Procter & Gamble Stock Capital Return Hits $99 Bil
In the last five years, Procter & Gamble (PG) stock has returned a notable $99 Bil back to its shareholders through cold, hard cash via dividends and buybacks. Let’s look at some numbers and compare how this payout power stacks up against the market’s biggest capital-return machines.
As it turns out, PG stock has returned the 11th highest amount to shareholders in history.
| PG | S&P Median | |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends | $54 Bil | $3.0 Bil |
| Share Repurchase | $44 Bil | $3.0 Bil |
| Total Returned | $99 Bil | $6.0 Bil |
| Total Returned as % of Current Market Cap | 29.3% | 18.8% |
Why should you care? Because dividends and share repurchases represent direct, tangible returns of capital to shareholders. They also signal management’s confidence in the company’s financial health and ability to generate sustainable cash flows. And there are more stocks like that. Here is a list of the top 10 companies ranked by total capital returned to shareholders via dividends and stock repurchases.
Top 10 Stocks By Total Shareholder Return
- Pay Less, Gain More: PG Tops Estee Lauder Companies Stock
- Pay Less, Gain More: PG Tops Estee Lauder Companies Stock
- Why PG Could Outperform Estee Lauder Companies Stock
- Buy or Sell Procter & Gamble Stock?
- Better Value & Growth: PG Leads Estee Lauder Companies Stock
- Ten-Year Tally: Procter & Gamble Stock Delivers $71 Bil Gain
| Total Money Returned | As % Of Current Market Cap | via Dividends | via Share Repurchases | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | $604 Bil | 16.2% | $89 Bil | $515 Bil |
| GOOGL | $328 Bil | 9.3% | $17 Bil | $310 Bil |
| MSFT | $265 Bil | 9.6% | $121 Bil | $144 Bil |
| JPM | $197 Bil | 24.3% | $84 Bil | $113 Bil |
| XOM | $167 Bil | 24.1% | $94 Bil | $73 Bil |
| META | $165 Bil | 11.0% | $10 Bil | $155 Bil |
| BAC | $140 Bil | 39.1% | $53 Bil | $88 Bil |
| CVX | $123 Bil | 30.2% | $67 Bil | $57 Bil |
| WFC | $116 Bil | 46.6% | $27 Bil | $90 Bil |
| V | $99 Bil | 16.9% | $22 Bil | $77 Bil |
For full ranking, visit Buybacks & Dividends Ranking
What do you notice here? The total capital returned to shareholders as a % of the current market cap appears inversely proportional to growth prospects for reinvestments. Stocks like Meta (META) and Microsoft (MSFT) are growing much faster, in a more predictable way, compared to the others, but they have returned a much lower fraction of their market cap to shareholders.
That’s the flip side to high capital returns. Sure, they are attractive, but you have to ask yourself the question: Am I sacrificing growth and sound fundamentals? With that in mind, let’s look at some numbers for PG. (see Buy or Sell Procter & Gamble Stock for more details)
Procter & Gamble Fundamentals
- Revenue Growth: 1.1% LTM and 2.0% last 3-year average.
- Cash Generation: Nearly 17.4% free cash flow margin and 23.6% operating margin LTM.
- Recent Revenue Shocks: The minimum annual revenue growth in the last 3 years for PG was 0.5%.
- Valuation: Procter & Gamble stock trades at a P/E multiple of 20.4
| PG | S&P Median | |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Consumer Staples | – |
| Industry | Personal Care Products | – |
| PE Ratio | 20.4 | 23.6 |
|
|
||
| LTM* Revenue Growth | 1.1% | 6.6% |
| 3Y Average Annual Revenue Growth | 2.0% | 5.5% |
| Min Annual Revenue Growth Last 3Y | 0.5% | 0.4% |
|
|
||
| LTM* Operating Margin | 23.6% | 18.7% |
| 3Y Average Operating Margin | 23.7% | 18.2% |
| LTM* Free Cash Flow Margin | 17.4% | 14.3% |
*LTM: Last Twelve Months
The table gives a good overview of what you get from PG stock, but what about the risk?
PG Historical Risk
Procter & Gamble isn’t immune to big drops. It slid 54% in the Dot-Com crash and almost 40% in the Global Financial Crisis. The 2018 correction, Covid selloff, and recent inflation shock all triggered 23-24% dips. Solid fundamentals matter, but even steady names like PG can take a serious hit when the market turns south.
The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming its benchmark that includes all 3 – the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 indices. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.