Cheniere Energy (LNG)
Market Price (12/25/2025): $190.22 | Market Cap: $41.7 BilSector: Energy | Industry: Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Cheniere Energy (LNG)
Market Price (12/25/2025): $190.22Market Cap: $41.7 BilSector: EnergyIndustry: Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 11%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 6.5%, FCF Yield is 5.3% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -34%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -53% | Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 58% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 27%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 12%, CFO LTM is 5.1 Bil, FCF LTM is 2.2 Bil | Weak revenue growthRev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -12% | |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -25% | Key risksLNG key risks include [1] a global LNG oversupply threatening its ability to secure profitable new contracts, Show more. | |
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 30% | ||
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US LNG. |
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 11%, ERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is 6.5%, FCF Yield is 5.3% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 27%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 12%, CFO LTM is 5.1 Bil, FCF LTM is 2.2 Bil |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -25% |
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 30% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US LNG. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -34%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -53% |
| Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 58% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -12% |
| Key risksLNG key risks include [1] a global LNG oversupply threatening its ability to secure profitable new contracts, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Weaker-than-expected Q3 2025 Financial Results. Cheniere Energy reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $4.44 billion, which was below analysts' anticipated $4.89 billion. This revenue shortfall was primarily attributed to feedgas quality challenges.2. Analyst Downgrades and Revised Price Targets. Following the softer third-quarter 2025 results, Goldman Sachs lowered its price target for Cheniere Energy to $275.00 from $280.00. This adjustment by a major financial institution indicated a less optimistic near-term outlook for the stock.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -19.3% change in LNG stock from 9/24/2025 to 12/24/2025 was primarily driven by a -23.4% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| 9242025 | 12242025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 235.98 | 190.33 | -19.34% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 18284.00 | 18962.00 | 3.71% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 21.05% | 21.12% | 0.33% |
| P/E Multiple | 13.60 | 10.42 | -23.36% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 221.80 | 219.30 | 1.13% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -19.35% |
Market Drivers
9/24/2025 to 12/24/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| LNG | -19.3% | |
| Market (SPY) | 4.4% | 14.8% |
| Sector (XLE) | -1.8% | 37.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -19.1% change in LNG stock from 6/25/2025 to 12/24/2025 was primarily driven by a -38.5% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| 6252025 | 12242025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 235.19 | 190.33 | -19.07% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 16894.00 | 18962.00 | 12.24% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 18.37% | 21.12% | 14.99% |
| P/E Multiple | 16.94 | 10.42 | -38.48% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 223.50 | 219.30 | 1.88% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -19.10% |
Market Drivers
6/25/2025 to 12/24/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| LNG | -19.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 14.0% | 1.1% |
| Sector (XLE) | 5.9% | 27.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -8.7% change in LNG stock from 12/24/2024 to 12/24/2025 was primarily driven by a -19.4% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| 12242024 | 12242025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 208.56 | 190.33 | -8.74% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 16090.00 | 18962.00 | 17.85% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 22.70% | 21.12% | -6.94% |
| P/E Multiple | 12.92 | 10.42 | -19.36% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 226.30 | 219.30 | 3.09% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -8.83% |
Market Drivers
12/24/2024 to 12/24/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| LNG | -8.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 15.8% | 41.1% |
| Sector (XLE) | 7.4% | 59.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 25.8% change in LNG stock from 12/25/2022 to 12/24/2025 was primarily driven by a 79.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12252022 | 12242025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 151.33 | 190.33 | 25.77% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 30900.00 | 18962.00 | -38.63% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.22 | 2.20 | 79.86% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 249.90 | 219.30 | 12.24% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 23.89% |
Market Drivers
12/25/2023 to 12/24/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| LNG | 12.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 48.9% | 33.5% |
| Sector (XLE) | 10.5% | 55.7% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| LNG Return | -2% | 69% | 49% | 15% | 27% | -10% | 228% |
| Peers Return | � | � | � | � | � | � | � |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 18% | 115% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| LNG Win Rate | 58% | 83% | 67% | 75% | 58% | 50% | |
| Peers Win Rate | � | � | � | � | � | 54% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| LNG Max Drawdown | -51% | -2% | 0% | -8% | -10% | -11% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | � | � | � | � | � | � | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: ET, SRE, VG, COP, XOM. See LNG Returns vs. Peers.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/24/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | LNG | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -23.4% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 30.6% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 183 days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -54.8% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 121.3% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 299 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -21.2% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 27.0% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 801 days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -97.7% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 4292.6% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1,857 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to ET, MPLX, OKE, PBA, ENB
In The Past
Cheniere Energy's stock fell -23.4% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 11/1/2022. A -23.4% loss requires a 30.6% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies for Cheniere Energy:
- The Panama Canal for U.S. natural gas exports. (It provides the critical infrastructure and gateway for U.S. natural gas to reach global markets.)
