Designer Brands (DBI)
Market Price (12/28/2025): $7.775 | Market Cap: $385.3 MilSector: Consumer Discretionary | Industry: Footwear
Designer Brands (DBI)
Market Price (12/28/2025): $7.775Market Cap: $385.3 MilSector: Consumer DiscretionaryIndustry: Footwear
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Attractive yieldDividend Yield is 2.5%, FCF Yield is 26% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -51%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -91% | Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 316% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include E-commerce & Digital Retail. Themes include Online Marketplaces, and Direct-to-Consumer Brands. | Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 15% | Stock price has recently run up significantly6M Rtn6 month market price return is 224% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -5.2%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -5.0%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -3.2% | ||
| Valuation getting more expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is 233% | ||
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -8.5% | ||
| Key risksDBI key risks include [1] significant financial distress and high leverage creating a potential for bankruptcy, Show more. |
| Attractive yieldDividend Yield is 2.5%, FCF Yield is 26% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include E-commerce & Digital Retail. Themes include Online Marketplaces, and Direct-to-Consumer Brands. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -51%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -91% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 15% |
| Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 316% |
| Stock price has recently run up significantly6M Rtn6 month market price return is 224% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -5.2%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -5.0%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -3.2% |
| Valuation getting more expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is 233% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -8.5% |
| Key risksDBI key risks include [1] significant financial distress and high leverage creating a potential for bankruptcy, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Designer Brands (DBI) stock experienced a significant appreciation from approximately August 31, 2025, to today, driven by several key operational improvements and financial results. The company's performance, particularly in the latter part of this period, contributed to a notable shift in investor sentiment.
<br><br>
<b>1. Strong Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Beat.</b> Designer Brands reported robust third-quarter 2025 financial results, with diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.35 and adjusted diluted EPS of $0.38, both representing an increase of over 40% year-over-year. This strong performance signaled a significant improvement in the company's profitability.
<br><br>
<b>2. Significant Gross Margin Expansion and Increased Operating Income.</b> The company achieved a 210-basis point improvement in its consolidated gross margin to 45.1% in Q3 2025. Alongside this, adjusted operating income also saw an increase, demonstrating enhanced operational efficiency and effective cost management.
<br><br>
<b>3. Sequential Improvement in Sales Trends and Store Performance.</b> Designer Brands reported sequential improvements in comparable sales in Q3 2025, attributed to healthier store traffic and higher in-store conversion rates. This indicated a positive shift in consumer demand and more effective in-store execution.
<br><br>
<b>4. Enhanced Inventory Management and Digital Fulfillment.</b> Improved in-stock levels, resulting from a 15% increase in digital demand fulfillment through its logistics center, and generally enhanced inventory management contributed to an expansion in the operating margin. These operational strategies played a role in strengthening the company's financial position.
<br><br>
<b>5. Strategic Partnership for On-Demand Delivery.</b> In September 2025, Designer Brands' DSW retail segment partnered with Uber Eats to offer nationwide on-demand delivery. This strategic move likely bolstered investor confidence by expanding accessibility and modernizing the company's delivery capabilities.
