Oracle Stock Capital Return Hits $158 Bil

+95.74%
Upside
140
Market
273
Trefis
ORCL: Oracle logo
ORCL
Oracle

In the last decade, Oracle (ORCL) stock has returned an impressive $158 Bil back to its shareholders through cold, hard cash via dividends and buybacks. Let’s look at some numbers and compare how this payout power stacks up against the market’s biggest capital-return machines.

As it turns out, ORCL stock has returned the 9th highest amount to shareholders in history.

  ORCL S&P Median
Dividends $35 Bil $4.6 Bil
Share Repurchase $123 Bil $5.6 Bil
Total Returned $158 Bil $9.4 Bil
Total Returned as % of Current Market Cap 35.6% 25.6%

Why should you care? Because dividends and share repurchases represent direct, tangible returns of capital to shareholders. They also signal management’s confidence in the company’s financial health and ability to generate sustainable cash flows. And there are more stocks like that. Here is a list of the top 10 companies ranked by total capital returned to shareholders via dividends and stock repurchases.

Top 10 Stocks By Total Shareholder Return

Relevant Articles
  1. Oracle Stock at Support Zone – Bargain or Trap?
  2. PTC Tops Oracle Stock on Price & Potential
  3. How Low Can ORCL Really Go In A Market Crash?
  4. Buy or Sell Oracle Stock?
  5. The Bear Case: How ORCL Behaves During Market Shocks
  6. Stress Testing ORCL: Historical Drawdowns and Macro Risks

  Total Money Returned As % Of Current Market Cap via Dividends via Share Repurchases
AAPL $874 Bil 23.6% $143 Bil $731 Bil
MSFT $376 Bil 13.2% $172 Bil $204 Bil
GOOGL $364 Bil 10.0% $17 Bil $346 Bil
XOM $224 Bil 32.8% $148 Bil $76 Bil
WFC $214 Bil 87.9% $58 Bil $156 Bil
JPM $188 Bil 23.7% $0.0 $188 Bil
META $184 Bil 12.1% $10 Bil $174 Bil
JNJ $160 Bil 28.3% $106 Bil $54 Bil
ORCL $158 Bil 35.8% $35 Bil $123 Bil
CVX $157 Bil 39.4% $99 Bil $58 Bil

For full ranking, visit Buybacks & Dividends Ranking

What do you notice here? The total capital returned to shareholders as a % of the current market cap appears inversely proportional to growth prospects for reinvestments. Stocks like Meta (META) and Microsoft (MSFT) are growing much faster, in a more predictable way, compared to the others, but they have returned a much lower fraction of their market cap to shareholders.

That’s the flip side to high capital returns. Sure, they are attractive, but you have to ask yourself the question: Am I sacrificing growth and sound fundamentals? With that in mind, let’s look at some numbers for ORCL. (see Buy or Sell Oracle Stock for more details)

Oracle Fundamentals

  • Revenue Growth: 14.9% LTM and 10.2% last 3-year average.
  • Cash Generation: Nearly -38.6% free cash flow margin and 32.3% operating margin LTM.
  • Recent Revenue Shocks: The minimum annual revenue growth in the last 3 years for ORCL was 6.4%.
  • Valuation: Oracle stock trades at a P/E multiple of 27.4

  ORCL S&P Median
Sector Information Technology
Industry Application Software
PE Ratio 27.4 23.7

   
LTM* Revenue Growth 14.9% 6.6%
3Y Average Annual Revenue Growth 10.2% 5.5%
Min Annual Revenue Growth Last 3Y 6.4% 0.4%

   
LTM* Operating Margin 32.3% 18.7%
3Y Average Operating Margin 31.2% 18.2%
LTM* Free Cash Flow Margin -38.6% 14.3%

*LTM: Last Twelve Months

The table gives good overview of what you get from ORCL stock, but what about the risk?

ORCL Historical Risk

Oracle’s no stranger to deep drops. It fell about 77% in the Dot-Com crash and over 40% during both the Global Financial Crisis and the Inflation Shock. The 2018 correction and Covid sell-off weren’t shy either, pulling the stock down nearly 19% and 29%, respectively. Even with solid fundamentals, Oracle can take a big hit when things get rough. It’s a reminder that no stock is completely safe when markets really unwind.

The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming its benchmark that includes all 3 – the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 indices. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.