Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK)
Market Price (12/24/2025): $1.845 | Market Cap: $89.2 MilSector: Industrials | Industry: Industrial Conglomerates
Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK)
Market Price (12/24/2025): $1.845Market Cap: $89.2 MilSector: IndustrialsIndustry: Industrial Conglomerates
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -119% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -104%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -153% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -37 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -16% |
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 81% | Weak revenue growthRev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -13% | |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 57%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 31% | Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -26% | |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -33% | Key risksTUSK key risks include [1] persistent net losses threatening its long-term viability, Show more. | |
| Attractive yieldFCF Yield is 81% | ||
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence, Datacenter Power, and Smart Grids & Grid Modernization. Themes include US Oilfield Technologies, Show more. |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -119% |
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 81% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 57%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 31% |
| Valuation becoming less expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is -33% |
| Attractive yieldFCF Yield is 81% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence, Datacenter Power, and Smart Grids & Grid Modernization. Themes include US Oilfield Technologies, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -104%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -153% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -37 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -16% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -13% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -26% |
| Key risksTUSK key risks include [1] persistent net losses threatening its long-term viability, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are the key points for why Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) stock moved by -22.4% from approximately August 31, 2025, to December 24, 2025: **1. Mammoth Energy Services reported disappointing third-quarter 2025 financial results, with total revenue of $14.8 million, a net loss of $12.1 million ($0.25 per diluted share), and an Adjusted EBITDA loss of $4.4 million, significantly missing analyst consensus estimates.****2. The company's ongoing business transformation, which included significant divestitures of its infrastructure subsidiaries and all hydraulic fracturing equipment in early to mid-2025, led to a reduced operational scope and diminished upside potential, particularly as core operating metrics showed continued decline.**
**3. Analyst sentiment and technical indicators for TUSK turned increasingly negative in late 2025, with some analyses indicating a "Strong Sell" signal and a notable increase in short interest, reflecting a bearish outlook from investors and market participants.**
**4. Persistent unprofitability remained a major concern, as management projected an Adjusted EBITDA loss for the second half of 2025 and indicated that profitability was not expected until 2026, thus impacting investor confidence.**
**5. Operational challenges in key segments, such as a 49% sequential decline in the sand segment's revenue due to asset divestiture and weather disruptions, and a 13% sequential decline in the infrastructure segment's revenue, contributed to overall financial pressures and a downward trend in the stock price.** Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -23.0% change in TUSK stock from 9/23/2025 to 12/23/2025 was primarily driven by a -22.1% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 9232025 | 12232025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.39 | 1.84 | -23.01% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 235.44 | 233.19 | -0.96% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.49 | 0.38 | -22.06% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 48.23 | 48.36 | -0.28% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -23.01% |
Market Drivers
9/23/2025 to 12/23/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TUSK | -23.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.7% | 23.3% |
| Sector (XLI) | 2.6% | 21.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -38.9% change in TUSK stock from 6/24/2025 to 12/23/2025 was primarily driven by a -38.1% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 6242025 | 12232025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.01 | 1.84 | -38.87% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 235.05 | 233.19 | -0.79% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.62 | 0.38 | -38.12% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 48.15 | 48.36 | -0.43% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -38.87% |
Market Drivers
6/24/2025 to 12/23/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TUSK | -38.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 13.7% | 25.5% |
| Sector (XLI) | 8.7% | 30.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -33.3% change in TUSK stock from 12/23/2024 to 12/23/2025 was primarily driven by a -62.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12232024 | 12232025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.76 | 1.84 | -33.33% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 129.04 | 233.19 | 80.71% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.03 | 0.38 | -62.93% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 48.13 | 48.36 | -0.48% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -33.33% |
Market Drivers
12/23/2024 to 12/23/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TUSK | -33.3% | |
| Market (SPY) | 16.7% | 26.7% |
| Sector (XLI) | 19.1% | 23.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -75.4% change in TUSK stock from 12/24/2022 to 12/23/2025 was primarily driven by a -65.9% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| 12242022 | 12232025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 7.48 | 1.84 | -75.40% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 316.41 | 233.19 | -26.30% |
| P/S Multiple | 1.12 | 0.38 | -65.88% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 47.31 | 48.36 | -2.21% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -75.41% |
Market Drivers
12/24/2023 to 12/23/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| TUSK | -60.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 48.4% | 25.5% |
| Sector (XLI) | 42.3% | 27.5% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| TUSK Return | 102% | -59% | 375% | -48% | -33% | -39% | -16% |
| Peers Return | -11% | 95% | 9% | 4% | 6% | 27% | 166% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 17% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| TUSK Win Rate | 50% | 25% | 67% | 42% | 42% | 25% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 43% | 53% | 48% | 45% | 48% | 48% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| TUSK Max Drawdown | -74% | -60% | -20% | -60% | -40% | -42% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -54% | -4% | -18% | -28% | -18% | -25% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HON, TTI, HHS, MMM, CSL.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/23/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | TUSK | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -78.7% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 369.7% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 262 days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -78.2% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 358.6% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 245 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -96.7% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 2950.7% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 120 days |
Compare to HON, TTI, HHS, MMM, CSL
In The Past
Mammoth Energy Services's stock fell -78.7% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 2/17/2021. A -78.7% loss requires a 369.7% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
A blend of Halliburton (HAL) for oilfield services and Quanta Services (PWR) for power line infrastructure.
