WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK)
Market Price (8/10/2026): $26.16 | Market Cap: $-Sector: Energy | Industry: Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK)
Market Price (8/10/2026): $26.16Market Cap: $-Sector: EnergyIndustry: Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 26% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Battery Technology & Metals, and Advanced Materials. Themes include Rare Earth Elements, Advanced Battery Components, Show more. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -45%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -72% | Key risksWHK key risks include [1] a total reliance on the drilling and development decisions of third-party operators and [2] a high concentration of its assets within the Appalachian and Haynesville basins. |
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 26% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Battery Technology & Metals, and Advanced Materials. Themes include Rare Earth Elements, Advanced Battery Components, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -45%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -72% |
| Key risksWHK key risks include [1] a total reliance on the drilling and development decisions of third-party operators and [2] a high concentration of its assets within the Appalachian and Haynesville basins. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK) stock has remained largely at the same level since it went public on 6/9/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Recent IPO and Lack of Post-IPO Financial Results.
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK) only commenced trading on the NYSE on June 9, 2026, following its upsized initial public offering (IPO) priced at $26.00 per share. As of August 1, 2026, the company has not yet released its first quarterly financial results since going public, with its Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call scheduled for August 13, 2026. The absence of new company-specific financial performance data, such as earnings beats or misses, has limited significant price catalysts, keeping investor sentiment in a "wait and see" mode for verifiable post-IPO performance.
2. Initial Market Reception and Analyst Sentiment.
The stock's debut on June 9, 2026, saw it open and close flat at its IPO price of $26.00, indicating a stable but not exceptionally enthusiastic initial market reception. While analysts have subsequently issued "Strong Buy" ratings, with average 12-month price targets ranging from $31.40 to $32.00 (representing a potential upside of approximately 21-23% from current levels), these targets project future growth rather than reflecting immediate market-moving events. The stock's performance has largely remained close to its initial offering price, fluctuating between a 52-week low of $25.49 on June 9, 2026, and a 52-week high of $28.60 on July 1, 2026.
Show more
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK) stock has remained largely at the same level since it went public on 6/9/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Recent IPO and Lack of Post-IPO Financial Results.
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK) only commenced trading on the NYSE on June 9, 2026, following its upsized initial public offering (IPO) priced at $26.00 per share. As of August 1, 2026, the company has not yet released its first quarterly financial results since going public, with its Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call scheduled for August 13, 2026. The absence of new company-specific financial performance data, such as earnings beats or misses, has limited significant price catalysts, keeping investor sentiment in a "wait and see" mode for verifiable post-IPO performance.
2. Initial Market Reception and Analyst Sentiment.
The stock's debut on June 9, 2026, saw it open and close flat at its IPO price of $26.00, indicating a stable but not exceptionally enthusiastic initial market reception. While analysts have subsequently issued "Strong Buy" ratings, with average 12-month price targets ranging from $31.40 to $32.00 (representing a potential upside of approximately 21-23% from current levels), these targets project future growth rather than reflecting immediate market-moving events. The stock's performance has largely remained close to its initial offering price, fluctuating between a 52-week low of $25.49 on June 9, 2026, and a 52-week high of $28.60 on July 1, 2026.
3. Absence of Significant Company-Specific Operational News.
Since its IPO, WhiteHawk Minerals, which focuses on acquiring and managing natural gas mineral and royalty interests in U.S. basins, particularly the Appalachian and Haynesville Basins, has not announced any major company-specific operational developments, such as new significant acquisitions or divestitures, that would typically drive substantial stock movement. The company's business model, centered on royalty interests, generally entails less operational volatility compared to direct exploration and production activities, contributing to a more subdued stock performance in its initial post-IPO period.