Show moreStock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 111.5% change in DBI stock from 9/27/2025 to 12/27/2025 was primarily driven by a 115.3% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 9272025 | 12272025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.68 | 7.78 | 111.55% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 2917.44 | 2892.65 | -0.85% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.06 | 0.13 | 115.30% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 49.11 | 49.56 | -0.91% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 111.53% |
Market Drivers
9/27/2025 to 12/27/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| DBI | 111.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 4.3% | 24.2% |
| Sector (XLY) | 1.8% | 34.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 224.2% change in DBI stock from 6/28/2025 to 12/27/2025 was primarily driven by a 239.6% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6282025 | 12272025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.40 | 7.78 | 224.19% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 2949.57 | 2892.65 | -1.93% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.04 | 0.13 | 239.57% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 48.24 | 49.56 | -2.72% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 223.95% |
Market Drivers
6/28/2025 to 12/27/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| DBI | 224.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 12.6% | 27.1% |
| Sector (XLY) | 11.9% | 35.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 51.7% change in DBI stock from 12/27/2024 to 12/27/2025 was primarily driven by a 52.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12272024 | 12272025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 5.13 | 7.78 | 51.67% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 3050.04 | 2892.65 | -5.16% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.09 | 0.13 | 52.16% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 52.08 | 49.56 | 4.85% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 51.31% |
Market Drivers
12/27/2024 to 12/27/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| DBI | 51.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 17.0% | 38.8% |
| Sector (XLY) | 7.0% | 45.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -7.6% change in DBI stock from 12/28/2022 to 12/27/2025 was primarily driven by a -16.8% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12282022 | 12272025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 8.42 | 7.78 | -7.58% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 3377.51 | 2892.65 | -14.36% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.16 | 0.13 | -16.76% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 64.25 | 49.56 | 22.86% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -12.41% |
Market Drivers
12/28/2023 to 12/27/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| DBI | -9.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 48.0% | 34.9% |
| Sector (XLY) | 37.7% | 38.6% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| DBI Return | -51% | 86% | -30% | -8% | -38% | 50% | -45% |
| Peers Return | 16% | 38% | -12% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 150% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 18% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| DBI Win Rate | 33% | 50% | 50% | 42% | 50% | 50% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 65% | 42% | 68% | 57% | 52% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| DBI Max Drawdown | -80% | -6% | -34% | -36% | -46% | -57% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -5% | -26% | -7% | -9% | -23% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL. See DBI Returns vs. Peers.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/26/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | DBI | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -68.8% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 220.4% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -80.9% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 424.0% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 377 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -58.4% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 140.6% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -84.9% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 561.3% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 771 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL
In The Past
Designer Brands's stock fell -68.8% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 5/17/2021. A -68.8% loss requires a 220.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-2 brief analogies to describe Designer Brands (DBI):
Nordstrom Rack for footwear
TJ Maxx for shoes
AI Analysis | Feedback
```html- Footwear Retail: Sale of a wide assortment of branded and private label shoes for men, women, and children through their retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
- Accessories Retail: Sale of complementary fashion accessories, including handbags, hosiery, and shoe care products, to consumers.
- Owned Brand Wholesale: Design, sourcing, and distribution of their portfolio of proprietary footwear and accessories brands to third-party retailers.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Designer Brands (DBI)
Designer Brands Inc. (DBI) primarily sells to **individual customers** through its extensive retail network, which includes DSW Designer Shoe Warehouse in the U.S. and The Shoe Company and Shoe Warehouse in Canada. While the company also has a significant wholesale business for its owned and licensed brands (e.g., Vince Camuto, Jessica Simpson, Keds, Hush Puppies), the majority of its revenue is generated through its direct-to-consumer retail channels.
Here are up to three categories of individual customers Designer Brands primarily serves through its retail operations:
- The Value-Seeking & Brand-Conscious Shopper: These customers are highly motivated by finding popular and designer brands at competitive prices. They actively utilize loyalty programs (like DSW VIP), promotions, and sales events to maximize value. They appreciate the vast selection of brands that allows them to compare options before purchasing.
- The Convenience-Oriented Family Shopper: This segment includes individuals and families looking for a convenient one-stop shop for footwear across multiple categories (men's, women's, children's) and occasions (casual, athletic, dress, seasonal). They value the accessibility of large-format retail stores combined with robust online shopping options for ease and variety.
- The Fashion-Aware & Trend-Following Individual: While value remains important, these customers are also attuned to current footwear trends and seek out stylish options from well-known brands. They appreciate the diverse inventory that allows them to find both classic staples and new arrivals to complement their personal style.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
Douglas M. Howe Chief Executive Officer
Doug Howe has served as Chief Executive Officer of Designer Brands since April 2023. He joined the company in May 2022 as President of DSW Designer Shoe Warehouse and Executive Vice President of Designer Brands. Mr. Howe has over 30 years of retail experience, holding previous leadership positions across merchandising, design, product development, and planning. Prior to Designer Brands, he was Chief Merchandising Officer at Kohl's from 2018 to 2022. His career also includes roles at Qurate Retail Group (Global Chief Merchandising Officer for QVC and HSN), Old Navy, Walmart (Senior VP of Product Development, Strategy, Design & Development), and May Department Stores.