Essentially, Halliburton (HAL) meets Quanta Services (PWR), offering both oilfield and electrical infrastructure services.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) provides a range of services and products primarily to the energy industry, including:
- Pressure Pumping Services: Provides hydraulic fracturing services to enhance oil and natural gas well production.
- Infrastructure Services: Specializes in the construction, repair, and maintenance of electrical infrastructure, including emergency storm restoration.
- Natural Sand Proppant: Mines, processes, and sells frac sand, a key material used in hydraulic fracturing.
- Well Completion Services: Offers specialized coiled tubing and flowback services to optimize oil and gas well performance.
- Cementing Services: Provides cementing solutions crucial for the construction and integrity of oil and gas wells.
- Logistics Services: Delivers transportation and hauling solutions for crude oil, frac sand, and heavy equipment.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Mammoth Energy Services (symbol: TUSK) primarily sells its services and products to other companies (Business-to-Business or B2B). The company's SEC filings, including its latest 10-K, indicate a diverse customer base and do not disclose specific major customers by name that individually account for 10% or more of its consolidated revenues.
Based on its operating segments and typical industry practices, Mammoth Energy Services serves the following major categories of business customers:
- Oil & Gas Exploration and Production (E&P) Companies: These customers utilize Mammoth's pressure pumping, proppant (sand), drilling & completion fluids, and well testing services for the exploration, extraction, and production of oil and natural gas.
- Utility and Telecommunications Providers: For its infrastructure services segment, Mammoth provides specialized construction and maintenance services, such as power line construction and storm restoration, and telecom infrastructure development to these companies.
- Governmental Entities and Other Private Industry Clients: Mammoth's infrastructure services also cater to various governmental bodies (e.g., for public works projects) and other private sector clients for specialized construction and maintenance projects.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
Phil Lancaster, Chief Executive Officer
Phil Lancaster assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2025. He brings over 20 years of experience in the energy industry. Prior to his current role, he served as Mammoth's Vice President of Corporate Development. His past positions include interim President of Mammoth's infrastructure subsidiaries (Cobra Acquisitions LLC, Higher Power Electrical LLC, and 5 Star Electric LLC) from June 2019 to November 2019, President of Mammoth Energy Partners LP from 2014 to 2015, Chief Executive Officer of Redback Energy Services LLC from 2011 to 2015, and Chief Executive Officer of Great White Energy Services, Inc. from 2006 to 2010. Mr. Lancaster also acted as a consultant to Wexford Capital LP, a private equity firm, from 2010 to 2011, focusing on energy-related investments. He has also served on the boards of directors for public companies Bronco Drilling Company, Inc. and Gulfport Energy Corporation.
Mark Layton, Chief Financial Officer
Mark Layton became Chief Financial Officer of Mammoth Energy Services in August 2014. He is a seasoned finance professional with extensive experience in leadership roles within the energy sector and is a Certified Public Accountant. Before joining Mammoth, Mr. Layton served as Chief Financial Officer of Stingray Pressure Pumping LLC from January 2014 to August 2014. His previous experience also includes serving as Director of Finance for North America at Archer Well Company Inc. from August 2011 to January 2014, and as Corporate Controller and Director of Financial Reporting at Great White Energy Services, Inc. from September 2009 to August 2011. He was also Vice President of Finance of Crossroads Wireless, Inc. from May 2007 through September 2009 and Director of Financial Reporting for Chickasaw Holding Company from April 2004 through May 2007. He began his career in public accounting.
