Bloomia (TULP)
Market Price (10/21/2026): $2.26 | Market Cap: $10.9 MilSector: Consumer Staples | Industry: Agricultural Products & Services
Bloomia (TULP)
Market Price (10/21/2026): $2.26Market Cap: $10.9 MilSector: Consumer StaplesIndustry: Agricultural Products & Services
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 14% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Health & Wellness Trends, and Vegan & Alternative Foods. Themes include Organic & Natural Products, Functional Foods & Beverages, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -72%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -117% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -3.7 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -7.7% Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 546% Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -8.3%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -9.2% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -113% |
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 14% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Health & Wellness Trends, and Vegan & Alternative Foods. Themes include Organic & Natural Products, Functional Foods & Beverages, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -72%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -117% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -3.7 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -7.7% |
| Debt is significantNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is 546% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -8.3%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -9.2% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -113% |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Bloomia (TULP) stock has lost about 40% since 6/30/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Bloomia Holdings reported a substantial net loss of $11.2 million for fiscal year 2026, which ended June 30, 2026, significantly widening from a $2.6 million net loss in fiscal year 2025. This was primarily driven by a one-time, non-cash impairment charge of $13.2 million, largely attributed to goodwill, recognized in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2026 (April 1, 2026 - June 30, 2026).
2. The company faced significant operational challenges that negatively impacted profitability during fiscal year 2026. Average tulip bulb costs increased by 21% year-over-year, compounded by a 6% appreciation of the Euro exchange rate, which increased purchasing costs. Additionally, an industry-wide mite treatment issue led to over $2.5 million of excess waste in Bloomia's peak demand quarter, further eroding margins. These factors contributed to adjusted EBITDA swinging to a loss of $0.5 million in fiscal year 2026, compared to a gain of $2.0 million in the prior fiscal year.
Show more
Bloomia (TULP) stock has lost about 40% since 6/30/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Bloomia Holdings reported a substantial net loss of $11.2 million for fiscal year 2026, which ended June 30, 2026, significantly widening from a $2.6 million net loss in fiscal year 2025. This was primarily driven by a one-time, non-cash impairment charge of $13.2 million, largely attributed to goodwill, recognized in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2026 (April 1, 2026 - June 30, 2026).
2. The company faced significant operational challenges that negatively impacted profitability during fiscal year 2026. Average tulip bulb costs increased by 21% year-over-year, compounded by a 6% appreciation of the Euro exchange rate, which increased purchasing costs. Additionally, an industry-wide mite treatment issue led to over $2.5 million of excess waste in Bloomia's peak demand quarter, further eroding margins. These factors contributed to adjusted EBITDA swinging to a loss of $0.5 million in fiscal year 2026, compared to a gain of $2.0 million in the prior fiscal year.
3. Despite strategic efforts to deleverage the balance sheet, including retiring over $19 million in debt and reducing total debt by 36% to $21.7 million at June 30, 2026, the overall financial performance and operational headwinds outweighed these positive developments. The announcement of these challenging fiscal year 2026 results on September 21, 2026, contributed to negative investor sentiment, leading to the stock's decline.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -40.7% change in TULP stock from 6/30/2026 to 10/20/2026 was primarily driven by a -61.0% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 6302026 | 10202026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.59 | 2.13 | -40.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 39 | 48 | 24.1% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.2 | 0.2 | 22.4% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 2 | 5 | -61.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -40.7% |
Market Drivers
6/30/2026 to 10/20/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TULP | -40.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.0% | 1.2% |
| Sector (XLP) | 5.6% | -2.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -45.9% change in TULP stock from 3/31/2026 to 10/20/2026 was primarily driven by a -61.0% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 3312026 | 10202026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.94 | 2.13 | -45.9% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 31 | 48 | 57.7% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.2 | 0.2 | -12.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 2 | 5 | -61.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -45.9% |
Market Drivers
3/31/2026 to 10/20/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TULP | -45.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 18.6% | 8.7% |
| Sector (XLP) | 7.8% | -0.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
9/30/2025 to 10/20/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TULP | ||
| Market (SPY) | 16.4% | 1.8% |
| Sector (XLP) | 14.3% | 2.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
9/30/2023 to 10/20/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TULP | ||
| Market (SPY) | 86.1% | 1.8% |
| Sector (XLP) | 37.4% | 2.8% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| TULP Return | - | - | - | - | - | -34% | -34% |
| Peers Return | 24% | 5% | 10% | -6% | -4% | 22% | 57% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 12% | 104% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| TULP Win Rate | - | - | - | - | - | 40% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 60% | 53% | 48% | 45% | 43% | 50% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| TULP Max Drawdown | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -21% | -30% | -24% | -25% | -28% | -19% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: LMNR, BG, ADM, DAR, INGR.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 10/20/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
TULP has limited trading history. Below is the Consumer Staples sector ETF (XLP) in its place.
