Ring Energy (REI)
Market Price (5/8/2026): $1.67 | Market Cap: $348.3 MilSector: Energy | Industry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Ring Energy (REI)
Market Price (5/8/2026): $1.67Market Cap: $348.3 MilSector: EnergyIndustry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 49% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US Oilfield Technologies, and US LNG. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -57%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -83% | Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 124% Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -14%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -6.1%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -6.9% Not cash flow generativeFCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -12% Valuation getting more expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is 79% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -81% Key risksREI key risks include [1] a significant debt burden and liquidity pressure and [2] potential production declines resulting from major cuts to capital spending aimed at preserving financial stability. |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 49% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US Oilfield Technologies, and US LNG. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -57%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -83% |
| Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 124% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -14%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -6.1%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -6.9% |
| Not cash flow generativeFCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -12% |
| Valuation getting more expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is 79% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -81% |
| Key risksREI key risks include [1] a significant debt burden and liquidity pressure and [2] potential production declines resulting from major cuts to capital spending aimed at preserving financial stability. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Analyst Upgrades and Strong Price Targets Fueled Investor Confidence.
Zacks upgraded Ring Energy to a "Strong Buy" rating on May 4, 2026, citing an upward trend in earnings estimates. This was reinforced by a consensus "Strong Buy" rating from Wall Street analysts, with an average price target of $2.50, suggesting a significant upside potential of over 50% from the stock's prevailing price.
2. Sustained Operational Efficiency and Positive Cash Flow Demonstrated Strength.
Ring Energy showcased consistent operational improvements, achieving lease operating expenses (LOE) of $10.41 per barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) in the first quarter of 2026, which was below the lower end of its guidance. The company also maintained a positive operating cash flow, recording $25.9 million in Q1 2026, marking its 26th consecutive quarter of positive operating cash flow.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 38.7% change in REI stock from 1/31/2026 to 5/7/2026 was primarily driven by a 50.1% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 1312026 | 5072026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.19 | 1.65 | 38.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 324 | 302 | -6.8% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.8 | 1.1 | 50.1% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 207 | 209 | -0.9% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 38.7% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 5/7/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| REI | 38.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.6% | -25.0% |
| Sector (XLE) | 10.3% | 73.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 72.8% change in REI stock from 10/31/2025 to 5/7/2026 was primarily driven by a 93.4% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 10312025 | 5072026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 0.95 | 1.65 | 72.8% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 334 | 302 | -9.8% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.6 | 1.1 | 93.4% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 207 | 209 | -1.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 72.8% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 5/7/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| REI | 72.8% | |
| Market (SPY) | 5.5% | -8.1% |
| Sector (XLE) | 28.9% | 68.2% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 86.2% change in REI stock from 4/30/2025 to 5/7/2026 was primarily driven by a 137.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302025 | 5072026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 0.89 | 1.65 | 86.2% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 366 | 302 | -17.6% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.5 | 1.1 | 137.9% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 198 | 209 | -5.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 86.2% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2025 to 5/7/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| REI | 86.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 30.4% | 7.9% |
| Sector (XLE) | 43.5% | 60.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -8.8% change in REI stock from 4/30/2023 to 5/7/2026 was primarily driven by a -21.8% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 4302023 | 5072026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.81 | 1.65 | -8.8% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 347 | 302 | -13.1% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.8 | 1.1 | 34.2% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 163 | 209 | -21.8% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -8.8% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2023 to 5/7/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| REI | -8.8% | |
| Market (SPY) | 78.7% | 27.9% |
| Sector (XLE) | 44.9% | 62.5% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| REI Return | 246% | 8% | -41% | -7% | -36% | 107% | 173% |
| Peers Return | 120% | 70% | -1% | -11% | -2% | 35% | 334% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 8% | 96% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| REI Win Rate | 58% | 58% | 25% | 33% | 17% | 80% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 75% | 56% | 54% | 42% | 60% | 72% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 60% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| REI Max Drawdown | 0% | -4% | -44% | -16% | -46% | 0% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -0% | 0% | -17% | -18% | -22% | -3% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | -7% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: FANG, PR, OXY, DVN, COP.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 5/7/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | REI | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -46.6% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 87.1% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 265 days | 79 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -27.7% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 38.3% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 75 days | 31 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -16.1% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 19.2% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 8 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -72.1% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 258.5% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 66 days | 140 days |
| 2016-2017 Trump Reflation Bond Selloff | ||
| % Loss | -12.6% | -3.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 14.4% | 3.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 9 days | 6 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -57.5% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 135.4% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 118 days | 62 days |
In The Past
Ring Energy's stock fell -46.6% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 87.1% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | REI | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -46.6% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 87.1% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 265 days | 79 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -27.7% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 38.3% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 75 days | 31 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -72.1% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 258.5% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 66 days | 140 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -57.5% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 135.4% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 118 days | 62 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -67.2% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 205.0% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 735 days | 123 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -74.7% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 296.0% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 799 days | 1085 days |
| Summer 2007 Credit Crunch | ||
| % Loss | -46.5% | -8.6% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 86.8% | 9.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2443 days | 47 days |
In The Past
Ring Energy's stock fell -46.6% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 87.1% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Ring Energy (REI)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are a few brief analogies for Ring Energy (REI):
- Ring Energy is like a smaller, regionally focused ConocoPhillips, specializing in finding and producing oil and natural gas exclusively in Texas and New Mexico.