4. Stable Natural Gas Market Conditions.
The period since WhiteHawk Minerals' IPO has seen relatively stable, rather than exceptionally dynamic, conditions in the natural gas market, which directly impacts the company's royalty interests. While the broader mining industry experienced some geopolitical impacts and commodity price volatility in Q1 2026, and gold prices saw a significant year-over-year increase in Q2 2026, the specific natural gas sector, in which WhiteHawk operates, did not present strong enough positive or negative catalysts to significantly deviate the stock price from its IPO level. This stable market backdrop, without major surges or downturns in natural gas demand or pricing, has likely contributed to the stock's steady performance.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
4/30/2026 to 8/9/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| WHK | ||
| Market (SPY) | 7.6% | 10.2% |
| Sector (XLE) | -3.6% | 23.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 8/9/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| WHK | ||
| Market (SPY) | 12.1% | 10.2% |
| Sector (XLE) | 13.4% | 23.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
7/31/2025 to 8/9/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| WHK | ||
| Market (SPY) | 23.4% | 10.2% |
| Sector (XLE) | 35.0% | 23.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
7/31/2023 to 8/9/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| WHK | ||
| Market (SPY) | 74.9% | 10.2% |
| Sector (XLE) | 43.7% | 23.7% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| WHK Return | - | - | - | - | - | -1% | -1% |
| Peers Return | 73% | 91% | -15% | 90% | -19% | 17% | 407% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 13% | 105% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| WHK Win Rate | - | - | - | - | - | 33% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 50% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 25% | 50% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| WHK Max Drawdown | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -23% | -45% | -26% | -35% | -27% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: VNOM, TPL.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 8/7/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
WHK has limited trading history. Below is the Energy sector ETF (XLE) in its place.
| Event | XLE | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -16.3% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 19.4% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 169 days | 79 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -14.5% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 16.9% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 145 days | 31 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -56.3% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 128.7% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 352 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -29.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 42.6% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1117 days | 105 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -24.3% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 32.0% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 98 days | 62 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -45.4% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 83.0% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2233 days | 15 days |
In The Past
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -16.3% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 19.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
WHK has limited trading history. Below is the Energy sector ETF (XLE) in its place.
| Event | XLE | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -56.3% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 128.7% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 352 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -29.9% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 42.6% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1117 days | 105 days |
| 2015-2016 China Devaluation / Global Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -24.3% | -12.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 32.0% | 13.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 98 days | 62 days |
| 2014-2016 Oil Price Collapse | ||
| % Loss | -45.4% | -6.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 83.0% | 7.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 2233 days | 15 days |
| 2011 US Debt Ceiling Crisis & European Contagion | ||
| % Loss | -28.8% | -17.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 40.5% | 21.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 484 days | 123 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -52.0% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 108.4% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 717 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -16.3% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 19.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK)
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK) operates as a premier natural gas mineral and royalty business in the United States. The company's core business involves the disciplined acquisition, active management, and ownership of high-quality mineral and royalty interests, primarily concentrated in the Marcellus and Haynesville Shales. Unlike traditional energy producers, WhiteHawk does not engage in drilling or incur significant capital expenditures. Instead, it generates revenue by receiving royalty payments from natural gas produced by third-party operators on its vast acreage, resulting in a high-margin business model designed to deliver substantial cash flow and total returns to its investors.
WhiteHawk owns the largest publicly traded natural gas mineral portfolio in the U.S., encompassing approximately 3.4 million gross DSU acres. Its assets represent an economic interest in roughly 13% of all U.S. natural gas production and are actively developed by leading operators such as EQT and Expand Energy. The company is strategically positioned to benefit from two major natural gas demand catalysts: the significant increase in electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-computing infrastructure, and the expansion of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity. The Haynesville Basin's proximity to Gulf Coast LNG facilities is particularly advantageous for the latter.
The company is led by an experienced management team with a strong track record of accretive acquisitions and value creation in the minerals and royalties sector. WhiteHawk continues to pursue a focused consolidation strategy within the fragmented market, aiming to expand its scale and enhance returns. For investors, WHK offers direct equity exposure to the powerful tailwinds of growing natural gas demand from AI and LNG exports, providing a resilient base for predictable cash flow growth without the capital expenditure risks associated with drilling operations.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Analogy 1: A REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) focused on natural gas mineral and royalty interests.
Analogy 2: The "landlord" of the most productive natural gas basins in the U.S., collecting royalties without the drilling costs.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Natural Gas Mineral and Royalty Interest Portfolio Management: WhiteHawk Minerals acquires, owns, and actively manages a portfolio of high-quality natural gas mineral and royalty interests, generating cash flow from third-party production without incurring drilling-related capital expenditures.
AI Analysis | Feedback
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK) sells primarily to other companies, specifically natural gas operators who develop the mineral interests owned by WhiteHawk and pay royalties. Based on the provided description, WhiteHawk's major customers (operators) include:
- EQT (NYSE: EQT)
- Range Resources (NYSE: RRC)
- CNX Resources (NYSE: CNX)
- Antero Resources (NYSE: AR)
- Expand Energy (NASDAQ: EXE)
- Comstock Resources (NYSE: CRK)
- Aethon Energy
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Daniel Herz, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman
Daniel Herz is the Founder, President, and Chief Executive Officer of WhiteHawk Minerals. He previously served as the Founder, President, and CEO of Falcon Minerals Corporation (NASDAQ: FLMN) from 2018-2021. Prior to that, he held senior leadership roles at Atlas Energy Group (NASDAQ: ATLS), serving as President from 2015-2018, and as CEO of Titan Energy, LLC (NYSE: TTEN) and its predecessor Atlas Resource Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ARP) from 2015-2018. He was also involved in the sale of Atlas Energy to Targa Resources for $7.7 billion in 2015 and the sale of Atlas Energy and Atlas Energy Resources to Chevron Corporation for $4.3 billion in 2011.
