New Concept Energy (GBR)
Market Price (12/29/2025): $0.74 | Market Cap: $3.8 MilSector: Real Estate | Industry: Real Estate Services
New Concept Energy (GBR)
Market Price (12/29/2025): $0.74Market Cap: $3.8 MilSector: Real EstateIndustry: Real Estate Services
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -33% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -71%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -110% | Penny stockMkt Price is 0.8 |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US LNG, and US Oilfield Technologies. | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -0.3 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -169% | |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 25x | ||
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -5.0% | ||
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -67%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -67% | ||
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -6.1% | ||
| Key risksGBR key risks include [1] an overwhelming dependence on the recovery of a single, Show more. |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -33% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US LNG, and US Oilfield Technologies. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -71%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -110% |
| Penny stockMkt Price is 0.8 |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -0.3 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -169% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 25x |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -5.0% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -67%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -67% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -6.1% |
| Key risksGBR key risks include [1] an overwhelming dependence on the recovery of a single, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
New Concept Energy (GBR) experienced a significant decline in its stock price, characterized by several key factors during the approximate period from August 31, 2025, to late December 2025. While the exact -24.8% movement for this specific timeframe is not detailed, the company's overall performance and outlook during this period suggest a strong downward trend.
1. Negative Short-Term Trend and Technical Sell Signals
The stock was in a "very wide and falling trend in the short term" and displayed "sell signals from both short and long-term Moving Averages," indicating a consistently negative forecast. Technical analysis revealed more sell signals than buy signals, pointing towards a bearish outlook in the mid-term. The increase in trading volume coinciding with a price drop further reinforced this strong bearish sentiment.
2. Weak Financial Performance and Unprofitability
New Concept Energy reported continued losses and negative financial metrics. For instance, in the 12 months leading up to late 2025, the company recorded revenue of $153,000 but incurred losses of $77,000, resulting in a loss per share of -$0.02. Additionally, its EBITDA was -$246.00K USD, with a significantly negative EBITDA margin of -153.42%, reflecting poor operating performance.
Show more
1. Negative Short-Term Trend and Technical Sell Signals
The stock was in a "very wide and falling trend in the short term" and displayed "sell signals from both short and long-term Moving Averages," indicating a consistently negative forecast. Technical analysis revealed more sell signals than buy signals, pointing towards a bearish outlook in the mid-term. The increase in trading volume coinciding with a price drop further reinforced this strong bearish sentiment.
2. Weak Financial Performance and Unprofitability
New Concept Energy reported continued losses and negative financial metrics. For instance, in the 12 months leading up to late 2025, the company recorded revenue of $153,000 but incurred losses of $77,000, resulting in a loss per share of -$0.02. Additionally, its EBITDA was -$246.00K USD, with a significantly negative EBITDA margin of -153.42%, reflecting poor operating performance.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -29.0% change in GBR stock from 9/28/2025 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -29.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 9282025 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.07 | 0.76 | -28.97% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0.15 | 0.15 | 1.32% |
| P/S Multiple | 36.37 | 25.49 | -29.90% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 5.13 | 5.13 | 0.00% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -28.97% |
Market Drivers
9/28/2025 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GBR | -29.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 4.3% | -6.2% |
| Sector (XLRE) | -3.2% | 7.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -29.0% change in GBR stock from 6/29/2025 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -31.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6292025 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.07 | 0.76 | -28.97% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0.15 | 0.15 | 3.38% |
| P/S Multiple | 37.10 | 25.49 | -31.29% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 5.13 | 5.13 | 0.00% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -28.97% |
Market Drivers
6/29/2025 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GBR | -29.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 12.6% | 12.4% |
| Sector (XLRE) | -0.7% | 10.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -34.5% change in GBR stock from 12/28/2024 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -37.1% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12282024 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.16 | 0.76 | -34.48% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0.15 | 0.15 | 4.08% |
| P/S Multiple | 40.50 | 25.49 | -37.05% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 5.13 | 5.13 | 0.00% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -34.48% |
Market Drivers
12/28/2024 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GBR | -34.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 17.0% | 12.1% |