Bernard Lancaster, Chief Operating Officer
Bernard Lancaster was appointed Chief Operating Officer and Principal Executive Officer effective July 1, 2025. He has accumulated over 11 years of experience working with various Mammoth subsidiaries. Mr. Lancaster previously held the position of Vice President of Operations for Mammoth. From June 2019 to December 2024, he served as Operations Manager for Stingray Energy Services LLC, while also assisting with projects for Mammoth subsidiaries Lion Power Services LLC and Higher Power Electrical LLC. Additionally, he was Vice President of Redback Energy Services LLC from August 2013 to July 2014 and again from August 2015 to May 2019.
Paul Jacobi, Chief Business Officer
Paul Jacobi was named Chief Business Officer effective July 1, 2025. He has been a director of Mammoth Energy Services since June 2020. Since 1996, Mr. Jacobi has held various positions at Wexford Capital, where he currently serves as a managing director overseeing Wexford's private equity energy investments. Wexford Capital LP is a significant shareholder, beneficially owning approximately 46% of Mammoth's outstanding common stock. Prior to Wexford Capital, he worked as an analyst at Moody's Investors Services from 1995 to 1996 and as a senior financial analyst in the investment banking group at Kidder Peabody & Co. from 1993 to 1995.
Arthur Amron, Chairman of the Board
Arthur Amron serves as the Chairman of Mammoth's Board of Directors.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Key Business Risks for Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK)
- Persistent Net Losses and Profitability Challenges: Mammoth Energy Services has consistently faced unprofitability, with widening annual losses over the past five years and no significant improvement in net profit margins. This trend indicates fundamental challenges with operational stability and future earnings growth, severely impacting the company's financial performance and long-term viability.
- Revenue Decline and Operational Challenges in Key Business Segments: The company has experienced a significant decline in revenue, particularly in its Sand segment and overall well completion services. This is attributed to factors such as weak natural gas drilling activity and outdated equipment, which hinder market share and competitiveness and affect the company's long-term growth prospects.
- High Stock Volatility and Negative Market Sentiment: Mammoth Energy Services' stock is characterized by high volatility, experiencing significant daily average price fluctuations. The market sentiment for TUSK is generally negative, marked by sell signals from moving averages and negative insider sentiment, leading to analyst downgrades due to underperformance and a lack of substantial growth in key business areas.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) operates across several key segments in the energy and infrastructure sectors. The estimated addressable markets for its main products and services, primarily in the U.S. and North America, are detailed below:
- Infrastructure Services (Electrical Transmission & Distribution): This segment includes power line construction, maintenance, storm restoration, and substation construction. The U.S. electric power transmission and distribution market was valued at approximately USD 89.9 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 110.4 billion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.7% from 2025 to 2032. Another source indicates the U.S. electricity transmission and distribution market was valued at USD 82.96 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 2.95% through 2030. The global Electric Power (Transmission & Distribution) Infrastructure Market was valued at USD 330.29 billion in 2023 and is predicted to reach USD 431.72 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 3.90% from 2024 to 2030. The U.S. transmission lines market alone was valued at USD 958.1 million in 2024 and is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 3.1% from 2025 to 2034, projected to surpass USD 1.2 billion by 2034.
- Oilfield Services (Pressure Pumping / Hydraulic Fracturing): Mammoth Energy Services provides well completion services including pressure pumping and hydraulic fracturing. While Mammoth Energy Services sold its hydraulic fracturing equipment business in June 2025, they previously offered these services. The global hydraulic fracturing and services market was valued at USD 110.73 billion in 2024 and is predicted to reach USD 261.10 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 10% during the forecast period. The U.S. alone contributes to 85% of global hydraulic fracturing and service activities. Separately, the global pressure pumping market was estimated at USD 89.39 billion in 2024 and is predicted to increase to approximately USD 173.34 billion by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of 6.85%. North America held the largest market share in the pressure pumping market in 2024.
- Natural Sand Proppant Services: This segment involves mining, processing, and selling natural sand proppant used in hydraulic fracturing. The proppants segment within hydraulic fracturing had a market value of US$ 9.05 billion in 2015, and resin-coated sand is expected to be a market leader. However, a specific market size for "natural sand proppant" or "frac sand" for the U.S. or North America from the provided search results is not available. Therefore, the addressable market size for natural sand proppant services is currently null.
- Drilling Services (Directional Drilling): Mammoth offers directional drilling services. While directional drilling is a significant part of the oilfield services market, a specific addressable market size for directional drilling services in the U.S. or globally was not found in the provided search results. Therefore, the addressable market size for drilling services (directional drilling) is currently null.
