Tempus AI (TEM)
Market Price (5/12/2026): $48.6 | Market Cap: $8.7 BilSector: Health Care | Industry: Health Care Technology
Tempus AI (TEM)
Market Price (5/12/2026): $48.6Market Cap: $8.7 BilSector: Health CareIndustry: Health Care Technology
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 70% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Precision Medicine, Biotechnology & Genomics, and Artificial Intelligence. Themes include Personalized Diagnostics, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -23%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -62% Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 15% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -269 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -20% Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 11% Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -14%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -16% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -7.8% Key risksTEM key risks include [1] substantial net losses and negative cash flow, Show more. |
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 70% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Precision Medicine, Biotechnology & Genomics, and Artificial Intelligence. Themes include Personalized Diagnostics, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -23%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -62% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 15% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -269 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -20% |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 11% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -14%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -16% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -7.8% |
| Key risksTEM key risks include [1] substantial net losses and negative cash flow, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Tempus AI reported a wider-than-expected GAAP net loss of $125.9 million, or $0.70 per share, for Q1 2026, despite a 36.1% year-over-year increase in revenue to $348.1 million, which surpassed analyst estimates. This significant net loss was partly influenced by $56.3 million in stock-based compensation and $32.3 million in unrealized losses on marketable securities. While adjusted loss per share was better than anticipated at $0.13, the substantial GAAP loss contributed to negative investor sentiment.
2. The company faces ongoing profitability challenges and a high valuation based on future growth, with a negative forward P/E ratio of -608.45. This long-term profitability concern is underscored by negative earnings per share of -1.41 and a return on equity of -89.48%, along with a free cash flow of -$112.5 million, indicating a focus on expansion over immediate profitability.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -19.0% change in TEM stock from 1/31/2026 to 5/11/2026 was primarily driven by a -32.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 1312026 | 5112026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 59.82 | 48.46 | -19.0% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,105 | 1,364 | 23.4% |
| P/S Multiple | 9.5 | 6.4 | -32.9% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 175 | 179 | -2.2% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -19.0% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 5/11/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TEM | -19.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.6% | 53.1% |
| Sector (XLV) | -7.2% | 29.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -46.1% change in TEM stock from 10/31/2025 to 5/11/2026 was primarily driven by a -61.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 10312025 | 5112026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 89.85 | 48.46 | -46.1% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 952 | 1,364 | 43.3% |
| P/S Multiple | 16.4 | 6.4 | -61.2% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 173 | 179 | -3.1% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -46.1% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 5/11/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TEM | -46.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 5.5% | 55.3% |
| Sector (XLV) | -0.0% | 26.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -6.2% change in TEM stock from 4/30/2025 to 5/11/2026 was primarily driven by a -48.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302025 | 5112026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 51.67 | 48.46 | -6.2% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 693 | 1,364 | 96.7% |
| P/S Multiple | 12.4 | 6.4 | -48.9% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 167 | 179 | -6.7% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -6.2% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2025 to 5/11/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TEM | -6.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 30.4% | 47.6% |
| Sector (XLV) | 3.6% | 32.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
4/30/2023 to 5/11/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TEM | ||
| Market (SPY) | 78.7% | 45.3% |
| Sector (XLV) | 12.6% | 32.7% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| TEM Return | - | - | - | -16% | 75% | -16% | 24% |
| Peers Return | -4% | -55% | 0% | 34% | 93% | -10% | 0% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 8% | 97% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| TEM Win Rate | - | - | - | 43% | 58% | 40% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 57% | 32% | 43% | 53% | 55% | 44% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 60% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| TEM Max Drawdown | - | - | - | -38% | -6% | -28% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -22% | -63% | -31% | -29% | -19% | -22% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | -7% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: GH, NTRA, IQV, ILMN, ADPT.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 5/11/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | TEM | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -56.6% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 130.2% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 156 days | 79 days |
In The Past
Tempus AI's stock fell -56.6% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 130.2% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | TEM | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -56.6% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 130.2% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 156 days | 79 days |
In The Past
Tempus AI's stock fell -56.6% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 130.2% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Tempus AI (TEM)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies for Tempus AI (TEM):
Tempus AI is like the Tesla of precision medicine, leveraging AI and massive datasets to personalize diagnostics and guide treatment.
