Own Cadence For AI? Oracle’s Backlog Demands A Look

Both software giants are riding the AI wave, but Oracle’s massive order book and clearer guidance present a more compelling forward case than Cadence’s premium-priced promise.

If you own software stocks, you’re likely making a bet on the transformative demand from artificial intelligence. For many, that bet has led them to Cadence Design Systems (CDNS), whose tools are essential for designing the next generation of AI chips. For others, it’s meant owning the legacy giant Oracle (ORCL), which is re-emerging as a critical provider of AI cloud infrastructure.

On the surface, the choice seems clear. Cadence stock has soared recently, while Oracle’s has lagged. But decisions are about the future, not the past. A closer look at each company’s forward guidance and order book reveals a surprising twist: the legacy name is flashing a much stronger, clearer signal about its future growth, while the high-flyer’s outlook comes with a few new complications. For an investor wanting this exposure from here, the decision turns on which forward path you’d rather underwrite.

Oracle’s Forward Signal: A Backlog Too Big to Ignore

The most powerful forward-looking statement a company can make is a mountain of contractual orders. On this front, Oracle’s latest report was staggering. The company’s remaining performance obligations, or RPO, which represents its backlog of contracted future revenue, finished at $638 billion, up 363%. Management also noted it signed $67 billion in new AI infrastructure contracts in the last quarter alone. This isn’t a forecast; it’s a locked-in order book that provides exceptional visibility into future growth.

This demand translated directly into one of the strongest guidance raises in the market. Oracle now expects total revenue growth of 34% for its fiscal year 2027. For the upcoming quarter, it guided for cloud revenue to grow as much as 64%. This is a company seeing a massive acceleration, and its own forecast reflects it.

Cadence Raises Its Outlook, But With A Catch

Cadence also has a strong forward look, just on a different scale. It boasts a record backlog of $8 billion and is seeing powerful demand for its new “agentic AI” tools that automate chip design. Management is confident enough that it raised its full-year 2026 revenue growth outlook to 17%.

However, that raise came with caveats. The company’s recent acquisition of Hexagon is expected to be dilutive to earnings by about $0.28 this year, prompting a reduction in the operating margin guide. Analysts on the call also noted that the company’s guidance implies a more cautious second half of the year, which management described as containing “appropriate prudence.” While the top-line story is strong, the near-term profit picture is getting cloudier.

Which Moat Is More Durable From Here?

Both companies have formidable moats. Cadence operates in a duopoly, with its highly complex chip design software creating massive switching costs. Its moat is its deep technical expertise, built on “decades of domain expertise, proprietary data and tightly integrated physically accurate engines,” as management described it.

Oracle’s moat is its vast installed base of mission-critical databases and enterprise applications. Its key advantage is that customers’ most valuable proprietary data “already sits in an Oracle database.” This makes Oracle the natural, and often easiest, choice for enterprises looking to apply AI to their own operations, creating a powerful, built-in growth engine. The massive RPO is tangible proof of this moat converting into future revenue.

The Price of Growth: A Clear Divide

The trailing numbers confirm the divergence in their forward stories. Oracle is not only growing faster right now (17.4% revenue growth vs. 13.4% for Cadence) and is more profitable (33.3% operating margin vs. 31.1%), but it also trades at a much lower valuation. Oracle’s price-to-operating-income multiple is 17.0, while Cadence’s is a steep 60.0. Cadence’s premium valuation asks investors to look past the near-term margin dilution and bet on a longer-term AI payoff. Oracle’s valuation, combined with its explosive guidance, suggests the market may be underestimating the scale of its contracted growth. We explored the core of Oracle’s upside case in a separate analysis.

The Tradeoff: A Buildout vs. A Premium

On the evidence, Oracle presents the cleaner, more financially compelling way to own this industry’s AI-driven demand right now. Its forward signals are unambiguous and backed by an enormous order book, all at a more reasonable price. But it’s not without risk. To meet this demand, Oracle plans a staggering net cash outlay for capital expenditures of around $70 billion in fiscal 2027 and expects to raise $40 billion in new capital. This is a monumental execution challenge.

A holder of Cadence is betting on a pure-play leader in a critical AI niche, and accepting a high valuation for that quality. The risk is that any stumble in its growth story could put that premium multiple in jeopardy. An investor choosing Oracle is getting contractually-backed growth at a lower price, but is underwriting one of the largest corporate buildouts in recent memory.

The decision ultimately turns on which risk you’re more comfortable with. The smartest move isn’t to blindly swap tickers, but to weigh the company you own against its rival on these forward dimensions. Does its valuation justify its forward growth, and are you comfortable with the specific risks you’re being asked to take on to achieve it?

Rather Compare Them On Your Own Terms?

You can line Cadence Design and Oracle up directly on the Cadence Design peer comparison, weigh them on valuation, growth, margins, and returns, and swap in any other Application Software names you hold. Or, if you would rather not pick a side at all, a software ETF like IGV holds both Cadence Design and Oracle alongside the rest of the group.

You just ran that test on two stocks in a few minutes. Running it on everything you own, every quarter, is the discipline that separates the investors who beat the market from the ones who quietly lag it.

Skip The Guesswork: The Portfolio That Beat The Market

What if the comparison were already done for you across the entire market, leaving you holding only the names with the best forward setup at a fair price?

That is what the Trefis methodology delivers. The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio ranks quality across thousands of names, owns the 30 best, and rebalances with discipline. It has outpaced a benchmark that combines the three major indices – the S&P 500, S&P Mid-cap, and Russell 2000.