- Rental Services (Equipment Rental for Oilfield, Construction, Aviation): Mammoth's rental services segment provides a wide range of equipment. A specific addressable market size for the combined equipment rental for oilfield, construction, and aviation activities in the U.S. or globally was not found. Therefore, the addressable market size for rental services is currently null.
- Accommodation Services: This segment provides housing, kitchen, dining, and recreational facilities for workers in remote areas. A specific addressable market size for remote workforce accommodation or oil and gas field accommodation services in the U.S. or globally was not found in the provided search results. Therefore, the addressable market size for accommodation services is currently null.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ: TUSK) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several key areas, stemming from its ongoing business transformation and strategic focus:
- Expansion and Increased Utilization of Rental Services, particularly Aviation: Mammoth Energy has made strategic investments in aviation assets, which are now leased and are contributing incremental EBITDA. The rental services segment has demonstrated significant year-over-year revenue increases and is benefiting from favorable supply and demand dynamics within the aviation market.
- Growth in Infrastructure Services through Fiber Optic and T&D Projects: The company's infrastructure services segment, now primarily focused on engineering and fiber operations, is experiencing increasing demand. This includes fiber optic activities and transmission and distribution (T&D) projects for various utilities.
- Improved Performance and Utilization in Drilling Services: The Drilling segment has shown strong recent performance, with revenue more than tripling sequentially in Q3 2025 and gross margin reaching a historical high. This growth is attributed to enhanced utilization and increased activity within the segment.
- Recovery and Increased Demand in Natural Sand Proppant Services: Despite past challenges and divestitures, Mammoth Energy anticipates improved results in its Sand segment, with expectations to return to a positive gross margin in 2026. The company foresees incremental demand driving better performance in this segment in 2025.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- In April 2025, Mammoth Energy Services authorized a new stock buyback program to repurchase up to $50 million or 10 million shares of common stock by March 31, 2026.
Share Issuance
- As of October 30, 2024, there were 48,127,369 shares of common stock outstanding.
- As of August 6, 2025, there were 48,194,035 shares of common stock outstanding.
- The 2024 Equity Incentive Plan, approved June 12, 2024, reserves a maximum of 2.1 million shares for issuance, with 1.9 million shares remaining available for future grants as of June 30, 2024.
Inbound Investments
- As of October 30, 2024, Mammoth received approximately $168.4 million of the $188.4 million owed through a Settlement Agreement with the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA).
- The first installment payment from PREPA, totaling $150.0 million, was received, which influenced the increase in the 2024 capital expenditure estimate.
Outbound Investments
- In April 2025, Mammoth sold its infrastructure subsidiaries (5 Star Electric, Higher Power Electrical, and Python Equipment) for $108.7 million, with immediate cash proceeds of $98.3 million.
- Mammoth sold its pressure pumping equipment for $15 million in October 2025.
- Mammoth has invested $25 million in its aviation portfolio so far in 2025, with much of its remaining $15 million capital expenditure budget expected to be growth capex for this segment and equipment rental business.
Capital Expenditures
- For the full year 2024, total capital expenditures were $17.065 million, following $19.395 million in 2023.
- Mammoth increased its 2024 capital expenditure budget to approximately $23.0 million, from a previously planned $12.0 million, primarily allocating $10.0 million for well completions, $12.0 million for infrastructure, and $1.0 million for other businesses.