- Amazon Web Services (AWS) for global natural gas trade. (It offers the essential, large-scale, and complex infrastructure-as-a-service for energy companies to export natural gas.)
- A global UPS or FedEx, but for liquefied natural gas instead of packages. (It handles the specialized processing and global shipping of a specific energy commodity.)
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Production and Sale: Cheniere produces and sells LNG, converting natural gas into its liquid form for global transport and consumption.
- LNG Terminal and Liquefaction Services: The company provides liquefaction and terminal services, enabling third parties to process their natural gas into LNG and load it onto carriers at Cheniere's export facilities.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Cheniere Energy (LNG) Major Customers
Cheniere Energy primarily sells liquefied natural gas (LNG) to other companies through long-term Sale and Purchase Agreements (SPAs). Its customers are typically global energy companies, national oil and gas companies, and utilities located across Europe and Asia, which then distribute or use the natural gas.
Major customer companies include:
- Shell plc (Symbol: SHEL)
- TotalEnergies SE (Symbol: TTE)
- Centrica plc (Symbol: CNA.L)
- Eni S.p.A. (Symbol: E.MI)
- Woodside Energy Group Ltd (Symbol: WDS)
- Korea Gas Corporation (KOGAS) (Symbol: KRX: 036460)
- Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. (Symbol: TYO: 9502)
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Jack A. Fusco, President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Fusco has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2016. With over 35 years in the energy industry, he co-founded Orion Power Holdings, an independent power producer, with backing from Goldman Sachs, serving as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Fusco was also the Chief Executive Officer of Calpine Corporation from August 2008 to May 2014 and Executive Chairman from May 2014 through May 2016. Calpine was subsequently sold in March 2018 to an affiliate of Energy Capital Partners and a consortium of other investors. He was recruited to Calpine in 2008 when the company was emerging from bankruptcy.
Zach Davis, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Davis has served as Chief Financial Officer since August 2020 and as Executive Vice President since February 2022. He joined Cheniere in November 2013 and has over 18 years of finance experience across the LNG, power, renewable energy, midstream, and infrastructure sectors. Prior to joining Cheniere, Mr. Davis held energy investment banking and project finance roles at Credit Suisse, Marathon Capital, and HSH Nordbank.
Anatol Feygin, Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer
Mr. Feygin has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer since September 2016. He joined Cheniere in March 2014 as Senior Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development. Before Cheniere, Mr. Feygin spent seven years at Loews Corporation, where he was Vice President, Energy Strategist and Senior Portfolio Manager. His career also includes three years at Bank of America as Head of Global Commodity Strategy and Senior Analyst, and a start in banking at J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as Senior Analyst covering natural gas pipelines, distributors, and electric utilities.
Sean N. Markowitz, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
Mr. Markowitz has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Corporate Secretary since February 2020. He joined Cheniere in October 2015 as Assistant General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, and previously held the role of General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from September 2016 to February 2020.
Corey Grindal, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Mr. Grindal has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since 2023. He previously served as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Trading from 2020 to 2023 and as Senior Vice President, Gas Supply from September 2016 to September 2020. Mr. Grindal initially joined Cheniere as Vice President of Supply in 2013.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Cheniere Energy's (symbol: LNG) business are primarily centered around market dynamics, financial leverage, and the evolving regulatory environment.