| Sector (XLRE) | 2.3% | 8.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -30.9% change in GBR stock from 12/29/2022 to 12/28/2025 was primarily driven by a -18.7% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12292022 | 12282025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.10 | 0.76 | -30.91% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0.18 | 0.15 | -15.00% |
| P/S Multiple | 31.36 | 25.49 | -18.72% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 5.13 | 5.13 | 0.00% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -30.91% |
Market Drivers
12/29/2023 to 12/28/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GBR | -24.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 48.4% | 7.7% |
| Sector (XLRE) | 7.1% | 4.1% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| GBR Return | 58% | 23% | -54% | -8% | 16% | -32% | -36% |
| Peers Return | 16% | 38% | -12% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 150% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 18% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| GBR Win Rate | 58% | 33% | 42% | 42% | 50% | 25% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 65% | 42% | 68% | 57% | 52% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| GBR Max Drawdown | -51% | -7% | -55% | -17% | -4% | -42% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -5% | -26% | -7% | -9% | -23% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/26/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | GBR | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -96.4% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 2647.3% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -57.1% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 133.2% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 125 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -86.5% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 641.7% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 402 days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -78.9% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 374.6% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 160 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL
In The Past
New Concept Energy's stock fell -96.4% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 1/28/2021. A -96.4% loss requires a 2647.3% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
New Concept Energy, Inc. engages in real estate rental business. The company owns approximately 190 acres of land located in Parkersburg West Virginia. It also provides advisory and management services for an independent oil and gas company. The company was formerly known as CabelTel International Corporation and changed its name to New Concept Energy, Inc. in May 2008. New Concept Energy, Inc. was founded in 1978 and is based in Dallas, Texas. New Concept Energy, Inc. is a former subsidiary of Arcadian Energy, Inc.
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. A small independent oil and gas producer, similar to a localized Occidental Petroleum, that also owns a retail shopping center like a single property from Simon Property Group.
2. A publicly traded mini-conglomerate, akin to a tiny Berkshire Hathaway, focused on Texas oil wells and a single retail property.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Oil and Gas Production: The company operates producing oil and gas properties primarily in the Appalachian Basin.
- Non-Operating Oil and Gas Interests: It holds working interests in various oil and gas properties where it does not perform direct operational activities.
- Real Estate Ownership: The company owns residential properties and mineral deeds for land.
AI Analysis | Feedback
New Concept Energy (GBR) generates its limited revenue from two main sources: oil and gas royalty income from its mineral interests and direct operations of a motel. The company explicitly states in its SEC filings that it does not have any material long-term contracts with single customers and that the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect, indicating an absence of "major customers" in the traditional sense.
While a portion of its revenue comes from oil and gas royalty payments received from various energy operating companies, its most direct customer-facing sales activity comes from its motel operations (the MCM Inn), which serve individuals. Therefore, focusing on the company's direct sales to individuals, its customer categories are:
- Business Travelers: Individuals staying for work-related purposes, including corporate meetings, business trips, or temporary assignments.
- Leisure Travelers/Tourists: Individuals or families visiting for vacation, recreational activities, or personal events in the area.
- Local/Transient Guests: Customers seeking short-term accommodation for various personal needs, such as relocating, visiting family, or during local emergencies.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
Gene S. Bertcher, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Bertcher has a lengthy tenure with New Concept Energy, Inc., spanning 36 years. Prior to his current roles, he served as the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Pillar Income Asset Management, Inc. since April 30, 2011. He also held the position of Chief Accounting Officer.
Louis J. Corna, Executive Vice President and Secretary
Gina H. Kay, Executive Vice President and Treasurer
Ms. Kay has also been noted for her role as Vice President and Treasurer of Realty Advisors Inc., a significant shareholder in New Concept Energy.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The public company New Concept Energy (symbol: GBR) faces several key risks to its business operations and financial stability:
- High Dependence on a Single, Related-Party Note Receivable: New Concept Energy's financial health is overwhelmingly dependent on the recovery of a single, significant, unsecured related-party note receivable, which constituted approximately 78% of its total assets as of September 30, 2025. This $3,542,000 note, due in September 2027, is the primary driver of the company's total income, with interest from this note being its largest single source of cash flow. The company's financial viability hinges on the successful repayment of this specific note.
