Intrusion (INTZ)
Market Price (5/25/2026): $0.8199 | Market Cap: $16.6 MilSector: Information Technology | Industry: Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Intrusion (INTZ)
Market Price (5/25/2026): $0.8199Market Cap: $16.6 MilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -91%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -177% | Penny stockMkt Price is 0.8 Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -11 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -171% Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -3.2%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -2.5%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -50% Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 16% Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -111%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -143% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -68% Key risksINTZ key risks include [1] substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern due to a history of recurring losses and negative cash flow, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -91%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -177% |
| Penny stockMkt Price is 0.8 |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -11 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -171% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -3.2%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -2.5%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -50% |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 16% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -111%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -143% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -68% |
| Key risksINTZ key risks include [1] substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern due to a history of recurring losses and negative cash flow, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Significant Revenue Miss and Steep Year-over-Year Decline in Q1 2026.
Intrusion (INTZ) reported Q1 2026 revenue of approximately $0.9 million, substantially missing the consensus analyst estimate of $2.03 million by 56.15%. This also represented a 50% year-over-year decrease from the $1.8 million reported in Q1 2025. This significant underperformance directly contributed to investor concern and a stock decline of 4.96% on the day the earnings were published.
2. Delays in Securing a Key U.S. Government Contract.
The primary driver for the dismal Q1 2026 revenue was attributed to "delays in securing a critical contract with the Department of War". This key U.S. government contract, related to critical infrastructure technology, experienced setbacks due to federal funding and procurement delays, impacting the company's expected revenue recognition. While management expressed optimism about recovering this revenue in future periods, the immediate delay negatively affected the stock.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -22.1% change in INTZ stock from 1/31/2026 to 5/24/2026 was primarily driven by a -14.8% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 1312026 | 5242026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.04 | 0.81 | -22.1% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 7 | 6 | -14.8% |
| P/S Multiple | 2.8 | 2.6 | -7.2% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 20 | 20 | -1.5% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -22.1% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 5/24/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| INTZ | -22.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 8.1% | 33.5% |
| Sector (XLK) | 25.5% | 34.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -56.7% change in INTZ stock from 10/31/2025 to 5/24/2026 was primarily driven by a -51.5% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 10312025 | 5242026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.87 | 0.81 | -56.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 7 | 6 | -9.1% |
| P/S Multiple | 5.4 | 2.6 | -51.5% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 20 | 20 | -1.9% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -56.7% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 5/24/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| INTZ | -56.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 9.9% | 34.8% |
| Sector (XLK) | 20.3% | 35.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -35.7% change in INTZ stock from 4/30/2025 to 5/24/2026 was primarily driven by a -29.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302025 | 5242026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.26 | 0.81 | -35.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 6 | 6 | -3.2% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.8 | 2.6 | -29.9% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 19 | 20 | -5.2% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -35.7% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2025 to 5/24/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| INTZ | -35.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 36.0% | 34.5% |
| Sector (XLK) | 72.8% | 33.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -96.0% change in INTZ stock from 4/30/2023 to 5/24/2026 was primarily driven by a -94.8% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 4302023 | 5242026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 20.20 | 0.81 | -96.0% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 8 | 6 | -17.5% |
| P/S Multiple | 2.8 | 2.6 | -5.7% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 1 | 20 | -94.8% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -96.0% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2023 to 5/24/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| INTZ | -96.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 86.3% | 3.8% |
| Sector (XLK) | 144.2% | 5.8% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| INTZ Return | -80% | -8% | -92% | -39% | -63% | -31% | -100% |
| Peers Return | 54% | -38% | 89% | 14% | 8% | 18% | 165% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 9% | 98% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| INTZ Win Rate | 25% | 67% | 25% | 25% | 42% | 20% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 72% | 35% | 70% | 53% | 52% | 48% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 60% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| INTZ Max Drawdown | -88% | -55% | -94% | -93% | -82% | -52% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -27% | -45% | -26% | -36% | -30% | -32% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: PANW, FTNT, CRWD, ZS, QLYS.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 5/22/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | INTZ | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -44.2% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 79.3% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 14 days | 79 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -52.5% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 110.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 52 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -53.6% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 115.6% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 200 days | 140 days |
| 2013 Taper Tantrum | ||
| % Loss | -22.2% | -0.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 28.6% | 0.2% |
| Time to Breakeven | 7 days | 1 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -18.9% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 23.3% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 12 days | 123 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -23.5% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 30.8% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 13 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
Intrusion's stock fell -44.2% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 79.3% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | INTZ | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -44.2% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 79.3% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 14 days | 79 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -52.5% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 110.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 52 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -53.6% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 115.6% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 200 days | 140 days |
| 2013 Taper Tantrum | ||
| % Loss | -22.2% | -0.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 28.6% | 0.2% |
| Time to Breakeven | 7 days | 1 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -23.5% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 30.8% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 13 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
Intrusion's stock fell -44.2% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 79.3% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Intrusion (INTZ)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-2 brief analogies for Intrusion (INTZ):
CrowdStrike for network threat detection and forensic investigations.