Think of Tempus AI as ChatGPT for medical data, using advanced AI to contextualize a patient's unique profile and generate personalized diagnostic insights and treatment paths.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Intelligent Diagnostics: AI-enhanced laboratory tests that integrate a patient's clinical data to personalize results and guide therapy selection and treatment decisions across various disease areas.
- Clinical Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Genomic sequencing services offered to patients, primarily in oncology, which are made more insightful by connecting results to a patient's personal clinical profile.
- Clinical Trial Matching Services: Services that leverage integrated multimodal patient data to identify and connect patients with relevant clinical trials.
- Data De-identification and Structuring Services: Services provided to healthcare institutions for processing, de-identifying, and structuring complex healthcare data.
- AI Applications (Analytical and Decision Support Capabilities): A product line offering advanced analytics and decision support tools, built upon their extensive data library, to aid physicians and researchers.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Tempus AI (TEM) primarily sells its products and services to other companies and healthcare professionals rather than directly to individuals. Its major customers fall into the following categories:
Pharmaceutical Companies: Tempus AI's offerings have been used by approximately 95% of the largest public pharmaceutical companies (based on 2023 revenue). These companies leverage Tempus AI's data, analytics, and intelligent diagnostics to support drug discovery, development, and therapeutic applications. Specific company names are not provided in the description.
Healthcare Institutions: This category includes hundreds of provider networks and more than 65% of all academic medical centers in the United States. These institutions order Tempus AI's diagnostic products and services (such as Next Generation Sequencing, or NGS), utilize its platform for clinical decision support, and engage in services like clinical trial matching.
Physicians and Researchers: These professionals, often operating within the aforementioned healthcare institutions and pharmaceutical companies, are direct users and beneficiaries of Tempus AI's intelligent diagnostics and AI applications. They use the platform to make personalized, data-driven decisions to improve patient care and accelerate drug discovery and development.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
Eric Lefkofsky, Founder & Chief Executive Officer
Eric Lefkofsky is the Founder and CEO of Tempus AI. A serial entrepreneur, he co-founded several successful companies before Tempus, including Groupon, Mediaocean, Echo Global Logistics, and InnerWorkings. He also serves as a co-managing partner of Lightbank, a venture capital firm. Lefkofsky founded Tempus AI in 2015, driven by a personal mission to improve patient outcomes through data-driven solutions, after his wife's breast cancer diagnosis.
James Rogers, Chief Financial Officer
James Rogers has served as Tempus AI's Chief Financial Officer since April 2021. He joined Tempus in 2017 as the first finance hire, building the finance function and helping guide the company through its public offering. Prior to Tempus, he held various finance positions at Groupon, including leading Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) for the North America business and serving as the financial controller of Asia Pacific operations. Rogers began his career in audit at Ernst & Young.
Ryan Fukushima, Chief Operating Officer
Ryan Fukushima has been the Chief Operating Officer at Tempus AI since September 2015 and was part of the founding team. He is also a co-founder and currently serves as CEO and a director of Pathos AI, Inc. Before joining Tempus, Fukushima was an Entrepreneur-in-Residence and Vice President at Lightbank LLC, a venture fund. He also worked at Hyde Park Venture Partners and as an engineer for Cisco and VMware.
Shane Colley, Chief Technology Officer
Shane Colley is the Chief Technology Officer at Tempus AI. Before joining Tempus, Colley was the Vice President of Research and Development at R1 RCM (formerly Accretive Health), where he was responsible for building and leading a global organization of over 200 professionals focused on R1's technology portfolio.
Ezra Cohen, MD, Chief Medical Officer of Oncology
Dr. Ezra Cohen joined Tempus AI in May 2023 as the Chief Medical Officer of Oncology. He is a prominent medical oncologist and cancer researcher with extensive clinical and research experience. Prior to his role at Tempus, Dr. Cohen served as the Chief of the Division of Hematology-Oncology and the Associate Director of Clinical Science at UC San Diego (UCSD) Moores Cancer Center. He also spent 15 years at the University of Chicago, where he co-directed the Head and Neck Cancer Program.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Key Risks to Tempus AI (TEM)
- Regulatory and Data Privacy Compliance: Tempus AI operates in a highly regulated healthcare environment, necessitating strict adherence to data privacy laws such as HIPAA in the United States. The company's business model relies heavily on acquiring and processing sensitive patient data, both as a covered entity and a business associate. Non-compliance, data breaches, or evolving regulatory landscapes (including those specific to AI in healthcare) could lead to significant legal penalties, reputational damage, and operational restrictions on their ability to collect and utilize data.