Mark A. Haley Interim Principal Financial Officer
Mark Haley was appointed Interim Principal Financial Officer effective November 1, 2025. He joined Designer Brands in 2017. Mr. Haley previously served as the Senior Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer (since January 2019) and Vice President and Controller (2017-2019) for the company. Before joining Designer Brands, his experience included serving as Chief Accounting Officer at Conn's, Inc. (2014-2017), Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer at Coldwater Creek Inc. (2010-2014), and a senior director of financial reporting at SUPERVALU INC. He is a CPA.
Jay L. Schottenstein Executive Chairman
Jay Schottenstein has served as the Executive Chairman of Designer Brands (formerly DSW) since 2005. He also holds positions as Chairman and CEO of American Eagle Outfitters Inc. and SB360 Capital Partners, and Chairman of American Signature Inc. and Schottenstein Stores Corp. Mr. Schottenstein was previously the Chief Executive Officer of Designer Brands from 2005 to 2009 and has held various executive roles at Schottenstein RVI LLC and Retail Ventures Inc. He has been a Director of Albertsons Companies since 2006. His family holds a majority voting ownership in Designer Brands.
Deborah L. Ferree Vice Chairman & Chief Product Officer
Deborah L. Ferree has been the Vice Chairman and Chief Product Officer of Designer Brands since February 2023. Prior to this role, she served as President of Camuto for the company from 2021 to 2023. Ms. Ferree has held numerous leadership positions within Designer Brands, including Senior Vice President of Merchandising, Executive Vice President, Vice President of Merchandising, and President and Chief Merchandising Officer. Her earlier career included leadership roles at Harris Department Store and the May Company.
Andrea O'Donnell Executive Vice President & President of Brands
Andrea O'Donnell serves as Executive Vice President, Designer Brands and President of Brands (also referred to as President of Camuto LLC). She is a key member of the executive team.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are the key risks to Designer Brands (DBI):- Financial Distress and High Leverage: Designer Brands faces significant financial challenges, including operating losses, an inability to cover interest expenses with operating income, and a high debt-to-equity ratio. The company's Altman Z-Score indicates it is in the distress zone, implying a potential risk of bankruptcy in the medium term. This high leverage and financial instability raise concerns about the company's long-term viability and ability to fund working capital.
- Weak Sales Trends and Declining Consumer Demand: DBI has consistently reported worsening top-line trends, with declining comparable store sales across all business units. This performance reflects worsening trends in U.S. consumer sentiment, with a notable decline in traffic and challenges in bringing new shoppers into its brick-and-mortar locations. This ongoing struggle to generate revenue impacts the company's overall profitability.
- Margin Pressure and Competitive Landscape: The company experiences compressed margins due to factors such as markdowns and a highly competitive promotional environment within the retail sector. Additionally, tariffs represent a significant potential cost increase, with initial estimates suggesting up to $100 million in gross profit exposure, further exacerbating margin pressure.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The clear emerging threat for Designer Brands (DBI) is the accelerating shift of major footwear brands towards a direct-to-consumer (DTC) sales model. Brands like Nike, Adidas, Crocs, and others are increasingly prioritizing their own e-commerce platforms and retail stores, reducing reliance on wholesale partners like DBI. This trend threatens DBI's core business by potentially limiting access to desirable inventory, increasing wholesale costs, and diverting customer traffic directly to brand channels, thereby disintermediating the multi-brand retailer.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Designer Brands Inc. (DBI) operates primarily in the footwear and accessories markets in North America, specifically the U.S. and Canada.
Addressable Market Sizes:
Footwear Market
- U.S. Footwear Market: The U.S. footwear market reached approximately USD 97.72 billion in 2024 and is estimated to grow to around USD 141.89 billion by 2034. Other estimates show the U.S. footwear market at USD 94.7 billion in 2024, projected to reach USD 119.0 billion by 2033.
- Canada Footwear Market: The Canada footwear market was estimated at USD 5.12 billion in 2024 and is anticipated to reach USD 11.46 billion by 2035. Another source indicates the Canadian footwear market generated USD 8,245.4 million in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 10,906.8 million by 2030.
Accessories Market
- U.S. Fashion Accessories Market: The United States fashion accessories market was valued at USD 254.48 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 505.69 billion by 2033.
