Solid Power (SLDP)
Market Price (6/18/2026): $2.73 | Market Cap: $593.2 MilSector: Consumer Discretionary | Industry: Automotive Parts & Equipment
Solid Power (SLDP)
Market Price (6/18/2026): $2.73Market Cap: $593.2 MilSector: Consumer DiscretionaryIndustry: Automotive Parts & Equipment
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -42% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Battery Technology & Metals. Themes include Advanced Battery Components. | Weak multi-year price returns3Y Excs Rtn is -48% Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 11% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -103 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -693% Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 39x Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -23%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -59% Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 66% Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -442%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -509% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -20% High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 115% Key risksSLDP key risks include [1] a significant cash burn rate with an extended path to profitability, Show more. |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -42% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Battery Technology & Metals. Themes include Advanced Battery Components. |
| Weak multi-year price returns3Y Excs Rtn is -48% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 11% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -103 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -693% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 39x |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -23%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -59% |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 66% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -442%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -509% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -20% |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 115% |
| Key risksSLDP key risks include [1] a significant cash burn rate with an extended path to profitability, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Solid Power (SLDP) stock has lost about 25% since 2/28/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Revenue Miss in Fiscal Q1 2026. Solid Power (SLDP) reported its fiscal Q1 2026 results on May 5, 2026, with revenue of $3.07 million, falling short of analyst expectations which ranged from $3.33 million to $5 million. This represented a substantial year-over-year decline of approximately 49% from $6.0 million in fiscal Q1 2025, primarily attributed to lower milestone and collaboration revenue. While the company did beat earnings per share estimates with a narrower net loss of $0.06 per share (surpassing forecasts by 54% to 57%), the significant revenue miss underscored the slower-than-anticipated progress in commercialization for the development-stage company.
2. Extended Commercialization Timelines and Persistent R&D Spending. Management commentary during and after the fiscal Q1 2026 earnings release indicated that commercial revenue generation might extend beyond earlier projections. Furthermore, elevated research and development (R&D) spending is expected to persist into the second half of fiscal 2026. These statements reinforced Solid Power's profile as a pre-revenue company with inherent execution risks and a prolonged path to profitability, which can deter investors seeking nearer-term financial returns.
Show more
Solid Power (SLDP) stock has lost about 25% since 2/28/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Revenue Miss in Fiscal Q1 2026. Solid Power (SLDP) reported its fiscal Q1 2026 results on May 5, 2026, with revenue of $3.07 million, falling short of analyst expectations which ranged from $3.33 million to $5 million. This represented a substantial year-over-year decline of approximately 49% from $6.0 million in fiscal Q1 2025, primarily attributed to lower milestone and collaboration revenue. While the company did beat earnings per share estimates with a narrower net loss of $0.06 per share (surpassing forecasts by 54% to 57%), the significant revenue miss underscored the slower-than-anticipated progress in commercialization for the development-stage company.
2. Extended Commercialization Timelines and Persistent R&D Spending. Management commentary during and after the fiscal Q1 2026 earnings release indicated that commercial revenue generation might extend beyond earlier projections. Furthermore, elevated research and development (R&D) spending is expected to persist into the second half of fiscal 2026. These statements reinforced Solid Power's profile as a pre-revenue company with inherent execution risks and a prolonged path to profitability, which can deter investors seeking nearer-term financial returns.
3. Share Dilution from Recent Capital Raise. In January 2026, Solid Power completed a registered direct offering, generating $130 million in gross proceeds and $121.3 million in net proceeds. While this offering significantly strengthened the company's liquidity, reaching $435.3 million as of March 31, 2026, it also resulted in the issuance of new shares, leading to dilution for existing shareholders. The market often reacts negatively to such dilution, especially for companies still in their development phase.