- Capital expenditures in Q3 2025 totaled $17.3 million, primarily focused on aviation fleet expansion. Looking ahead, the company plans to invest in additional crews and engineering services for its Infrastructure Services segment and upgrade pressure pumping equipment in its Well Completion Services division to more efficient dual-fuel Tier 4 technology.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| Mammoth Energy Services Earnings Notes | ||
| How Low Can Mammoth Energy Services Stock Really Go? | Return |
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to TUSK. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11212025 | CNM | Core & Main | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 17.7% | 17.7% | -1.6% |
| 11212025 | VRRM | Verra Mobility | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 4.4% | 4.4% | -1.2% |
| 11212025 | LII | Lennox International | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 6.3% | 6.3% | 0.0% |
| 11212025 | ADP | Automatic Data Processing | Monopoly | MY | Getting CheaperMonopoly-Like with P/S DeclineLarge cap with monopoly-like margins or cash flow generation and getting cheaper based on P/S multiple | 2.2% | 2.2% | -1.2% |
| 11212025 | CW | Curtiss-Wright | Quality | Q | Momentum | UpsideQuality Stocks with Momentum and UpsideBuying quality stocks with strong momentum but still having room to run | 6.3% | 6.3% | -0.4% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Mammoth Energy Services
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 84.77 |
| Mkt Cap | 7.6 |
| Rev LTM | 2,817 |
| Op Inc LTM | 549 |
| FCF LTM | 515 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 515 |
| CFO LTM | 609 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 597 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 0.6% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 2.3% |
| Rev Chg Q | 2.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 0.6% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 14.4% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 6.1% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.5% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 15.2% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 15.1% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 10.8% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 11.2% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $1.84 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.1 | |
| First Trading Date | 10/14/2016 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -46.3% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $1.99 | $2.34 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -7.4% | -21.3% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 63.8% | 64.5% |
| Downside Capture | 132.59 | 118.44 |
| Upside Capture | -14.80 | 60.24 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 21.4% | 26.5% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.83 | 1.43 | 1.27 | 1.42 | 0.87 | 0.96 |
| Up Beta | 0.43 | 1.03 | 1.24 | 1.68 | 0.79 | 1.00 |
| Down Beta | 3.77 | 2.19 | 2.07 | 1.56 | 0.87 | 0.92 |
| Up Capture | 60% | 24% | 5% | 44% | 41% | 30% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 13 | 26 | 39 | 74 | 142 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 8 | 14 | 22 | 48 | 101 | 330 |
| Down Capture | 251% | 186% | 159% | 187% | 118% | 106% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 12 | 24 | 37 | 68 | 136 | 388 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of TUSK With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -35.0% | 20.4% | 18.8% | 72.9% | 9.0% | 3.7% | -11.4% |
| Annualized Volatility | 64.2% | 18.8% | 19.5% | 19.2% | 15.3% | 17.2% | 35.0% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.43 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 2.72 | 0.36 | 0.05 | -0.14 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 23.6% | 26.6% | -5.2% | 8.6% | 24.2% | 30.7% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLI, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of TUSK With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -13.7% | 13.8% | 14.8% | 18.9% | 11.8% | 4.7% | 35.5% |
| Annualized Volatility | 74.6% | 17.2% | 17.1% | 15.5% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.9% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.13 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.98 | 0.51 | 0.16 | 0.62 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 25.7% | 22.6% | 6.6% | 21.6% | 21.8% | 11.6% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLI, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of TUSK With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -19.2% | 13.5% | 14.8% | 15.1% | 6.8% | 5.4% | 69.1% |
| Annualized Volatility | 87.6% | 19.9% | 18.0% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.14 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.90 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 23.2% | 20.5% | 3.9% | 22.1% | 16.0% | 5.4% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLI, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 10/31/2025 | -4.2% | -5.2% | -17.1% |
| 8/8/2025 | -4.5% | -6.5% | -4.1% |
| 3/7/2025 | -8.4% | -1.4% | -6.0% |
| 11/1/2024 | -16.5% | -13.9% | -22.0% |
| 8/9/2024 | 3.8% | 4.3% | -3.0% |
| 3/1/2024 | 2.7% | -1.4% | 1.4% |
| 11/9/2023 | -1.0% | 9.4% | 14.3% |
| 8/11/2023 | -1.5% | -19.6% | -11.7% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| # Negative | 13 | 13 | 12 |
| Median Positive | 3.8% | 12.5% | 18.4% |
| Median Negative | -8.4% | -9.5% | -16.7% |
| Max Positive | 21.8% | 50.6% | 101.3% |
| Max Negative | -16.5% | -33.9% | -34.7% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 9302025 | 11032025 | 10-Q 9/30/2025 |
| 6302025 | 8082025 | 10-Q 6/30/2025 |
| 3312025 | 5072025 | 10-Q 3/31/2025 |
| 12312024 | 3072025 | 10-K 12/31/2024 |
| 9302024 | 11012024 | 10-Q 9/30/2024 |
| 6302024 | 8092024 | 10-Q 6/30/2024 |
| 3312024 | 5022024 | 10-Q 3/31/2024 |
| 12312023 | 3012024 | 10-K 12/31/2023 |
| 9302023 | 11092023 | 10-Q 9/30/2023 |
| 6302023 | 8112023 | 10-Q 6/30/2023 |
| 3312023 | 5012023 | 10-Q 3/31/2023 |
| 12312022 | 2242023 | 10-K 12/31/2022 |
| 9302022 | 10282022 | 10-Q 9/30/2022 |
| 6302022 | 8022022 | 10-Q 6/30/2022 |
| 3312022 | 5102022 | 10-Q 3/31/2022 |
| 12312021 | 3042022 | 10-K 12/31/2021 |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.