- Think of Ring Energy as a focused Occidental Petroleum, but dedicated solely to exploring and extracting oil and gas from the Permian Basin region of Texas and New Mexico.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Oil: The company extracts and sells crude oil from its operations in Texas and New Mexico.
- Natural Gas: The company extracts and sells natural gas from its operations in Texas and New Mexico.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Major Customers of Ring Energy (REI)
Ring Energy, Inc. primarily sells its oil and natural gas production to other companies within the energy sector, rather than directly to individual consumers. Based on the company's description, its customer base consists of:
- End Users: In the context of oil and natural gas production, these are typically refiners, petrochemical plants, power generation facilities, or large industrial consumers that process or utilize crude oil and natural gas as raw materials or fuel.
- Marketers: These companies act as intermediaries in the energy market, purchasing crude oil and natural gas from producers like Ring Energy and then reselling it to other end users, refiners, or other participants further along the energy value chain.
- Other Purchasers: This broad category can encompass various entities within the energy supply chain, such as energy trading firms, pipeline operators, or storage facilities that acquire crude oil and natural gas for distribution, processing, or further sale.
The provided background information does not specify the names of individual customer companies that Ring Energy sells to. As is common for exploration and production (E&P) companies selling commodity products, specific customer relationships and names are generally not publicly disclosed unless a single customer accounts for a significant portion (e.g., 10% or more) of revenue, which is not indicated here.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Paul D. McKinney – Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Paul D. McKinney joined Ring Energy as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer on October 1, 2020. Prior to Ring Energy, he served as President, CEO & Director of SandRidge Energy from January 2019 to December 2019. Before SandRidge, he was President & Chief Operating Officer for Yuma Energy, Inc. from April 2017, after serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2014. Yuma Energy, Inc. filed for bankruptcy in April 2020. His career also includes roles at Apache Corporation as Region Vice President, Gulf Coast Onshore, and Manager, Corporate Reservoir Engineering, and at Anadarko Petroleum Corporation where he held various positions over 23 years from 1983 to 2006. He also served as Vice President and Director, Acquisitions & Divestitures for Tristone Capital, Inc. from 2006 to 2007. Mr. McKinney is a director for Pro-Ject Holdings, LLC, a privately owned oil field chemical services company.
Sundip "Sonu" S. Johl – Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Sundip "Sonu" S. Johl joined Ring Energy as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective February 27, 2026. He brings over 20 years of experience across upstream oil and gas investment banking, corporate finance, and strategic advisory roles, with deep expertise in mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, valuation, and financial strategy. From 2020 through January 2026, Mr. Johl was Managing Director, Co-Head of Energy Investment Banking at Raymond James & Associates, Inc., where he advised public and private E&P companies, including those in the Permian Basin. He also served as Managing Director, Co-Head of E&P at UBS Investment Banking Global Energy Group from 2018 to 2020, and as a Director at Citi Investment Banking Global Energy Group from 2009 to 2018.
Alexander Dyes – Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer
Alexander Dyes joined Ring Energy in October 2020 and has served as an Executive Officer of the Company since December 2020. In March 2025, his title was changed to Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer, after serving as Executive Vice President of Engineering and Corporate Strategy. Prior to Ring Energy, Mr. Dyes was Vice President - A&D at Sandridge from May 2019 to June 2020. Before that, he worked at Yuma Energy, Inc. from late 2014 to early 2019 as Vice President of A&D/Engineering. He began his career at Apache Corporation in 2007.