4. Broader "Risk-Off" Market Sentiment. During the period, there was a general "risk-off" macro backdrop in the market, characterized by factors such as rising oil prices, elevated bond yields, and overall market weakness. This environment tended to pressure speculative small-cap technology stocks, including those in the electric vehicle (EV) battery sector like Solid Power. This broader market caution likely exacerbated the downward pressure on SLDP shares, amplifying the impact of company-specific news.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -23.7% change in SLDP stock from 2/28/2026 to 6/17/2026 was primarily driven by a -16.9% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 2282026 | 6172026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.54 | 2.70 | -23.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 18 | 15 | -16.9% |
| P/S Multiple | 38.6 | 39.4 | 2.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 196 | 217 | -10.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -23.7% |
Market Drivers
2/28/2026 to 6/17/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| SLDP | -23.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 8.3% | 58.4% |
| Sector (XLY) | -1.0% | 45.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -48.1% change in SLDP stock from 11/30/2025 to 6/17/2026 was primarily driven by a -24.8% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 11302025 | 6172026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 5.20 | 2.70 | -48.1% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 20 | 15 | -24.8% |
| P/S Multiple | 47.9 | 39.4 | -17.7% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 182 | 217 | -16.1% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -48.1% |
Market Drivers
11/30/2025 to 6/17/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| SLDP | -48.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 9.0% | 50.0% |
| Sector (XLY) | -1.9% | 36.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 73.1% change in SLDP stock from 5/31/2025 to 6/17/2026 was primarily driven by a 168.8% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 5312025 | 6172026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 1.56 | 2.70 | 73.1% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 19 | 15 | -22.9% |
| P/S Multiple | 14.7 | 39.4 | 168.8% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 181 | 217 | -16.5% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 73.1% |
Market Drivers
5/31/2025 to 6/17/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| SLDP | 73.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 27.2% | 33.6% |
| Sector (XLY) | 8.9% | 30.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 23.3% change in SLDP stock from 5/31/2023 to 6/17/2026 was primarily driven by a 36.1% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 5312023 | 6172026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.19 | 2.70 | 23.3% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 13 | 15 | 11.3% |
| P/S Multiple | 28.9 | 39.4 | 36.1% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 177 | 217 | -18.6% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 23.3% |
Market Drivers
5/31/2023 to 6/17/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| SLDP | 23.3% | |
| Market (SPY) | 84.3% | 29.8% |
| Sector (XLY) | 56.1% | 30.4% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| SLDP Return | -13% | -71% | -43% | 30% | 125% | -36% | -73% |
| Peers Return | -8% | -58% | -12% | -4% | 53% | -9% | -54% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 10% | 100% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| SLDP Win Rate | 38% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 43% | 35% | 47% | 30% | 50% | 37% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| SLDP Max Drawdown | - | -78% | -67% | -54% | -58% | -55% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -77% | -76% | -65% | -74% | -60% | -52% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: QS, SES, ENVX, AMPX, MVST.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 6/17/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | SLDP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -36.1% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 56.4% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 46 days | 79 days |
| 2024 Yen Carry Trade Unwind | ||
| % Loss | -28.1% | -7.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 39.1% | 8.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 141 days | 18 days |
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -49.8% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 99.2% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 611 days | 24 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -44.1% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 79.0% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 794 days | 31 days |
In The Past
Solid Power's stock fell -36.1% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 56.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | SLDP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -36.1% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 56.4% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 46 days | 79 days |
| 2024 Yen Carry Trade Unwind | ||
| % Loss | -28.1% | -7.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 39.1% | 8.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 141 days | 18 days |
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -49.8% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 99.2% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 611 days | 24 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -44.1% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 79.0% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 794 days | 31 days |
In The Past
Solid Power's stock fell -36.1% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 56.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Solid Power (SLDP)
Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) is a technology company focused on innovating the next generation of battery solutions. The company specializes in the research, development, and commercialization of all-solid-state battery cells. Its primary mission is to advance battery technology beyond current standards, particularly through the use of advanced materials.
