Intensity Therapeutics (INTS)
Market Price (2/16/2026): $0.23 | Market Cap: $9.9 MilSector: Health Care | Industry: Biotechnology
Intensity Therapeutics (INTS)
Market Price (2/16/2026): $0.23Market Cap: $9.9 MilSector: Health CareIndustry: Biotechnology
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -65% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -129%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -162% | Penny stockMkt Price is 0.3 |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Aging Population & Chronic Disease, and Precision Medicine. Themes include Oncology Treatments, Targeted Therapies, Show more. | Very low revenueRev LTMTotal Revenue or Sales, Last Twelve Months is 0 | |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -12 Mil | ||
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -113% | ||
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 418% | ||
| Key risksINTS key risks include [1] a critical funding shortage that has already paused a pivotal clinical trial and [2] its total dependence on the success of a single drug candidate, Show more. |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -65% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Aging Population & Chronic Disease, and Precision Medicine. Themes include Oncology Treatments, Targeted Therapies, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -129%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -162% |
| Penny stockMkt Price is 0.3 |
| Very low revenueRev LTMTotal Revenue or Sales, Last Twelve Months is 0 |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -12 Mil |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -113% |
| High stock price volatilityVol 12M is 418% |
| Key risksINTS key risks include [1] a critical funding shortage that has already paused a pivotal clinical trial and [2] its total dependence on the success of a single drug candidate, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Nasdaq Delisting Threat and Imminent Reverse Stock Split. The company faced the ongoing challenge of maintaining its listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, having received a 180-day extension on December 5, 2025, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. This persistent low stock price culminated in the announcement on February 13, 2026, of a 1-for-25 reverse stock split, effective February 18, 2026, specifically aimed at increasing its per-share trading price to meet Nasdaq's requirements. Reverse stock splits are often perceived negatively by investors, signaling underlying financial distress and lack of sustained investor confidence, which can further depress share value.
2. Clinical Trial Delays and Pauses. Investor confidence was impacted by significant setbacks and delays in Intensity Therapeutics' key clinical programs. The Phase 3 INVINCIBLE-3 study for soft tissue sarcoma remained on pause since March 2025 due to funding constraints, with plans to reinitiate enrollment contingent on securing additional capital. Furthermore, the Phase 2 INVINCIBLE-4 study for breast cancer experienced a temporary pause in new patient enrollment in September 2025, necessitated by observed localized skin irritation, leading to protocol modifications to adjust dosing volumes. These interruptions and the need for protocol amendments introduce uncertainty and extend the timeline for potential product commercialization.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -65.7% change in INTS stock from 10/31/2025 to 2/15/2026 was primarily driven by a -56.2% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 10312025 | 2152026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 0.73 | 0.25 | -65.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| P/S Multiple | ∞ | ∞ | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 19 | 43 | -56.2% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 0.0% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 2/15/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| INTS | -65.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | -0.0% | 24.2% |
| Sector (XLV) | 9.3% | -2.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -9.7% change in INTS stock from 7/31/2025 to 2/15/2026 was primarily driven by a -64.7% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 7312025 | 2152026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 0.28 | 0.25 | -9.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| P/S Multiple | ∞ | ∞ | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 15 | 43 | -64.7% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 0.0% |
Market Drivers
7/31/2025 to 2/15/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| INTS | -9.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 8.2% | -8.6% |
| Sector (XLV) | 21.4% | 1.2% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -88.7% change in INTS stock from 1/31/2025 to 2/15/2026 was primarily driven by a -67.9% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 1312025 | 2152026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.21 | 0.25 | -88.7% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| P/S Multiple | ∞ | ∞ | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 14 | 43 | -67.9% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 0.0% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2025 to 2/15/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| INTS | -88.7% | |
| Market (SPY) | 14.3% | -4.9% |
| Sector (XLV) | 8.8% | 1.2% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
1/31/2023 to 2/15/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| INTS | ||
| Market (SPY) | 74.0% | -1.8% |
| Sector (XLV) | 23.7% | 3.1% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| INTS Return | - | - | 44% | -79% | -77% | -10% | -94% |
| Peers Return | 12% | -27% | -9% | 4% | -20% | 2% | -37% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | -0% | 82% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| INTS Win Rate | - | - | 29% | 17% | 42% | 50% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 46% | 44% | 38% | 48% | 46% | 38% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| INTS Max Drawdown | - | - | -65% | -79% | -87% | -17% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -30% | -48% | -46% | -33% | -51% | -13% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | -1% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: REPL, IOVA, MRNA, EXEL.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 2/13/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
INTS has limited trading history. Below is the Health Care sector ETF (XLV) in its place.
