TeraWulf (WULF)
Market Price (12/25/2025): $12.27 | Market Cap: $4.9 BilSector: Financials | Industry: Diversified Capital Markets
TeraWulf (WULF)
Market Price (12/25/2025): $12.27Market Cap: $4.9 BilSector: FinancialsIndustry: Diversified Capital Markets
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 33% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -120 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -71% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Crypto & Blockchain, and Datacenter Power. Themes include Cryptocurrency Mining, and Sustainable Datacenter Power. | Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 29x |
| Stock price has recently run up significantly6M Rtn6 month market price return is 224% | |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 36% | |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -46%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -404% | |
| Valuation getting more expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is 151% | |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -16% | |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 119% | |
| Significant short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 25% | |
| Key risksWULF key risks include [1] a highly leveraged financial structure with substantial debt and liquidity concerns, Show more. |
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 33% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Crypto & Blockchain, and Datacenter Power. Themes include Cryptocurrency Mining, and Sustainable Datacenter Power. |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -120 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -71% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 29x |
| Stock price has recently run up significantly6M Rtn6 month market price return is 224% |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 36% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -46%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -404% |
| Valuation getting more expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is 151% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -16% |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 119% |
| Significant short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 25% |
| Key risksWULF key risks include [1] a highly leveraged financial structure with substantial debt and liquidity concerns, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are the key points for TeraWulf (WULF)'s stock movement for the approximate time period from August 31, 2025, to December 25, 2025: 1. Transition to High-Performance Computing (HPC) and Major AI Hosting Contracts: TeraWulf significantly advanced its strategy towards high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, securing substantial long-term contracts. Notably, the company executed three ten-year Fluidstack leases, backed by Google, amounting to approximately $6.7 billion in contracted revenue for HPC capacity. This strategic pivot and the associated large-scale agreements position TeraWulf as a key player in the digital infrastructure market for AI workloads. 2. Strong Third Quarter 2025 Revenue Growth: For the third quarter ended September 30, 2025, TeraWulf reported an 87% year-over-year increase in total revenue, reaching $50.6 million. This growth was primarily driven by a higher average bitcoin price, expanded bitcoin mining capacity, and the commencement of High-Performance Computing (HPC) lease revenue. 3. Show moreStock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 8.0% change in WULF stock from 9/24/2025 to 12/24/2025 was primarily driven by a 16.3% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| 9242025 | 12242025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 11.40 | 12.31 | 7.98% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 144.09 | 167.60 | 16.32% |
| P/S Multiple | 30.61 | 29.49 | -3.65% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 386.90 | 401.56 | -3.79% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 7.83% |
Market Drivers
9/24/2025 to 12/24/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| WULF | 8.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 4.4% | 37.9% |
| Sector (XLF) | 4.0% | 30.2% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 223.9% change in WULF stock from 6/25/2025 to 12/24/2025 was primarily driven by a 167.4% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6252025 | 12242025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.80 | 12.31 | 223.95% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 132.02 | 167.60 | 26.95% |
| P/S Multiple | 11.03 | 29.49 | 167.44% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 383.15 | 401.56 | -4.80% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 223.20% |
Market Drivers
6/25/2025 to 12/24/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| WULF | 223.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 14.0% | 22.8% |
| Sector (XLF) | 8.8% | 24.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 97.6% change in WULF stock from 12/24/2024 to 12/24/2025 was primarily driven by a 56.7% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12242024 | 12242025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 6.23 | 12.31 | 97.59% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 126.47 | 167.60 | 32.53% |
| P/S Multiple | 18.82 | 29.49 | 56.69% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 382.09 | 401.56 | -5.10% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 97.08% |
Market Drivers
12/24/2024 to 12/24/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| WULF | 97.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 15.8% | 45.3% |
| Sector (XLF) | 14.9% | 36.0% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 1490.9% change in WULF stock from 12/25/2022 to 12/24/2025 was primarily driven by a 2966.3% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| 12252022 | 12242025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 0.77 | 12.31 | 1490.85% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 5.47 | 167.60 | 2966.30% |
| P/S Multiple | 15.41 | 29.49 | 91.42% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 108.84 | 401.56 | -268.95% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -10016.17% |
Market Drivers
12/25/2023 to 12/24/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| WULF | 472.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 48.9% | 41.8% |
| Sector (XLF) | 53.2% | 32.2% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| WULF Return | 86% | 51% | -96% | 261% | 136% | 119% | 132% |
| Peers Return | � | � | � | � | -3% | 83% | � |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 18% | 115% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| WULF Win Rate | 67% | 58% | 17% | 58% | 67% | 67% | |
| Peers Win Rate | � | � | � | � | 45% | 67% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| WULF Max Drawdown | -44% | -14% | -96% | -19% | -45% | -60% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | � | � | � | � | -47% | -42% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: RIOT, MARA, CLSK, CIFR, HUT.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/24/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | WULF | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -98.7% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 7726.5% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -59.0% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 143.8% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 287 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -60.1% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 150.8% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 435 days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -61.9% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 162.5% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1,474 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to BTGO, DMNT, OMG, PURR, SIBO
In The Past
TeraWulf's stock fell -98.7% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 11/19/2021. A -98.7% loss requires a 7726.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies for TeraWulf (WULF):
- A digital gold miner, similar to Barrick Gold (GOLD), but focused on producing Bitcoin.
