Lucid Diagnostics (LUCD)
Market Price (1/19/2026): $1.22 | Market Cap: $132.0 MilSector: Health Care | Industry: Life Sciences Tools & Services
Lucid Diagnostics (LUCD)
Market Price (1/19/2026): $1.22Market Cap: $132.0 MilSector: Health CareIndustry: Life Sciences Tools & Services
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -18% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -65%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -82% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -48 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -1091% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Biotechnology & Genomics, and Precision Medicine. Themes include Advanced Diagnostics, and Personalized Diagnostics. | Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 102% | |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -995%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -1004% | ||
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -45% | ||
| Key risksLUCD key risks include [1] its precarious financial health and high bankruptcy risk, Show more. |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -18% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Biotechnology & Genomics, and Precision Medicine. Themes include Advanced Diagnostics, and Personalized Diagnostics. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -65%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -82% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -48 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -1091% |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 102% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -995%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -1004% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -45% |
| Key risksLUCD key risks include [1] its precarious financial health and high bankruptcy risk, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Absence of Significant News or Catalysts. A lack of new, material information from Lucid Diagnostics, such as major clinical trial results, regulatory approvals, new product launches, or significant financial guidance updates, would likely lead to a period of price stagnation. Without fresh data to influence investor sentiment, buying and selling pressures could remain balanced, resulting in no net change in the stock price. The company did report its Q3 2025 results in November 2025, which, while showing a revenue increase, also noted a net loss and missed consensus revenue expectations, potentially leading to balanced investor reactions and contributing to a stable stock price rather than significant movement in either direction.
2. Extremely Low Trading Volume and Liquidity. If the number of shares traded for LUCD during this period was consistently very low, the stock price would be more prone to remaining flat. Low liquidity means fewer buyers and sellers are active in the market, making it difficult for the price to move significantly in either direction. While specific daily volumes varied, average volumes for LUCD are generally in the hundreds of thousands, which for a small-cap company can contribute to periods of limited price discovery or sustained price levels.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 0.0% change in LUCD stock from 10/31/2025 to 1/18/2026 was primarily driven by a 8.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 10312025 | 1182026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 4.36 | 4.40 | 0.89% |
| P/S Multiple | 27.47 | 29.76 | 8.31% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 98.99 | 108.18 | -9.28% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -0.86% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 1/18/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| LUCD | 0.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 1.4% | 15.8% |
| Sector (XLV) | 8.0% | 18.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 23.6% change in LUCD stock from 7/31/2025 to 1/18/2026 was primarily driven by a 84.4% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 7312025 | 1182026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 0.98 | 1.21 | 23.65% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 4.17 | 4.40 | 5.42% |
| P/S Multiple | 16.13 | 29.76 | 84.43% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 68.80 | 108.18 | -57.24% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -16.87% |
Market Drivers
7/31/2025 to 1/18/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| LUCD | 23.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 9.7% | 20.6% |
| Sector (XLV) | 20.0% | 21.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 26.3% change in LUCD stock from 1/31/2025 to 1/18/2026 was primarily driven by a 158.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 1312025 | 1182026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 0.96 | 1.21 | 26.32% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 4.19 | 4.40 | 5.01% |
| P/S Multiple | 11.52 | 29.76 | 158.31% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 50.37 | 108.18 | -114.75% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -140.00% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2025 to 1/18/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| LUCD | 26.3% | |
| Market (SPY) | 15.9% | 21.8% |
| Sector (XLV) | 7.4% | 11.0% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -7.6% change in LUCD stock from 1/31/2023 to 1/18/2026 was primarily driven by a -197.1% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| 1312023 | 1182026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.31 | 1.21 | -7.63% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0.56 | 4.40 | 678.58% |
| P/S Multiple | 84.41 | 29.76 | -64.75% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 36.41 | 108.18 | -197.14% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -366.60% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2023 to 1/18/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| LUCD | -7.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 76.5% | 13.7% |
| Sector (XLV) | 22.2% | 8.7% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| LUCD Return | -54% | -75% | 4% | -42% | 33% | 15% | -89% |
| Peers Return | -30% | -54% | 26% | 12% | 68% | 4% | -21% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 1% | 85% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| LUCD Win Rate | 0% | 33% | 67% | 42% | 58% | 100% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 38% | 32% | 53% | 45% | 53% | 80% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 100% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| LUCD Max Drawdown | -59% | -77% | -15% | -52% | -3% | 0% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -39% | -68% | -19% | -31% | -37% | -1% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | 0% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: EXAS, CSTL, GH, VCYT, NEO.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 1/16/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | LUCD | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -90.1% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 913.8% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
Compare to EXAS, CSTL, GH, VCYT, NEO
In The Past
Lucid Diagnostics's stock fell -90.1% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 10/14/2021. A -90.1% loss requires a 913.8% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies to describe Lucid Diagnostics (LUCD):
Exact Sciences for esophageal cancer screening.