A specialized Palo Alto Networks or Fortinet, focused on advanced threat protection and forensic intelligence for government and enterprises.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- INTRUSION Shield: A security-as-a-service cybersecurity solution designed to identify and stop Zero-Day and ransomware attacks.
- INTRUSION TraceCop: A big data tool providing an inventory of network selectors and enrichments to support forensic investigations.
- INTRUSION Savant: A network monitoring solution that leverages TraceCop data to identify suspicious network traffic in real-time.
- Resale of Computers and Servers: Provision of standard commercially available computers and servers from various vendors.
- Pre- and Post-Sales Support Services: Offerings include network security design, system installation, and technical consulting services.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Major Customers of Intrusion Inc. (INTZ)
- US federal government entities
- State and local government entities
- Companies ranging from mid-market to large enterprises
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
```htmlTony Scott
President & CEO
Tony Scott was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Intrusion Inc. on November 11, 2021. Prior to joining Intrusion, he was CEO of the TonyScottGroup, LLC, a consulting and venture capital firm specializing in early-stage cybersecurity and privacy technologies. From 2015 to 2017, he served as the Federal Chief Information Officer (Federal CIO) for the U.S. Government under the Obama administration, overseeing an annual IT budget exceeding $85 billion. His extensive CXO-level career includes roles as Chief Information Officer at VMware (2013-2015), Microsoft Corporation (2008-2013), and The Walt Disney Company (2005-2008), as well as Chief Technology Officer at General Motors Corporation. He also held senior executive positions at Bristol Myers Squibb, Price Waterhouse, Sun Microsystems, and Marriott. Scott earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Information Systems Management from the University of San Francisco and a Juris Doctorate from Santa Clara University. He was inducted into CIO magazine's "CIO Hall of Fame" in 2009. Upon his arrival at Intrusion, the company was facing significant challenges, and he focused on product improvements before expanding sales efforts.
Kimberly Pinson
Chief Financial Officer
Kimberly Pinson was appointed Chief Financial Officer of Intrusion Inc. on June 27, 2022. She brings over 25 years of experience leading finance and related functions across global software, technology, medical device, healthcare, and real estate companies. Before joining Intrusion, Ms. Pinson served as CFO for NetFortris, a managed IT and UCaaS provider, EndoStim, an early-stage medical device company, and United Orthopedic Group, an orthopedic bracing and healthcare services company. She has also held senior finance leadership roles at Quadrem, Xtria, Novo Networks, and Centex. Her career began in audit at Grant Thornton. Ms. Pinson holds a BBA from the University of Texas at Dallas and is a licensed Certified Public Accountant. According to Intrusion's CEO Tony Scott, her experience includes developing strategic plans, raising debt and equity capital, and completing domestic and international acquisitions in both private equity and public companies.
Joe Head
Chief Technology Officer
Joe Head is a co-founder of Intrusion Inc. and has served as a director since the company's inception in September 1983. He was named Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors in June 2000 and Vice President in February 2003. Earlier in his career at Intrusion, he served as Senior Vice President from 1983 to 1998 and Executive Vice President from 1998 to June 2000. Before co-founding Intrusion, Mr. Head held positions as Product Marketing Manager and Marketing Engineer at Honeywell Optoelectronics from 1980 to 1983. He holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) are primarily centered around its financial viability, intense market competition, and revenue concentration.