Jeffrey Slotterback, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary, and Director
Jeffrey Slotterback has served in prior CFO roles at Titan Energy and several Atlas entities. He brings a strong background in public accounting and energy finance to WhiteHawk Minerals.
Michael Downs, Chief Operating Officer
Michael Downs previously served as the Chief Operating Officer of Falcon Minerals. He also has prior executive experience with Atlas companies and is a partner at PhiCap Advisors.
Matthew Heinlein, Vice President, Head of Corporate Development & Strategy
Matthew Heinlein possesses an investment background from his time at Blackstone and Jefferies. He was responsible for leading M&A and strategy at Falcon Minerals.
Stephen Pilatzke, Chief Accounting Officer
Stephen Pilatzke previously held the position of Chief Accounting Officer for Volta, Inc (NYSE: VLTA) from 2022 to 2023, until its sale to Shell USA, Inc. He also served as Chief Accounting Officer of Falcon Minerals Corporation (NASDAQ: FLMN) from 2018 to 2022, until its sale to Sitio Royalties Corp. Additionally, he was Chief Accounting Officer for Lightfoot Capital Partners GP, LLC and Arc Logistics Partners GP, LLC (NYSE: ARCX) until its sale to Zenith Energy U.S., LP. He is a Certified Public Accountant.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to WhiteHawk Minerals' business include:
- Exposure to Natural Gas Price Volatility: WhiteHawk Minerals' revenue and cash flow are directly tied to the market prices of natural gas. While the company highlights strong demand catalysts from AI-driven electricity and LNG exports, natural gas prices are subject to significant volatility due to factors such as supply and demand imbalances, weather conditions, geopolitical events, and economic shifts. A sustained downturn in natural gas prices would negatively impact the value of its royalty interests, cash distributions, and overall financial performance.
- Reliance on Third-Party Operators' Drilling and Development Activity: WhiteHawk Minerals is a mineral and royalty owner and does not operate wells or conduct drilling activities itself. Its production, reserves, and cash flow are entirely dependent on the capital allocation decisions, drilling plans, and operational success of the independent third-party operators (such as EQT, Expand Energy, Range Resources, etc.) on whose acreage WhiteHawk holds royalty interests. Any reduction in these operators' drilling programs, shifts in their focus away from WhiteHawk's acreage, or their financial distress could directly and materially impact WhiteHawk's future production and revenue streams.
- Concentration of Assets in the Appalachian and Haynesville Basins: WhiteHawk's mineral interests are primarily concentrated in the Appalachian and Haynesville Basins. While these basins are described as highly productive and low-cost, this geographic concentration exposes the company to specific regional risks. These could include adverse regulatory changes within these states, localized infrastructure bottlenecks, environmental restrictions unique to these areas, or other operational challenges that could disproportionately affect its asset base and business performance.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK) operates within the natural gas sector, with its primary addressable markets defined by natural gas production in key U.S. basins and the broader demand for natural gas.
- Appalachian Basin Natural Gas Production: The Appalachian Basin, a core region for WhiteHawk Minerals, has a daily natural gas production of approximately 33 Bcf/d (billion cubic feet per day). This market size is for the U.S. region.
- Haynesville Basin Natural Gas Production: The Haynesville Basin, another key operational area for WhiteHawk Minerals, has a daily natural gas production of approximately 13 Bcf/d. This market size is for the U.S. region.
- U.S. Natural Gas Market Share: Together, the Appalachian and Haynesville Basins accounted for more than 50% of total U.S. dry gas production in 2025. This indicates a significant portion of the overall U.S. natural gas production market.
- AI-Driven Electricity Demand Growth for Natural Gas: An estimated additional natural gas demand of 7.8 Bcf/d is projected by 2031, associated with new power plants for artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-computing infrastructure. This increased demand is expected largely within WhiteHawk’s Appalachian Basin footprint. This market growth is for the U.S. region.