| Event | XLV | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -16.1% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 19.1% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 599 days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -28.8% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 40.4% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 116 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -15.8% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 18.8% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 326 days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -40.6% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 68.3% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1,100 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to REPL, IOVA, MRNA, EXEL
In The Past
SPDR Select Sector Fund's stock fell -16.1% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 4/8/2022. A -16.1% loss requires a 19.1% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Intensity Therapeutics (INTS)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies for Intensity Therapeutics (INTS):
- A very early-stage Bristol Myers Squibb or Merck, aiming to discover the next breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy.
- Like a Moderna or BioNTech in its clinical trial phase, but focused on a novel platform for directly injecting cancer therapies into tumors.
- A clinical-stage Amgen or Genentech, aspiring to develop groundbreaking new treatments for cancer.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- INT2306: An investigational, intratumoral immuno-oncology drug candidate designed to destroy solid tumors and stimulate an anti-tumor immune response.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Intensity Therapeutics (INTS) is a clinical-stage oncology company focused on developing proprietary, novel, intratumoral, immune-based product candidates for the treatment of solid tumor cancers. As a clinical-stage biotechnology company, Intensity Therapeutics is primarily engaged in research and development and conducting clinical trials for its product candidates, such as INT2306.
Therefore, at its current stage, Intensity Therapeutics does not have any commercially approved products on the market, nor does it generate revenue from product sales to major customers. Consequently, the company does not have "major customers" in the traditional sense, either companies or individuals, that purchase its products or services.
If and when Intensity Therapeutics' product candidates receive regulatory approval and are commercialized, their future "customers" would primarily be:
- Healthcare providers (e.g., hospitals, oncology clinics, cancer centers, and individual oncologists) who would administer the approved drug to patients.
- Potentially, large pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies, if Intensity Therapeutics chooses to license or partner the commercialization rights for its approved drugs.
However, as of now, Intensity Therapeutics is pre-commercial and does not have major customers.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Lewis H. Bender, Chairman of the Board, President and CEO
Mr. Bender is the founder of Intensity Therapeutics and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2012. He has over 28 years of biopharmaceutical leadership experience and has guided products from discovery to approval using novel drug delivery techniques. Before founding Intensity Therapeutics, Mr. Bender was the CEO of Interleukin Genetics, a publicly traded personalized medicine company, from January 2008 to August 2012. At Interleukin, he restructured the company, significantly increased sales, developed a new genetic testing platform, and partnered with an insurance provider for product reimbursement. Prior to Interleukin Genetics, he held various positions at Emisphere Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded drug delivery company, from 1993 to December 2007, including Interim President & CEO, Chief Technology Officer, Senior Vice President of Business Development, and Vice President of Manufacturing and Process Development. During his career, Mr. Bender has successfully raised capital from institutional investors through multiple types of transactions and has partnered with major pharmaceutical and biotech companies.
Joseph Talamo, Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Talamo has served as Chief Financial Officer of Intensity Therapeutics since December 2023 and possesses over 25 years of experience in financial leadership roles within biopharmaceutical companies. Before joining Intensity Therapeutics, he was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HiberCell, Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company, from 2020 to 2023. Prior to that, Mr. Talamo held several senior positions at Caladrius Biosciences, Inc., a publicly traded clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, from 2011 to 2020, serving as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2015 to 2020. From 1996 to 2010, he also held various senior roles at OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company, including Vice President and Corporate Controller from 2006 to 2010.
John Wesolowski, Principal Accounting Officer and Controller
Mr. Wesolowski has been the Principal Accounting Officer and Controller at Intensity Therapeutics since March 2017. He also served as Interim Chief Financial Officer from June 2023. Before joining Intensity Therapeutics, Mr. Wesolowski was the Director of Costing in the Yale University Controller's office from 1998 to 2016, where he managed financial reporting, property tax, and overhead and benefit rate calculations.
Kimberly A. Guedes, Vice President of Clinical Operations
Ms. Guedes is a seasoned professional with 30 years of experience in clinical development and operations, covering pre-clinical, Phase I-IV trials, translational research, and various drug development disciplines. Her experience includes roles at Yale University School of Medicine, Keiferx, Centrexion Therapeutics, Merck Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Mitsubishi Pharmaceuticals.