The core products offered by Solid Power include proprietary all-solid-state battery cells and the solid electrolyte materials critical to their function. Unlike conventional lithium-ion batteries that rely on liquid electrolytes, solid-state batteries utilize a solid material, which is engineered to offer potential advantages in terms of energy density, safety, and cycle life. These advanced materials are foundational to the performance of their battery cells.
Solid Power primarily targets the expanding battery-powered electric vehicle (EV) market. The company aims to provide foundational battery technology that can enable automotive manufacturers to produce EVs with improved performance characteristics, such as increased range, faster charging capabilities, and enhanced safety features. Its developments are crucial for supporting the global transition to electric transportation.
```AI Analysis | Feedback
Solid Power (SLDP) can be described as:
- Qualcomm for EV batteries: Developing critical, next-generation battery technology (solid-state cells) that electric vehicle manufacturers will integrate into their cars.
- Corning for EV battery materials: Specializing in advanced material science to create crucial, improved components (solid electrolytes) for the electric vehicle battery market.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- All-Solid-State Battery Cells: Advanced battery cells that utilize solid electrodes and solid electrolytes for improved performance and safety, primarily for electric vehicles.
- Solid Electrolyte Materials: Key components developed for use within all-solid-state battery cells, crucial for their functionality and performance.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Solid Power (SLDP) sells primarily to other companies, specifically automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and battery manufacturers. Its major customers and strategic partners include:
- BMW Group (FWB: BMW)
- Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F)
- SK On Co., Ltd.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
John Van Scoter, Chief Executive Officer, President and Class I Director
Mr. Van Scoter has served as Solid Power's Chief Executive Officer, President, and a Class I Director since June 2023. Prior to joining Solid Power, he was Vice President, General Manager Products at SRI International Inc. from 2019 to June 2023. From 2010 to 2018, Mr. Van Scoter served as the CEO, President, and Chairman of eSolar, Inc., an early-stage solar power plant technology company. He held multiple leadership positions over nearly 30 years at Texas Instruments Incorporated, including Senior Vice President of Alternative Energy Strategy and Senior Vice President, General Manager of DLP® Products Division, where he was responsible for starting multiple technology businesses and established the DLP® division as a high growth and profit center. He also served as Executive Chairman at Princeton Identity, an SRI spin-out.
Linda Heller, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary
Ms. Heller has served as Solid Power's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since June 2024 and Secretary since May 2025. Before Solid Power, she was Chief Financial Officer of Swell Energy, Inc., a distributed solar energy resource and deployment platform company, from May 2021 until June 2024, where she played a critical role in the company's debt and equity capital financings and successful acquisition and integration of Renu Energy Systems. Ms. Heller served as Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of Deca Technologies, Inc., a wafer technology company, from September 2017 to March 2020. She was also Chief Financial Officer of eSolar, Inc. from 2013 to 2017, and Senior Vice President, Finance and CFO of Power-One, Inc., a formerly publicly traded company, from 2008 to 2010.
Josh Buettner-Garrett, Chief Technology Officer
Mr. Buettner-Garrett has served as Solid Power's Chief Technology Officer since November 2013. Prior to joining Solid Power, he was Program Manager of the Energy Storage Group at ADA Technologies, Inc., a research and product development business, from 2011 to 2013, and a Senior Research Scientist in the same group from 2010 to 2011.
Ramelle Gilliland, EVP of Strategic Supply Chain Management
Ms. Gilliland serves as the Executive Vice President of Strategic Supply Chain Management, a role critical for Solid Power's focus on electrolyte production and supply chain partnerships.