- Dependence on Data Acquisition and Healthcare Institution Partnerships: Tempus AI's core "Intelligent Diagnostics" and AI models are built upon one of the largest libraries of clinical and molecular oncology data, amassed through approximately 450 unique data connections with over 2,000 healthcare institutions. The company's continued success is fundamentally reliant on establishing and maintaining these data pipelines and strategic partnerships. Any disruption to these critical relationships, challenges in securing new data agreements, or increased costs associated with data acquisition and integration could severely impair its ability to grow its proprietary dataset, develop and train its generative AI models, and deliver its products and services.
- Efficacy, Clinical Adoption, and Competition in AI-Powered Diagnostics: The company's value proposition centers on leveraging AI, including generative AI, to create more accurate and personalized diagnostic tests. There is an inherent risk that the AI models may not consistently achieve the anticipated accuracy or clinical utility, or that they may face challenges in widespread adoption by physicians and healthcare systems. Furthermore, the market for AI in healthcare and diagnostics is becoming increasingly competitive, with both established corporations and agile startups vying for market share. Tempus AI must continuously innovate and demonstrate tangible benefits to distinguish its offerings and secure market penetration amidst this competitive pressure.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Expected Drivers of Future Revenue Growth for Tempus AI (TEM)
Tempus AI (TEM) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several key initiatives, focusing on its core diagnostics business, advanced AI capabilities, and strategic market expansion:
- Growth in Diagnostics Volume, particularly in Oncology and Hereditary Testing: Tempus AI anticipates continued strong growth in the volume of its diagnostic tests, especially within oncology and hereditary testing. The company reported a 29% increase in oncology unit volume and a 23% increase in hereditary testing in Q4 2025, with similar momentum expected to continue. This growth is supported by increasing adoption of genomic sequencing in cancer care and the expansion of Tempus's comprehensive test portfolio.
- Increased Average Selling Prices (ASPs) and Improved Reimbursement: A significant driver of revenue growth is the projected increase in average selling prices (ASPs) for Tempus's diagnostic tests. Management expects substantial ASP upside, with an outline of more than $500 per test of potential ASP improvement over time. This improvement is largely attributed to the transition of volume from lab-developed tests to FDA-approved versions, such as the xT CDx, which is priced at $4,500 compared to the previous $1,630-$2,200 range for its primary oncology test. Additionally, the company anticipates that continued FDA approvals and the shift of tests into Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Test (ADLT) status will help improve reimbursement rates.
- Expansion and Monetization of Data and AI Capabilities: The "Data and Services" or "Insights" segment is a rapidly scaling, high-margin revenue stream for Tempus AI. This segment, which includes data licensing and AI algorithm commercialization, delivered 69% reported revenue growth in Q4 2025 (including a one-time warrant impact) and is projected to grow by roughly 40% in the following quarter. Tempus has a strong commercial pipeline, with total contract value exceeding $1.1 billion, providing significant visibility into future data-driven expansion. Strategic collaborations, such as multi-year agreements to build multimodal foundation models in oncology, are also contributing to this segment's growth.
- Launch of New Diagnostic Products and Expansion into New Disease Areas: While oncology remains a primary focus, Tempus AI is expanding its diagnostic offerings and entering new disease areas. The company has launched new liquid biopsy assays like xM for Treatment Response Monitoring ("TRM") and expects the xF liquid biopsy FDA submission to have a significant impact on revenue starting in 2027. The background also mentions expansion into neuropsychiatry, radiology, and cardiology, indicating a broader market reach for its Intelligent Diagnostics.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Capital Expenditures
- Capital expenditures have primarily focused on the development and expansion of the Tempus Platform, which includes proprietary software and the establishment of a network of approximately 450 unique data connections across more than 2,000 healthcare institutions.
- Significant investment has been directed towards building and maintaining a unified multimodal database and cloud infrastructure, which now houses over 200 petabytes of data, serving as a proprietary training dataset for generative AI applications.