Hologic for esophageal cancer screening.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test: A molecular diagnostic test that analyzes DNA collected from the esophagus to detect biomarkers associated with Barrett's Esophagus and esophageal cancer.
- EsoCheck Esophageal Cell Collection Device: A minimally invasive, swallowable device used to collect cells from the esophagus for subsequent diagnostic analysis with the EsoGuard test.
AI Analysis | Feedback
```htmlLucid Diagnostics (symbol: LUCD) primarily operates within a business-to-business (B2B) model, providing its diagnostic services and devices to healthcare entities rather than directly to individual consumers.
Given the nature of their business, which focuses on the early detection of esophageal precancer and cancer through products like the EsoGuard® Esophageal DNA Test and EsoCure® Esophageal Cell Collection Device, their major "customers" are typically the organizations that order and utilize these services for patient care.
Major Customer Categories (Business-to-Business):
Lucid Diagnostics sells primarily to other companies and organizations within the healthcare sector. While they do not publicly disclose specific major customer names due to the fragmented nature of the healthcare market and confidentiality, their customer base can be categorized as follows:
- Gastroenterology Practices and Clinics: These are a primary target for Lucid Diagnostics, as gastroenterologists are specialists who manage and treat patients at risk for esophageal diseases, making them key prescribers of the EsoGuard test.
- Primary Care Physician (PCP) Offices: Lucid Diagnostics is also expanding its reach to PCPs, aiming to educate them on the importance of early screening for at-risk patients, thereby making PCP offices a growing customer segment for ordering the diagnostic tests.
- Hospitals and Integrated Delivery Networks (IDNs): While much of their sales strategy focuses on direct physician adoption, larger hospital systems and IDNs may also represent customer opportunities where Lucid's diagnostic tests can be integrated into broader screening and care pathways.
Lucid Diagnostics' strategy involves engaging directly with these healthcare providers to integrate their testing solutions into routine patient care, with the company's CLIA-certified laboratory (LucidDx Labs) performing the actual test processing.
```AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Lishan Aklog, MD Chief Executive Officer
Dr. Lishan Aklog is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lucid Diagnostics. He also co-founded and serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lucid's parent company, PAVmed Inc. (Nasdaq: PAVM), since its inception in 2014. He previously co-founded a medtech holding company that established four medical device companies, and he led one of its portfolio companies which commercialized AngioVac®, one of his life-saving inventions. Dr. Aklog is an inventor on dozens of patents, including life-saving products he and his colleagues have commercialized. Before his entrepreneurial career in life sciences, he had a distinguished career as an innovator in cardiac surgery, holding faculty positions at leading academic medical centers such as Harvard Medical School and Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Dennis McGrath Chief Financial Officer
Dennis McGrath has been Lucid Diagnostics' Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 2017. Prior to joining Lucid Diagnostics, Mr. McGrath held several senior leadership roles at PhotoMedex, Inc. (Nasdaq: PHMD), a global manufacturer and distributor of medical device equipment and services, from 2000 to 2017. His positions at PhotoMedex included director, President, and Chief Financial Officer from 2011 to 2017. Before PhotoMedex's reverse merger with Radiancy, Inc. in December 2011, he also served as Chief Executive Officer from 2009 to 2011 and as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2009.
Shaun O'Neil, MBA President & Chief Operating Officer
Shaun O'Neil has served as Lucid Diagnostics' President & Chief Operating Officer since November 2023. Before this role, he was the company's Chief Commercial Officer. Mr. O'Neil is responsible for leading strategic initiatives at Lucid Diagnostics, including the design and launch of commercial operations, sales and marketing strategy, market access, and the management of Lucid's CLIA-certified laboratory, Lucid Dx Labs.
Brian deGuzman, MD Chief Technology and Compliance Officer
Dr. Brian deGuzman has been the Chief Technology Officer of Lucid Diagnostics since April 2023 and Chief Compliance Officer since January 2022. He previously held the position of Chief Medical Officer from October 2014 until April 2023. Dr. deGuzman, along with Dr. Lishan Aklog, transitioned from practicing medicine to pursue entrepreneurship full-time, founding PAVmed in 2012 as a vehicle for their ventures. He currently oversees technology, compliance, and regulatory aspects for the company.