- U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Export Capacity: The U.S. LNG export capacity is projected to nearly double from approximately 17 Bcf/d in 2025 to approximately 34 Bcf/d by 2031. This represents a significant and growing addressable market at both a U.S. national and global export level.
AI Analysis | Feedback
WhiteHawk Minerals (WHK) is expected to drive future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years through several key factors:
- Accretive Acquisitions: WhiteHawk is actively pursuing a consolidation strategy in the fragmented minerals and royalties market, targeting accretive acquisitions to expand its scale, enhance returns, and extend development visibility. The company has a proven track record of completing large acquisitions, making it the most active acquirer of natural gas mineral and royalty properties in the United States.
- Increased Natural Gas Demand from AI-Driven Electricity Generation: The rapid buildout of AI and cloud-computing infrastructure is projected to create additional demand for natural gas-fired power generation. WhiteHawk anticipates approximately 7.8 Bcf/d of total natural gas demand associated with new power plants expected to be constructed by 2031, largely within its Appalachian Basin footprint.
- Expansion of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Exports: Global demand for U.S. natural gas is expected to accelerate significantly through LNG export growth. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects nearly a doubling of LNG export capacity from approximately 17 Bcf/d in 2025 to nearly 34 Bcf/d by 2031. WhiteHawk's mineral interests in the Haynesville Basin are strategically positioned due to their proximity and pipeline connectivity to the Gulf Coast LNG corridor, enabling them to benefit directly from this expansion in export capacity and feed-gas demand.
- Continuous Development by Leading Operators: WhiteHawk's mineral interests are concentrated in the core of the Appalachian and Haynesville Basins, which are developed by many of the largest, most active, and well-capitalized natural gas operators in the United States. The company benefits directly from the continuous development, scale, financial strength, and efficiency of these premier operators, ensuring a resilient base for predictable cash flow growth from new wells being drilled and completed on its royalty acreage.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Outbound Investments
- WhiteHawk has completed eight large acquisitions, establishing itself as the most active acquirer of natural gas mineral and royalty properties in the United States.
- The company pursues a focused consolidation strategy, targeting accretive acquisitions to expand scale, enhance returns, and extend development visibility.
Capital Expenditures
- As a mineral and royalty business, WhiteHawk does not pay any drilling-related capital expenditures.
- The company incurs only minimal operating expenses on its properties.
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 40.82 |
| Mkt Cap | 15.7 |
| Rev LTM | 1,467 |
| Op Inc LTM | 841 |
| FCF LTM | 137 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -96 |
| CFO LTM | 1,049 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 744 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 64.2% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 28.5% |
| Rev Chg Q | 78.9% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 14.8% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 48.2% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 18.3% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 62.2% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 68.4% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 3.5% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 70.3% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 70.9% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 9.1% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -7.7% |
Price Behavior
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.24 | 0.07 | -0.45 | 0.12 | -0.48 | -0.70 |
| Up Beta | 0.03 | 0.72 | 0.25 | -0.45 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Down Beta | 0.36 | 0.04 | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 | -0.34 |
| Up Capture | -85% | 34% | 21% | 9% | 4% | 0% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 11 | 22 | 35 | 67 | 138 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 9 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
| Down Capture | -12% | 24% | 21% | 11% | 7% | 4% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 21 | 28 | 59 | 114 | 326 |
| Stock -ve Days | 11 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with WHK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHK | 0.3% | 26.5% | 0.04 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 39.2% | 21.1% | 1.46 | 23.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 23.3% | 12.8% | 1.36 | 10.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 28.5% | 28.4% | 0.87 | -15.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 32.9% | 19.8% | 1.32 | 20.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 14.2% | 13.8% | 0.72 | -13.9% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -43.7% | 43.0% | -1.21 | -24.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with WHK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHK | 0.1% | 26.5% | 0.04 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 22.6% | 25.8% | 0.78 | 23.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 13.5% | 17.2% | 0.61 | 10.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 18.6% | 18.6% | 0.81 | -15.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.2% | 19.6% | 0.31 | 20.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 2.3% | 18.9% | 0.02 | -13.9% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 9.0% | 53.0% | 0.36 | -24.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with WHK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHK | 0.0% | 26.5% | 0.04 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 9.9% | 29.6% | 0.37 | 23.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.4% | 17.9% | 0.73 | 10.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.1% | 16.2% | 0.61 | -15.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 7.4% | 18.0% | 0.33 | 20.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 4.8% | 20.7% | 0.20 | -13.9% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 58.4% | 66.2% | 0.98 | -24.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Earnings Returns History
Updated 6/10/2026| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.