- Like a specialized utility company that generates Bitcoin rather than electricity.
- A high-tech digital factory, similar to Foxconn, but instead of assembling electronics, they 'manufacture' Bitcoin.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Bitcoin Mining: TeraWulf operates large-scale data centers to produce new Bitcoin by solving complex cryptographic puzzles using specialized hardware and sustainable energy sources.
AI Analysis | Feedback
TeraWulf (WULF) is a self-mining Bitcoin company. Its primary business activity is the production of Bitcoin through its mining operations. Unlike companies that provide services or sell specific products to a defined customer base, TeraWulf generates revenue by mining Bitcoin, which is then typically sold on the open market or held as an asset.
Therefore, TeraWulf does not have "major customers" in the traditional sense, such as other companies purchasing its services or a direct-to-consumer sales channel for its mined Bitcoin. Its "customer base" is effectively the global market for Bitcoin, comprising a wide range of participants from individual investors to institutional buyers, exchanges, and financial institutions that trade Bitcoin. The company sells its mined Bitcoin into this broad, decentralized market rather than to specific, identifiable major customers.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Bitmain Technologies Ltd. (Privately held)
- MicroBT (Privately held)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Paul Prager, Co-Founder, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Paul Prager co-founded TeraWulf and has served as its Chairman and CEO since February 2021. Prior to TeraWulf, he founded and was the CEO of Beowulf Electricity & Data Inc., a private energy and digital infrastructure company, and its predecessor companies since 1990. He also founded Brooklyn Marine & Oil LLC and previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Direct Gas. Mr. Prager is also a Co-Founder and Executive Chairman of NovaWulf Digital Management, LP, an investment fund. He has extensive experience in international shipping, commodity trading, and power generation. Mr. Prager is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy.
Patrick Fleury, Chief Financial Officer
Patrick Fleury has been the Chief Financial Officer of TeraWulf since May 2022. He brings 22 years of finance experience, including capital markets, principal investing, and advisory roles. Most recently, Mr. Fleury was a founding member of the credit team at Platinum Equity, where he was responsible for public and private credit investments. Before that, he was a Managing Director at Blackstone's global credit platform, GSO Capital Partners. Mr. Fleury began his career in the Global Energy & Power Investment Banking Group at Banc of America Securities, LLC. From January to May 2022, he served as Managing Director of NovaWulf.
Nazar Khan, Co-Founder, Chief Operating Officer & Chief Technology Officer
Nazar Khan is a Co-Founder of TeraWulf and has served as its Chief Operating Officer, Chief Technology Officer, and a Board Member since February 2021. He also serves as Co-Founder and Chief Operating Officer of NovaWulf. For nearly 20 years, from January 2002 to February 2021, Mr. Khan was the Executive Vice President of Beowulf Energy LLC, leading the firm's acquisition and development efforts. Prior to Beowulf, he worked at Evercore Partners Inc. in both investment banking and private equity.
Kerri Langlais, Chief Strategy Officer
Kerri Langlais serves as the Chief Strategy Officer for TeraWulf.
Stefanie Fleischmann, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary
Stefanie Fleischmann holds the position of Chief Legal Officer & Secretary at TeraWulf.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to TeraWulf's business operations and financial health primarily stem from its highly leveraged financial structure, the inherent volatility of cryptocurrency markets, and the significant execution challenges associated with its strategic pivot to high-performance computing (HPC) and AI infrastructure.
