Evolution Petroleum (EPM)
Market Price (5/17/2026): $4.655 | Market Cap: $159.7 MilSector: Energy | Industry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Evolution Petroleum (EPM)
Market Price (5/17/2026): $4.655Market Cap: $159.7 MilSector: EnergyIndustry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 8.2%, Dividend Yield is 10%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 3.9% Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 33% Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 39% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Energy Transition & Decarbonization, Sustainable Resource Management, and US Energy Independence. Themes include Carbon Capture & Storage, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -40%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -94% | Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -3.2%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -15%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -11% Not cash flow generativeFCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -16% Key risksEPM key risks include [1] its reliance on third-party operators, Show more. |
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 8.2%, Dividend Yield is 10%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 3.9% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 33% |
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 39% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Energy Transition & Decarbonization, Sustainable Resource Management, and US Energy Independence. Themes include Carbon Capture & Storage, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -40%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -94% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -3.2%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -15%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -11% |
| Not cash flow generativeFCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -16% |
| Key risksEPM key risks include [1] its reliance on third-party operators, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Consistent Shareholder Returns through Dividends. Evolution Petroleum maintained its quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share for the 51st consecutive quarter, demonstrating a commitment to shareholder returns even amid a challenging fiscal third quarter for 2026.
2. Strategic Acquisitions and Operational Growth. The company continued to expand its portfolio through strategic acquisitions of long-life, low-decline assets, including SCOOP/STACK minerals, TexMex, and Louisiana minerals. These acquisitions, alongside planned contributions from Haynesville and Bossier shales, are anticipated to drive future production and revenue growth. Average daily production also saw a slight increase to 6,700 barrels of oil equivalent per day (BOEPD) year-over-year.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 21.4% change in EPM stock from 1/31/2026 to 5/16/2026 was primarily driven by a 26.5% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 1312026 | 5162026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.84 | 4.66 | 21.4% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 85 | 83 | -2.3% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.5 | 1.9 | 26.5% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 34 | 34 | -1.7% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 21.4% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 5/16/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| EPM | 21.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 7.1% | -16.8% |
| Sector (XLE) | 17.2% | 52.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 12.5% change in EPM stock from 10/31/2025 to 5/16/2026 was primarily driven by a 18.6% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 10312025 | 5162026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 4.14 | 4.66 | 12.5% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 86 | 83 | -3.0% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.6 | 1.9 | 18.6% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 34 | 34 | -2.2% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 12.5% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 5/16/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| EPM | 12.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 9.0% | -7.3% |
| Sector (XLE) | 36.9% | 53.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 23.2% change in EPM stock from 4/30/2025 to 5/16/2026 was primarily driven by a 33.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302025 | 5162026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.78 | 4.66 | 23.2% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 86 | 83 | -3.7% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.4 | 1.9 | 33.2% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 33 | 34 | -4.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 23.2% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2025 to 5/16/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| EPM | 23.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 34.8% | 8.2% |
| Sector (XLE) | 52.4% | 55.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -8.0% change in EPM stock from 4/30/2023 to 5/16/2026 was primarily driven by a -41.0% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 4302023 | 5162026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 5.07 | 4.66 | -8.0% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 141 | 83 | -41.0% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.2 | 1.9 | 61.3% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 33 | 34 | -3.3% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -8.0% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2023 to 5/16/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| EPM | -8.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 84.7% | 22.9% |
| Sector (XLE) | 54.0% | 52.9% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| EPM Return | 86% | 59% | -17% | -2% | -25% | 30% | 133% |
| Peers Return | 151% | 2501% | -13% | -7% | -26% | 14% | 4386% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 10% | 100% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| EPM Win Rate | 58% | 67% | 42% | 50% | 50% | 80% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 47% | 62% | 33% | 48% | 38% | 56% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 60% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| EPM Max Drawdown | -29% | -35% | -42% | -24% | -32% | -15% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -50% | -39% | -37% | -52% | -27% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: NOG, AMPY, EP, SD, REI. See EPM Returns vs. Peers.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 5/15/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | EPM | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -20.0% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 24.9% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 35 days | 79 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -14.3% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 16.7% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 11 days | 31 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -55.5% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 124.7% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 447 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -43.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 78.4% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1673 days | 105 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -23.9% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.3% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 59 days | 62 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -59.6% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 147.3% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 317 days | 15 days |
In The Past
Evolution Petroleum's stock fell -20.0% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 24.9% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | EPM | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -55.5% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 124.7% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 447 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -43.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 78.4% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1673 days | 105 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -23.9% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.3% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 59 days | 62 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -59.6% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 147.3% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 317 days | 15 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -21.0% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 26.6% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 102 days | 123 days |
| 2010 Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis / Flash Crash | ||
| % Loss | -20.0% | -15.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 25.1% | 18.2% |
| Time to Breakeven | 72 days | 125 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -74.7% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 295.2% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 361 days | 1085 days |
| Summer 2007 Credit Crunch | ||
| % Loss | -28.8% | -8.6% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 40.5% | 9.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 28 days | 47 days |
In The Past
Evolution Petroleum's stock fell -20.0% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 24.9% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Evolution Petroleum (EPM)
AI Analysis | Feedback
It's like a focused ConocoPhillips for mature oil fields, specializing in enhanced recovery techniques to maximize production.
