S&P 500 Stocks Trading At 52-Week Low

SPY: State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust logo
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

As on Thursday, November 13, 5 of the S&P 500 stocks are trading at their 52-week lows. Among these stocks, Smurfit WestRock (SW) has corrected the most in the last one month, falling by 16% over this period.
 
Stocks At 52W Lows

Below is the complete list of these S&P 500 stocks, sorted by market capitalization – highlighting some the headwinds for these stocks across industries ranging from Human Resource & Employment Services and Paper & Plastic Packaging Products & Materials to Building Products and Timber REITs:
 

Tickers Market
Cap
1D
% Chg
1W
% Chg
1M
% Chg
1Y
% Chg
PAYX $40.0 Bil -0.5% -3.7% -12.8% -22.9%
SW $18.5 Bil -1.3% -1.9% -16.2% -30.2%
LII $16.8 Bil -2.1% -2.7% -10.2% -23.7%
WY $16.2 Bil -1.3% -0.1% -6.1% -27.5%
CLX $12.9 Bil -0.3% -3.9% -11.3% -34.2%

 

What is the point? A 52-week low often reflects deep pessimism, but also potential opportunity. This price point can signal capitulation, setting the stage for mean reversion or contrarian entry. It is where risk and reward start to skew interestingly. But of course, a trade at this level requires deep conviction. Among the stocks above, we find Paychex (PAYX) attractive

Relevant Articles
  1. Why Wait For Adobe Stock To Bottom When You Can Get Paid Today?
  2. The Story Behind QuantumScape Stock’s Surge Wasn’t About Cars
  3. How Will General Mills Stock React To Its Upcoming Earnings?
  4. Better Value & Growth: UI Leads Cisco Systems Stock
  5. Tesla’s Missing 10,000: Is Optimus Falling Behind The Robotics Pack?
  6. What a Market Shock Does to Exxon Mobil Stock

Worried that these stocks could fall much more? You could take a look at the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming its benchmark that includes all 3 — the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 indices. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.