- Canada Fashion Accessories Market: The Canada fashion accessories market size was valued at USD 64.6 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 130.98 billion by 2033.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Designer Brands (symbol: DBI) is anticipating several key drivers for its future revenue growth over the next two to three years:
- Expansion of Owned Brands and Private Labels: Designer Brands is strategically focused on significantly growing its portfolio of owned brands, aiming to double their sales to approximately one-third of total revenue by fiscal year 2026 (ending January 2027). This includes brands such as Vince Camuto, Keds, Topo Athletic, Le Tigre, Jessica Simpson, Lucky Brand, and Hush Puppies. This initiative is expected to be a primary driver of growth and is also anticipated to be highly margin-accretive.
- Growth in Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Channels: A substantial portion of the planned growth from owned brands is projected to occur through Designer Brands' direct-to-consumer channels, with a goal to increase DTC revenue to 21% of total revenue by fiscal 2026. This strategy is complemented by efforts to enhance the overall omnichannel customer experience.
- Assortment Modernization and Strategic Brand Partnerships: The company is actively revitalizing and modernizing its product assortment, placing a strong emphasis on athletic and athleisure categories, which have demonstrated robust performance. Additionally, Designer Brands is strengthening and expanding its relationships with top national brand partners, increasing the variety of styles available.
- Growth in Canadian Retail Segment: Designer Brands anticipates mid to high single-digit net sales growth in its Canada Retail segment for fiscal year 2025.
- Enhanced Customer Experience and Omni-channel Optimization: Initiatives such as the "Warehouse Reimagined" store format, the introduction of Fit Finder technology, augmented reality try-on kiosks, and customization stations are being implemented to improve the in-store and online customer experience. These enhancements, along with increased marketing investments to boost DSW awareness and optimize the omnichannel model, are expected to drive higher conversion rates and overall sales.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- In 2024, Designer Brands repurchased 10.3 million Class A common shares at an aggregate cost of $68.6 million.
- As of February 1, 2025, $19.7 million of Class A common shares remained available for future repurchase under the existing share repurchase program.
- Net common equity repurchased by the company was approximately $148 million in 2023, $102 million in 2024, and $69 million in 2025.
Capital Expenditures
- Designer Brands anticipates reducing its annual capital spending from $50 million to $40 million for Q1 2026.
- For the trailing twelve months ended July 2025, capital expenditures were approximately $38.16 million.
- Fiscal year 2025 projections for capital expenditures are $44 million, with a historical focus on digital and omnichannel capabilities.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to DBI. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11302025 | BBWI | Bath & Body Works | Dip Buy | DB | Insider Buys | Low D/EDip Buy with Strong Insider BuyingBuying dips for companies with strong insider buying in the last 1 month, positive operating income and reasonable debt / market cap | 13.7% | 13.7% | 0.0% |
| 11262025 | HRB | H&R Block | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 6.0% | 6.0% | -0.1% |
| 11262025 | LRN | Stride | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 3.8% | 3.8% | -4.4% |
| 11212025 | ABNB | Airbnb | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 19.7% | 19.7% | 0.0% |
| 11212025 | MTN | Vail Resorts | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 2.3% | 2.3% | -1.6% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Designer Brands
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 51.32 |
| Mkt Cap | 158.8 |
| Rev LTM | 56,496 |
| Op Inc LTM | 7,584 |
| FCF LTM | 7,327 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 7,366 |
| CFO LTM | 8,590 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 8,697 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 5.2% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 2.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 8.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 2.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 12.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 11.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 14.6% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 17.1% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 11.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 12.1% |