Berislav Blizanac, Executive Vice President, Cell Technologies
Mr. Blizanac is the Executive Vice President of Cell Technologies and oversees the company's battery cell development.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Key Risks to Solid Power (SLDP)
- Commercialization and Scalability Challenges: Solid Power is a pre-commercial company, and its business success hinges on the uncertain development and commercialization of its sulfide-based solid electrolytes and cell technology. There are significant technical hurdles in developing electrolytes capable of high-volume production with acceptable performance and costs, and the unpredictability of battery technology development could delay or prevent revenue generation. The path from pilot production to commercial-scale manufacturing requires substantial capital expenditure, and meaningful commercial revenue from selling electrolytes is not expected until 2027/2028 at the earliest. The company has faced performance issues during cell development and still needs to overcome technological challenges for complete refinement before progressing to commercial production.
- Intense Competition and Market Adoption Risks: The battery industry is highly competitive, with numerous players, including established companies and other solid-state battery developers like QuantumScape, Toyota, and Samsung SDI, vying for market share. Solid Power's business model relies on the successful integration of its technology by partners, such as Ford and BMW, and widespread market adoption. However, agreements with partners are often non-exclusive, posing a risk that partners may pursue other technologies or that delays in technology acceptance could adversely impact the company's prospects. The lack of a fully commercial market for sulfide-based solid electrolytes also presents a risk, as does the potential inability to compete effectively if such a market emerges.
- Financial Risks and Capital Requirements: As an R&D stage company, Solid Power has a history of accumulated deficits, ongoing financial losses, and significant operating expenses. The company requires continuous funding to sustain its research, development, and scaling efforts. While Solid Power has maintained a strong liquidity position, it is burning through cash, and further capital raises or financing may be required before mass commercialization, potentially leading to shareholder dilution. The transition from a research-focused entity to a commercially viable company is critical for long-term financial stability.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The development by Toyota of its own solid-state battery technology, with claimed breakthroughs in durability and manufacturing processes, alongside an aggressive commercialization timeline by 2027-2028, poses a clear emerging threat to Solid Power. As a major automotive original equipment manufacturer (OEM) with substantial R&D resources and manufacturing capabilities, Toyota's success in rapidly bringing a competitive or superior solid-state battery to market could significantly reduce the addressable market and partnership opportunities for Solid Power and other independent solid-state battery developers.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) focuses on developing and commercializing all-solid-state battery cells and solid electrolyte materials for the battery-powered electric vehicle (EV) market. The addressable markets for their main products and services are global.
All-Solid-State Battery Cells for Electric Vehicles
The global market for solid-state batteries for electric vehicles was valued at approximately $1.4 billion in 2025. This market is projected to reach an estimated $27.8 billion by 2034, demonstrating a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 36.7% from 2026 to 2034. Other estimates also indicate substantial growth, with the global solid-state battery market projected to reach $17.78 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 34.3% from 2024 to 2031. More specifically for electric vehicles, the solid-state car battery market was estimated at $259.8 million in 2023 and is projected to reach $6,889.2 million (approximately $6.9 billion) by 2030, with a CAGR of 54.0% from 2024 to 2030. The adoption rate of solid-state batteries in EVs is projected to account for up to 30% of the EV battery market by 2030.
Solid Electrolyte Materials
The global solid electrolyte market, which includes materials central to solid-state battery design, was valued at $407.6 million in 2025. This market is projected to grow significantly, reaching an estimated $5,396.38 million (approximately $5.4 billion) by 2034, with a CAGR of 33.25% during the forecast period of 2026-2034. Another projection indicates the global solid electrolyte material market is anticipated to be worth $1,356.6 million in 2026 and is expected to reach $4,747.54 million (approximately $4.7 billion) by 2035 at a CAGR of 15.1%.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) anticipates future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years to be driven by several key factors as it progresses toward commercialization of its solid-state battery technology.
- Increased Sales of Sulfide-Based Solid Electrolyte Materials: Solid Power's core commercialization strategy involves manufacturing and selling its proprietary sulfide-based solid electrolyte to Tier 1 battery manufacturers and automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs). The company's revenue growth is directly tied to expanding the sales volume of this material.
