.27% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -58.59% |
Market Drivers
9/28/2025 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| ASPN | -58.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 4.3% | 37.5% |
| Sector (XLI) | 3.0% | 25.2% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -50.0% change in ASPN stock from 6/29/2025 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -37.8% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6292025 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 5.88 | 2.94 | -50.00% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 436.92 | 352.85 | -19.24% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.10 | 0.69 | -37.84% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 82.07 | 82.40 | -0.41% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -50.00% |
Market Drivers
6/29/2025 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| ASPN | -50.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 12.6% | 36.2% |
| Sector (XLI) | 7.5% | 27.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -76.4% change in ASPN stock from 12/28/2024 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -70.1% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12282024 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 12.47 | 2.94 | -76.42% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 413.83 | 352.85 | -14.74% |
| P/S Multiple | 2.30 | 0.69 | -70.12% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 76.26 | 82.40 | -8.05% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -76.58% |
Market Drivers
12/28/2024 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| ASPN | -76.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 17.0% | 35.7% |
| Sector (XLI) | 19.2% | 32.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -74.6% change in ASPN stock from 12/29/2022 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -108.4% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| 12292022 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 11.57 | 2.94 | -74.59% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 152.23 | 352.85 | 131.79% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.00 | 0.69 | -77.15% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 39.53 | 82.40 | -108.43% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -104.46% |
Market Drivers
12/29/2023 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| ASPN | -81.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 48.4% | 33.6% |
| Sector (XLI) | 41.4% | 32.1% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| ASPN Return | 115% | 198% | -76% | 34% | -25% | -75% | -62% |
| Peers Return | 16% | 38% | -12% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 150% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 18% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| ASPN Win Rate | 67% | 75% | 25% | 58% | 33% | 42% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 65% | 42% | 68% | 57% | 52% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| ASPN Max Drawdown | -36% | -5% | -83% | -53% | -31% | -76% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -5% | -26% | -7% | -9% | -23% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL. See ASPN Returns vs. Peers.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/26/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | ASPN | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -91.3% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 1055.4% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -53.5% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 115.0% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 184 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -70.2% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 235.4% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 169 days | 120 days |
Compare to HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL
In The Past
Aspen Aerogels's stock fell -91.3% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 11/18/2021. A -91.3% loss requires a 1055.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies to describe Aspen Aerogels (ASPN):
- Aspen Aerogels is like the Corning of advanced insulation materials, specializing in unique aerogel technology for high-performance thermal management.
- It's similar to how Intel or Qualcomm develop critical 'chips' for computing; Aspen Aerogels develops critical aerogel materials for advanced thermal management and EV battery safety.
- Just as Albemarle supplies crucial lithium for EV batteries, Aspen Aerogels provides the advanced aerogel materials essential for thermal management and safety in those same EV batteries.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Pyrogel® Aerogel Insulation: Flexible aerogel blanket insulation used in high-temperature industrial applications, energy infrastructure, and passive fire protection.
- Spaceloft® Aerogel Insulation: Flexible aerogel blanket insulation primarily designed for high-performance building and construction applications.
- Ondura® Thermal Barriers: Advanced thermal management materials developed for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) to improve safety and performance.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Aspen Aerogels (symbol: ASPN) sells primarily to other companies (Business-to-Business, B2B). Its major customers and customer categories include:- General Motors (GM): A major North American electric vehicle (EV) original equipment manufacturer (OEM) for which Aspen Aerogels supplies its PyroThin® thermal barrier products for use in battery modules across multiple vehicle programs.
- Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) firms, Industrial Contractors, and Large Industrial End-Users: This category encompasses a broad base of customers for Aspen Aerogels' traditional Pyrogel® and Cryogel® industrial insulation products. These firms and end-users operate in sectors such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil & gas, petrochemicals, power generation, and other industrial processes, where high-performance insulation is critical for energy efficiency, safety, and operational reliability. Sales often occur directly, through EPCs designing and building facilities, or via distributors to industrial contractors.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Evonik Industries AG (EVK)
- Wacker Chemie AG (WCH)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Donald R. Young, President & CEO
Donald R. Young has served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a member of the board of directors of Aspen Aerogels since November 2001. Before joining Aspen Aerogels, he was the Chief Executive Officer of HighWired, a venture capital-backed software and e-learning company. He also held various senior operating roles with Cabot Corporation, a global specialty chemical company, and worked in the investment business at Fidelity Management & Research. Mr. Young holds a BA from Harvard College and an MBA from Harvard Business School.