- Global LNG Supply Glut and Market Price Volatility: Cheniere Energy faces a significant risk from a potential global oversupply of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Analysts project more than 100 million tonnes per year of new global LNG capacity to enter the market between 2025 and 2027 from competitors in Qatar, Africa, and other U.S. projects. This influx could pressure spot prices, making it more challenging for Cheniere to secure favorable terms for new long-term contracts. In 2024, the company experienced a $4.7 billion decrease in revenues compared to 2023, primarily due to declining global LNG and gas prices and a reduction in volumes sold under short-term agreements. Furthermore, a disconnect between Cheniere's ambitious LNG export capacity plans and U.S. natural gas output could lead to higher input costs or underutilized capacity.
- High Debt Levels and Reliance on Capital Markets: The company carries a substantial debt burden, reported at $23.1 billion as of December 31, 2024, and approximately $25.19 billion as of September 2025. This significant debt is a result of its capital-intensive projects and aggressive expansion. Cheniere's ability to fund ongoing capital expenditures and refinance existing indebtedness is highly dependent on continued access to project financing and capital markets. Factors such as economic conditions, interest rate fluctuations, and changing banking policies related to fossil fuel investments could adversely impact the availability or cost of this crucial capital, potentially limiting future growth initiatives or the company's ability to withstand economic downturns.
- Evolving Regulatory and Environmental Landscape: Cheniere Energy is exposed to risks associated with the dynamic regulatory environment, particularly those driven by the transition to a lower-carbon economy. This includes potential new environmental policies and regulations that could mandate expanded reporting on climate impacts or stricter emissions standards. While Cheniere has stated its facilities meet current pollution limits, future regulatory changes could necessitate costly equipment retrofits or impose operational restrictions. Additionally, as an energy infrastructure company with facilities located along the Gulf Coast, Cheniere faces physical climate-related risks from extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and flooding, which could disrupt operations.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The accelerating global energy transition, driven by rapidly falling costs and widespread deployment of renewable energy sources (solar, wind, battery storage), coupled with significant emerging investments and technological advancements in green hydrogen production and infrastructure, threatens the long-term demand for natural gas by offering increasingly competitive and sustainable alternatives for power generation, industrial processes, and heating.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Cheniere Energy (symbol: LNG) primarily operates in the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) business, encompassing LNG liquefaction, export, and marketing, as well as the ownership and operation of LNG terminals and pipelines. The addressable markets for Cheniere Energy's main product, LNG, are as follows:Global LNG Market
The global liquefied natural gas market was valued at approximately USD 122.60 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 226.97 billion by 2030, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 11.6% from 2025 to 2030. Other estimates place the global market size at USD 128.44 billion in 2024, with a projection to grow to USD 1088.33 billion by 2033 at a CAGR of 26.8% during the forecast period (2025–2033). Another report estimated the global LNG market size at USD 167.06 billion in 2024, expected to be USD 171.69 billion in 2025 and reach USD 227.28 billion by 2032, exhibiting a CAGR of 4.09% during 2025-2032.North American LNG Market
The North America LNG market is projected to reach a valuation of USD 26,615.3 million (USD 26.61 billion) in 2024 and is anticipated to reach USD 44,208.1 million (USD 44.21 billion) by 2033, recording a CAGR of 5.8% from 2024 to 2033. Another source indicates that the market size of North America stood at USD 54.44 billion in 2024. North America's LNG export capacity is also expected to more than double between 2024 and 2028, increasing from 11.6 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) to 24.4 bcf/d.AI Analysis | Feedback
Expected Drivers of Future Revenue Growth for Cheniere Energy (LNG) over the Next 2-3 Years:
- Increased Liquefaction Capacity from Expansion Projects: Cheniere Energy is actively expanding its liquefaction capacity through significant projects. The Corpus Christi Stage 3 project is nearing completion, with several trains coming online, and the Corpus Christi Midscale Trains 8 & 9 project, adding approximately 5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) of capacity, has reached a Final Investment Decision (FID) and is under construction, expected to be operational by 2028. Additionally, the company is pursuing further brownfield expansions at both its Sabine Pass and Corpus Christi terminals, including the Corpus Christi Stage 4 expansion (24 million tonnes per year) and Sabine Pass Stage 5 (three 6.5 million tonnes per year trains), with FID for Sabine Pass anticipated in late 2026 or early 2027. These expansions, combined with debottlenecking efforts, are projected to increase Cheniere's total liquefaction capacity to over 60 mtpa by 2028 and potentially up to 75 mtpa by the early 2030s.