- Expansion and Execution of Strategic Partnerships and Licensing Agreements: Revenue generation is expected from deepening existing collaborations and forming new ones. Solid Power has an ongoing line installation agreement with SK On, which has been a primary driver of past revenue. Additionally, a Joint Evaluation Agreement with Samsung SDI and BMW for advancing all-solid-state battery development, including the demonstration of Solid Power's technology in a BMW i7 test vehicle, indicates a path for future revenue through technology validation and potential licensing of its cell designs and manufacturing processes.
- Scaling Up Electrolyte Production Capacity: A significant driver of future revenue will be the expansion of Solid Power's production capabilities for its solid electrolyte. The company plans to commission a continuous electrolyte production pilot line by the end of 2026, aiming to increase its annual production capacity to up to 75 metric tons. Efforts are also underway to explore potential partnerships for commercial-scale electrolyte production in Korea, with a target of up to 500 metric tons annually, which would enable substantial revenue growth through increased supply to the market.
- Advancement and Commercialization of All-Solid-State Battery (ASSB) Technology: While current revenue streams are focused on electrolyte sales and development work with partners, the ultimate long-term driver for Solid Power is the successful commercialization of its all-solid-state battery technology. Ongoing efforts to enhance electrolyte performance, refine process engineering, and tailor the electrolyte to customer specifications are critical steps towards this goal, which would unlock significant revenue potential from a broader adoption of its ASSB technology in the electric vehicle market.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Repurchases
- Solid Power's Board authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $50 million in January 2024, expected to conclude by December 31, 2025.
- In 2025, the company reported repurchases of common stock totaling $3.592 million.
Share Issuance
- In January 2026, Solid Power completed a registered direct offering that raised approximately $130 million through the issuance of common stock and warrants to a single institutional investor.
- The company generated net proceeds of $88.8 million in 2025 from an at-the-market (ATM) offering program.
Inbound Investments
- Solid Power received a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) grant of up to $50 million, which is linked to a new continuous electrolyte line.
- The company has engaged in joint evaluation agreements and partnerships with companies such as Samsung SDI, BMW, and SK On to advance solid-state battery development and electrolyte sampling efforts.
Capital Expenditures
- Capital expenditures for 2025 amounted to $10.2 million, primarily allocated to the planned construction of Solid Power's continuous electrolyte production pilot line.
- For 2026, Solid Power anticipates a cash investment, which encompasses operating cash burn and capital expenditures, ranging from $85 million to $100 million.
- The continuous electrolyte production pilot line, a key focus of capital expenditures, is expected to be commissioned by the end of 2026, aiming to increase annual electrolyte production capacity to up to 75 metric tons.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| Solid Power Earnings Notes | 12/16/2025 | |
| Why You Shouldn Not Be Buying Solid Power Stock | 11/06/2025 | |
| With Solid Power Stock Sliding, Have You Assessed The Risk? | 10/17/2025 | |
| Day 5 of Gains Streak for Solid Power Stock with 82% Return (vs. 233% YTD) [10/7/2025] | 10/08/2025 | |
| Solid Power (SLDP) Debt Comparison | 08/09/2025 | |
| Solid Power (SLDP) Net Income Comparison | 08/09/2025 | |
| Solid Power (SLDP) Tax Expense Comparison | 08/09/2025 | |
| Solid Power (SLDP) EBITDA Comparison | 08/09/2025 | |
| Solid Power (SLDP) Operating Cash Flow Comparison | 08/09/2025 | |
| ARTICLES | ||
| How Does Solid Power Stock Compare With Peers? | 11/06/2025 | |
| Solid Power Stock To $6? | 11/06/2025 | |
| 5-Day Rally Sends Solid Power Stock Up 82% | 10/07/2025 | |
| Market Movers | Winners: GDRX, DAY, OPEN | Losers: SLDP, KODK, CRK | 08/19/2025 | |
| Market Movers | Winners: WULF, OPEN, SLDP | Losers: EVEX, COHR, TPR | 08/15/2025 |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 4.70 |
| Mkt Cap | 1.0 |
| Rev LTM | 28 |