| Event | XLP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -12.2% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 13.8% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 146 days | 24 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -12.1% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 13.8% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 46 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -24.2% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.9% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 140 days | 140 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -10.7% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 12.0% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 78 days | 123 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -31.8% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 46.7% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 371 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -5.9% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 6.2% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
TULP has limited trading history. Below is the Consumer Staples sector ETF (XLP) in its place.
| Event | XLP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -24.2% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.9% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 140 days | 140 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -31.8% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 46.7% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 371 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -5.9% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 6.2% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Bloomia (TULP)
Bloomia (TULP) is an in-store advertising solutions provider operating across the United States. The company specializes in creating and implementing various marketing tools directly within retail environments to help brands capture shopper attention at the point of purchase, aiming to influence consumer buying decisions.
Its offerings are categorized into three main areas. Firstly, it provides in-store signage solutions, which encompass a range of point-of-purchase services designed to highlight products and promotions. Secondly, Bloomia develops merchandising solutions, including diverse corrugate displays, side caps, free-standing shippers, and customized end-cap solutions to optimize product presentation and visibility. Lastly, the company offers on-pack solutions such as BoxTalk, coupons, recipes, and cross-promotions, directly integrating promotional content onto product packaging for added value and engagement.
Bloomia primarily serves a broad spectrum of clients within the consumer goods ecosystem. Its key customers include consumer-packaged goods manufacturers, retailers, shopper marketing agencies, and brokerages, all seeking effective ways to enhance product appeal and drive sales in physical stores throughout the United States.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-2 brief analogies for Bloomia (TULP):
- Vistaprint for in-store retail promotions.
- JCDecaux for the inside of retail stores.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- In-store signage solutions: These services provide point-of-purchase displays for advertising.
- Merchandising solutions: These include various types of corrugated displays, side caps, free-standing shippers, and customized end-cap solutions for product presentation.
- On-pack solutions: These services offer marketing elements like BoxTalk, coupons, recipes, and cross-promotions directly on product packaging.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Bloomia (trading as Insignia Systems, Inc., symbol: TULP) sells primarily to other businesses within the United States. Its major customers fall into the following categories:
- Consumer-packaged goods (CPG) manufacturers: These companies produce packaged goods sold to consumers and utilize in-store advertising to promote their products. Examples of potential customers in this category include large CPG companies like Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP), and The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO).
- Retailers: These are businesses that sell goods directly to consumers and use in-store signage and merchandising to enhance the shopping experience and promote products. Potential customers include major retail chains such as Walmart (NYSE: WMT), Target (NYSE: TGT), and Kroger (NYSE: KR).
- Shopper marketing agencies: These agencies specialize in developing and executing marketing strategies aimed at influencing purchase decisions at the point of sale for their clients (often CPG manufacturers or retailers).
- Brokerages: These firms often act as intermediaries, representing manufacturers to retailers and facilitating product placement and promotional activities.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
The accelerating shift of consumer shopping and advertising budgets towards e-commerce platforms, diminishing the overall demand for physical in-store advertising and merchandising solutions.