- Financial Challenges and Lack of Profitability: Intrusion Inc. continues to face significant financial hurdles, operating at a net loss despite experiencing sequential revenue growth in recent quarters. The company is currently unprofitable and is burning cash to fund its operations, making the path to sustained profitability a core challenge.
- High Industry Competition: The cybersecurity market is characterized by intense competition from larger, well-established companies with substantial financial and marketing resources. As a micro-cap entity, Intrusion Inc. is at a considerable disadvantage in competing for market share against these rivals, who often offer more comprehensive platforms.
- Product and Revenue Concentration: Intrusion Inc. exhibits risks associated with both product and revenue concentration. A significant portion of its revenue is derived from its Shield product, and the company is heavily reliant on government contracts, with sales to government entities accounting for nearly 95% of its year-to-date revenue in Q3 2025. This high dependence on a limited customer base and specific product lines creates vulnerability, particularly concerning potential delays in government contract renewals and new orders.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Intrusion Inc.'s main products and their addressable markets are as follows:
- INTRUSION Shield: This cybersecurity solution, based on a security-as-a-service (SaaS) model, operates within the broader cybersecurity as a service (CSaaS) and intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) markets.
- The global cybersecurity as a service market was valued at approximately USD 17.60 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 69.48 billion by 2032. North America accounts for the largest share of this market.
- The global intrusion detection system market size was valued at USD 6.19 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 11.77 billion by 2034. North America is the largest market for Intrusion Detection Systems.
- INTRUSION TraceCop: As a big data tool supporting forensic investigations, TraceCop addresses the digital forensics and forensic technology markets.
- The global digital forensics market size was valued at USD 13.46 billion in 2025 and is predicted to increase to approximately USD 53.65 billion by 2035. North America held the largest revenue share of 39.8% in the digital forensics market in 2023.
- The forensic technology market size was valued at USD 4.50 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 10.80 billion by 2032. North America held the largest market share of 35% of the global forensic technologies and services in 2023.
- INTRUSION Savant: This network monitoring solution operates within the global network monitoring market.
- The global network monitoring market size is expected to increase from USD 3.13 billion in 2025 to USD 5.23 billion by 2031.
- Another estimate places the global network monitoring market size at USD 4.13 billion in 2025, projected to grow to USD 9.52 billion by 2034. North America holds the largest market share in network monitoring.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several key initiatives and market trends:
- Expansion of INTRUSION Shield and its variants: The company anticipates continued deployment of its INTRUSION Shield technology solutions to new customers, which is expected to enhance financial performance and contribute to sustainable growth and profitability. This includes the launch of INTRUSION Shield Cloud on the AWS Marketplace, aimed at driving long-term growth and providing autonomous network enforcement across modern infrastructure. Additionally, the introduction of Shield Stratus for cloud-native packet filtering and Shield Sentinel for large enterprises and carriers are expected to broaden the product's reach and customer adoption.
- Growth in U.S. federal government and critical infrastructure sectors: Intrusion has seen revenue increases from new customer acquisitions, including awards from the U.S. Department of Defense for both Shield technology and consulting services. The company is focusing on critical infrastructure protection, viewing it as a highly promising market due to escalating cyber threats. Strategic hires, such as a Public Sector VP of Sales with extensive federal experience, are intended to deepen coverage and support customer portfolio growth within government and enterprise sectors. Ongoing discussions for domestic and Pacific expansion with federal customers also present substantial revenue opportunities.
- Expansion through strategic partnerships and channel sales: Intrusion is leveraging strategic partner activities, particularly with companies like PortNexus, to create incremental opportunities in endpoint and critical infrastructure cybersecurity markets. These partnerships, including deployments in sectors like K-12 school districts, are anticipated to catalyze additional channel relationships and drive demand. The addition of a Director of Channel Sales & Partnerships is aimed at growing partner-led go-to-market strategies and AWS initiatives.