- High Debt and Liquidity Risk: TeraWulf is operating with a substantial debt load, which poses a significant risk to its financial stability and ability to fund ongoing operations and growth initiatives. The company reported approximately $1.5 billion in total outstanding debt as of September 30, 2025, largely due to its expansion into HPC. This heavy debt burden, coupled with negative operating cash flow, indicates the company is not yet generating sufficient cash internally to cover its day-to-day operations and growth, leading to concerns about liquidity and a "financial tightrope" approach.
- Bitcoin Price Volatility: Despite a strategic pivot towards HPC and AI, TeraWulf's business still largely relies on Bitcoin mining operations, making its revenue highly susceptible to the volatile price fluctuations of Bitcoin. A significant downturn in Bitcoin's market value would directly impact the value of its self-mined assets and overall revenue, further straining its financial condition and potentially exacerbating its debt challenges.
- Execution Risk of HPC/AI Pivot and Competition: TeraWulf is undergoing an "aggressive pivot" to become a prominent player in the HPC and AI infrastructure space. This transition is capital-intensive and carries considerable execution risk. The success of this strategy is contingent on factors such as the speed and efficiency of execution, the ability to secure and retain clients for its new services, and navigating an increasingly competitive market for both HPC and cryptocurrency mining. Execution missteps or weaker-than-anticipated demand for AI tenant services could significantly strain free cash flow and undermine the anticipated returns on these substantial investments.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
TeraWulf (WULF) operates in two primary addressable markets: Bitcoin mining and High-Performance Computing (HPC) / AI infrastructure leasing.
Bitcoin Mining
The global cryptocurrency mining market was valued at approximately USD 1.55 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to about USD 2.83 billion by 2032, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.8% during this period. Another estimate places the global cryptocurrency mining market at USD 2.45 billion in 2024, growing to USD 2.77 billion in 2025, and predicted to surpass USD 8.24 billion by 2034, with a CAGR of 12.90%. For 2025, global cryptocurrency mining revenue is projected to reach USD 20.4 billion, with Bitcoin mining contributing an estimated USD 13.5 billion to this total. The United States held approximately 37% of the global Bitcoin mining activity in 2022, signifying its significant regional market share.
High-Performance Computing (HPC) and AI Infrastructure Leasing
The addressable market for TeraWulf's HPC and AI infrastructure leasing services can be understood through the AI infrastructure market and the data center colocation market.
- Global AI Infrastructure Market: This market was valued between USD 46.15 billion and USD 69.44 billion in 2024. It is projected to reach approximately USD 356.14 billion by 2032, with a CAGR of 29.10%. Another forecast estimates the global AI infrastructure market to reach USD 1248.60 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 43.50%.
- U.S. AI Infrastructure Market: In the United States, the AI infrastructure market was valued at approximately USD 14.52 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to around USD 156.45 billion by 2034, at a CAGR of 26.84%. The U.S. accounted for 59% of the global AI infrastructure spending in the first half of 2024.
- Global Data Center Colocation Market: This market was valued between USD 69.41 billion and USD 72.5 billion in 2024. It is estimated to reach approximately USD 185.0 billion by 2033, demonstrating a CAGR of 11.0%.
- U.S. Data Center Colocation Market: The U.S. data center colocation market, based on investment, was valued at USD 24.94 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow to USD 57.32 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 14.88%.
AI Analysis | Feedback
TeraWulf (WULF) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next two to three years through several key initiatives, primarily focusing on its strategic pivot towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and AI hosting, alongside continued optimization of its Bitcoin mining operations and expansion of its sustainable infrastructure.
- Significant Expansion into High-Performance Computing (HPC) and AI Hosting Services: TeraWulf is making a substantial shift into the higher-margin HPC and AI hosting market. The company has secured long-term agreements, notably with Fluidstack and backed by Google, for multi-billion dollar contracts to provide AI-optimized data center capacity. This includes plans to develop and deliver critical IT load at campuses like Lake Mariner and the new Abernathy campus in Texas. TeraWulf has significantly raised its annual target for new HPC signings, aiming for 250 to 500 megawatts per year, up from previous guidance of 100 to 150 megawatts, reflecting strong customer demand and pipeline advancements.