Grant Thoele, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Grant Thoele joined Aspen Aerogels in August 2021 and was appointed Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer in October 2025. Prior to his CFO appointment, he served as Chief of Staff to the CEO and Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Finance, leading strategy, financial planning & analysis, and commercial finance activities. Before Aspen Aerogels, Mr. Thoele was a Vice President at Providence Equity Partners, a private equity firm. He also led FP&A at Learfield Sports and began his career in public accounting at KPMG, LLP. Mr. Thoele received his Bachelor of Business Administration and Master of Science in Accounting from Texas Tech University.
George L. Gould, Chief Technology Officer
George L. Gould has been with Aspen Aerogels since its inception in 2001, serving as Vice President, Research and Development since April 2011 and later becoming Chief Technology Officer. Prior to joining Aspen Aerogels' predecessor, Aspen Systems, Dr. Gould was a chemistry professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He holds a B.A. in Chemistry from the College of Wooster, a Ph.D. in Inorganic Chemistry from Yale University, and completed post-doctoral training at Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Gregg R. Landes, Senior Vice President, Operations and Strategic Development
Gregg R. Landes joined Aspen Aerogels in September 2016. Before this, he was employed by Hess Corporation as Vice President, Business Development for Hess LNG. Prior to Hess Corporation, Mr. Landes held a variety of senior financial and business leadership roles at Cabot Corporation. He earned a BSBA in Finance from the University of Florida and an MBA from the F.W. Olin Graduate School of Business at Babson College.
Glenn Deegan, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Glenn Deegan was appointed Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary in September 2025. Prior to joining Aspen Aerogels, he served as Chief Legal and Human Resources Officer of Altra Industrial Motion Corp., where he played a key role in significant mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Deegan also served as General Counsel or in-house counsel for multiple public companies and was engaged in the private practice of law. He holds a BS from Providence College and a JD from Boston College Law School.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Aspen Aerogels' (ASPN) business are primarily concentrated around the volatility of the electric vehicle (EV) market, significant customer concentration, and ongoing profitability challenges.
- Reliance on the Electric Vehicle (EV) Market and Volatility: Aspen Aerogels' core product, PyroThin thermal barriers, is heavily dependent on the EV market. The company has experienced a sharp downturn in this market, leading to a dramatic cut in its 2025 financial outlook and a massive financial reset. This market volatility, coupled with weak consumer confidence, directly impacted demand and resulted in a 38% year-over-year decline in total revenue in Q3 2025 for its Thermal Barrier segment. The company even closed a manufacturing facility in Statesboro, Georgia, due to decreased EV demand, incurring a substantial impairment charge. The phasing out of EV tax credits could further reduce demand in the near term.
- Customer Concentration Risk: A significant portion of Aspen Aerogels' revenue is derived from a single customer, General Motors, which accounted for a massive 64% of total revenue in 2024. This high customer concentration poses a substantial risk, as the company's growth and sales are heavily constrained by GM's performance and strategic decisions in the EV market. There is also a risk that GM could switch to alternative battery technologies, which would directly impact Aspen Aerogels' sales.
- Profitability Challenges and Need for Additional Capital: Aspen Aerogels has consistently faced financial challenges, including significantly negative net margins (-78.53%) and a negative return on equity (-68.89%). The company has a history of incurring annual net losses and may continue to do so, potentially hindering its ability to achieve sustained profitability. A large non-cash impairment charge of $287.6 million was recognized in 2025, contributing to a projected significant net loss for the year. Consequently, Aspen Aerogels may need to raise additional capital to fund its growth strategies, ongoing operations, and product development, as it may not generate sufficient positive cash flow in the future. The company is also categorized as a "Possible Value Trap" with a negative Altman Z-Score, indicating potential financial distress.
AI Analysis | Feedback
One clear emerging threat for Aspen Aerogels (ASPN) is the intensifying competition from alternative aerogel producers and other advanced material companies. Competitors such as JIOS Aerogel are aggressively expanding manufacturing capacity and market presence, directly challenging Aspen Aerogels' position, particularly in the critical Electric Vehicle (EV) battery thermal management market. Additionally, a wide array of other advanced material companies are developing and marketing alternative high-performance thermal insulation solutions (e.g., specialized foams, mica-based products, ceramic fibers, and phase-change materials) that compete directly with aerogels for thermal runaway protection in EV battery packs and other industrial applications.