Shawn Young – Vice President of Operations
Shawn Young was promoted to Vice President of Operations effective July 2024, having initially joined Ring Energy in 2022 as Production Engineering Manager. He is a petroleum engineer with over 33 years of experience in the energy industry, encompassing roles in both large and small public and private companies. Prior to Ring Energy, he served as Vice President – East Texas & Rockies Business Unit Lead for Legacy Reserves Inc./Revenir Energy. Before Legacy, Mr. Young held operations engineering and operations management roles for Legado Resources, an Encap-backed private equity company, since 2008. He also worked at Henry Petroleum and spent 15 years with Anadarko Petroleum Corporation.
James Parr – Executive Vice President and Chief Exploration Officer
James Parr serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Exploration Officer at Ring Energy.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Ring Energy (REI) faces several key risks inherent to the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry.Key Risks to Ring Energy (REI)
- Commodity Price Volatility: Ring Energy's financial performance is highly susceptible to extreme volatility in global crude oil and natural gas prices. Fluctuations in these commodity prices directly impact the company's revenue, cash flow, profitability, and the valuation of its assets on the balance sheet. For instance, in the third quarter of 2025, market volatility led to a significant non-cash ceiling test impairment charge of $72.9 million. The company's future free cash flow projections are also sensitive to strip prices for oil.
- Financial Health and Debt Levels: The company's financial health presents a significant risk, particularly concerning its debt and ability to cover interest payments. Ring Energy has shown signs of potential financial distress, as indicated by its Altman Z-Score. Interest payments on its debt are noted as not being well covered by its earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT). Although Ring Energy has been working to reduce its debt-to-equity ratio, its overall debt level and interest coverage remain key vulnerabilities.
- Regulatory and Environmental Risks: Ring Energy is exposed to risks associated with evolving environmental and governmental regulations. Changes in regulations, particularly those related to hydraulic fracturing and climate change, could materially affect the company's operating costs and access to markets. Furthermore, future environmental, social, and governance (ESG) compliance developments could adversely impact the company's ability to raise both equity and debt capital.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Accelerated global adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs): This represents a clear emerging threat to the long-term demand for crude oil, which is a primary product for Ring Energy, as the transportation sector increasingly shifts away from gasoline-powered internal combustion engines.
- Rapid expansion of renewable energy sources (solar, wind) and advancements in energy storage technologies: This trend directly threatens the demand for natural gas in electricity generation and contributes to a broader systemic shift away from fossil fuels across the energy sector, impacting the market for Ring Energy's products.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) operates within the oil and natural gas exploration and production sector, with primary activities focused in Texas and New Mexico. The addressable markets for their main products, crude oil and natural gas, can be quantified by the significant economic output and production volumes within these regions.
Texas
In Texas, the oil and natural gas industry represents a substantial addressable market. The direct Gross Regional Product (GRP) for the Texas oil and natural gas industry was estimated at $385 billion in 2025. Texas leads the United States in crude oil production, supplying approximately 2.1 billion barrels to energy markets in 2025, setting a new record. For natural gas, Texas also set a new record in 2025, producing over 13.5 trillion cubic feet (Tcf). In 2024, Texas accounted for 43% of the nation's crude oil production and 28% of its natural gas gross withdrawals.
New Mexico
New Mexico also presents a significant addressable market for oil and natural gas. In the fiscal year 2025, the state's oil and gas industry generated a record-breaking $13.1 billion in state and local revenue. As of May 2024, the oil and gas sector in New Mexico was valued at a staggering $27 billion, making it the largest contributor to the state's GDP. New Mexico has emerged as the nation's second-largest crude oil-producing state after Texas, with oil production surpassing 2 million barrels per day (mb/d) in 2024. Specifically, as of March 2024, New Mexico produced approximately 2.014 million barrels of oil daily. Furthermore, New Mexico was the third-largest natural gas-producing state in 2024, contributing 8% of the nation's total natural gas gross withdrawals.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several key strategies:
-
Increased Production Volumes from Organic Development of Existing Assets: Ring Energy plans to sustain and grow its production through ongoing drilling programs, successful well completions, and the development of its extensive drilling inventory within the Permian Basin. The company has demonstrated its ability to organically grow reserves and recorded record sales volumes in 2023 and 2024. Management's strategy involves investing capital to maintain or slightly increase production, with projections for continued sales volume growth in 2025. The company reported record oil and total sales volumes in Q2 2025, exceeding guidance midpoints. Furthermore, the successful integration and continued development of recently acquired assets, such as Lime Rock's CBP assets, have also contributed to increased production and future drilling locations.
