DexCom vs UFP Technologies: Which Stock Could Rally?

DXCM: DexCom logo
DXCM
DexCom

Even as DexCom fell -15% during the past Day, its peer UFP Technologies may be a better choice. Consistently evaluating alternatives is core to sound investment approach. UFP Technologies (UFPT) stock offers superior revenue growth across key periods, better profitability, and relatively lower valuation vs DexCom (DXCM) stock, suggesting you may be better off investing in UFPT

  • UFPT’s quarterly revenue growth was 37.2%, vs. DXCM’s 15.2%.
  • In addition, its Last 12 Months revenue growth came in at 41.0%, ahead of DXCM’s 9.3%.
  • UFPT’s LTM margin is higher: 16.6% vs. DXCM’s 16.0%.

A single stock can be risky, but there is a huge value to a broader, diversified approach we take with the Trefis High Quality Portfolio. We go beyond just equities. Is a portfolio of 10% commodities, 10% gold, and 2% crypto in addition to equities and bonds likely to return more during the next 1-3 years, and protect you better if markets crash 20%? We have crunched the numbers.

DXCM designs and commercializes continuous glucose monitoring systems, including the next-generation Dexcom G7, for use in the United States and internationally. UFPT designs and manufactures custom components and products for medical devices, wound care, wearables, and multiple industries including automotive, aerospace, defense, electronics, and industrial markets.

Valuation & Performance Overview

Relevant Articles
  1. What’s Behind The 86% Surge in Wheaton Stock?
  2. Why Has Barrick Mining Stock Surged 154%?
  3. What Could Send Pfizer Stock Soaring
  4. What Can Trigger Intel Stock’s Slide?
  5. Cash Machine Trading Cheap – Iridium Communications Stock Set to Run?
  6. 3M Stock vs. Honeywell Stock: Which Is A Better Investment?

  DXCM UFPT Preferred
     
Valuation      
P/EBIT Ratio 33.2 15.2 UFPT
     
Revenue Growth      
Last Quarter 15.2% 37.2% UFPT
Last 12 Months 9.3% 41.0% UFPT
Last 3 Year Average 17.3% 30.2% UFPT
     
Operating Margins      
Last 12 Months 16.0% 16.6% UFPT
Last 3 Year Average 15.8% 15.6% DXCM
     
Momentum      
Last 3 Year Return -51.8% 105.3% UFPT

Note: For “Last 3 Year Return” metric, preferred stock is one with higher returns unless the returns are too high (>300%) which creates risk of sell off.
See more revenue details: DXCM Revenue Comparison | UFPT Revenue Comparison
See more margin details: DXCM Operating Income Comparison | UFPT Operating Income Comparison
 
But do these numbers tell the full story? Read Buy or Sell UFPT Stock to see if UFP Technologies’s edge holds up under the hood or if DexCom still has cards to play (see Buy or Sell DXCM Stock).

Historical Market Performance

  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total [1] Avg Best
Returns
DXCM Return 69% 45% -16% 10% -37% -12% 29%  
UFPT Return -6% 51% 68% 46% 42% -24% 305% <===
S&P 500 Return 16% 27% -19% 24% 23% 16% 110%  
Monthly Win Rates [3]
DXCM Win Rate 67% 67% 42% 50% 33% 56%   52%  
UFPT Win Rate 50% 83% 67% 67% 58% 44%   62%  
S&P 500 Win Rate 58% 75% 42% 67% 75% 67%   64% <===
Max Drawdowns [4]
DXCM Max Drawdown -13% -12% -49% -33% -48% -23%   -30%  
UFPT Max Drawdown -37% -3% -18% -10% -10% -24%   -17%  
S&P 500 Max Drawdown -31% -1% -25% -1% -2% -15%   -12% <===

[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] 2025 data is for the year up to 10/31/2025 (YTD)
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year

 
No matter how good the numbers, stock investment is never a smooth ride. There is a risk you must factor in. Read UFPT Dip Buyer Analyses and DXCM Dip Buyer Analyses to see how these stocks have fallen and recovered in the past.

The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming its benchmark that includes all 3 — the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 indices. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.