Think of it as an "oil field landlord," similar to how a smaller Pioneer Natural Resources might meticulously optimize existing properties for long-term value.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Major Products:
- Crude Oil: A naturally occurring petroleum product extracted from its oil and gas properties.
- Natural Gas: A naturally occurring hydrocarbon gas extracted from its oil and gas properties.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) primarily sells its crude oil and natural gas production to other companies within the energy industry, rather than directly to individuals.
However, the specific names of Evolution Petroleum's major customers are not publicly disclosed in its financial filings or other public statements. Companies operating in the upstream oil and natural gas sector, like EPM, typically sell their commodity products (crude oil and natural gas) to a limited number of purchasers, such as pipeline operators, refiners, and natural gas marketers. While their 10-K reports indicate sales concentration with a few purchasers, these specific entities are not explicitly named in public documents, as is common practice in commodity markets where buyers are generally interchangeable.
Based on the nature of the company's business as an oil and natural gas producer, its major customers would generally fall into the following categories:
- Crude Oil Purchasers: These customers typically include crude oil pipeline operators, independent crude oil marketing companies, or directly to refineries that process crude oil into refined products like gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel.
- Natural Gas Purchasers: These customers are generally natural gas pipeline companies, midstream operators that gather and process natural gas, or large industrial users and utility companies (Local Distribution Companies - LDCs) that distribute natural gas to end-users or for power generation.
These purchasers are typically large, creditworthy companies involved in the transportation, processing, or end-use of hydrocarbons.
AI Analysis | Feedback
```html- ExxonMobil (XOM)
- Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Kelly W. Loyd President and Chief Executive Officer Mr. Loyd has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Evolution Petroleum since October 2022, and as a director since 2008. He possesses over 20 years of experience in the energy sector, encompassing both investment banking and buy-side roles, with a focus on analyzing and investing in public and private energy opportunities, corporate finance, and mergers and acquisitions. Since 2004, he has been associated with Petralis Energy Partners, LLC and JVL Advisors, LLC, both private energy investment vehicles, indicating a pattern of involvement with companies backed by private energy investment firms. Prior to 2001, Mr. Loyd co-founded and served as controller of L.A.B. Sports and Entertainment. Ryan Stash Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary Mr. Stash has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer for Evolution Petroleum since November 18, 2020. He brings over 20 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, specializing in capital raising, mergers and acquisitions, and accounting and financial reporting. Before joining Evolution, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Harvest Oil & Gas Corp. from October 2018 to November 2020. Earlier in his career, Mr. Stash served as a Managing Director at Regions Securities, focusing on the energy sector, and spent 11 years in the Energy Investment Banking Group at Wells Fargo Securities. He began his career as an auditor at Hewlett-Packard and Ernst & Young, LLP, and is a Certified Public Accountant in Texas. J. Mark Bunch Chief Operating Officer Mr. Bunch joined Evolution Petroleum in February 2023 as Chief Operating Officer. He has over 40 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. Before his tenure at Evolution, and since 2020, Mr. Bunch was a Senior Vice President and a founding partner of Alamo Resources III, LLC. Additionally, since 2016, he has provided independent consulting services to various upstream energy companies, including Evolution, through his wholly-owned firm, Dantoria Energy, LLC. His career began at Arco Oil and Gas Company in 1981, holding various reservoir and production engineering roles. Kelly M. Beatty Chief Accounting Officer Ms. Beatty serves as Evolution Petroleum's Chief Accounting Officer and has over 15 years of accounting experience. She has worked with a range of onshore and offshore exploration and production companies in both private and public sectors. Most recently, Ms. Beatty was the Controller of QuarterNorth Energy (formerly Fieldwood Energy) from 2019 to 2022. Her background also includes 10 years in financial reporting positions at other public oil and gas companies, such as Petrohawk Energy Corporation and Halcon Resources Corporation. She started her career in 2006 in the assurance practice at Ernst & Young LLP.AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Evolution Petroleum (EPM) are primarily associated with the inherent volatility of the oil and natural gas industry, regulatory and environmental pressures on its enhanced oil recovery operations, and its financial structure, including increased debt levels.
