Greenland Energy (GLND)
Market Price (8/9/2026): $2.36 | Market Cap: $47.4 MilSector: Energy | Industry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Greenland Energy (GLND)
Market Price (8/9/2026): $2.36Market Cap: $47.4 MilSector: EnergyIndustry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Renewable Energy Transition, and Hydrogen Economy. Themes include Wind Energy Development, Battery Storage & Grid Modernization, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -127%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -154% Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 12% | High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 182% Key risksGLND key risks include [1] significant geological uncertainty in its unproven basin, Show more. |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Renewable Energy Transition, and Hydrogen Economy. Themes include Wind Energy Development, Battery Storage & Grid Modernization, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -127%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -154% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 12% |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 182% |
| Key risksGLND key risks include [1] significant geological uncertainty in its unproven basin, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Greenland Energy (GLND) stock has lost about 25% since 4/30/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Stock Dilution from Public Offering: Greenland Energy completed a public offering on April 29, 2026, raising approximately $70 million by issuing 17.5 million shares (including common shares and pre-funded warrants) at a price of $4.00 per share, with accompanying common stock warrants exercisable at $5.00. This substantial increase in the number of outstanding shares likely contributed to the stock's subsequent decline of over 40% from the offering price to $2.27 by August 1, 2026.
2. Early-Stage, Pre-Revenue Operations and High Investment Risk: As an exploration-stage oil and gas company, Greenland Energy reported no revenue and a net loss of approximately $0.8 million, or $0.04 per share, for fiscal Q1 2026, which ended March 31, 2026. The company lacks proven reserves, and its valuation is highly speculative, relying entirely on the success of future drilling campaigns in Greenland's Jameson Land Basin, which are planned for late 2026. This inherently high-risk profile contributes to significant stock volatility and downside pressure.
Show more
Greenland Energy (GLND) stock has lost about 25% since 4/30/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Stock Dilution from Public Offering: Greenland Energy completed a public offering on April 29, 2026, raising approximately $70 million by issuing 17.5 million shares (including common shares and pre-funded warrants) at a price of $4.00 per share, with accompanying common stock warrants exercisable at $5.00. This substantial increase in the number of outstanding shares likely contributed to the stock's subsequent decline of over 40% from the offering price to $2.27 by August 1, 2026.
2. Early-Stage, Pre-Revenue Operations and High Investment Risk: As an exploration-stage oil and gas company, Greenland Energy reported no revenue and a net loss of approximately $0.8 million, or $0.04 per share, for fiscal Q1 2026, which ended March 31, 2026. The company lacks proven reserves, and its valuation is highly speculative, relying entirely on the success of future drilling campaigns in Greenland's Jameson Land Basin, which are planned for late 2026. This inherently high-risk profile contributes to significant stock volatility and downside pressure.
3. Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Lack of Financial Track Record: In its fiscal Q1 2026 report, Greenland Energy disclosed a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting due to an incomplete formal control framework as a newly public company. This indicates elevated reporting risk. Furthermore, the company has not provided sufficient historical financial data for a comprehensive track record assessment, leading to increased investor uncertainty and contributing to the stock's pronounced volatility, with an average weekly change of 26% over the preceding three months.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
4/30/2026 to 8/8/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GLND | -23.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 7.6% | 19.0% |
| Sector (XLE) | -3.6% | -0.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 8/8/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GLND | ||
| Market (SPY) | 12.1% | 4.3% |
| Sector (XLE) | 13.4% | -0.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
7/31/2025 to 8/8/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GLND | ||
| Market (SPY) | 23.4% | 4.3% |
| Sector (XLE) | 35.0% | -0.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
7/31/2023 to 8/8/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| GLND | ||
| Market (SPY) | 74.9% | 4.3% |
| Sector (XLE) | 43.7% | -0.3% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| GLND Return | - | - | - | - | - | -83% | -83% |
| Peers Return | 104% | 68% | -6% | -12% | -1% | 34% | 275% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 13% | 105% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| GLND Win Rate | - | - | - | - | - | 33% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 76% | 60% | 48% | 43% | 60% | 55% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| GLND Max Drawdown | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -28% | -33% | -25% | -32% | -32% | -22% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: EOG, FANG, DVN, APA, OXY.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 8/7/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
GLND has limited trading history. Below is the Energy sector ETF (XLE) in its place.