| Op Inc LTM | -90 |
| FCF LTM | -67 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -76 |
| CFO LTM | -61 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | -63 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 49.9% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 50.8% |
| Rev Chg Q | 15.8% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 4.4% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 5.9% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | -5.5% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -352.3% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -374.3% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 9.5% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | -252.4% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | -259.6% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | -262.8% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -342.3% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $2.70 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.6 | |
| First Trading Date | 05/18/2021 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -68.3% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $3.17 | $4.25 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -14.7% | -36.5% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 69.6% | 115.8% |
| Downside Capture | 448.75 | 393.53 |
| Upside Capture | 224.78 | 332.55 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 56.9% | 33.4% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.96 | 3.05 | 2.39 | 2.47 | 3.14 | 1.81 |
| Up Beta | -2.53 | 2.41 | 2.39 | 2.17 | 1.58 | 1.47 |
| Down Beta | 0.98 | 0.05 | 0.90 | 1.62 | 3.75 | 1.17 |
| Up Capture | 294% | 255% | 242% | 243% | 1256% | 2514% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 13 | 28 | 36 | 67 | 141 | 432 |
| Stock +ve Days | 11 | 20 | 27 | 54 | 117 | 335 |
| Down Capture | 827% | 647% | 298% | 263% | 199% | 113% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 13 | 27 | 57 | 109 | 318 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 19 | 33 | 66 | 122 | 377 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with SLDP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLDP | 51.8% | 115.5% | 0.86 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLY) | 8.8% | 18.5% | 0.32 | 30.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 24.5% | 12.4% | 1.48 | 33.0% |
| Gold (GLD) | 24.7% | 27.5% | 0.79 | 17.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 22.7% | 18.9% | 0.95 | 2.1% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 10.6% | 13.8% | 0.49 | 8.3% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -38.7% | 42.4% | -1.04 | 28.6% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with SLDP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLDP | -25.0% | 86.9% | 0.05 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLY) | 6.9% | 23.8% | 0.25 | 34.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 13.4% | 17.1% | 0.61 | 31.4% |
| Gold (GLD) | 16.9% | 18.3% | 0.75 | 10.0% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 7.5% | 19.4% | 0.29 | 9.1% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 1.9% | 18.9% | 0.00 | 25.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 12.3% | 54.2% | 0.42 | 20.9% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with SLDP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLDP | -12.2% | 86.7% | 0.08 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLY) | 12.4% | 22.1% | 0.52 | 34.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.2% | 18.0% | 0.72 | 31.4% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.4% | 16.1% | 0.63 | 10.0% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 5.9% | 18.0% | 0.26 | 9.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.3% | 20.7% | 0.22 | 25.2% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 60.4% | 66.8% | 1.00 | 20.7% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Updated 6/8/2026| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 5/5/2026 | -4.7% | -14.5% | -5.4% |
| 2/24/2026 | 4.0% | -5.4% | -13.0% |
| 11/4/2025 | 51.6% | 26.4% | -7.9% |
| 8/6/2025 | 30.6% | 40.5% | 22.2% |
| 5/6/2025 | 6.2% | 26.5% | 25.7% |
| 2/27/2025 | 0.8% | -5.7% | -11.5% |
| 11/7/2024 | -1.7% | -10.2% | -0.8% |
| 8/6/2024 | -19.2% | -9.1% | -20.5% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 10 | 9 | 5 |
| # Negative | 8 | 9 | 13 |
| Median Positive | 6.5% | 11.2% | 13.2% |
| Median Negative | -4.1% | -10.2% | -7.9% |