- The company has also focused capital on expanding its Intelligent Diagnostics and AI applications beyond oncology into new disease areas such as neuropsychiatry, radiology, and cardiology, by leveraging large amounts of de-identified data.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| TEM Stock Falls -10% With A 6-day Losing Spree On Canaccord PT Cut To $80 | 01/01/2026 | |
| Would You Still Hold Tempus AI Stock If It Fell Another 30%? | 10/17/2025 | |
| TEM Dip Buy Analysis | 07/10/2025 | |
| Day 7 of Gains Streak for Tempus AI Stock with 23% Return (vs. 113% YTD) [6/16/2025] | 06/17/2025 | |
| Tempus AI (TEM) Valuation Ratios Comparison | 05/15/2025 | |
| Tempus AI (TEM) Operating Cash Flow Comparison | 02/17/2025 | |
| Tempus AI (TEM) Net Income Comparison | 02/16/2025 | |
| Tempus AI (TEM) Operating Income Comparison | 02/15/2025 | |
| Tempus AI (TEM) Revenue Comparison | 02/13/2025 | |
| ARTICLES | ||
| Why The Dip In TEM Stock Is A Buying Window | 05/06/2026 | |
| Tempus AI Stock: Why The AI Oncology Platform Is Worth Paying Up For | 02/19/2026 | |
| Mid Cap Stocks Trading At 52-Week High | 10/04/2025 | |
| Why Tempus AI Is A High Stakes High Rewards Play? | 09/12/2025 | |
| Tempus AI: Will The Rally Continue? | 08/18/2025 |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to TEM.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04302026 | GEHC | GE HealthCare Technologies | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 04302026 | IQV | IQVIA | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 04302026 | UHS | Universal Health Services | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 04302026 | ABT | Abbott Laboratories | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 04302026 | ZBIO | Zenas BioPharma | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 119.61 |
| Mkt Cap | 17.2 |
| Rev LTM | 1,933 |
| Op Inc LTM | -158 |
| FCF LTM | 21 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -51 |
| CFO LTM | 92 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | -4 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 38.1% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 25.4% |
| Rev Chg Q | 35.6% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 7.0% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 2.0% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 9.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -14.4% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -33.2% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.6% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | -0.4% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | -12.8% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | -3.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -16.9% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 17.2 |
| P/S | 6.7 |
| P/Op Inc | -30.3 |
| P/EBIT | -33.2 |
| P/E | -29.0 |
| P/CFO | -17.9 |
| Total Yield | -1.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | -0.3% |
| D/E | 0.1 |
| Net D/E | 0.1 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | 9.4% |
| 3M Rtn | -9.1% |
| 6M Rtn | -5.8% |
| 12M Rtn | 40.5% |
| 3Y Rtn | 65.0% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | 0.6% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | -15.5% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | -16.6% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | 3.4% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -17.0% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $48.46 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 8.6 | |
| First Trading Date | 06/14/2024 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -53.1% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $50.30 | $66.87 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -3.7% | -27.5% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 68.9% | 68.8% |
| Downside Capture | 1.50 | 1.88 |
| Upside Capture | 171.86 | 234.98 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 45.5% | 45.4% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.60 | 2.39 | 2.31 | 2.55 | 2.68 | -0.17 |
| Up Beta | 2.18 | 2.45 | 2.14 | 2.12 | 2.12 | -0.30 |
| Down Beta | 4.47 | 2.73 | 2.37 | 2.51 | 2.15 | 0.35 |
| Up Capture | 271% | 213% | 196% | 233% | 599% | 1857% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 15 | 22 | 31 | 66 | 141 | 428 |
| Stock +ve Days | 13 | 21 | 29 | 54 | 124 | 235 |
| Down Capture | 848% | 238% | 247% | 235% | 198% | 113% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 4 | 18 | 30 | 56 | 108 | 321 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 22 | 35 | 71 | 127 | 233 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with TEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEM | -24.3% | 68.9% | -0.12 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 8.6% | 15.4% | 0.34 | 33.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 28.1% | 12.5% | 1.78 | 46.5% |