Michael Gordon General Counsel and Secretary
Michael Gordon has served as General Counsel and Secretary of Lucid Diagnostics since May 2022. Prior to joining Lucid, he was a partner in the corporate department of the law firm Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP from January 2013 to May 2022, and a member of the firm's management committee from January 2019 to May 2022. During his time at Friedman Kaplan, Mr. Gordon represented PAVmed and Lucid in various M&A, financing, and other corporate and commercial transactions, and advised their boards on corporate governance matters.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Lucid Diagnostics' business primarily revolve around its financial viability, the crucial process of securing reimbursement for its products, and the competitive landscape of the medical diagnostics industry.
- Financial Health and Path to Profitability: Lucid Diagnostics faces significant financial challenges, including persistent net losses, high operating expenses, and a rapid cash burn rate. The company reported a GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders of approximately $11.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024. Analysts also highlight negative gross profit margins of -67.6% and state that the company is currently unprofitable and not forecasted to become profitable within the next three years. Its substantial selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) and research and development (R&D) expenses consistently exceed its revenue, indicating operational inefficiency and posing a significant hurdle to achieving profitability. Furthermore, the company may need to raise additional capital, and there is no guarantee it can do so on favorable terms. The Altman Z-Score of -6.52 places the company in a distress zone, suggesting a high risk of bankruptcy within two years.
- Reimbursement and Market Adoption: A major risk for Lucid Diagnostics is the pace and success of obtaining favorable medical policies and coverage from Medicare and private payers for its EsoGuard test. Delays in securing Medicare coverage could significantly hinder the company's ability to generate substantial revenue growth, as many potential patients and healthcare providers may defer testing until reimbursement is available. The company continues to grapple with revenue recognition challenges due to the early stages of its reimbursement process. Slow clinician adoption and uncertain reimbursement policies are critical factors that could delay revenue growth and the company's path to profitability. Declining test volumes, such as the 25% sequential decrease in Q1 2025, suggest potential difficulties in convincing healthcare providers and patients to adopt the EsoGuard/EsoCheck tests.
- Intense Competition: Lucid Diagnostics operates in the highly competitive medical diagnostics field, facing established diagnostic companies and emerging players with innovative technologies. This intense competition could put pressure on Lucid Diagnostics' market share, pricing strategies, and overall profitability. The competitive landscape for diagnostic tests is dynamic, requiring the company to continuously differentiate its products and services to maintain a competitive edge.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The emergence and growing adoption of alternative non-endoscopic cell collection devices for esophageal precancer screening, such as the Cytosponge. The Cytosponge, developed in the UK, offers a similar less-invasive approach to collect esophageal cells for biomarker analysis (e.g., TFF3 or DNA), which directly competes with Lucid Diagnostics' EsoCure Esophageal Cell Sampler and EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test for the same market of patients at risk for Barrett's Esophagus and esophageal cancer.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Lucid Diagnostics' primary product, the EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test, has an addressable market estimated to be approximately $60 billion in the U.S.. This market is based on an estimated 30 million at-risk patients suffering from chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Furthermore, an NCI-sponsored study suggests that the addressable market could expand by up to 70% by including at-risk patients who do not present with GERD symptoms.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Lucid Diagnostics (LUCD) is anticipating several key drivers for future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years, primarily centered around its EsoGuard® Esophageal DNA Test. Here are the expected drivers:- Growth in EsoGuard Test Volume: Lucid Diagnostics has demonstrated consistent growth in the volume of EsoGuard tests performed. The company reported a record 4,042 EsoGuard tests in Q4 2024, representing an 84% year-over-year growth and a 45% sequential increase from Q3 2024. This growth trend continued into Q2 2025, with revenue climbing 40% sequentially. The ongoing commercialization efforts for EsoGuard are expected to sustain this increase in test adoption.
- Expansion of Commercial Revenue Channels: The company is strategically diversifying its revenue streams for EsoGuard. It is focusing on a three-pronged approach that includes traditional claims submissions to insurance, direct contracting with employers and self-insured entities, and implementing a new cash-pay program specifically for concierge medicine practices. This multi-channel strategy aims to enhance monetization and expand accessibility.