- Growth in Bitcoin Mining Capacity and Operational Efficiency: While diversifying, Bitcoin mining remains a core component of TeraWulf's revenue. The company continues to expand its energized Bitcoin-mining capacity at sites like the Lake Mariner Campus, which reported 245 MW of capacity as of Q3 2025. Improvements in operational efficiency, including optimized power costs, also contribute to higher Bitcoin output and revenue generation from its digital asset mining segment.
- Development of New and Expansion of Existing Data Center Infrastructure through Strategic Partnerships: TeraWulf is actively expanding its digital infrastructure, which is crucial for increasing its capacity for both HPC hosting and Bitcoin mining. Strategic partnerships and joint ventures, such as the one with Fluidstack and Google for the Abernathy HPC campus in Texas, are key to these expansion plans. The company has completed significant long-term financings to support these expansions, allowing for the build-out of new data centers and increased IT load, like the CB-5 expansion at Lake Mariner.
- Leveraging its Predominantly Zero-Carbon Energy Infrastructure: TeraWulf's commitment to developing, owning, and operating environmentally sustainable, industrial-scale data center infrastructure provides a competitive advantage. This focus on predominantly zero-carbon energy sources positions the company favorably to attract customers seeking low-cost and low-carbon compute solutions for energy-intensive HPC and AI workloads, as well as Bitcoin mining operations.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- In October 2024, TeraWulf authorized a share repurchase program for up to $200 million of its common stock through December 31, 2025.
- The company repurchased over $150 million in shares in late 2024 and early 2025 as part of this program.
- A $33 million stock repurchase was executed in Q1 2025.
Share Issuance
- TeraWulf's shares outstanding significantly increased from 0.085 billion in Q4 2021 to approximately 0.351 billion in Q4 2024, with current shares around 391.27 million to 418.68 million as of November 2025.
- In October 2024, TeraWulf issued $500 million in 2.75% convertible notes due 2030 to fund HPC hosting growth.
- In August 2025, the company upsized an offering of convertible senior notes to $1.0 billion (1.00% due 2031) for data center expansion, and later completed a $1.025 billion offering of 0.00% Convertible Notes due 2032 to fund its equity contribution to the Abernathy Joint Venture and enhance liquidity.
Inbound Investments
- In August 2025, Google increased its stake in TeraWulf to 14% from 8%, including a $1.4 billion backstop commitment, bringing Google's total support to $3.2 billion and including warrants for 32.5 million additional shares.
- Google also agreed to backstop $1.8 billion of Fluidstack's lease obligations in exchange for purchase warrants for approximately 41 million shares of TeraWulf common stock (representing around 8% ownership as of August 2025).
- TeraWulf received a $90 million pre-payment from Core42 in Q1 2025.
Outbound Investments
- In 2024, TeraWulf sold its 25% equity interest in Nautilus for $85 million, reinvesting the proceeds into Lake Mariner's HPC capabilities.
- TeraWulf formed the Abernathy Joint Venture with Fluidstack and Google to develop 240 MW of HPC capacity, with potential expansion to 600 MW.
- The company secured up to a 51% ownership interest in a future Fluidstack-led approximately 200 MW project.
Capital Expenditures
- Capital expenditures in the last 12 months (as of November 2025) totaled -$598.83 million.
- TeraWulf's 2025 capital allocation plan includes approximately $300 million for HPC hosting capacity and $60 million for site electrical infrastructure.