| Event | XLE | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -16.3% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 19.4% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 169 days | 79 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -14.5% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 16.9% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 145 days | 31 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -56.3% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 128.7% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 352 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -29.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 42.6% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1117 days | 105 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -24.3% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 32.0% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 98 days | 62 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -45.4% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 83.0% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2233 days | 15 days |
In The Past
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -16.3% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 19.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
GLND has limited trading history. Below is the Energy sector ETF (XLE) in its place.
| Event | XLE | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -56.3% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 128.7% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 352 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -29.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 42.6% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1117 days | 105 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -24.3% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 32.0% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 98 days | 62 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -45.4% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 83.0% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2233 days | 15 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -28.8% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 40.5% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 484 days | 123 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -52.0% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 108.4% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 717 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -16.3% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 19.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Greenland Energy (GLND)
Greenland Energy Company (GLND) operates as an early-stage oil and gas exploration company. Based in Denver, Colorado, the company is primarily focused on identifying and appraising potential hydrocarbon reserves within the Jameson Land Basin located in East Greenland.
The core business of Greenland Energy involves conducting geological and geophysical surveys, along with drilling exploratory wells, to discover commercially viable deposits of crude oil and natural gas. As an early-stage explorer, its current activity centers on the identification and potential certification of these reserves, which represent future sources of energy.
Ultimately, if successful in its exploration efforts, Greenland Energy aims to contribute to the global energy supply by developing and producing crude oil and natural gas. These resources would serve the broader energy market, providing essential raw materials for various industries, power generation, and transportation worldwide.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies for Greenland Energy (GLND):
1. Think of it like a junior mining company, but instead of digging for gold, they're exploring for oil and gas in the Arctic.
2. It's akin to a biotech startup, but instead of searching for a breakthrough drug, they are searching for a breakthrough oil field in a frontier region.
3. Imagine a tiny, speculative version of ExxonMobil, focused purely on finding new oil reserves in an unproven territory like East Greenland.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Oil and Gas Exploration: Identifying and evaluating potential oil and natural gas reserves, primarily within the Jameson Land Basin in East Greenland.
AI Analysis | Feedback
As an early-stage oil and gas exploration company, Greenland Energy (GLND) is primarily focused on identifying and appraising potential hydrocarbon reserves in the Jameson Land Basin. At this stage of its operations, the company does not yet have major customers in the traditional sense that purchase oil, gas, or related products/services.
Exploration companies typically generate revenue through capital raises, joint venture agreements, or by selling their developed assets/rights to larger energy producers once commercially viable discoveries are made. Therefore, Greenland Energy is not currently engaged in sales to end-users (individuals) or to companies that would process or distribute oil and gas products.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Robert Price, Chief Executive Officer
Robert Price has assembled and managed companies across the energy, real estate, and manufacturing sectors. He founded Brooks Energy Company in 1991. Price previously served as Vice President, Trust Officer, and Oil and Gas Trust Energy Department Manager at the First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, which is now J.P. Morgan Chase Bank. He has led companies through mergers and equity rollovers, aligning management ownership with long-term strategy, and focuses on building value in energy assets through operational improvements and disciplined capital allocation. He holds a significant 28.4% stake in Greenland Energy Co, reflecting equity rolled over from March GL Company into the combined business.
Ashiq Merchant, Chief Financial Officer
Ashiq Merchant brings over 25 years of senior multinational financial leadership experience, having worked at BP from September 2000 to September 2025. At BP, he held progressively senior finance roles across upstream and downstream businesses in multiple international jurisdictions, including North America and the Middle East. His background encompasses overseeing financial reporting, capital allocation, joint-venture financial oversight, and complex strategic transactions and restructurings. Merchant is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and a member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA).
Larry G. Swets, Jr., Executive Chairman
Larry G. Swets, Jr. has been actively involved in advancing the development of energy resources within Greenland's Jameson Land Basin. His involvement includes work through Greenland Exploration Limited and its business combination with March GL Company and Pelican Acquisition Corporation, which led to the formation of Greenland Energy Company.