| Gold (GLD) | 42.9% | 26.9% | 1.30 | 14.3% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 48.6% | 18.0% | 2.14 | 1.0% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 13.6% | 13.5% | 0.70 | 22.9% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -22.4% | 41.7% | -0.50 | 29.4% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with TEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEM | 4.2% | 99.6% | 0.55 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 4.8% | 14.6% | 0.15 | 32.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.9% | 17.1% | 0.59 | 45.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 21.2% | 17.9% | 0.96 | 5.4% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 13.5% | 19.1% | 0.58 | 0.6% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 3.6% | 18.8% | 0.09 | 29.9% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 8.5% | 56.0% | 0.36 | 26.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with TEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEM | 2.1% | 99.6% | 0.55 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 9.2% | 16.5% | 0.45 | 32.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.0% | 17.9% | 0.72 | 45.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 13.4% | 15.9% | 0.70 | 5.4% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 9.5% | 17.7% | 0.45 | 0.6% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.6% | 20.7% | 0.24 | 29.9% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 68.1% | 66.9% | 1.07 | 26.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 5/5/2026 | -1.1% | ||
| 2/24/2026 | -7.3% | -11.3% | -19.3% |
| 11/4/2025 | -2.6% | -15.3% | -9.3% |
| 8/8/2025 | 3.6% | 21.9% | 36.6% |
| 5/6/2025 | 12.6% | 32.0% | 12.4% |
| 1/13/2025 | -13.8% | -6.3% | 89.8% |
| 11/4/2024 | -10.1% | 56.8% | 17.2% |
| 8/6/2024 | -4.5% | 4.9% | 36.9% |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| # Negative | 6 | 3 | 2 |
| Median Positive | 8.1% | 27.0% | 36.6% |
| Median Negative | -5.9% | -11.3% | -14.3% |
| Max Positive | 12.6% | 56.8% | 89.8% |
| Max Negative | -13.8% | -15.3% | -19.3% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/05/2026 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2025 | 02/24/2026 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/04/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/08/2025 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/06/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 02/24/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/04/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/06/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 06/17/2024 | 424B4 |
| 09/30/2023 | 12/15/2023 | DRS/A |
| 09/30/2022 | 01/17/2023 | DRS/A |
| 09/30/2021 | 12/03/2021 | DRS/A |
| 06/30/2021 | 10/28/2021 | DRS/A |
Recent Forward Guidance [BETA]
Latest: Q1 2026 Earnings Reported 5/5/2026
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| 2026 Revenue | 1.59 Bil | 1.59 Bil | 1.60 Bil | 0.3% | Raised | Guidance: 1.59 Bil for 2026 | |
| 2026 Adjusted EBITDA | 65.00 Mil | 0 | Affirmed | Guidance: 65.00 Mil for 2026 | |||
Prior: Q4 2025 Earnings Reported 2/24/2026
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| 2026 Revenue | 1.59 Bil | 25.7% | Raised | Guidance: 1.26 Bil for 2025 | |||
| 2026 Revenue Growth | 25.0% | -68.8% | -55.0% | Lowered | Guidance: 80.0% for 2025 | ||
| 2026 Adjusted EBITDA | 65.00 Mil | Higher New | Guidance: 0 for 2025 | ||||
Insider Activity
Expand for More| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lefkofsky, Eric P | CEO and Chairman | Gray Media, LLC | Sell | 3272026 | 46.38 | 33,250 | 1,542,232 | 411,649,930 | Form |
| 2 | Lefkofsky, Eric P | CEO and Chairman | Blue Media, LLC | Sell | 3272026 | 46.38 | 133,000 | 6,168,918 | 732,360,468 | Form |
| 3 | Epstein, David R | Direct | Sell | 3042026 | 50.69 | 250 | 12,672 | 1,307,853 | Form | |
| 4 | Rogers, James William | Chief Financial Officer | Direct | Sell | 3042026 | 50.69 | 11,414 | 578,576 | 6,450,201 | Form |
| 5 | Polovin, Andrew | EVP, Chief Legal Officer | Direct | Sell | 2202026 | 60.31 | 10,949 | 660,292 | 7,653,932 | Form |
TEM Trade Sentinel
MARKET WEIGHT (Score 5-6)
CONVICTION RATIONALE
Tempus scores a 5, a 'Market Weight' rating. The company is at a critical and promising inflection point, with a strong growth engine in its high-margin data business. However, the moat in its core business is only contested, not widening, and the valuation is speculative, pricing in a flawless execution of its pivot to profitability. Significant execution risks, evidenced by widening GAAP losses and a high cash burn, balance the compelling long-term data-as-a-service narrative, resulting in a neutral risk/reward skew at the current price.
STOCK ARCHETYPE
Primary: 'Transition / Profit Pivot' (Type F), Secondary: 'High-Beta Compounder' (Type A)The company is at a clear inflection point, shifting focus from growth-at-all-costs to achieving profitability (positive Adjusted EBITDA guidance for FY2026), which is the hallmark of a Type F. However, its high-growth Data & Applications segment (40.5% YoY) and significant cash burn retain characteristics of a Type A.
