ZS Looks Stronger Than PANW With 61% Return Potential

PANW: Palo Alto Networks logo
PANW
Palo Alto Networks

We Forecast Higher Stock Return For Zscaler vs. Its Competitor Palo Alto Networks
 
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is trading at a cheaper P/S valuation vs Zscaler (ZS) but it makes sense to pay more for Zscaler for higher return.
 

  PANW ZS
Market Cap 121.7 44.6
LTM Revenue 8.9 2.5
Current P/S 13.7 17.5
Current P/EBIT 91.9 -3,902.3
Stock Return Forecast (3Y) 43.9% 61.0%

P/S = Price to Sales | P/EBIT = Price to earnings before interest and taxes | Current = as of date: 7/31/2025 | LTM = Last 12 months
 
PANW provides global cybersecurity solutions, including firewall appliances, security management, and subscription services for threat prevention, malware protection, URL filtering, and device security. ZS provides cloud-based security solutions for secure user, device, and workload access to applications, including Internet Access and workload segmentation to detect and fix SaaS misconfigurations.

Running growth and valuation scenarios based on historical trends is one way to assess stocks. Trefis High Quality Portfolio evaluates much more, and is designed to reduce stock-specific risk while giving upside exposure
 
3-Year Return Depends On [1] Revenue Growth [2] P/S
 

  PANW ZS
LTM Revenue 8.9 2.5
x Annual Revenue Growth 15.0% 19.6%
= Revenue Forecast (3Y) 13.5 4.4
x PS Forecast 13.0 16.5
= Market Cap Forecast (3Y) 175.1 71.8
Market Cap Today 121.7 44.6
Stock Return Forecast (3Y) 43.9% 61.0%

P/S = Price to Sales | P/EBIT = Price to earnings before interest and taxes | Current = as of date: 7/31/2025 | LTM = Last 12 months
 
How Much Can Revenue Grow In Next 3 Years
 
We forecast annual revenue growth of 15.0% for PANW and 19.6% for ZS
 
Past revenue growth metrics that form basis of our expectation
 

Relevant Articles
  1. Nutanix Stock To $33?
  2. Texas Pacific Land Stock Drop Looks Sharp, But How Deep Can It Go?
  3. Advanced Micro Devices Stock Drop Looks Sharp, But How Deep Can It Go?
  4. Would You Still Hold Broadcom Stock If It Fell Another 30%?
  5. Would You Still Hold Modine Manufacturing Stock If It Fell Another 30%?
  6. Why Is Lyft Stock Down 16%?

  PANW ZS
Recent Quarter Growth 15.3% 22.6%
LTM Growth 13.9% 25.5%
3Y Avg Growth (LTM) 19.8% 38.4%
Annual Growth Forecast 15.0% 19.6%

PANW Revenue Comparison | ZS Revenue Comparison
Recent Quarter Growth = Last quarter (yoy) growth | LTM = Last 12 months
 
Forecast methodology involves:
(a) Different weights to short-term (quarterly) vs long-term (LTM, 3Y Avg) growth (b) Removing exceptional growth periods from consideration
(c) Applying base effect to moderate future growth (d) Applying growth caps and floors based on company size

 
Which P/S Scenarios Make Sense
 
We forecast P/S of 13.0 for PANW and 16.5 for ZS based on below plausible scenarios
 
P/S Scenarios & Corresponding 3-Year Returns (in brackets)
 

  PANW ZS
Current 13.7 (52.1%) 17.5 (71.2%)
Expansion 17.8 (97.7%) 20.5 (100.8%)
Contraction 9.7 (7.0%) 14.9 (45.6%)
Average 10.7 (18.7%) 12.9 (26.6%)
Scenario Average 13.0 (43.9%) 16.5 (61.0%)

PANW Valuation Ratios Comparison | ZS Valuation Ratios Comparison
Current = as of 7/31/2025 | Expansion/Contraction = Based on quarterly trend (+/-) | Average = Historical quarterly average
(a) Exceptional spikes excluded (b) Quarterly trend defined by quarterly average % change (c) Expansion/contraction capped at +30%/-30%

 
Are Current P/S Ratios Justified
 
A higher P/S is justified by higher margin, higher revenue growth, better margin expansion, and lower risk
 

  PANW ZS
Current P/S 13.7 17.5
Current P/EBIT 91.9 -3,902.3

   
Last Q Sequential Growth 1.4% 4.7%
Last Q YoY Growth 15.3% 22.6%
LTM Growth 13.9% 25.5%
3Y Average Growth 19.8% 38.4%

   
LTM Op Margin 11.1% -4.8%
3Y AVG Margin 7.5% -9.9%
LTM FCF Margin 33.8% 27.1%

   
Debt to Equity 0.6% 4.0%
Cash to Assets 15.0% 56.3%

 
The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the last 4-year period. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.