Doranne Frano, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Control
Ms. Frano is a global life science regulatory, clinical, and quality professional with over 40 years of experience in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, medical devices, diagnostics, and regulatory compliance. She began her career in Clinical Research at G.D. Searle and has since moved into executive regulatory and quality roles.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Intensity Therapeutics (INTS) business are primarily centered around its financial viability, the inherent uncertainties of drug development, and a heavy reliance on its lead drug candidate.
- Financial Challenges and Need for Additional Funding: Intensity Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that has not generated any revenue from product sales and has incurred significant net losses since its inception. The company has a limited operating history and continues to experience ongoing financial losses as it invests heavily in research and development, particularly for its clinical trials. As of December 31, 2024, the company had a cash and cash equivalents balance of $2.6 million and an accumulated deficit of $66.8 million. While the company raised additional funds in 2025, its cash position appears critically insufficient given its quarterly burn rate, and it will likely require substantial additional funding to complete its ongoing Phase 3 INVINCIBLE-3 sarcoma trial and Phase 2/3 INVINCIBLE-4 triple-negative breast cancer trial. The INVINCIBLE-3 trial was temporarily paused due to funding constraints, underscoring this significant risk.
- Clinical Trial Risks and Regulatory Approvals: As with any biotechnology company, Intensity Therapeutics faces inherent uncertainties in the biotechnology sector, including the initiation, timing, progress, and results of its preclinical studies and clinical trials. The success of Intensity Therapeutics is directly tied to the ability of its lead product candidate, INT230-6, to successfully complete clinical trials and obtain the necessary regulatory approvals. Any delays, unfavorable results, or failures in these trials could significantly impact the company's future prospects and financial health. The process for regulatory filings and approvals is complex and uncertain.
- Dependence on a Single Drug Candidate (INT230-6): Intensity Therapeutics is a "pure play" clinical-stage biotech firm, with its entire future substantially riding on the success of one single oncology drug candidate, INT230-6. The company currently has no commercialized products on the market, meaning it has zero product revenues. This high concentration of its business on a single investigational product creates a significant risk, as any setback related to INT230-6, such as clinical trial failures, unexpected safety issues, or an inability to achieve regulatory approval or market acceptance, would have a severe adverse impact on the company's business, financial condition, and stock price.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The clear emerging threat for Intensity Therapeutics (INTS) stems from advanced competitors in the intratumoral immunotherapy space, particularly those utilizing oncolytic viruses. While INTS's lead product, INT230-6, employs direct intratumoral injection of chemotherapy agents with a lipid component to induce immunogenic cell death, other companies are developing different intratumoral approaches that could establish market dominance for this therapeutic modality.
An example is **Replimmune Group (REPL)** with its lead product, **RP-1**. RP-1 is an oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) designed for intratumoral injection, aiming to destroy tumor cells and induce a systemic anti-tumor immune response. RP-1 is significantly further along in clinical development than INT230-6, currently in Phase 3 trials for advanced melanoma and recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, and in Phase 2 for other solid tumors. Although the specific mechanism of action differs (oncolytic virus vs. chemotherapy agents + lipid), both therapies share the core strategy of using intratumoral injection to achieve local tumor control and systemic immune activation in solid tumors. If RP-1 (or similar advanced oncolytic virus therapies) successfully gains regulatory approval and demonstrates broad efficacy across various solid tumor types, it could become a preferred or established intratumoral treatment option, potentially limiting the market opportunity for INT230-6 or setting a high benchmark for efficacy and safety in this therapeutic area.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Intensity Therapeutics (INTS) is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing intratumoral immunotherapy products for solid tumors. Their lead product candidate, INT230-6, targets several cancer indications, with addressable market sizes identified for soft tissue sarcoma and triple-negative breast cancer.
For **soft tissue sarcoma**, the addressable market in the U.S. includes approximately 157,000 patients, with 12,000 new cases diagnosed annually and 6,000 deaths per year. Intensity Therapeutics' Phase 3 INVINCIBLE-3 study for metastatic sarcoma is actively enrolling patients across the U.S., Canada, Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain), and Australia.
For **triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)**, the U.S. market was valued at $584.3 million in 2022. Annually, approximately 287,850 new cases of invasive breast cancer are diagnosed in women in the U.S. The company is also conducting a Phase 2/3 program for TNBC, with its INVINCIBLE-4 study for presurgical TNBC expecting to enroll patients in Switzerland and France.