- Structurally Unprofitable Core Operations and Consistent Net Losses: New Concept Energy's core business operations, which include real estate rental and advisory and management services for an independent oil and gas company, are structurally unprofitable. The company has consistently reported net losses, with total revenue in 2024 at $146,000 and losses at -$18,000. For the first nine months of 2025, it reported a net loss of $58,000. Corporate general and administrative expenses frequently exceed the revenue generated from these operations, leading to a consistent operational deficit.
- Limited and Declining Revenue Streams: The company's revenue streams are minimal and primarily consist of stable but small rental income from its leased property in West Virginia (around $101,000 annually) and management fees from oil and gas operations. The management fees have decreased due to a decline in oil and gas prices, indicating vulnerability to commodity market fluctuations. This limited diversification and the small scale of its revenue-generating activities contribute to the company's overall financial precariousness.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The accelerating global transition towards renewable energy sources and decarbonization initiatives poses a clear emerging threat to New Concept Energy's core business of oil and gas production. This shift is driven by rapid technological advancements in renewables, increasing governmental regulations aimed at combating climate change, and evolving investor and consumer preferences towards sustainable energy. This trend directly threatens the long-term demand for, and profitability of, fossil fuel assets, potentially leading to asset write-downs, reduced capital availability for exploration, and higher operational costs due to environmental compliance requirements.
AI Analysis | Feedback
New Concept Energy (GBR) operates in two main markets: real estate rental and oil and natural gas exploration and production.
-
Real Estate Rental: The market size for commercial leasing in the U.S. is measured at approximately $265.2 billion in 2025.
-
Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Production: The addressable market size for the upstream (exploration and production) sector of the U.S. oil and gas market is estimated to be approximately $103.2 billion in 2025. This is based on the overall U.S. oil and gas market size of USD 142.81 billion in 2025, with the upstream sector accounting for 72.3% of the market in 2024.
AI Analysis | Feedback
New Concept Energy (GBR) operates primarily in real estate leasing and oil and gas consulting. Over the next 2-3 years, the expected drivers of future revenue growth for the company are anticipated to stem from the following areas:- Growth in Real Estate Rental Income: The company owns approximately 190 acres of land and over 53,000 square feet of building space in Parkersburg, West Virginia, which generates rental income. Future revenue growth is expected from potential increases in rental rates or higher occupancy levels within its leased property.
- Fluctuations in Oil and Gas Prices: New Concept Energy provides advisory and management services to an independent oil and gas company, receiving a management fee that is a share of the oil and gas revenue. Therefore, an increase in oil and gas prices would directly lead to higher management fee income.
- Expansion of Oil and Gas Consulting Services: While the company currently serves a single oil and gas client, future revenue growth could be driven by expanding its consulting management agreement with the existing client to cover more operations or by securing new consulting agreements with additional clients in the oil and gas sector.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Outbound Investments
- New Concept Energy sold its oil and gas operation in August 2020 for $85,000, which resulted in a gain of $2.1 million primarily due to being relieved of plug and abandonment obligations.
- In the second quarter of 2022, the company collected $62,000 from a previously fully reserved investment and recorded a gain of $68,000 from the sale of equipment.
- The company continues to own and operate approximately 191 acres of land with four structures in Parkersburg, West Virginia, with a business strategy that includes potentially selling this property.
Capital Expenditures
- Capital expenditures for the last 12 months (prior to November 2025) amounted to -$20,000, indicating a net inflow likely from asset sales.
