Huckleberry.ai (HUCK)
Market Price (10/17/2026): $3.1 | Market Cap: $120.4 MilSector: Information Technology | Industry: Application Software
Huckleberry.ai (HUCK)
Market Price (10/17/2026): $3.1Market Cap: $120.4 MilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: Application Software
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 33% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Artificial Intelligence, and Autonomous Technologies. Themes include AI Software Platforms, and Machine Learning. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -43%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -87% Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 16% | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -60 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -19% Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 19% Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -3.9%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -7.0% Key risksHUCK key risks include [1] a fundamental uncertainty in its future strategy after divesting its core business, Show more. |
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 33% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Artificial Intelligence, and Autonomous Technologies. Themes include AI Software Platforms, and Machine Learning. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -43%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -87% |
| Meaningful short interestShort Interest % of Basic SharesShort Interest % of Basic Shares = (Short Interest Quantity) / (Basic Shares Outstanding). A high fraction of short interest can indicate potential risk of a short squeeze. is 16% |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -60 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -19% |
| Significant share based compensationSBC/Rev LTMShare Based Compensation / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 19% |
| Not cash flow generativeCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -3.9%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -7.0% |
| Key risksHUCK key risks include [1] a fundamental uncertainty in its future strategy after divesting its core business, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) stock has lost about 10% since it went public on 9/25/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Earnings Miss. Huckleberry.ai reported an earnings per share of -0.21 USD for the last reported fiscal quarter, significantly missing the analyst estimation of 0.00 USD, which resulted in a -12,100% surprise. This substantial earnings miss likely dampened investor confidence shortly after the company's rebranding to Huckleberry.ai in September 2026.
2. Broader AI Sector Correction and Rising Interest Rates. The period from late September to mid-October 2026 was marked by a broader negative sentiment in the technology and AI sectors. "Sharp swings in AI stocks whipsawed equity books" in September 2026. This was exacerbated by news on October 8, 2026, that OpenAI's revenue was reportedly lower than investor expectations, triggering an "AI selloff" that saw the Nasdaq Composite fall 1.25%. Concurrently, rising interest rates placed considerable pressure on growth-oriented stocks, with the 10-year Treasury yield climbing to its highest level since 2002 in September 2026.
Show more
Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) stock has lost about 10% since it went public on 9/25/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Significant Earnings Miss. Huckleberry.ai reported an earnings per share of -0.21 USD for the last reported fiscal quarter, significantly missing the analyst estimation of 0.00 USD, which resulted in a -12,100% surprise. This substantial earnings miss likely dampened investor confidence shortly after the company's rebranding to Huckleberry.ai in September 2026.
2. Broader AI Sector Correction and Rising Interest Rates. The period from late September to mid-October 2026 was marked by a broader negative sentiment in the technology and AI sectors. "Sharp swings in AI stocks whipsawed equity books" in September 2026. This was exacerbated by news on October 8, 2026, that OpenAI's revenue was reportedly lower than investor expectations, triggering an "AI selloff" that saw the Nasdaq Composite fall 1.25%. Concurrently, rising interest rates placed considerable pressure on growth-oriented stocks, with the 10-year Treasury yield climbing to its highest level since 2002 in September 2026.
3. Historical Underperformance and High Volatility. The company, formerly known as Domo, Inc., has a history of significant stock depreciation, with HUCK stock showing a -76.48% decrease over the last year and reaching an all-time low of $1.84 on June 16, 2026. This long-term trend of underperformance, coupled with the stock's high volatility (evidenced by a beta coefficient of 2.72), likely contributed to investor caution and magnified price movements following the company's rebranding and through the specified period.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
6/30/2026 to 10/16/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| HUCK | ||
| Market (SPY) | 2.2% | 39.2% |
| Sector (XLK) | -3.7% | 21.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
3/31/2026 to 10/16/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| HUCK | ||
| Market (SPY) | 17.7% | 39.2% |
| Sector (XLK) | 38.2% | 21.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
9/30/2025 to 10/16/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| HUCK | ||
| Market (SPY) | 15.5% | 39.2% |
| Sector (XLK) | 30.7% | 21.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
9/30/2023 to 10/16/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| HUCK | ||
| Market (SPY) | 84.7% | 39.2% |
| Sector (XLK) | 127.8% | 21.5% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| HUCK Return | - | - | - | - | - | -5% | -5% |
| Peers Return | -3% | -52% | 104% | 76% | 22% | 12% | 128% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 14% | 108% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| HUCK Win Rate | - | - | - | - | - | 0% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 50% | 33% | 57% | 50% | 48% | 54% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| HUCK Max Drawdown | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -41% | -58% | -27% | -34% | -39% | -41% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: PLTR, AI, SNOW, CRM, MSFT.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 10/16/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
HUCK has limited trading history. Below is the Information Technology sector ETF (XLK) in its place.