INVESTMENT THESIS
The primary catalyst for Tempus AI is the market re-rating the company from a low-margin diagnostics business to a high-margin, recurring-revenue healthcare AI/data platform. This is driven by the rapid growth (40.5% YoY) and superior gross margin (73.1%) of the Data & Applications segment, which is turning the company's vast proprietary dataset into a scalable profit engine.
- Data & Applications revenue grew 40.5% YoY in Q1 2026.
- The segment has a 73.1% Non-GAAP gross margin, significantly higher than the 62.3% for Diagnostics.
- Total Contract Value (TCV) for the data business exceeded $1.1 billion at year-end 2025, providing strong forward revenue visibility.
- Company has guided for its first full year of positive Adjusted EBITDA (~$65 million) in FY2026.
PRIMARY RISK
The primary friction is the company's significant and widening GAAP net losses ($125.9M in Q1 2026) and persistent cash burn. Despite strong top-line growth and a pivot to adjusted profitability, the high cost structure, particularly stock-based compensation ($56.3M in Q1), creates uncertainty around the company's ability to achieve sustainable free cash flow and GAAP earnings, which could keep the valuation suppressed.
- Q1 2026 Net Loss was $125.9 million, nearly double the $68.0 million loss from the prior year.
- Q1 2026 EPS of -$0.71 represented a 610% negative surprise versus the consensus forecast of -$0.10.
- Free Cash Flow has been consistently negative, with -$239M burned in FY2025.
| KPI | Threshold | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Data & Applications Revenue Growth YoY | > 40% | This is the highest margin segment and the core of the bull thesis. Deceleration below 40% would signal the growth story is weakening. |
| Adjusted EBITDA | Positive; Tracking towards +$65M FY2026 Guidance | This is the key catalyst and proof-point of the 'Profit Pivot'. Failure to achieve and sustain positive adjusted EBITDA would break the thesis. |
| Quarterly GAAP Net Loss | Trend of sequential improvement | The market is punishing the stock for widening GAAP losses. Management must show a clear path to controlling costs and narrowing these losses to restore confidence. |
The Data Moat vs. The Cash Burn
BULL VIEW
The 40.5% YoY growth in the high-margin (73.1%) data business, with TCV over $1.1B, proves the data moat is monetizable and will drive a profitable re-rating.
CORE TENSION
Can the high-margin Data & Applications business scale fast enough to achieve profitability before the market loses patience with widening GAAP losses and significant cash burn?
PREVAILING SENTIMENT
Q1 2026 Net Loss widened to $125.9M from $68.0M YoY, despite strong revenue growth. This supports the Bear view that the cost structure is unsustainable.
BEAR VIEW
Widening GAAP losses ($125.9M in Q1) and persistent negative free cash flow show a broken economic model, where costs scale with revenue, making the pivot to profitability unlikely.
| Timeline | Event & Metric To Watch |
|---|---|
Early August 2026 | Q2 2026 Earnings Call Watch: Quarterly GAAP Net Loss. Watch for a sequential improvement from the -$125.9M loss reported in Q1, showing tangible progress on cost control. |
Early November 2026 | Q3 2026 Earnings Call Watch: Data & Applications revenue growth. Must remain above 35% YoY to avoid confirming the deceleration trend from Q1's 40.5% rate. |
May 29 - June 2, 2026 | ASCO 2026 Competitor Data Readout Watch: Headline from Guardant Health (GH) or Foundation Medicine showing superior diagnostic test sensitivity or specificity in a key cancer type. |
Next 6 months | Hospital System Earnings Reports Watch: Announcements of diagnostic spending cuts or CapEx freezes from major health systems (e.g., HCA) due to margin pressure. |
| Date | Event | Stock Impact |
|---|---|---|
Nov 6, 2025 | Q3 2025 Earnings Report Details: While specific details from this period are not in the provided data, a significant negative stock reaction of -12.36% indicates a likely earnings or guidance miss that disappointed investors. | -12.36% $82.26 -> $72.09 |
Dec 1, 2025 | Major Strategic Partnership Announced Details: Company announced a major multi-year strategic data and modeling agreement with Merck. Despite the positive news, the stock fell notably by -4.95% amid broader market weakness. | -4.95% $77.93 -> $74.07 |