Another clear emerging threat stems from the rapid evolution of Electric Vehicle battery architectures and designs. The EV industry is continuously innovating battery pack designs, including cell-to-pack, blade batteries, and structural batteries. These new designs may integrate thermal management solutions differently, potentially reducing the need for external, pre-formed thermal barriers like Aspen's aerogel blankets, or favoring alternative materials better suited to the new form factors. A significant shift in battery pack design that internalizes or fundamentally alters thermal management requirements could diminish the addressable market for Aspen's current aerogel products, posing a risk of technological bypass.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 3-5 expected drivers of future revenue growth for Aspen Aerogels (ASPN) over the next 2-3 years:
- Accelerated Adoption and Integration of PyroThin in Electric Vehicle (EV) Platforms: Aspen Aerogels anticipates significant revenue growth from the increasing integration of its PyroThin thermal barrier material into new and next-generation electric vehicle platforms from various automotive OEMs. The company has a growing pipeline of awarded programs and expects continued market penetration within the EV sector for battery thermal management.
- Expansion into Broader Battery Materials Markets: Beyond current EV thermal management applications, Aspen Aerogels is focused on expanding its presence within the broader battery materials segment, exploring new opportunities that leverage its aerogel technology in energy storage.
- Growth in New Industrial and Infrastructure Applications: The company is targeting and expects growth from new industrial thermal and infrastructure applications. This represents a diversification of its market reach beyond its core automotive segment into other high-value industrial markets globally.
- Leveraging Strategic Capacity Expansion: Aspen Aerogels' investments in strategic capacity expansion, such as its new manufacturing facility in Georgia, are crucial to meeting the anticipated strong demand for its PyroThin products and other aerogel materials. This increased production capability will enable higher sales volumes and revenue growth in the coming years.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Share Issuance
- In October 2024, Aspen Aerogels announced an underwritten public offering of 4,250,000 shares of its common stock, with net proceeds of approximately $93.2 million, intended for working capital, capital expenditures, and general corporate purposes.
- In June 2021, the company issued 3,462,124 shares of its common stock to Koch Strategic Platforms (KSP) in a private placement, raising $75 million.
- In February 2020, Aspen Aerogels completed an underwritten public offering of 1,700,000 shares of common stock at $8.25 per share, with expected gross proceeds of approximately $14.0 million for working capital and general corporate purposes.
- Inbound Investments
- In February 2022, Koch Strategic Platforms (KSP) made a $150 million investment in Aspen Aerogels through the purchase of convertible notes and common stock, aimed at supporting the company's aerogel thermal barrier growth opportunities.
- In June 2021, an affiliate of Koch Strategic Platforms (KSP) made a $75 million private placement investment in Aspen Aerogels by purchasing common stock.
- Outbound Investments
- As of September 2025, Aspen Aerogels has not made any reported outbound investments or acquisitions.
- Capital Expenditures
- For the full year 2025, capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $25 million, excluding costs related to the Statesboro plant project. Costs related to the Statesboro plant project totaled $15.4 million year-to-date as of September 30, 2025.
- In the first quarter of 2025, the company recorded a significant impairment charge of $287.6 million, along with $9.8 million in restructuring costs, related to the demobilization of its previously planned second aerogel manufacturing facility in Statesboro, Georgia.