-
Optimization of Product Mix Towards Higher-Value Crude Oil: Ring Energy has strategically focused on increasing crude oil production as a percentage of its overall product mix. This emphasis on higher-value crude oil directly enhances the company's realized prices per barrel of oil equivalent (BOE), thereby contributing to revenue growth. The company aimed to grow crude oil production in 2023 and 2024 due to improved economics, with oil representing 70% of its product mix in Q1 2024. This focus on oil-rich assets is a deliberate strategy for resilience against commodity price volatility.
-
Improved Capital Efficiency and Cost Management: Enhancements in capital efficiency for drilling and completion activities, coupled with rigorous cost control, allow Ring Energy to maximize production output per dollar invested. This operational excellence supports sustained production volumes and enables more effective reinvestment into its asset base, indirectly contributing to revenue growth by optimizing the allocation of resources for new production. The company has shown a reduction in year-over-year operating costs and improved drilling capital efficiency. Additionally, Ring Energy reported lease operating expenses below guidance and aims to maintain low operating costs while meeting production targets.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Issuance
- Ring Energy's outstanding shares significantly increased over the past few years, rising from 99.78 million at the end of 2021 to 206.68 million by the end of 2025.
- The company experienced notable increases in outstanding shares of 63.09% in 2022 and 20.04% in 2023.
Outbound Investments
- In March 2025, Ring Energy completed the acquisition of Central Basin Platform (CBP) assets from Lime Rock Resources IV, LP, for approximately $70.9 million, including a $63.6 million cash payment.
- The company made a deferred payment of $10 million in December 2025 related to the Lime Rock acquisition.
- Ring Energy also completed the Founders Acquisition in August 2023, which contributed to an increase in its production.
- During the third quarter of 2024, the company divested non-core vertical wells and associated facilities in the Central Basin Platform for $5.5 million.
Capital Expenditures
- Ring Energy's capital expenditures were $152 million for the full year 2023 and $151.9 million for the full year 2024.
- Capital spending for 2025 significantly decreased to $98.2 million, representing a 35% reduction from the previous year, partly due to a more than 50% decrease in Q2 2025 spending in response to lower oil prices.
- For 2026, the company projects total capital spending between $100 million and $130 million, with a midpoint of $115 million, primarily focused on drilling and completing 23 to 32 wells, with a higher emphasis on horizontal drilling.
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to REI.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04172026 | VAL | Valaris | Quality | Q | Momentum | UpsideQuality Stocks with Momentum and UpsideBuying quality stocks with strong momentum but still having room to run | 15.2% | 15.2% | -0.9% |
| 03312026 | KGS | Kodiak Gas Services | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 16.3% | 16.3% | -0.7% |
| 03312026 | KOS | Kosmos Energy | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 10.8% | 10.8% | -10.8% |
| 12262025 | TPL | Texas Pacific Land | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 54.5% | 54.5% | -2.1% |
| 12122025 | NOV | NOV | Insider | Insider Buys | Low D/EStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with strong insider buying in the last 1 month, positive operating income and reasonable debt / market cap | 25.4% | 25.4% | -6.5% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 49.62 |
| Mkt Cap | 40.7 |
| Rev LTM | 15,826 |
| Op Inc LTM | 3,144 |
| FCF LTM | 1,381 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 984 |
| CFO LTM | 7,328 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 6,888 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | -1.3% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | -5.0% |
| Rev Chg Q | -5.7% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | -1.5% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | -25.6% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | -23.4% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 21.4% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 28.8% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -1.3% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 48.7% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 51.3% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 8.4% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 9.9% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 40.7 |
| P/S | 2.5 |
| P/Op Inc | 10.2 |
| P/EBIT | 12.2 |
| P/E | 15.8 |
| P/CFO | 5.1 |
| Total Yield | 7.5% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.2% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | 4.6% |
| D/E | 0.3 |
| Net D/E | 0.2 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | -7.7% |
| 3M Rtn | 18.2% |
| 6M Rtn | 39.2% |
| 12M Rtn | 47.3% |