The broader **global intratumoral cancer therapies market**, which encompasses the types of treatments Intensity Therapeutics is developing, was valued at approximately USD 210.07 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach nearly USD 410.62 billion by 2030. Another estimate places the global market at USD 153.8 billion in 2024, growing to USD 435.6 billion by 2035. For the top seven major markets (US, EU4, UK, and Japan), the intratumoral cancer therapies market was valued at USD 457.8 billion in 2024, with a projected increase to USD 669.1 billion by 2035.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Intensity Therapeutics (INTS), a clinical-stage biotechnology company, anticipates several key drivers for its future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years, primarily stemming from the progression and potential commercialization of its lead investigational product, INT230-6. These drivers are largely dependent on successful clinical trial outcomes and securing adequate funding.
- Advancement and Commercialization of INT230-6 in Soft Tissue Sarcoma (INVINCIBLE-3 Study): The successful progression and eventual commercialization of INT230-6 through its Phase 3 INVINCIBLE-3 study for second and third-line treatment of certain soft tissue sarcoma subtypes represent a significant potential revenue driver. This study aims to enroll 333 patients across eight countries, with overall survival as the primary endpoint. While new patient enrollment and site activations were paused in March 2025 due to funding constraints, the company intends to restart enrollment, highlighting the importance of this program for future revenue.
- Advancement and Commercialization of INT230-6 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (INVINCIBLE-4 Study): The ongoing Phase 2 INVINCIBLE-4 study evaluating INT230-6 in early-stage, operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is another crucial driver. This study, which is recruiting patients in Switzerland and France and is expected to reinitiate patient enrollment in Q1 2026 after a dosing regimen amendment, could pave the way for a larger Phase 3 trial and potential market entry in a challenging cancer indication.
- Positive Clinical Data and Increased Awareness: The publication of promising clinical trial data, such as the IT-01 study results demonstrating a 75% disease control rate and extended median overall survival in advanced cancer patients, along with presentations at major medical conferences, can significantly enhance the company's visibility and attract further investment or strategic partnerships. This increased awareness of INT230-6's efficacy and unique mechanism of action could accelerate its path to market.
- Strategic Partnerships and Sufficient Funding: While not a direct revenue source, securing additional funding and establishing strategic partnerships are critical enablers for Intensity Therapeutics to complete its clinical trials and move towards commercialization. The company has actively been raising capital to extend its cash runway, recognizing that sustained operations and trial advancement depend on robust financial backing.
- Expansion of INT230-6 Applications and DfuseRx Platform Leverage: Beyond the current lead indications, INT230-6 has shown activity across over 20 different cancer types in earlier studies. Successful outcomes in the ongoing trials could allow Intensity Therapeutics to explore additional indications, broadening the market potential for INT230-6. Furthermore, the proprietary DfuseRx technology platform, which enables enhanced intratumoral delivery of cancer agents, represents a valuable asset that could lead to further drug candidates or collaborative opportunities.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Issuance
- Since the beginning of the third quarter of 2025, Intensity Therapeutics has raised $13.6 million in gross proceeds through various offerings, including At-the-Market (ATM) sales and a registered direct offering.
- In July 2025, the company generated $6.6 million in gross proceeds (net proceeds of $6.3 million) by selling 19,868,658 shares of common stock through its At-the-Market (ATM) offering at an average price of $0.3323 per share.
- In April 2025, Intensity Therapeutics completed a public offering which resulted in approximately $2.35 million in gross proceeds from the sale of 3,133,333 shares of common stock and accompanying warrants.
Inbound Investments
- On December 5, 2024, Intensity Therapeutics announced a seed funding round, raising $3.65 million.
Capital Expenditures
- Research and development expenses, which are the primary focus of capital allocation for product development, increased to $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $4.8 million in 2023.
- These expenditures were primarily directed towards advancing the INVINCIBLE-3 Study (Phase 3 trial for soft tissue sarcoma) and the INVINCIBLE-4 Study (Phase 2 study for presurgical triple-negative breast cancer).