- For 2026, the company projects approximately $10 million in capital expenditures.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to ASPN. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11212025 | CNM | Core & Main | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 18.3% | 18.3% | -1.6% |
| 11212025 | VRRM | Verra Mobility | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 5.5% | 5.5% | -1.2% |
| 11212025 | LII | Lennox International | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 7.1% | 7.1% | 0.0% |
| 11212025 | ADP | Automatic Data Processing | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | 2.9% | 2.9% | -1.2% |
| 11212025 | CW | Curtiss-Wright | Quality | Q | Momentum | UpsideQuality Stocks with Momentum and UpsideBuying quality stocks with strong momentum but still having room to run | 5.7% | 5.7% | -0.4% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Aspen Aerogels
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 51.32 |
| Mkt Cap | 158.8 |
| Rev LTM | 56,496 |
| Op Inc LTM | 7,584 |
| FCF LTM | 7,327 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 7,366 |
| CFO LTM | 8,590 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 8,697 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 5.2% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 3.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 8.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 2.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 12.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 11.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 17.7% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 17.1% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 11.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 12.1% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 158.8 |
| P/S | 2.7 |
| P/EBIT | 21.2 |
| P/E | 33.0 |
| P/CFO | 16.2 |
| Total Yield | 3.9% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | 5.7% |
| D/E | 0.4 |
| Net D/E | 0.1 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | -1.5% |
| 3M Rtn | 4.9% |
| 6M Rtn | 10.9% |
| 12M Rtn | 11.8% |
| 3Y Rtn | 73.5% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | -3.0% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | 0.6% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | -1.3% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | -4.6% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -6.2% |
Comparison Analyses
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $2.94 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.2 | |
| First Trading Date | 06/13/2014 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -78.8% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $4.65 | $6.11 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -36.8% | -51.9% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 113.0% | 87.0% |
| Downside Capture | 732.73 | 306.48 |
| Upside Capture | 173.77 | 116.70 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 37.3% | 35.6% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 4.52 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.18 | 1.55 | 2.07 |
| Up Beta | 1.62 | 1.35 | 1.85 | 3.24 | 1.22 | 1.58 |
| Down Beta | 2.88 | 1.60 | 2.59 | 3.42 | 1.37 | 1.43 |
| Up Capture | -76% | 197% | 203% | 210% | 105% | 2593% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 12 | 25 | 38 | 73 | 141 | 426 |
| Stock +ve Days | 6 | 16 | 24 | 53 | 105 | 355 |
| Down Capture | 790% | 534% | 471% | 318% | 158% | 112% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 13 | 25 | 38 | 70 | 139 | 383 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of ASPN With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASPN | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -75.6% | 19.3% | 17.8% | 72.1% | 8.6% | 4.4% | -8.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 86.4% | 18.8% | 19.4% | 19.3% | 15.2% | 17.0% | 35.0% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.19 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 2.70 | 0.34 | 0.09 | -0.08 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 32.8% | 35.6% | 6.1% | 14.0% | 24.6% | 22.7% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLI, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of ASPN With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASPN | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -29.8% | 13.8% | 14.7% | 18.7% | 11.5% | 4.6% | 30.8% |
| Annualized Volatility | 85.3% | 17.2% | 17.1% | 15.5% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.6% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.02 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 0.57 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 39.8% | 41.1% | 6.8% | 14.7% | 35.3% | 22.1% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLI, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of ASPN With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASPN | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -6.4% | 13.5% | 14.8% | 15.3% | 7.0% | 5.3% | 69.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 73.8% | 19.9% | 18.0% | 14.7% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.25 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.90 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 33.6% | 35.3% | 3.9% | 16.8% | 30.3% | 14.1% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLI, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 11/6/2025 | -44.5% | -53.7% | -55.6% |
| 8/7/2025 | -8.1% | -9.3% | -19.8% |
| 5/8/2025 | -24.3% | 0.7% | 5.8% |
| 2/12/2025 | -23.4% | -30.6% | -37.2% |
| 10/16/2024 | 13.2% | -9.1% | -30.7% |
| 8/7/2024 | 16.0% | 27.7% | 28.5% |
| 5/1/2024 | 56.7% | 75.0% | 96.6% |
| 1/11/2024 | -4.2% | -14.8% | -16.4% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 13 | 10 | 14 |
| # Negative | 10 | 13 | 9 |
| Median Positive | 11.1% | 19.8% | 21.7% |
| Median Negative | -8.9% | -8.1% | -19.8% |
| Max Positive | 56.7% | 75.0% | 96.6% |
| Max Negative | -44.5% | -53.7% | -55.6% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 9302025 | 11062025 | 10-Q 9/30/2025 |
| 6302025 | 8072025 | 10-Q 6/30/2025 |
| 3312025 | 5082025 | 10-Q 3/31/2025 |
| 12312024 | 2272025 | 10-K 12/31/2024 |
| 9302024 | 11072024 | 10-Q 9/30/2024 |
| 6302024 | 8082024 | 10-Q 6/30/2024 |
| 3312024 | 5022024 | 10-Q 3/31/2024 |
| 12312023 | 3072024 | 10-K 12/31/2023 |
| 9302023 | 11022023 | 10-Q 9/30/2023 |
| 6302023 | 8032023 | 10-Q 6/30/2023 |
| 3312023 | 5042023 | 10-Q 3/31/2023 |
| 12312022 | 3162023 | 10-K 12/31/2022 |
| 9302022 | 11072022 | 10-Q 9/30/2022 |
| 6302022 | 8042022 | 10-Q 6/30/2022 |
| 3312022 | 5102022 | 10-Q 3/31/2022 |
| 12312021 | 3012022 | 10-K 12/31/2021 |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.