The increasing adoption of digital signage, interactive displays, and other technology-driven in-store marketing solutions by retailers, potentially displacing traditional physical point-of-purchase materials and merchandising.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 69.82 |
| Mkt Cap | 9.4 |
| Rev LTM | 7,215 |
| Op Inc LTM | 927 |
| FCF LTM | 355 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 607 |
| CFO LTM | 1,075 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 1,094 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 14.5% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | -1.8% |
| Rev Chg Q | 16.4% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 3.8% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 19.3% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | -4.8% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 2.3% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 2.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.6% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 3.4% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 14.7% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 2.0% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 9.7% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $2.13 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.0 | |
| First Trading Date | 03/18/1993 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -59.4% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $3.13 | |
| DMA Trend | down | |
| Distance from DMA | -31.9% | |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 71.5% | 72.7% |
| Downside Capture | 236.88 | |
| Upside Capture | -82.35 | |
| Correlation (S&P 500) | 8.9% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.37 | 0.68 | -0.02 | 0.38 | -0.37 | 0.26 |
| Up Beta | -2.36 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 0.29 | -0.59 | -0.63 |
| Down Beta | -4.11 | -0.45 | 0.68 | 1.63 | -0.19 | -0.44 |
| Up Capture | -30% | 1% | -107% | -34% | -9% | -1% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 6 | 16 | 27 | 66 | 132 | 424 |
| Stock +ve Days | 4 | 11 | 19 | 48 | 76 | 76 |
| Down Capture | 405% | 252% | 74% | 78% | 38% | 22% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 16 | 26 | 37 | 60 | 120 | 328 |
| Stock -ve Days | 10 | 14 | 22 | 51 | 78 | 78 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with TULP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TULP | -19.3% | 76.0% | -0.15 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLP) | 12.4% | 14.7% | 0.56 | 3.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 16.8% | 12.7% | 0.93 | 2.5% |
| Gold (GLD) | -2.9% | 29.3% | -0.10 | 7.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 52.5% | 20.7% | 1.93 | 2.9% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.1% | 13.8% | 0.11 | -6.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -23.7% | 43.6% | -0.50 | 5.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with TULP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TULP | -4.2% | 76.0% | -0.15 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLP) | 7.3% | 13.7% | 0.30 | 3.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 13.6% | 17.1% | 0.61 | 2.5% |
| Gold (GLD) | 18.1% | 18.9% | 0.77 | 7.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 9.7% | 19.5% | 0.38 | 2.9% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 1.4% | 18.9% | -0.03 | -6.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 7.7% | 51.7% | 0.33 | 5.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with TULP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TULP | -2.1% | 76.0% | -0.15 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLP) | 8.1% | 14.9% | 0.40 | 3.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.3% | 17.9% | 0.72 | 2.5% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.1% | 16.4% | 0.60 | 7.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.2% | 18.1% | 0.37 | 2.9% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.2% | 20.7% | 0.21 | -6.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 62.9% | 66.2% | 1.03 | 5.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2026 | 09/21/2026 | 10-K |
| 03/31/2026 | 05/13/2026 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2025 | 02/13/2026 | 10-Q |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/10/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/28/2025 | 10-KT |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/13/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/27/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/19/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/19/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/21/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 04/01/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/11/2023 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/09/2023 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/10/2022 | 10-Q |
| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2026 | 09/21/2026 | 10-K |
| 03/31/2026 | 05/13/2026 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2025 | 02/13/2026 | 10-Q |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/10/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/28/2025 | 10-KT |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/13/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/27/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/19/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/19/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/21/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 04/01/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/11/2023 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/09/2023 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/10/2022 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/10/2022 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2022 | 05/11/2022 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2021 | 03/09/2022 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2021 | 11/05/2021 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2021 | 08/23/2021 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2021 | 05/07/2021 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2020 | 03/11/2021 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2020 | 11/12/2020 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2020 | 08/11/2020 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2020 | 05/14/2020 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2019 | 03/10/2020 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2019 | 11/13/2019 | 10-Q |
Industry Resources
| Consumer Staples Resources |
| FoodNavigator |
| Consumer Goods Technology (CGT) |
| Beverage Digest |
| Agricultural Products & Services Resources |
| AgFunder Network Partners |
| The Packer |
| CropLife |
| Agri-Pulse |
| USDA Data |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.