S&P 500 Stocks Trading At 52-Week Low

SPY: State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust logo
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

As of Saturday, June 6, 6 of the S&P 500 stocks are trading at their 52-week lows. Among these stocks, Intuit (INTU) has corrected the most in the last one month, falling by 24% over this period.

Stocks At 52W Lows

Below is the complete list of these S&P 500 stocks, sorted by market capitalization – highlighting some the headwinds for these stocks across industries ranging from Application Software and Integrated Telecommunication Services to Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods and Advertising:

Tickers Market
Cap
1D
% Chg
1W
% Chg
1M
% Chg
1Y
% Chg
T $161.5 Bil -0.1% -8.3% -11.0% -13.2%
INTU $81.9 Bil -1.7% -10.5% -23.6% -61.0%
LULU $13.4 Bil -8.6% -12.9% -13.5% -65.9%
TRMB $12.7 Bil -2.7% -3.9% -14.6% -24.4%
TTD $9.5 Bil -5.1% -7.5% -16.9% -73.8%
JKHY $9.3 Bil -0.5% -4.1% -8.5% -27.2%

 

Relevant Articles
  1. The Real Risk Inside Apple Stock
  2. What You Missed About Google Stock Right Before It Went 2x
  3. Why Is Lilly Stock Growing Like A Silicon Valley Tech Darling?
  4. Is the Market Underestimating Meta Stock’s AI Payoff
  5. Is Uber Stock Poised For A Rally?
  6. Why Applied Optoelectronics Sank 13%

Trefis: SPX Stock Insights

What is the point? A 52-week low often reflects deep pessimism, but also potential opportunity. This price point can signal capitulation, setting the stage for mean reversion or contrarian entry. It is where risk and reward start to skew interestingly. But of course, a trade at this level requires deep conviction. Among these stocks, we find Intuit (INTU) and Lululemon Athletica (LULU) attractive.

Worried that these stocks could fall much more? You could take a look at the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming its benchmark that includes all 3 — the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 indices. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.