- Commodity Price Volatility
Evolution Petroleum's financial performance is highly sensitive to the fluctuating prices of crude oil and natural gas. A significant and sustained decline in these commodity prices, particularly if West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude drops below approximately $60 per barrel, could substantially reduce the company's profit margins and impact the cash flow available for dividends. As a "higher-cost operator," Evolution Petroleum is particularly vulnerable to periods of weak oil prices. The company's earnings have shown sensitivity to commodity prices, with a reported 60% year-over-year decline in Q1 fiscal 2026 due to lower commodity pricing and elevated lease operating costs. - Regulatory and Environmental Pressures, Coupled with Operational Risks of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)
Evolution Petroleum's operations, particularly its CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects like the Delhi field, are exposed to various risks stemming from climate change concerns. These include potential regulatory changes, political scrutiny, litigation, and financial risks that could lead to increased operating and compliance costs or limit future production areas. The broader oil and gas sector faces increasing pressure to transition to cleaner energy solutions, and CO2-EOR, despite increasing oil production, carries environmental risks, including potential harm to groundwater, surface environments, and local communities, as well as the risk of CO2 leakage. Furthermore, EPM holds non-operating interests, meaning it relies on its partners to execute development and maintenance plans, which can be challenging, especially in aging assets like the Delhi or Hamilton Dome fields that require capital-intensive EOR methods to maintain production. These operations also face specific risks such as equipment degradation, leaks, blowouts, and challenges in managing contaminated fluids. - Financial Risks from Increased Debt and Operating Costs
Evolution Petroleum has recently taken on a notable amount of long-term debt, reported at $53 million as of November 2025, which marks a shift from its historically low-debt position. This increased debt, alongside the company's characterization as a "higher-cost operator," elevates its financial risk, particularly during periods of weak oil prices. The company's main risk category is identified as Finance & Corporate, accounting for a significant portion of its total identified risks.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The accelerated adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs) threatens demand for petroleum products, directly impacting the oil segment of Evolution Petroleum's business.
The rapid expansion and decreasing costs of grid-scale renewable energy sources (solar, wind) combined with advanced battery storage threaten demand for natural gas, a key product for Evolution Petroleum, particularly in electricity generation.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Evolution Petroleum Corporation's addressable markets for its main products and services in the United States are as follows:
-
Upstream Oil and Natural Gas Market (U.S.): The U.S. upstream oil and gas market, which includes exploration and production activities, was approximately USD 102.6 billion in 2025.
-
CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Market (U.S.): The U.S. CO2 enhanced oil recovery market surpassed USD 22 billion in 2024 and is projected to increase to approximately USD 44.25 billion by 2034.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Evolution Petroleum (EPM) is poised for future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years, driven by several key strategies and market factors:
- Opportunistic Acquisitions: The company's core strategy involves the opportunistic acquisition of undervalued, proven oil and natural gas reserves and assets. Recent examples include acquisitions in the SCOOP/STACK area and TexMex, which have contributed to production growth and are expected to continue to do so. Evolution Petroleum aims to build and maintain a diversified portfolio through such strategic acquisitions.