Segment Financials
Revenue by Segment| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States (US) Retail | 2,534 | 2,792 | 2,770 | 1,800 | 2,745 |
| Brand Portfolio | 349 | 328 | 286 | 249 | 448 |
| Canada Retail | 264 | 283 | 235 | 183 | 249 |
| Eliminations | -72 | -87 | -94 | -60 | -72 |
| Other | 63 | 122 | |||
| Total | 3,075 | 3,315 | 3,197 | 2,235 | 3,493 |
| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States (US) Retail | 262 | ||||
| Canada Retail | 25 | ||||
| Net elimination of intersegment activity | 3 | ||||
| Impairment charges | -5 | ||||
| Brand Portfolio | -27 | ||||
| Corporate shared service costs | -186 | ||||
| Total | 72 |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $7.78 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.4 | |
| First Trading Date | 12/29/2006 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -9.5% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $4.90 | $3.63 |
| DMA Trend | up | up |
| Distance from DMA | 58.6% | 114.4% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 120.5% | 98.4% |
| Downside Capture | -32.32 | 187.77 |
| Upside Capture | 336.75 | 201.03 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 23.9% | 39.1% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.89 | 2.38 | 2.15 | 2.74 | 1.93 | 1.75 |
| Up Beta | -0.67 | 1.42 | 2.66 | 2.34 | 1.83 | 1.85 |
| Down Beta | 0.93 | 2.00 | 2.14 | 2.89 | 1.75 | 1.45 |
| Up Capture | 697% | 417% | 247% | 362% | 349% | 323% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 12 | 25 | 38 | 73 | 141 | 426 |
| Stock +ve Days | 9 | 19 | 30 | 63 | 116 | 355 |
| Down Capture | 273% | 209% | 167% | 239% | 149% | 111% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 10 | 19 | 28 | 55 | 122 | 380 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of DBI With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBI | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 46.2% | 7.5% | 17.8% | 72.1% | 8.6% | 4.4% | -8.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 98.0% | 24.3% | 19.4% | 19.3% | 15.2% | 17.0% | 35.0% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.81 | 0.24 | 0.72 | 2.70 | 0.34 | 0.09 | -0.08 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 45.0% | 38.8% | -1.9% | 14.0% | 28.4% | 22.8% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLY, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of DBI With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBI | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 3.0% | 9.6% | 14.7% | 18.7% | 11.5% | 4.6% | 30.8% |
| Annualized Volatility | 73.1% | 23.8% | 17.1% | 15.5% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.6% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 0.57 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 39.1% | 36.3% | 0.6% | 13.5% | 29.5% | 15.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLY, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of DBI With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBI | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -7.8% | 13.2% | 14.8% | 15.3% | 7.0% | 5.3% | 69.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 74.6% | 21.9% | 18.0% | 14.7% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.21 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.90 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 42.9% | 38.6% | -3.8% | 19.3% | 36.0% | 14.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLY, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 12/9/2025 | 48.5% | 77.3% | |
| 9/9/2025 | 5.5% | 5.8% | -17.3% |
| 6/10/2025 | -18.2% | -35.9% | -16.4% |
| 3/20/2025 | 6.3% | -1.1% | -29.4% |
| 12/10/2024 | 3.8% | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| 9/11/2024 | -11.5% | 10.2% | 2.7% |
| 6/4/2024 | -20.4% | -35.3% | -39.3% |
| 3/21/2024 | -5.5% | -7.4% | -23.3% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 10 | 11 | 8 |
| # Negative | 14 | 13 | 16 |
| Median Positive | 9.8% | 5.4% | 9.7% |
| Median Negative | -9.9% | -14.3% | -17.3% |
| Max Positive | 48.5% | 77.3% | 47.7% |
| Max Negative | -33.3% | -35.9% | -39.3% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 10312025 | 12092025 | 10-Q 11/1/2025 |
| 7312025 | 9092025 | 10-Q 8/2/2025 |
| 4302025 | 6102025 | 10-Q 5/3/2025 |
| 1312025 | 3242025 | 10-K 2/1/2025 |
| 10312024 | 12102024 | 10-Q 11/2/2024 |
| 7312024 | 9112024 | 10-Q 8/3/2024 |
| 4302024 | 6042024 | 10-Q 5/4/2024 |
| 1312024 | 3252024 | 10-K 1/28/2024 |
| 10312023 | 12052023 | 10-Q 10/28/2023 |
| 7312023 | 9072023 | 10-Q 7/29/2023 |
| 4302023 | 6082023 | 10-Q 4/29/2023 |
| 1312023 | 3162023 | 10-K 1/28/2023 |
| 10312022 | 12012022 | 10-Q 10/29/2022 |
| 7312022 | 8312022 | 10-Q 7/30/2022 |
| 4302022 | 6022022 | 10-Q 4/30/2022 |
| 1312022 | 3212022 | 10-K 1/29/2022 |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.