- Marketplace expansion on cloud platforms: The company is expanding its reach by making its products, such as Shield Cloud, available on major cloud marketplaces like AWS and is planning launches on Microsoft Azure. These standalone Shield variants are designed to offer broader customer choice and increase adoption flexibility, thereby enhancing revenue streams.
- Overall growth in the Intrusion Detection System (IDS) market: The global intrusion detection system market is projected for significant growth, with an anticipated increase from USD 6.65 billion in 2026 to USD 11.77 billion by 2034, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.39%. This broader market expansion, driven by increasing cybersecurity awareness and the need for real-time threat detection, provides a favorable environment for Intrusion's specialized solutions.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Issuance
- In early 2025, Intrusion Inc. eliminated $10.1 million notional value of all Series A Preferred Stock by exchanging it for common stock.
- The company received approximately $14.5 million in total proceeds from various equity transactions, including a registered direct offering in January 2025, to fund operations through 2025.
- In Q4 2024, approximately $5.0 million of common stock was sold through an At-The-Market (ATM) program, and $0.3 million was received from the exercise of 369 thousand warrants via a Warrant Inducement Plan.
Inbound Investments
- Intrusion Inc. received an additional $3.0 million for continued Department of Defense contract support in Q2 2025, facilitating operational deployment of critical infrastructure monitoring tools and enhancing research-driven threat analysis capabilities.
- On October 1, 2025, the company collected an additional $3.0 million in cash from trade receivables, boosting its immediate liquid position, related to a DoD contract extension.
- Received $1.7 million from draws on the Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (SEPA) with Streeterville Capital, LLC during 2024.
Capital Expenditures
- Capital expenditures in Q3 2025 were $34K, representing a significant decrease from the prior quarter.
- Over the trailing twelve months, capital expenditures were -1.31M.
- The net proceeds from equity actions in early 2025 were intended for general corporate purposes, which may include capital expenditures, working capital, and other investments.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| Intrusion Earnings Notes | 12/16/2025 | |
| Intrusion Stock Rallied 9.9% - Have You Assessed the Risk | 10/17/2025 |
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to INTZ.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04302026 | PLTR | Palantir Technologies | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 04102026 | ADSK | Autodesk | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 8.5% | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| 04102026 | BSY | Bentley Systems | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 4.2% | 4.2% | 0.0% |
| 04102026 | ENPH | Enphase Energy | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 5.7% | 5.7% | 0.0% |
| 04102026 | BL | BlackLine | Dip Buy | DB | CFO/Rev | Low D/EDip Buy with High Cash Flow MarginsBuying dips for companies with significant cash flows from operations and reasonable debt / market cap | 3.2% | 3.2% | -3.0% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 158.15 |
| Mkt Cap | 64.0 |
| Rev LTM | 3,907 |
| Op Inc LTM | 110 |
| FCF LTM | 1,058 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 885 |
| CFO LTM | 1,363 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 1,135 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 15.6% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 15.9% |
| Rev Chg Q | 17.5% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 4.0% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | -8.9% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 17.2% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 4.8% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 3.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.5% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 38.3% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 37.2% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 31.7% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 30.6% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 64.0 |
| P/S | 11.8 |
| P/Op Inc | 7.1 |
| P/EBIT | 7.1 |
| P/E | 8.3 |
| P/CFO | 30.7 |
| Total Yield | 0.3% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | 2.5% |
| D/E | 0.0 |
| Net D/E | -0.0 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | 40.3% |
| 3M Rtn | 40.8% |
| 6M Rtn | 3.4% |
| 12M Rtn | 3.0% |
| 3Y Rtn | 71.7% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | 37.9% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | 42.9% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | -11.8% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | -25.1% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -5.1% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $0.81 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.0 | |
