Salesforce Upgraded Its Profit Engine. Quietly

The software giant has quietly transformed its profitability, but investors are still pricing it like the company it used to be.

After a year that saw its stock return -37% while the S&P 500 climbed, a Salesforce (CRM) investor might ask what, if anything, is going right. The answer is found in a single, startling number: for every dollar of sales, the company now keeps 22% in operating profit. The market is pricing Salesforce for its past, a high-growth, low-margin story that the numbers no longer support.

This is a claim that the company has fundamentally changed its operating model, and the evidence suggests it has.

Salesforce’s profitability has structurally improved.

The leap to a 22% operating margin is not a one-year fluke. The company’s three-year average margin is 20%, itself well above the five-year average of 14.2%, showing a consistent upward trend. And no, this is not a case of a company shrinking to profitability; Salesforce grew revenue by 11.0% over the same period. This combination of expanding margins and double-digit growth points to a durable shift in how the business runs, focused on what management calls the “Agentic Enterprise” to drive efficiency.

The market’s hesitation to reward this new profile is understandable. For years, the narrative was about grabbing market share at all costs. Now, investors are grappling with a different story. Some recent analysis asks if the market is ignoring the real growth story in Salesforce stock, which may center on this new, more profitable model. The current investor debate focuses on whether the impressive adoption of new AI products can translate into broad financial strength, especially when leading indicators have not yet shown significant outperformance.

But the old story could still prove right.

For the current stock price to be correct, the market must believe the new AI-driven efficiency cannot outrun weakness in the company’s core business. Management has acknowledged softness in its Commerce and Tableau products. The central fear is that while new offerings like Agentforce are seeing “incredible demand” with ARR now greater than $1 billion, this momentum might not be enough to offset a slowdown in established segments. If the new products merely replace, rather than augment, revenue from legacy clouds, then the promised acceleration may not arrive. For investors who see this dynamic across the industry, a software ETF like IGV might seem like a more diversified way to participate in the theme.

The test is management’s promise of a second-half reacceleration.

Ultimately, the debate comes down to a specific forecast. Management has been clear, stating they expect to “drive organic revenue reacceleration in the second half of FY 27.” This is the fulcrum on which the stock’s future rests. If they deliver, it validates the thesis that AI is a powerful new growth layer for a more profitable company. If they miss, it suggests the bears were right, and the drag from legacy businesses was too much to overcome. The story has changed; the market is just waiting for the final chapter to be written.

For more companies whose price lags their fundamentals, our Buy the Dip screen runs that screen across the market, daily.

Better Businesses, Bought Systematically

A company that structurally improved while its price stood still is the kind of gap disciplined investors live for. The catch is that any one such gap can take years to close, and a single stock ties your outcome to one management team, one industry, one story.

The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio hunts the same signal at scale: roughly 30 names selected on the durable fundamentals, margins, cash generation, and financial strength, not on one quarter’s narrative, then sized and rebalanced with rules. It has a track record of outpacing a benchmark that combines all major indices – the S&P 500, S&P Mid-cap, and Russell 2000. Enjoy spotting the upgrades the market missed; own the basket that does it systematically.