| 3Y Rtn | 12.2% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | -12.1% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | 10.3% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | 31.2% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | 15.1% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -64.2% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $1.65 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.4 | |
| First Trading Date | 02/23/2007 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -16.7% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $1.52 | $1.12 |
| DMA Trend | up | up |
| Distance from DMA | 8.3% | 46.7% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 73.4% | 60.9% |
| Downside Capture | -0.87 | -0.05 |
| Upside Capture | 17.43 | 72.10 |
| Correlation (SPY) | -20.5% | 6.7% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | -4.41 | -2.00 | -1.15 | -0.29 | 0.36 | 1.02 |
| Up Beta | -3.79 | -4.25 | -3.59 | -2.49 | -0.87 | 0.70 |
| Down Beta | -13.21 | -0.13 | 1.50 | 1.23 | 1.73 | 1.67 |
| Up Capture | -112% | -76% | -1% | 62% | 64% | 49% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 15 | 22 | 31 | 66 | 141 | 428 |
| Stock +ve Days | 13 | 24 | 36 | 61 | 124 | 356 |
| Down Capture | -1332% | -250% | -239% | -71% | 19% | 101% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 4 | 18 | 30 | 56 | 108 | 321 |
| Stock -ve Days | 8 | 18 | 25 | 58 | 118 | 351 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with REI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REI | 100.2% | 60.8% | 1.38 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 43.6% | 20.0% | 1.69 | 59.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 29.6% | 12.5% | 1.86 | 6.3% |
| Gold (GLD) | 37.0% | 27.1% | 1.14 | 1.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 48.7% | 18.0% | 2.12 | 50.5% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 12.9% | 13.5% | 0.65 | -0.4% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -16.3% | 42.1% | -0.31 | 11.1% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with REI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REI | -4.4% | 61.8% | 0.18 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 22.2% | 26.1% | 0.76 | 69.2% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.8% | 17.1% | 0.59 | 30.4% |
| Gold (GLD) | 21.1% | 17.9% | 0.96 | 12.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 14.1% | 19.1% | 0.60 | 55.3% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 3.3% | 18.8% | 0.08 | 23.2% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 7.0% | 56.0% | 0.34 | 15.4% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with REI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REI | -13.7% | 73.6% | 0.13 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 9.5% | 29.5% | 0.36 | 61.0% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.0% | 17.9% | 0.72 | 35.3% |
| Gold (GLD) | 13.5% | 16.0% | 0.70 | 4.4% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 9.4% | 17.8% | 0.44 | 48.6% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.7% | 20.7% | 0.24 | 27.4% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 68.2% | 66.9% | 1.07 | 12.0% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 3/5/2026 | -0.6% | -1.9% | 0.6% |
| 11/7/2025 | 4.7% | 4.6% | -3.9% |
| 8/7/2025 | 6.3% | 22.9% | 30.7% |
| 3/7/2025 | 0.9% | 7.3% | -13.7% |
| 11/7/2024 | -10.9% | -11.5% | -19.0% |
| 8/7/2024 | 10.2% | 9.0% | -5.4% |
| 3/8/2024 | 3.2% | 19.9% | 31.4% |
| 11/3/2023 | -8.8% | -14.0% | -10.5% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 11 | 11 | 10 |
| # Negative | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| Median Positive | 2.2% | 9.0% | 15.1% |
| Median Negative | -7.0% | -10.3% | -13.7% |
| Max Positive | 10.2% | 22.9% | 63.8% |
| Max Negative | -10.9% | -27.8% | -28.0% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/06/2026 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2025 | 03/04/2026 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/06/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/06/2025 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/07/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/05/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/06/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/06/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/06/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 03/07/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/02/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/03/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/03/2023 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/09/2023 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/10/2022 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/04/2022 | 10-Q |
Insider Activity
Expand for More| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dyes, Alexander | EVP Chief Operations Officer | Direct | Buy | 8142025 | 0.86 | 29,069 | 24,950 | 778,612 | Form |
| 2 | McKinney, Paul D | CEO and Chairman of the Board | Direct | Buy | 8132025 | 0.84 | 20,000 | 16,712 | 2,520,215 | Form |
| 3 | McKinney, Paul D | CEO and Chairman of the Board | Direct | Buy | 8132025 | 0.80 | 30,000 | 24,033 | 2,400,139 | Form |
| 4 | Warburg, Pincus (e&p) Xii Llc | See Footnotes | Sell | 6162025 | 0.92 | 2,486,027 | 2,287,145 | 18,868,556 | Form | |
| 5 | Warburg, Pincus & CO Us, Llc | See Footnotes | Sell | 6162025 | 0.92 | 2,486,027 | 2,287,145 | 18,868,556 | Form |
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.