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Exploration and Geological Risks
Greenland Energy is an early-stage exploration company with no operating history, revenues, or proved reserves. The estimated 13 billion barrels of oil in the Jameson Land Basin are "un-risked prospective recoverable oil," meaning there is no certainty of discovery or commercial viability. The basin has a history of costly failures and geological uncertainty, having never produced a commercial discovery despite decades of study. The costs associated with drilling are high, with the first well alone estimated at $40 million. The inherent uncertainty of finding commercially viable oil and gas reserves is the most significant risk for the company.2. Operational and Environmental Risks in the Arctic Environment
Operating in a remote Arctic location like East Greenland presents extreme challenges. These include harsh weather conditions, limited daylight, a complete lack of existing infrastructure, and narrow seasonal windows for access for equipment and personnel. These factors necessitate specialized equipment, highly skilled personnel, and robust logistics, all of which substantially increase operational costs and the complexity of drilling campaigns. Furthermore, operations in Greenland face increasing scrutiny and opposition from environmental groups and institutional investors due to climate change concerns related to Arctic drilling.3. Financial Risk and Going Concern Uncertainty
As an early-stage exploration company, Greenland Energy is heavily reliant on external capital to finance its ambitious drilling program. The company currently has no revenues or proved reserves, is burning cash, and operates with negative equity, indicating a strong dependence on external financing for its operations. There is "substantial doubt about continuing as a going concern without additional funding". While the company recently completed a $70 million equity and warrant financing, it continues to report negative operating cash flow and negative stockholders' equity, highlighting ongoing financial vulnerability.AI Analysis | Feedback
- Governmental policy shifts in Greenland regarding fossil fuel exploration and production. The Greenlandic government has historically demonstrated a willingness to implement moratoriums or bans on new oil and gas exploration permits due to environmental concerns and the global climate agenda, posing a direct threat to GLND's operational viability and future prospects.
- Accelerated global energy transition and increasing pressure from investors, financial institutions, and governments to divest from or restrict funding for new fossil fuel projects. This makes it increasingly challenging for early-stage exploration companies like GLND to secure the significant capital required for exploration and development, potentially rendering long-lead-time projects unfinanceable or uneconomic.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The addressable market for Greenland Energy (GLND) for its main products and services, which include oil and gas exploration and potential extraction, is primarily focused on the Jameson Land Basin in East Greenland. Independent assessments by Sproule ERCE indicate a potential of approximately 13 billion barrels of un-risked recoverable prospective oil resources within the Jameson Land Basin. This estimate places the region among the world's most significant undrilled oil provinces.
While broader estimates for the East Greenland region, including the Jameson Land Basin, have been made by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) at up to 31.387 billion barrels of oil equivalents in oil, gas, and natural gas liquids, the more specific market size for Greenland Energy's direct area of focus in the Jameson Land Basin is the 13 billion barrels of prospective recoverable oil.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Greenland Energy (GLND) is an early-stage oil and gas exploration company with no current revenue, meaning its future growth hinges entirely on exploration success and subsequent development. The primary drivers of potential future revenue growth for Greenland Energy over the next 2-3 years include:
- Successful Exploration Drilling Campaign: A critical driver of future revenue for Greenland Energy is the success of its planned drilling of two targeted exploration wells in the Jameson Land Basin during the second half of 2026. Positive results from these initial wells, confirming the presence of recoverable oil in significant quantities, would be a transformative catalyst for the company.
- Earning a Significant Working Interest: By fully funding the costs associated with the two exploration wells, Greenland Energy is positioned to earn up to a 70% working interest in three onshore licenses within the Jameson Land Basin. This substantial ownership stake would directly translate into a larger share of any future oil and gas production revenues if the exploration efforts prove successful.
- Transition to Development and Production: The ultimate driver of revenue growth would be the successful transition from an exploration-focused company to one actively engaged in the development and production of oil and gas. While currently speculative, a major discovery could unlock a multi-billion-barrel opportunity, paving the way for the substantial capital investment required for extraction and ultimately, commercial sales.
- Leveraging Strategic Partnerships and Funding: Greenland Energy has secured a crucial agreement with Halliburton Company for integrated consulting, drilling, and logistical support for its 2026 exploration campaign, which is vital for operating in the challenging Arctic environment. Additionally, the company recently closed a public offering, raising approximately $70 million, which is intended to fund its exploration and appraisal activities in the Jameson Land Basin. These strategic partnerships and financing are essential enablers that support the successful execution of its exploration strategy, which is a prerequisite for generating future revenue.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Issuance
- In April 2026, Greenland Energy completed a public offering of 16,250,000 common shares, 1,250,000 pre-funded warrants, and 17,500,000 common warrants, generating gross proceeds of approximately $70 million.
- This offering expanded the public float from approximately 26.16 million to an anticipated 43.66 million shares, before any warrant exercises.
- The company's formation in March 2026 through a business combination involved issuing 1.5 million shares to existing Greenland Exploration shareholders and 20 million shares to March GL shareholders.
Inbound Investments
- Greenland Energy received approximately $70 million in gross proceeds from a public offering of shares and warrants in April 2026.
- The company was established in March 2026 through a business combination with Pelican Acquisition Corporation, Greenland Exploration Limited, and March GL Company.