- In the second quarter of 2025, research and development expenses decreased to $1.5 million, mainly due to the pausing of new patient enrollment in the INVINCIBLE-3 pivotal trial due to funding limitations.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| Intensity Therapeutics Earnings Notes | 12/16/2025 |
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 7.97 |
| Mkt Cap | 0.9 |
| Rev LTM | 250 |
| Op Inc LTM | -324 |
| FCF LTM | -283 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -217 |
| CFO LTM | -278 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | -212 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 7.0% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | -19.6% |
| Rev Chg Q | 5.6% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 1.4% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -157.3% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -79.9% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 2.6% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | -89.8% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | -58.7% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | -120.9% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -76.1% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 0.9 |
| P/S | 5.0 |
| P/EBIT | -2.3 |
| P/E | -2.3 |
| P/CFO | -2.6 |
| Total Yield | -42.5% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | -23.6% |
| D/E | 0.0 |
| Net D/E | -0.3 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | 1.0% |
| 3M Rtn | 4.0% |
| 6M Rtn | 14.6% |
| 12M Rtn | -43.5% |
| 3Y Rtn | -67.1% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | 4.7% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | 1.0% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | 8.5% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | -55.2% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -137.6% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $0.25 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.0 | |
| First Trading Date | 06/30/2023 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -89.4% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $0.41 | $0.37 |
| DMA Trend | down | down |
| Distance from DMA | -38.9% | -32.5% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 112.6% | 421.4% |
| Downside Capture | 364.01 | 1.64 |
| Upside Capture | 17.61 | -216.55 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 30.9% | -5.1% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.15 | 2.25 | 2.94 | -5.79 | -1.14 | 0.50 |
| Up Beta | 0.10 | -5.09 | -4.04 | -0.26 | -0.64 | 0.25 |
| Down Beta | 1.64 | 3.65 | 5.06 | -11.22 | -0.72 | 0.14 |
| Up Capture | -241% | 267% | 142% | -17% | -49% | -4% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 11 | 22 | 34 | 71 | 142 | 430 |
| Stock +ve Days | 5 | 16 | 23 | 55 | 108 | 282 |
| Down Capture | -57% | 319% | 417% | -275% | 21% | 95% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 9 | 19 | 27 | 54 | 109 | 321 |
| Stock -ve Days | 15 | 25 | 38 | 69 | 138 | 348 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with INTS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTS | -87.7% | 419.7% | 0.31 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 9.6% | 17.4% | 0.37 | 1.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 14.0% | 19.4% | 0.55 | -5.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 74.3% | 25.3% | 2.17 | 8.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 7.0% | 16.7% | 0.24 | -0.8% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 7.9% | 16.6% | 0.28 | 1.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -29.8% | 44.9% | -0.65 | -0.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with INTS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTS | -46.2% | 272.0% | 0.14 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 8.0% | 14.5% | 0.37 | 3.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 13.3% | 17.0% | 0.62 | -1.9% |
| Gold (GLD) | 22.1% | 17.0% | 1.06 | 6.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 10.5% | 18.9% | 0.44 | -0.6% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.2% | 18.8% | 0.18 | 4.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 8.3% | 57.2% | 0.37 | 0.1% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with INTS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTS | -26.6% | 272.0% | 0.14 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLV) | 11.2% | 16.5% | 0.56 | 3.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.6% | 17.9% | 0.75 | -1.9% |
| Gold (GLD) | 15.3% | 15.6% | 0.82 | 6.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.1% | 17.6% | 0.38 | -0.6% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 6.4% | 20.7% | 0.27 | 4.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 67.9% | 66.7% | 1.07 | 0.1% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 11/6/2025 | -6.2% | -1.5% | 8.7% |
| 8/7/2025 | 7.1% | 18.5% | 15.5% |
| 3/13/2025 | -0.2% | -17.0% | -18.7% |
| 11/13/2024 | 2.4% | -4.8% | -33.5% |
| 8/8/2024 | -1.7% | -6.3% | -10.8% |
| 3/14/2024 | 15.6% | 32.5% | 0.2% |
| 11/13/2023 | 1.8% | -22.8% | 197.1% |
| 8/14/2023 | -0.0% | -5.1% | -15.2% |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| # Negative | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Median Positive | 4.8% | 25.5% | 12.1% |
| Median Negative | -1.0% | -5.7% | -17.0% |
| Max Positive | 15.6% | 32.5% | 197.1% |
| Max Negative | -6.2% | -22.8% | -33.5% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2025 | 11/06/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/07/2025 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/13/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/13/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/13/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/08/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/09/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 03/14/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/13/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 06/30/2023 | 424B4 |
| 06/30/2022 | 09/20/2022 | S-1/A |
| 03/31/2022 | 05/16/2022 | S-1/A |
| 12/31/2021 | 04/20/2022 | S-1/A |
| 09/30/2021 | 11/18/2021 | S-1/A |
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.