- A primary focus of capital expenditures has been expanding into AI and HPC hosting, including the Lake Mariner HPC buildout and delivering over 70 megawatts of capacity between Q1 and Q3 2025, targeting 72.5 megawatts of HPC hosting capacity by the end of Q2 2025.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to WULF. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11212025 | WU | Western Union | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 13.8% | 13.8% | -0.4% |
| 11212025 | COIN | Coinbase Global | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | -0.3% | -0.3% | -0.5% |
| 11142025 | PYPL | PayPal | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | -4.4% | -4.4% | -7.5% |
| 11142025 | V | Visa | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | 7.6% | 7.6% | -2.7% |
| 11072025 | WD | Walker & Dunlop | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | -11.2% | -11.2% | -12.1% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for TeraWulf
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 13.12 |
| Mkt Cap | 4.9 |
| Rev LTM | 653 |
| Op Inc LTM | -131 |
| FCF LTM | -888 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -532 |
| CFO LTM | -322 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | -173 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 71.1% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 87.8% |
| Rev Chg Q | 131.5% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 19.4% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -59.4% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -55.5% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 10.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | -74.3% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | -43.4% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | -198.3% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -200.4% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $12.31 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 4.8 | |
| First Trading Date | 12/29/2006 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -23.5% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $13.68 | $7.77 |
| DMA Trend | up | up |
| Distance from DMA | -10.0% | 58.4% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 95.6% | 119.0% |
| Downside Capture | 287.56 | 360.44 |
| Upside Capture | 267.91 | 382.58 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 37.9% | 45.5% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.84 | 2.49 | 2.12 | 2.65 | 2.82 | 2.77 |
| Up Beta | 5.61 | 3.71 | 2.71 | -1.06 | 1.86 | 1.88 |
| Down Beta | 2.57 | 2.35 | 2.77 | 3.40 | 2.46 | 2.63 |
| Up Capture | 426% | 389% | 345% | 1200% | 3357% | 139313% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 13 | 26 | 39 | 74 | 142 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 12 | 27 | 39 | 73 | 130 | 371 |
| Down Capture | 317% | 147% | 71% | 167% | 165% | 112% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 8 | 15 | 24 | 52 | 117 | 364 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of WULF With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 89.7% | 18.3% | 19.2% | 71.9% | 8.9% | 6.0% | -10.4% |
| Annualized Volatility | 119.2% | 19.0% | 19.5% | 19.3% | 15.3% | 17.1% | 35.0% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.06 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 2.69 | 0.36 | 0.18 | -0.12 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 35.9% | 44.9% | -5.2% | 20.7% | 15.3% | 32.8% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLF, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of WULF With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 13.6% | 16.3% | 14.9% | 18.7% | 11.7% | 4.8% | 32.6% |
| Annualized Volatility | 128.5% | 18.9% | 17.1% | 15.5% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.7% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 0.59 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 25.1% | 31.9% | 8.0% | 10.3% | 18.8% | 28.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLF, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of WULF With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 1.5% | 13.0% | 14.7% | 14.9% | 6.9% | 5.2% | 69.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 107.0% | 22.3% | 18.0% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.90 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 15.8% | 21.0% | 5.6% | 9.1% | 12.9% | 18.6% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLF, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 10/28/2025 | 16.9% | 18.0% | 2.2% |
| 8/8/2025 | 1.8% | 76.3% | 86.2% |
| 5/9/2025 | -8.8% | 6.7% | 37.3% |
| 2/28/2025 | 16.1% | -6.9% | -24.7% |
| 11/12/2024 | -13.9% | -13.5% | -11.7% |
| 8/12/2024 | -7.3% | 21.8% | 23.8% |
| 5/13/2024 | -9.2% | -4.7% | 71.4% |
| 11/13/2023 | -4.7% | 12.9% | 61.4% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 8 | 10 | 10 |
| # Negative | 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Median Positive | 6.0% | 11.5% | 32.9% |
| Median Negative | -6.0% | -10.2% | -18.3% |
| Max Positive | 18.3% | 76.3% | 110.6% |
| Max Negative | -13.9% | -28.2% | -44.3% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 9302025 | 11102025 | 10-Q 9/30/2025 |
| 6302025 | 8082025 | 10-Q 6/30/2025 |
| 3312025 | 5092025 | 10-Q 3/31/2025 |
| 12312024 | 3032025 | 10-K 12/31/2024 |
| 9302024 | 11122024 | 10-Q 9/30/2024 |
| 6302024 | 8132024 | 10-Q 6/30/2024 |
| 3312024 | 5132024 | 10-Q 3/31/2024 |
| 12312023 | 3202024 | 10-K 12/31/2023 |
| 9302023 | 11132023 | 10-Q 9/30/2023 |
| 6302023 | 8142023 | 10-Q 6/30/2023 |
| 3312023 | 5152023 | 10-Q 3/31/2023 |
| 12312022 | 3312023 | 10-K 12/31/2022 |
| 9302022 | 11142022 | 10-Q 9/30/2022 |
| 6302022 | 8162022 | 10-Q 6/30/2022 |
| 3312022 | 5162022 | 10-Q 3/31/2022 |
| 12312021 | 3312022 | 10-K 12/31/2021 |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.