Capital Expenditures
- Net proceeds from the $70 million public offering are designated to fund initial exploration and drilling activities in the Jameson Land Basin, including procurement for exploration wells OPW1 and OPW2.
- Greenland Energy plans to fully fund the costs for drilling up to two exploration wells at the Jameson project to earn up to a 70% interest in three onshore licenses.
- The estimated cost for the first exploration well (OPW1) is approximately $40 million.
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 49.44 |
| Mkt Cap | 46.6 |
| Rev LTM | 19,676 |
| Op Inc LTM | 5,883 |
| FCF LTM | 3,682 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 1,399 |
| CFO LTM | 10,143 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 7,857 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 14.6% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 2.5% |
| Rev Chg Q | 53.4% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 13.4% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 21.3% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | -2.7% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 35.4% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 35.8% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 4.9% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 50.6% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 48.5% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 22.1% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 15.1% |
Price Behavior
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.20 | 0.90 | 1.19 | 0.77 | -1.48 | 0.11 |
| Up Beta | 8.94 | 1.26 | 1.32 | -1.23 | -2.05 | 0.53 |
| Down Beta | -1.00 | -1.31 | -0.68 | 3.58 | -5.00 | -4.87 |
| Up Capture | 314% | 52% | 87% | -88% | -39% | -4% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 11 | 22 | 35 | 67 | 138 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 9 | 15 | 23 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Down Capture | 236% | 223% | 229% | 189% | 125% | 70% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 21 | 28 | 59 | 114 | 326 |
| Stock -ve Days | 13 | 27 | 39 | 56 | 56 | 56 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with GLND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLND | -82.1% | 181.6% | -1.66 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 39.2% | 21.1% | 1.46 | -0.3% |
| Equity (SPY) | 23.3% | 12.8% | 1.36 | 4.3% |
| Gold (GLD) | 28.5% | 28.4% | 0.87 | -15.1% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 32.9% | 19.8% | 1.32 | 4.8% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 14.2% | 13.8% | 0.72 | -12.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -43.7% | 43.0% | -1.21 | 4.4% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with GLND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLND | -29.1% | 181.6% | -1.66 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 22.6% | 25.8% | 0.78 | -0.3% |
| Equity (SPY) | 13.5% | 17.2% | 0.61 | 4.3% |
| Gold (GLD) | 18.6% | 18.6% | 0.81 | -15.1% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.2% | 19.6% | 0.31 | 4.8% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 2.3% | 18.9% | 0.02 | -12.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 9.0% | 53.0% | 0.36 | 4.4% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with GLND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLND | -15.8% | 181.6% | -1.66 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 9.9% | 29.6% | 0.37 | -0.3% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.4% | 17.9% | 0.73 | 4.3% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.1% | 16.2% | 0.61 | -15.1% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 7.4% | 18.0% | 0.33 | 4.8% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 4.8% | 20.7% | 0.20 | -12.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 58.4% | 66.2% | 0.98 | 4.4% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Earnings Returns History
Updated 6/3/2026| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/13/2026 | 10-Q |
| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/13/2026 | 10-Q |
Insider Activity
Updated 6/8/2026| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 6082026 | 2.77 | 10,000 | 27,699 | 1,578,843 | Form | |
| 2 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 6032026 | 3.05 | 15,000 | 45,705 | 1,706,320 | Form | |
| 3 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 5222026 | 2.66 | 20,000 | 53,152 | 1,448,392 | Form | |
| 4 | Furlan, Melanie Sue | Direct | Buy | 5122026 | 3.02 | 33,330 | 100,657 | 145,274 | Form | |
| 5 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 5072026 | 2.79 | 25,000 | 69,750 | 1,395,000 | Form |
| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 6082026 | 2.77 | 10,000 | 27,699 | 1,578,843 | Form | |
| 2 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 6032026 | 3.05 | 15,000 | 45,705 | 1,706,320 | Form | |
| 3 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 5222026 | 2.66 | 20,000 | 53,152 | 1,448,392 | Form | |
| 4 | Furlan, Melanie Sue | Direct | Buy | 5122026 | 3.02 | 33,330 | 100,657 | 145,274 | Form | |
| 5 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 5072026 | 2.79 | 25,000 | 69,750 | 1,395,000 | Form | |
| 6 | Baqar, Hassan | Direct | Buy | 5042026 | 2.90 | 45,000 | Form | |||
| 7 | Swets, Larry G JR | Direct | Buy | 5042026 | 2.98 | 50,000 | 149,000 | 1,415,500 | Form |
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.