- Robust Global Demand for LNG: The company is poised to benefit from strong and growing global demand for liquefied natural gas, particularly from Asian and European markets. Countries in Asia are rapidly expanding their regasification capacity, with forecasts indicating significant increases in LNG demand from China, India, and Southeast Asia through 2040. The United States remains the world's largest LNG exporter, and U.S. LNG exports are projected to increase by 36% from 2024 to 2026.
- Stability from Long-Term Contracts: Cheniere's business model is significantly supported by its reliance on long-term sales and purchase agreements (SPAs). These contracts provide stable, long-term cash flows and largely insulate the company from short-term spot price volatility. Approximately 90% of Cheniere's current and expanding capacity is covered by these long-term contracts, which often include fixed fees that ensure revenue regardless of whether the customer takes delivery.
- Improved LNG Pricing and Margins: Recent financial results indicate that Cheniere has experienced higher LNG margins driven by improved pricing. While the market faces potential risks from increasing global supply, strong demand in key regions has contributed to favorable pricing conditions.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- In Q3 2025, Cheniere Energy repurchased approximately 4.4 million shares for over $1 billion.
- Year-to-date September 30, 2025, the company repurchased approximately 7.4 million shares for $1.7 billion.
- In June 2024, Cheniere announced an increase in its share repurchase authorization by an additional $4 billion through 2027, with $3.2 billion remaining under authorization as of June 30, 2025.
Share Issuance
- No significant share issuances for capital raising purposes were identified within the last 3-5 years. Small amounts of shares were issued related to share-based compensation.
Capital Expenditures
- In Q3 2025, Cheniere reported approximately $600 million in growth capital expenditures, primarily allocated to the Corpus Christi Stage 3 project and Midscale Trains 8 and 9.
- In June 2025, the company made a Final Investment Decision (FID) to invest approximately $2.9 billion in the Corpus Christi Midscale Trains 8 & 9 Project and debottlenecking, which is expected to add about 5 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) of capacity.
- Cheniere is actively expanding its liquefaction capacity, with the Corpus Christi Stage 3 project being over 90% complete by Q3 2025, and planning further expansions including Corpus Christi Stage 4 and Sabine Pass Stage 5.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to LNG. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11212025 | WHD | Cactus | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 12.0% | 12.0% | 0.0% |
| 10172025 | OVV | Ovintiv | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 6.6% | 6.6% | 0.0% |
| 10102025 | COP | ConocoPhillips | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 5.7% | 5.7% | -2.3% |
| 10102025 | HAL | Halliburton | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 28.4% | 28.4% | -0.7% |
| 10102025 | OXY | Occidental Petroleum | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | -4.5% | -4.5% | -7.1% |
| 05312020 | LNG | Cheniere Energy | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 32.5% | 91.4% | 0.0% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Cheniere Energy
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 91.80 |
| Mkt Cap | 58.0 |
| Rev LTM | 39,375 |
| Op Inc LTM | 8,144 |
| FCF LTM | 3,706 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 6,095 |
| CFO LTM | 7,984 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 10,217 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 7.2% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | -5.6% |
| Rev Chg Q | 14.4% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 3.1% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 21.7% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 21.0% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.3% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 30.2% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 27.8% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 6.9% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 9.3% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 58.0 |
| P/S | 1.9 |
| P/EBIT | 7.8 |
| P/E | 12.9 |
| P/CFO | 8.1 |
| Total Yield | 10.7% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.7% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | 6.7% |