- Achievement of Medicare Coverage: Securing Medicare coverage for EsoGuard is identified as a critical catalyst for significant market expansion and is expected to drive broader adoption by private insurers. A Medicare Contractor Advisory Committee (CAC) meeting was held in September 2025, and Lucid Diagnostics anticipates a draft Local Coverage Determination by the end of 2025, with potential final coverage in early 2026.
- Expanded Indication for EsoGuard: A National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored study, published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology, has shown that EsoGuard effectively detects esophageal precancer in at-risk patients even without GERD symptoms. This evidence supports an expanded indication for the test, which could potentially increase its total addressable market opportunity by up to 70%, significantly broadening the patient population that could benefit from EsoGuard testing.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Issuance
- In 2025, Lucid Diagnostics completed multiple offerings, including a public offering in September that generated approximately $26.9 million in net proceeds from 28,750,000 common shares at $1.00 each, another public offering in April that raised about $16.1 million in net proceeds from 14,375,000 shares at $1.20 each, and a registered direct offering in March resulting in $15.3 million in gross proceeds from 13,939,331 shares at $1.10 each.
- In October 2023, the company sold 5,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock to accredited investors, generating aggregate gross proceeds of $5.0 million.
- Lucid Diagnostics completed its Initial Public Offering (IPO) in October 2021, which involved offering up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock.
Inbound Investments
- PAVmed Inc. holds a controlling financial interest in Lucid Diagnostics, owning approximately 70.1% as of December 31, 2023, and 64.9% as of March 21, 2024, of the combined voting power of outstanding common stock.
- Lucid Diagnostics relies on PAVmed for various critical services, including management, technical, research and development, legal, accounting, and administrative support.
- The company received $5.0 million in gross proceeds from the sale of Series A-1 Preferred Stock to accredited investors in October 2023.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| Lucid Diagnostics Earnings Notes | ||
| With Lucid Diagnostics Stock Surging, Have You Considered The Downside? | Return |
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Lucid Diagnostics
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 40.79 |
| Mkt Cap | 2.5 |
| Rev LTM | 602 |
| Op Inc LTM | -70 |
| FCF LTM | 4 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -12 |
| CFO LTM | 38 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 16 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 12.3% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 24.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 12.9% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 3.1% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -11.6% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -16.5% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 1.2% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 7.2% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 3.6% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 2.5% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -3.0% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $1.21 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.1 | |
| First Trading Date | 10/14/2021 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -26.7% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $1.10 | $1.17 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | 9.8% | 3.6% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 44.2% | 75.5% |
| Downside Capture | 108.41 | 79.27 |
| Upside Capture | 98.55 | 103.65 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 21.0% | 21.5% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.40 | 0.92 | 1.66 | 1.37 | 0.83 | 0.58 |
| Up Beta | 2.26 | -0.53 | 0.64 | 2.20 | 0.31 | 0.16 |
| Down Beta | -1.50 | 1.31 | 2.10 | 1.32 | 1.50 | 0.85 |
| Up Capture | 124% | 68% | 198% | 88% | 97% | 30% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 11 | 23 | 37 | 72 | 143 | 431 |
| Stock +ve Days | 11 | 16 | 30 | 56 | 115 | 330 |
| Down Capture | 59% | 152% | 154% | 122% | 86% | 96% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 18 | 27 | 55 | 108 | 320 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 19 | 27 | 55 | 108 | 335 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
nullBased On 5-Year Data
nullBased On 10-Year Data
nullReturns Analyses
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2025 | 11/12/2025 | 10-Q (09/30/2025) |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/12/2025 | 10-Q (06/30/2025) |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/13/2025 | 10-Q (03/31/2025) |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/24/2025 | 10-K (12/31/2024) |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/12/2024 | 10-Q (09/30/2024) |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/12/2024 | 10-Q (06/30/2024) |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/13/2024 | 10-Q (03/31/2024) |
| 12/31/2023 | 03/25/2024 | 10-K (12/31/2023) |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/13/2023 | 10-Q (09/30/2023) |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 10-Q (06/30/2023) |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/15/2023 | 10-Q (03/31/2023) |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/14/2023 | 10-K (12/31/2022) |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/14/2022 | 10-Q (09/30/2022) |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/15/2022 | 10-Q (06/30/2022) |
| 03/31/2022 | 05/16/2022 | 10-Q (03/31/2022) |
| 12/31/2021 | 04/06/2022 | 10-K (12/31/2021) |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.