| Event | XLK | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -25.7% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 34.5% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 65 days | 79 days |
| 2024 Yen Carry Trade Unwind | ||
| % Loss | -17.0% | -7.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 20.4% | 8.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 92 days | 18 days |
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -10.0% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 11.2% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 15 days | 24 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -33.1% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 49.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 246 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -31.2% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 45.2% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 78 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -23.8% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.2% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 100 days | 105 days |
In The Past
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -25.7% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 34.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
HUCK has limited trading history. Below is the Information Technology sector ETF (XLK) in its place.
| Event | XLK | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -25.7% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 34.5% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 65 days | 79 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -33.1% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 49.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 246 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -31.2% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 45.2% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 78 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -23.8% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.2% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 100 days | 105 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -51.5% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 106.2% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 797 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -25.7% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 34.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Huckleberry.ai (HUCK)
Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) operates a cloud-based business intelligence platform designed to digitally connect various facets of an organization, from leadership to frontline staff. Its core offering provides real-time access to data and insights, enabling improved decision-making and operational management across the enterprise.
The company's platform serves as a central hub, integrating people, data, and systems within an organization. A key feature is the ability for users to manage their business directly from smartphones, offering flexibility and immediate access to critical information. Huckleberry.ai caters to a wide range of customers, targeting businesses and organizations across the United States, Japan, and other international markets.
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Like a Microsoft Power BI or Google Looker dashboard for your entire organization, providing real-time insights on your smartphone.
2. Salesforce's Tableau, but designed to connect every employee to real-time business data and insights on their smartphone.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Cloud-based Business Intelligence Platform: This platform digitally connects stakeholders from top executives to frontline employees, providing real-time data and insights to manage business operations from various devices, including smartphones.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are the key risks to Huckleberry.ai (symbol: HUCK):
- Uncertainty of Future Business Operations and Strategy: Huckleberry.ai, formerly known as Domo, Inc., has divested its core operating business, a cloud-based business intelligence platform, to Progress Software. The company is now evaluating opportunities to deploy its capital and significant net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. This fundamental change leaves Huckleberry.ai without an established core business, creating substantial uncertainty regarding its future strategic direction, revenue generation, and long-term viability.
- Risks Related to Capital Deployment and Utilization of Tax Assets: Huckleberry.ai currently holds approximately $221 million in cash and retains over $900 million in net operating loss carryforwards. The company's success heavily depends on its board's ability to identify, evaluate, and successfully execute new ventures or investments that can effectively deploy this capital and strategically utilize its NOLs. There is an inherent risk that the company may not find suitable opportunities or that any new ventures may not generate sufficient returns, potentially impacting shareholder value.
- Execution Risk for New Ventures/Investments: As Huckleberry.ai embarks on a new chapter without its previous operational infrastructure and business model, any future strategic shift towards new business areas or significant investments will carry inherent execution risks. The successful implementation of new plans, the ability to build new operational capabilities, and the competition in any chosen markets will be critical for the company's future performance.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 211.79 |
| Mkt Cap | 196.3 |
| Rev LTM | 5,795 |
| Op Inc LTM | 1,287 |
| FCF LTM | 2,276 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 1,418 |
| CFO LTM | 2,327 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 1,470 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 14.5% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 13.0% |
| Rev Chg Q | 14.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 3.4% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 16.2% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 10.9% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 1.3% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -1.5% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.0% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 29.5% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 28.9% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 21.1% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 23.5% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $3.09 | |
| First Trading Date | 06/29/2018 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -8.3% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | ||
| DMA Trend | ||
| Distance from DMA | ||
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 33.4% | 33.4% |
| Downside Capture | ||
| Upside Capture | ||
| Correlation (S&P 500) |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.32 | -0.61 | 0.87 | -1.25 | -0.89 | -0.18 |
| Up Beta | � | � | � | � | � | � |
| Down Beta | -3.50 | 3.48 | -1.74 | -1.71 | -2.13 | -0.83 |
| Up Capture | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 6 | 16 | 27 | 66 | 132 | 424 |
| Stock +ve Days | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Down Capture | 19% | 13% | 8% | 5% | 2% | 1% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 16 | 26 | 37 | 60 | 120 | 328 |