| D/E | 0.6 |
| Net D/E | 0.6 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | 2.8% |
| 3M Rtn | -3.1% |
| 6M Rtn | 5.0% |
| 12M Rtn | 1.1% |
| 3Y Rtn | 22.8% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | -0.6% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | -9.3% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | -10.1% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | -14.1% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -56.1% |
Comparison Analyses
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $190.33 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 41.7 | |
| First Trading Date | 04/04/1994 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -24.3% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $206.94 | $225.29 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -8.0% | -15.5% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 15.8% | 30.3% |
| Downside Capture | 44.80 | 26.71 |
| Upside Capture | -64.69 | 13.68 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 13.2% | 41.2% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.66 | 0.58 |
| Up Beta | 0.35 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.47 |
| Down Beta | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.38 | 1.19 | 0.95 |
| Up Capture | 3% | -38% | -48% | -36% | 13% | 16% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 13 | 26 | 39 | 74 | 142 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 11 | 20 | 29 | 61 | 129 | 391 |
| Down Capture | 20% | 40% | 16% | -38% | 40% | 74% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 22 | 34 | 65 | 120 | 359 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of LNG With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNG | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -6.7% | 10.0% | 19.2% | 71.9% | 8.9% | 6.0% | -10.4% |
| Annualized Volatility | 30.2% | 24.4% | 19.5% | 19.3% | 15.3% | 17.1% | 35.0% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.22 | 0.34 | 0.78 | 2.69 | 0.36 | 0.18 | -0.12 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 59.7% | 41.3% | 8.2% | 39.2% | 38.0% | 12.2% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of LNG With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNG | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 27.5% | 21.8% | 14.9% | 18.7% | 11.7% | 4.8% | 32.6% |
| Annualized Volatility | 30.0% | 26.7% | 17.1% | 15.5% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.7% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 0.59 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 60.2% | 33.1% | 10.0% | 38.6% | 27.8% | 12.7% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of LNG With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNG | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 17.7% | 8.0% | 14.7% | 14.9% | 6.9% | 5.2% | 69.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 34.1% | 29.8% | 18.0% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.57 | 0.32 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.90 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 64.0% | 43.8% | 2.8% | 42.7% | 33.8% | 6.6% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 10/30/2025 | 0.2% | -2.6% | 0.1% |
| 8/7/2025 | -0.3% | -1.7% | 0.2% |
| 5/8/2025 | -0.6% | -2.1% | 2.0% |
| 2/20/2025 | 3.7% | 0.1% | 5.2% |
| 10/31/2024 | 5.2% | 8.8% | 23.4% |
| 8/8/2024 | 1.5% | 3.9% | 1.9% |
| 5/3/2024 | -1.9% | -1.5% | 0.3% |
| 2/22/2024 | -4.2% | -7.1% | -3.0% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 12 | 12 | 15 |
| # Negative | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| Median Positive | 2.7% | 3.9% | 3.5% |
| Median Negative | -0.9% | -1.9% | -2.0% |
| Max Positive | 9.4% | 12.2% | 23.4% |
| Max Negative | -4.2% | -8.6% | -35.3% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 9302025 | 10302025 | 10-Q 9/30/2025 |
| 6302025 | 8072025 | 10-Q 6/30/2025 |
| 3312025 | 5082025 | 10-Q 3/31/2025 |
| 12312024 | 2202025 | 10-K 12/31/2024 |
| 9302024 | 10312024 | 10-Q 9/30/2024 |
| 6302024 | 8082024 | 10-Q 6/30/2024 |
| 3312024 | 5032024 | 10-Q 3/31/2024 |
| 12312023 | 2222024 | 10-K 12/31/2023 |
| 9302023 | 11022023 | 10-Q 9/30/2023 |
| 6302023 | 8032023 | 10-Q 6/30/2023 |
| 3312023 | 5022023 | 10-Q 3/31/2023 |
| 12312022 | 2232023 | 10-K 12/31/2022 |
| 9302022 | 11032022 | 10-Q 9/30/2022 |
| 6302022 | 8042022 | 10-Q 6/30/2022 |
| 3312022 | 5042022 | 10-Q 3/31/2022 |
| 12312021 | 2242022 | 10-K 12/31/2021 |
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.