- Production Optimization and Development of Existing Assets: Evolution Petroleum focuses on maximizing output from its current asset base through methodical production optimization, selective development opportunities, and exploitation efforts. This includes ongoing development activity in fields like Chaveroo and continued work in the SCOOP/STACK play, as well as resolving operational issues to enhance production from existing properties, such as the Delhi Field.
- Growth in Higher-Margin Mineral and Royalty Interests: The company is strategically expanding its portfolio of mineral and royalty interests. Acquisitions in areas like the SCOOP/STACK and Haynesville-Bossier Shale are expected to provide incremental high-margin production and meaningful contributions to revenue and cash flow, leveraging the inherently higher margins associated with these types of assets.
- Favorable Commodity Price Environment, particularly for Natural Gas: While commodity prices are inherently volatile, Evolution Petroleum's diversified portfolio, which includes significant exposure to natural gas (54% natural gas, 15% oil, and 31% natural gas liquids), positions it to benefit from favorable natural gas price trends. Recent financial results indicate that higher realized natural gas prices have contributed positively to revenue and EBITDA, offsetting declines in other commodities, and the company utilizes hedging strategies to manage price risk.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- Evolution Petroleum authorized a share repurchase program on September 8, 2022, allowing for repurchases of up to $25.0 million of common stock through December 31, 2024. Under this program, the company repurchased approximately 0.8 million shares at a total cost of around $4.6 million.
- In November 2023, the company initiated a Rule 10b5-1 plan to repurchase up to $0.8 million in shares, which was effective until June 30, 2024. During the nine months ended March 31, 2024, approximately 0.1 million shares were repurchased for about $0.8 million under this plan.
Share Issuance
- For the fiscal year 2025, Evolution Petroleum reported $3.84 million in common stock issuance.
- A director received a restricted stock award of 24,214 shares on December 4, 2025.
- The company acquired treasury stock during the nine months ended March 31, 2025, and 2024, to cover payroll tax withholding obligations for employee stock-based awards.
Outbound Investments
- In March 2025, Evolution Petroleum acquired non-operated oil and natural gas assets in New Mexico, Texas, and Louisiana for $9.0 million, which is expected to add approximately 440 net barrels of oil equivalent per day (BOEPD) of low-decline production.
- After the end of fiscal year 2025, the company made a $17 million acquisition of SCOOP/STACK royalty interests in August 2025.
- The company is expanding its minerals and royalty platform with recent Haynesville Shale acquisitions, which are anticipated to contribute meaningfully starting in fiscal Q3 2026.
Capital Expenditures
- Evolution Petroleum's capital expenditures were -$21.64 million for fiscal year 2025, -$49.63 million for fiscal year 2024, -$6.99 million for fiscal year 2023, and -$54.87 million for fiscal year 2022.
- The full-year fiscal 2026 capital expenditure guidance is projected to be between $4 million and $6 million.
- Primary focuses for capital expenditures include operational improvements at Tex-Mex, recovery of Delhi production, and efforts to achieve sustainable cost reductions at Barnett Shale.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to EPM.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04172026 | VAL | Valaris | Quality | Q | Momentum | UpsideQuality Stocks with Momentum and UpsideBuying quality stocks with strong momentum but still having room to run | 15.2% | 15.2% | -0.9% |
| 03312026 | KGS | Kodiak Gas Services | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 16.3% | 16.3% | -0.7% |
| 03312026 | KOS | Kosmos Energy | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 10.8% | 10.8% | -10.8% |
| 12262025 | TPL | Texas Pacific Land | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 54.5% | 54.5% | -2.1% |
| 12122025 | NOV | NOV | Insider | Insider Buys | Low D/EStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with strong insider buying in the last 1 month, positive operating income and reasonable debt / market cap | 25.4% | 25.4% | -6.5% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 4.95 |
| Mkt Cap | 0.2 |
| Rev LTM | 196 |
| Op Inc LTM | 31 |
| FCF LTM | -24 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -13 |
| CFO LTM | 64 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 71 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | -10.4% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | -10.1% |