| First Trading Date | 12/29/2006 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -68.4% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $0.86 | $1.32 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -6.3% | -38.6% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 101.8% | 91.1% |
| Downside Capture | 250.31 | 361.72 |
| Upside Capture | 161.61 | 180.04 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 28.9% | 31.3% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.28 | 2.07 | 2.28 | 2.40 | 2.63 | 0.65 |
| Up Beta | 1.15 | 2.03 | 2.02 | 2.24 | 2.45 | 1.45 |
| Down Beta | 6.22 | 3.09 | 3.27 | 2.89 | 2.85 | 0.00 |
| Up Capture | 123% | 75% | 140% | 123% | 305% | 12% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 15 | 22 | 31 | 66 | 141 | 428 |
| Stock +ve Days | 10 | 17 | 23 | 47 | 104 | 313 |
| Down Capture | 1319% | 274% | 255% | 234% | 194% | 112% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 4 | 18 | 30 | 56 | 108 | 321 |
| Stock -ve Days | 12 | 26 | 40 | 75 | 137 | 413 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with INTZ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTZ | -53.8% | 90.6% | -0.47 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 58.5% | 20.5% | 2.13 | 32.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 29.5% | 12.0% | 1.86 | 32.4% |
| Gold (GLD) | 35.5% | 26.8% | 1.11 | 13.2% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 42.9% | 18.7% | 1.77 | -4.9% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 15.2% | 13.1% | 0.82 | 11.2% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -31.3% | 41.8% | -0.78 | 26.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with INTZ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTZ | -68.7% | 220.2% | 0.05 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 22.7% | 24.8% | 0.80 | 6.9% |
| Equity (SPY) | 14.0% | 17.0% | 0.64 | 5.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 18.8% | 18.0% | 0.85 | 2.9% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 10.4% | 19.4% | 0.42 | 6.3% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 3.8% | 18.8% | 0.10 | 2.2% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 11.6% | 55.3% | 0.41 | 2.7% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with INTZ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTZ | -44.7% | 201.2% | 0.08 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 25.3% | 24.4% | 0.93 | 8.3% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.7% | 17.9% | 0.75 | 6.9% |
| Gold (GLD) | 13.0% | 16.0% | 0.67 | 3.4% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 7.8% | 17.9% | 0.35 | 7.1% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.5% | 20.7% | 0.23 | 4.3% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 66.7% | 66.9% | 1.06 | 2.9% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 3/24/2026 | -5.7% | -21.1% | -22.8% |
| 11/12/2025 | -8.0% | -17.1% | -16.6% |
| 8/12/2025 | -4.7% | -9.4% | -13.1% |
| 2/27/2025 | -21.3% | -8.3% | 5.6% |
| 11/12/2024 | -15.2% | -24.0% | -40.6% |
| 8/13/2024 | 19.2% | 6.7% | -12.5% |
| 3/26/2024 | -8.9% | 12.1% | -37.0% |
| 11/14/2023 | -22.6% | -34.9% | -56.3% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| # Negative | 12 | 10 | 11 |
| Median Positive | 7.2% | 6.7% | 9.4% |
| Median Negative | -8.4% | -19.1% | -22.8% |
| Max Positive | 29.9% | 17.3% | 45.3% |
| Max Negative | -31.9% | -40.6% | -56.3% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/14/2026 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2025 | 03/25/2026 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/12/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/12/2025 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2025 | 04/29/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 02/27/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/13/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/14/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/15/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 04/01/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/15/2023 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/31/2023 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/14/2022 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/04/2022 | 10-Q |
Insider Activity
Expand for More| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pinson, Kimberly | Chief Financial Officer | Direct | Buy | 1122026 | 0.98 | 2,500 | 2,444 | 59,778 | Form |
| 2 | Scott, Anthony | Chief Executive Officer | Direct | Buy | 1122026 | 0.98 | 2,175 | 2,126 | 624,420 | Form |
| 3 | Levecchio, Anthony J | Direct | Sell | 12042025 | 1.39 | 200 | 277 | 166,104 | Form | |
| 4 | Scott, Anthony | Chief Executive Officer | Direct | Sell | 8192025 | 1.79 | 18,254 | 32,584 | 1,136,376 | Form |
| 5 | Scott, Anthony | Chief Executive Officer | Direct | Buy | 7022025 | 1.95 | 1,091 | 2,124 | 1,274,708 | Form |
Industry Resources
| Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Resources |
| The Verge |
| TechRadar |
| Tom’s Hardware |
| PCMag |
| CNET |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.