- The primary focus of the company's capital allocation has been on maintaining its real estate property in West Virginia and providing advisory and management services.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| New Concept Energy Earnings Notes | ||
| Is New Concept Energy Stock Built to Withstand a Pullback? | Return |
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to GBR. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10312025 | MPW | Medical Properties Trust | Special | Short Squeeze PotentialShort Squeeze PotentialHas potential for a short squeeze. High short interest, rising short interest and high debt. | -0.1% | -0.1% | -5.8% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for New Concept Energy
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 51.32 |
| Mkt Cap | 158.8 |
| Rev LTM | 56,496 |
| Op Inc LTM | 7,584 |
| FCF LTM | 7,327 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 7,366 |
| CFO LTM | 8,590 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 8,697 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 5.2% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 2.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 8.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 2.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 12.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 11.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 14.6% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 17.1% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 11.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 12.1% |
Price Behavior
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $0.76 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.0 | |
| First Trading Date | 03/26/1993 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -56.8% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $0.83 | $0.92 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -8.9% | -17.1% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 59.1% | 88.2% |
| Downside Capture | -27.26 | 56.18 |
| Upside Capture | -184.73 | 5.14 |
| Correlation (SPY) | -5.6% | 12.2% |
GBR Betas & Captures as of 11/30/2025
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.45 |
| Up Beta | 1.32 | 0.73 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
| Down Beta | -1.10 | 0.88 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.81 | 0.45 |
| Up Capture | -124% | -84% | -28% | 66% | 21% | 6% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 12 | 25 | 38 | 73 | 141 | 426 |
| Stock +ve Days | 6 | 15 | 25 | 51 | 103 | 317 |
| Down Capture | 82% | 80% | 120% | 154% | 88% | 78% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 13 | 25 | 36 | 68 | 131 | 376 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of GBR With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBR | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -33.3% | 2.7% | 17.8% | 72.1% | 8.6% | 4.4% | -8.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 87.4% | 16.8% | 19.4% | 19.3% | 15.2% | 17.0% | 35.0% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.10 | -0.01 | 0.72 | 2.70 | 0.34 | 0.09 | -0.08 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 9.1% | 12.4% | 6.8% | 19.1% | 9.1% | 5.8% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLRE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of GBR With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBR | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -15.3% | 5.3% | 14.7% | 18.7% | 11.5% | 4.6% | 30.8% |
| Annualized Volatility | 440.8% | 19.1% | 17.1% | 15.5% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.6% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.40 | 0.19 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 0.57 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 2.3% | 4.7% | 2.2% | 4.3% | 3.2% | 7.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLRE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of GBR With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBR | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -4.4% | 6.3% | 14.8% | 15.3% | 7.0% | 5.3% | 69.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 333.3% | 20.6% | 18.0% | 14.7% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.43 | 0.27 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.90 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 3.2% | 5.7% | 0.9% | 6.9% | 4.0% | 5.1% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLRE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 11/17/2025 | -3.6% | -2.3% | 0.6% |
| 8/15/2025 | 5.7% | -9.6% | 19.6% |
| 3/27/2025 | -2.2% | -18.1% | -19.3% |
| 11/15/2024 | 0.0% | 3.8% | -3.8% |
| 8/20/2024 | 0.8% | -3.0% | -10.6% |
| 4/5/2024 | -0.8% | 1.7% | 8.5% |
| 11/28/2023 | 2.4% | 2.4% | -2.9% |
| 8/9/2023 | -4.5% | -8.2% | 9.1% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| # Negative | 11 | 10 | 10 |
| Median Positive | 2.4% | 5.0% | 10.2% |
| Median Negative | -2.6% | -6.8% | -12.2% |
| Max Positive | 5.7% | 73.9% | 31.2% |
| Max Negative | -10.1% | -18.1% | -26.7% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 9302025 | 11122025 | 10-Q 9/30/2025 |
| 6302025 | 8132025 | 10-Q 6/30/2025 |
| 3312025 | 5152025 | 10-Q 3/31/2025 |
| 12312024 | 3242025 | 10-K 12/31/2024 |
| 9302024 | 11132024 | 10-Q 9/30/2024 |
| 6302024 | 8142024 | 10-Q 6/30/2024 |
| 3312024 | 5092024 | 10-Q 3/31/2024 |
| 12312023 | 4012024 | 10-K 12/31/2023 |
| 9302023 | 11092023 | 10-Q 9/30/2023 |
| 6302023 | 8072023 | 10-Q 6/30/2023 |
| 3312023 | 5102023 | 10-Q 3/31/2023 |
| 12312022 | 3212023 | 10-K 12/31/2022 |
| 9302022 | 11102022 | 10-Q 9/30/2022 |
| 6302022 | 8122022 | 10-Q 6/30/2022 |
| 3312022 | 5122022 | 10-Q 3/31/2022 |
| 12312021 | 3222022 | 10-K 12/31/2021 |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.