| Max Positive | 51.6% | 40.5% | 25.7% |
| Max Negative | -19.2% | -14.5% | -50.3% |
| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 5/5/2026 | -4.7% | -14.5% | -5.4% |
| 2/24/2026 | 4.0% | -5.4% | -13.0% |
| 11/4/2025 | 51.6% | 26.4% | -7.9% |
| 8/6/2025 | 30.6% | 40.5% | 22.2% |
| 5/6/2025 | 6.2% | 26.5% | 25.7% |
| 2/27/2025 | 0.8% | -5.7% | -11.5% |
| 11/7/2024 | -1.7% | -10.2% | -0.8% |
| 8/6/2024 | -19.2% | -9.1% | -20.5% |
| 5/7/2024 | -2.8% | 11.2% | -6.1% |
| 2/27/2024 | -3.5% | -13.9% | 11.0% |
| 11/7/2023 | 6.2% | 9.7% | -3.4% |
| 8/8/2023 | 6.8% | -8.4% | -15.3% |
| 5/8/2023 | -7.2% | -13.0% | 9.9% |
| 2/28/2023 | -13.3% | -13.9% | -14.8% |
| 11/8/2022 | -3.0% | 2.3% | -50.3% |
| 8/9/2022 | 12.1% | 7.3% | -6.6% |
| 5/10/2022 | 5.8% | 35.2% | 13.2% |
| 3/22/2022 | 8.9% | 9.2% | -3.4% |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 10 | 9 | 5 |
| # Negative | 8 | 9 | 13 |
| Median Positive | 6.5% | 11.2% | 13.2% |
| Median Negative | -4.1% | -10.2% | -7.9% |
| Max Positive | 51.6% | 40.5% | 25.7% |
| Max Negative | -19.2% | -14.5% | -50.3% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/06/2026 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2025 | 02/25/2026 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/05/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/07/2025 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/07/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 02/28/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/08/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/07/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/08/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 02/28/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/08/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/09/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/10/2023 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/01/2023 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/09/2022 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/10/2022 | 10-Q |
| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 05/06/2026 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2025 | 02/25/2026 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/05/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/07/2025 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/07/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 02/28/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/08/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/07/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/08/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 02/28/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/08/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/09/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/10/2023 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/01/2023 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/09/2022 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/10/2022 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2022 | 05/11/2022 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2021 | 03/23/2022 | 10-K |
| 06/30/2021 | 11/10/2021 | 424B3 |
Insider Activity
Updated 5/21/2026| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roe, Lesa B | Direct | Sell | 5212026 | 2.66 | 39,207 | 104,291 | 648,974 | Form | |
| 2 | Anderson, Erik J | WestRiver Management, LLC | Sell | 12082025 | 5.20 | 30,000 | 156,072 | 819,987 | Form | |
| 3 | Roe, Lesa B | Direct | Sell | 5302025 | 1.69 | 29,000 | 49,010 | 403,993 | Form | |
| 4 | Goldberg, Steven H | Direct | Sell | 5282025 | 1.62 | 82,365 | 133,481 | 192,540 | Form |
| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roe, Lesa B | Direct | Sell | 5212026 | 2.66 | 39,207 | 104,291 | 648,974 | Form | |
| 2 | Anderson, Erik J | WestRiver Management, LLC | Sell | 12082025 | 5.20 | 30,000 | 156,072 | 819,987 | Form | |
| 3 | Roe, Lesa B | Direct | Sell | 5302025 | 1.69 | 29,000 | 49,010 | 403,993 | Form | |
| 4 | Goldberg, Steven H | Direct | Sell | 5282025 | 1.62 | 82,365 | 133,481 | 192,540 | Form |
Industry Resources
| Consumer Discretionary Resources |
| Retail Dive |
| Business of Fashion (BoF) |
| WWD (Women's Wear Daily) |
| National Retail Federation (NRF) |
| McKinsey & Company - Consumer |
| Mintel Consumer Trends |
| Automotive Parts & Equipment Resources |
| AftermarketNews |
| Tire Review |
| Motor Age |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.