Jan 1, 2026 | Positive Reimbursement Decision Details: A positive CMS decision establishing a reimbursement rate for the company's ECG-AF algorithm became effective. The stock surged +5.61% on the first trading day of the year. | +5.61% $59.05 -> $62.36 |
Feb 24, 2026 | Q4 2025 Earnings Report Details: Reported full-year 2025 results, with Data and Applications segment growth of 56.9% YoY (underlying). The stock saw a modest 1.15% gain as results met expectations. | +1.15% $57.29 -> $57.95 |
Apr 15, 2026 | Lawsuit Consolidation Details: Multiple class-action lawsuits concerning alleged improper use of Ambry Genetics data were consolidated. Stock surged +13.89%, possibly on a 'sell the rumor, buy the news' technical reaction. | +13.89% $49.53 -> $56.41 |
May 5, 2026 | Q1 2026 Earnings & Guidance Details: Reported 36.1% YoY revenue growth to $348.1M and raised FY26 guidance. However, stock fell notably by -3.12% on a massive EPS miss of -$0.71 vs -$0.10 consensus. | -3.12% $55.81 -> $54.07 |
Position Sizing
1% - 3%
CONSERVATIVE
Stock is in an Explosive Volatility regime (4.4x S&P). The Bearish sentiment, contested moat, speculative valuation, and poor operational quality create significant drawdown risk. We cap exposure to a 'Watchlist Nibble' size until the path to GAAP profitability becomes clear.
Diversification Alternatives
GH
INDUSTRYWhile also unprofitable, Guardant has a more established position with clinicians due to a longer history of reimbursement and a strong portfolio of FDA-approved companion diagnostics.
RHHBY
SECTORRoche (owner of Foundation Medicine) is a profitable, diversified pharmaceutical and diagnostics giant. It provides exposure to precision oncology growth without the single-stock, cash-burn risk of TEM.
Tempus AI is transitioning from a high-growth, cash-burning genomics testing company to a profitable, AI-driven healthcare technology platform, where its proprietary dataset is the core asset monetized through high-margin data licensing to pharmaceutical companies.
Filter all news through the lens of the Data & Applications segment's growth and profitability, as this high-margin business is the key to the company's re-rating.
New large, multi-year data licensing deals with top pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Merck, Gilead); Data & Applications revenue growth accelerating beyond 40% YoY; sustained positive Adjusted EBITDA; expansion of Total Contract Value (TCV) faster than revenue.
Deceleration in Data & Applications revenue growth; major pharma partners not renewing contracts; increased competition on data analytics from players like Flatiron Health or Foundation Medicine; significant cash burn returning.
Quarterly fluctuations in genomic testing volume (Oncology or Hereditary) unless it signals a major market share shift; minor acquisitions of small tech companies; early-stage product announcements without near-term revenue impact.
Repricing Catalyst
Achieving and sustaining positive Adjusted EBITDA, guided to be ~$65 million for FY2026, driven by the high-margin (73.1% Non-GAAP Gross Margin) Data and Applications business. This segment, which includes data licensing and AI modeling, grew 40.5% YoY in Q1 2026 and is supported by a Total Contract Value (TCV) exceeding $1.1 billion. This demonstrates a shift from pure volume-based diagnostics revenue to a more scalable, recurring data-as-a-service model.
Genomic & Diagnostic Testing Services
$1044400.0B TTM (75% of Total) · 62.3% MarginWhat It Is
Genomic sequencing tests for solid tumors, liquid biopsies (xF, xT), minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, and hereditary cancer (xG).
Who Pays & How
Oncologists and hospital systems (e.g., NYU Langone Health, Northwestern Medicine) pay for tests to guide patient treatment. This creates a flywheel: more tests generate more data, which improves the platform and strengthens the data moat.
Competition
Data Licensing & AI Modeling Services
$349400.0B TTM (25% of Total) · 73.1% MarginWhat It Is
Subscription access to de-identified multimodal database; AI-driven modeling and analytics services (Insights); Clinical trial matching services (TIME network).
Who Pays & How
Pharmaceutical companies (95% of top pharma) like Merck and Gilead pay multi-year, multi-million dollar license fees to access Tempus's data and AI platform (Lens) to accelerate drug discovery, biomarker identification, and clinical trial design.
Competition
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.