| Stock -ve Days | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with HUCK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUCK | -8.3% | 33.4% | -4.34 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 29.7% | 26.4% | 0.95 | 21.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.8% | 12.7% | 0.86 | 39.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | -1.4% | 29.4% | -0.05 | 44.2% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 50.4% | 20.7% | 1.86 | -10.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 4.8% | 13.7% | 0.09 | 38.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -25.9% | 43.6% | -0.57 | 14.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with HUCK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUCK | -1.7% | 33.4% | -4.34 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 20.2% | 26.0% | 0.69 | 21.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 13.2% | 17.1% | 0.59 | 39.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 18.4% | 18.9% | 0.79 | 44.2% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 9.6% | 19.5% | 0.37 | -10.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 1.6% | 18.8% | -0.02 | 38.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 8.8% | 51.8% | 0.35 | 14.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with HUCK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUCK | -0.9% | 33.4% | -4.34 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 23.9% | 25.0% | 0.86 | 21.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.2% | 17.9% | 0.72 | 39.2% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.3% | 16.4% | 0.61 | 44.2% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.1% | 18.1% | 0.36 | -10.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.2% | 20.7% | 0.21 | 38.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 63.2% | 66.2% | 1.03 | 14.8% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2024 | 12/10/2024 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2024 | 09/06/2024 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2024 | 06/07/2024 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2024 | 03/28/2024 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2023 | 12/08/2023 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2023 | 09/05/2023 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2023 | 06/09/2023 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2023 | 03/27/2023 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2022 | 12/09/2022 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2022 | 09/08/2022 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2022 | 06/08/2022 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2022 | 03/23/2022 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2021 | 12/10/2021 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2021 | 09/09/2021 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2021 | 06/09/2021 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2021 | 04/01/2021 | 10-K |
| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2024 | 12/10/2024 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2024 | 09/06/2024 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2024 | 06/07/2024 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2024 | 03/28/2024 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2023 | 12/08/2023 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2023 | 09/05/2023 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2023 | 06/09/2023 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2023 | 03/27/2023 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2022 | 12/09/2022 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2022 | 09/08/2022 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2022 | 06/08/2022 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2022 | 03/23/2022 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2021 | 12/10/2021 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2021 | 09/09/2021 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2021 | 06/09/2021 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2021 | 04/01/2021 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2020 | 12/10/2020 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2020 | 09/09/2020 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2020 | 06/09/2020 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2020 | 04/13/2020 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2019 | 12/12/2019 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2019 | 09/12/2019 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2019 | 06/13/2019 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2019 | 04/15/2019 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2018 | 12/13/2018 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2018 | 09/13/2018 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2018 | 06/29/2018 | 424B4 |
Insider Activity
Updated 10/6/2026| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jolley, David R | Direct | Sell | 10062026 | 3.20 | 12,845 | 41,063 | 860,310 | Form | |
| 2 | Thayne, Daren | CTO & EVP of Product | Direct | Sell | 6242026 | 2.38 | 52,365 | 124,503 | 1,184,166 | Form |
| 3 | Crane, Tod | Chief Financial Officer | Direct | Sell | 6242026 | 2.38 | 68,483 | 162,825 | 658,141 | Form |
| 4 | James, Joshua G | Founder and CEO | Direct | Sell | 6242026 | 2.38 | 96,088 | 228,459 | 3,896,584 | Form |
| 5 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 4.46 | 39,034 | 174,092 | 18,677,628 | Form |
| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jolley, David R | Direct | Sell | 10062026 | 3.20 | 12,845 | 41,063 | 860,310 | Form | |
| 2 | Thayne, Daren | CTO & EVP of Product | Direct | Sell | 6242026 | 2.38 | 52,365 | 124,503 | 1,184,166 | Form |
| 3 | Crane, Tod | Chief Financial Officer | Direct | Sell | 6242026 | 2.38 | 68,483 | 162,825 | 658,141 | Form |
| 4 | James, Joshua G | Founder and CEO | Direct | Sell | 6242026 | 2.38 | 96,088 | 228,459 | 3,896,584 | Form |
| 5 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 4.46 | 39,034 | 174,092 | 18,677,628 | Form | |
| 6 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 4.12 | 38,583 | 158,962 | 17,414,593 | Form | |
| 7 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 3.84 | 23,869 | 91,657 | 16,379,236 | Form | |
| 8 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 3.71 | 27,439 | 101,799 | 15,913,284 | Form | |
| 9 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 3.68 | 15,828 | 58,247 | 15,885,581 | Form | |
| 10 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 3.65 | 11,837 | 43,205 | 15,813,851 | Form | |
| 11 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 3.56 | 20,870 | 74,297 | 15,466,060 | Form | |
| 12 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 3.79 | 32,955 | 124,899 | 16,544,370 | Form | |
| 13 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 3.66 | 16,628 | 60,858 | 16,097,500 | Form | |
| 14 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 3.49 | 22,683 | 79,164 | 15,407,833 | Form | |
| 15 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Sell | 6032026 | 2.56 | 1,100,900 | Form | |||
| 16 | Rpd, Fund Management Llc | See footnotes | Buy | 6032026 | 2.57 | 924,709 | 2,376,502 | 11,404,465 | Form | |
| 17 | Daniel, Daniel David Iii | Twenty Acre Capital managed accounts | Sell | 10082025 | 15.26 | 273,900 | Form |
Industry Resources
| Information Technology Resources |
| TechCrunch |
| Wired |
| CIO |
| MIT Technology Review |
| Gartner Insights |
| Ars Technica |
| Application Software Resources |
| Capterra |
| Software Advice |
| InfoWorld |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.