| Rev Chg Q | -8.7% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | -2.3% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | -38.8% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | -42.5% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 12.8% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 19.6% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -1.2% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 40.9% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 39.9% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | -13.9% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -9.9% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 0.2 |
| P/S | 1.5 |
| P/Op Inc | 4.2 |
| P/EBIT | -1.2 |
| P/E | -1.2 |
| P/CFO | 3.8 |
| Total Yield | -6.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.4% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | -5.9% |
| D/E | 0.3 |
| Net D/E | 0.2 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | -1.4% |
| 3M Rtn | -4.0% |
| 6M Rtn | 10.0% |
| 12M Rtn | 34.6% |
| 3Y Rtn | -20.9% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | -6.6% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | -12.4% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | 4.5% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | 6.7% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -96.1% |
Comparison Analyses
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $4.66 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.2 | |
| First Trading Date | 01/13/1997 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -8.3% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $4.56 | $4.26 |
| DMA Trend | indeterminate | up |
| Distance from DMA | 2.2% | 9.4% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 48.7% | 38.6% |
| Downside Capture | -120.15 | -2.28 |
| Upside Capture | -48.61 | 14.60 |
| Correlation (SPY) | -23.4% | 6.4% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | -1.67 | -0.83 | -0.37 | -0.11 | 0.35 | 0.63 |
| Up Beta | -1.83 | -1.72 | -1.58 | -1.13 | 0.03 | 0.44 |
| Down Beta | 1.97 | 0.44 | 1.05 | 0.85 | 1.13 | 1.03 |
| Up Capture | -40% | -38% | 21% | 10% | 22% | 19% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 15 | 22 | 31 | 66 | 141 | 428 |
| Stock +ve Days | 10 | 23 | 36 | 61 | 130 | 371 |
| Down Capture | -531% | -130% | -101% | -24% | 16% | 84% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 4 | 18 | 30 | 56 | 108 | 321 |
| Stock -ve Days | 8 | 15 | 22 | 52 | 105 | 350 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with EPM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPM | 14.2% | 38.5% | 0.43 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 44.1% | 20.1% | 1.70 | 54.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 27.4% | 12.1% | 1.71 | 5.3% |
| Gold (GLD) | 42.5% | 26.8% | 1.30 | -4.1% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 45.4% | 18.5% | 1.88 | 33.8% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 11.5% | 13.5% | 0.56 | 8.7% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -23.7% | 41.8% | -0.54 | 18.9% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with EPM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPM | 12.1% | 45.8% | 0.40 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 21.7% | 26.1% | 0.75 | 60.8% |
| Equity (SPY) | 13.6% | 17.1% | 0.63 | 28.6% |
| Gold (GLD) | 19.4% | 17.9% | 0.88 | 11.5% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 10.9% | 19.4% | 0.45 | 44.0% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 2.9% | 18.8% | 0.06 | 23.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 7.2% | 55.9% | 0.34 | 11.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with EPM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPM | 5.6% | 50.1% | 0.31 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 10.6% | 29.5% | 0.40 | 59.9% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.5% | 17.9% | 0.74 | 38.3% |
| Gold (GLD) | 13.0% | 16.0% | 0.67 | 5.2% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.3% | 17.9% | 0.38 | 42.9% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.0% | 20.7% | 0.21 | 33.2% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 67.4% | 66.9% | 1.06 | 9.7% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 5/12/2026 | -12.1% | ||
| 2/10/2026 | 5.5% | 13.0% | 19.0% |
| 9/16/2025 | -0.5% | -8.8% | -12.4% |
| 5/13/2025 | 1.1% | -2.5% | 16.1% |
| 2/11/2025 | -1.3% | -1.7% | -5.3% |
| 9/10/2024 | 16.2% | 23.5% | 22.2% |
| 5/7/2024 | 2.7% | -0.2% | -2.2% |
| 2/6/2024 | 3.7% | 3.9% | 14.5% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 10 | 8 | 12 |
| # Negative | 9 | 10 | 6 |
| Median Positive | 6.5% | 12.7% | 17.6% |
| Median Negative | -3.6% | -3.0% | -12.9% |
| Max Positive | 16.2% | 26.4% | 45.8% |
| Max Negative | -20.9% | -23.2% | -27.3% |
Recent Forward Guidance [BETA]
Latest: Q3 2026 Earnings Reported 5/12/2026
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| Q4 2026 Incremental Production | 100 | Higher New | Actual: 0 for Q3 2026 | ||||
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.