Meta Platforms Stock Capital Return Hits $184 Bil
In the last decade, Meta Platforms (META) stock has returned an impressive $184 Bil back to its shareholders through cold, hard cash via dividends and buybacks. Let’s look at some numbers and compare how this payout power stacks up against the market’s biggest capital-return machines.
As it turns out, META stock has returned the 7th highest amount to shareholders in history.
| META | S&P Median | |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends | $10 Bil | $4.6 Bil |
| Share Repurchase | $174 Bil | $5.6 Bil |
| Total Returned | $184 Bil | $9.4 Bil |
| Total Returned as % of Current Market Cap | 12.3% | 25.5% |
Why should you care? Because dividends and share repurchases represent direct, tangible returns of capital to shareholders. They also signal management’s confidence in the company’s financial health and ability to generate sustainable cash flows. And there are more stocks like that. Here is a list of the top 10 companies ranked by total capital returned to shareholders via dividends and stock repurchases.
Top 10 Stocks By Total Shareholder Return
| Total Money Returned | As % Of Current Market Cap | via Dividends | via Share Repurchases | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | $874 Bil | 23.9% | $143 Bil | $731 Bil |
| MSFT | $376 Bil | 13.3% | $172 Bil | $204 Bil |
| GOOGL | $364 Bil | 10.0% | $17 Bil | $346 Bil |
| XOM | $224 Bil | 33.1% | $148 Bil | $76 Bil |
| WFC | $214 Bil | 88.6% | $58 Bil | $156 Bil |
| JPM | $188 Bil | 24.0% | $0.0 | $188 Bil |
| META | $184 Bil | 12.3% | $10 Bil | $174 Bil |
| JNJ | $160 Bil | 28.3% | $106 Bil | $54 Bil |
| ORCL | $158 Bil | 36.9% | $35 Bil | $123 Bil |
| CVX | $157 Bil | 40.0% | $99 Bil | $58 Bil |
For full ranking, visit Buybacks & Dividends Ranking
What do you notice here? The total capital returned to shareholders as a % of the current market cap appears inversely proportional to growth prospects for reinvestments. Stocks like Meta (META) and Microsoft (MSFT) are growing much faster, in a more predictable way, compared to the others, but they have returned a much lower fraction of their market cap to shareholders.
That’s the flip side to high capital returns. Sure, they are attractive, but you have to ask yourself the question: Am I sacrificing growth and sound fundamentals? With that in mind, let’s look at some numbers for META. (see Buy or Sell Meta Platforms Stock for more details.)
Meta Platforms Fundamentals
- Revenue Growth: 22.2% LTM and 19.9% last 3-year average.
- Cash Generation: Nearly 22.9% free cash flow margin and 41.4% operating margin LTM.
- Recent Revenue Shocks: The minimum annual revenue growth in the last 3 years for META was 15.7%.
- Valuation: Meta Platforms stock trades at a P/E multiple of 24.8
| META | S&P Median | |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Communication Services | – |
| Industry | Interactive Media & Services | – |
| PE Ratio | 24.8 | 23.4 |
|
|
||
| LTM* Revenue Growth | 22.2% | 6.6% |
| 3Y Average Annual Revenue Growth | 19.9% | 5.5% |
| Min Annual Revenue Growth Last 3Y | 15.7% | 0.4% |
|
|
||
| LTM* Operating Margin | 41.4% | 18.7% |
| 3Y Average Operating Margin | 39.4% | 18.2% |
| LTM* Free Cash Flow Margin | 22.9% | 14.3% |
*LTM: Last Twelve Months
The table gives a good overview of what you get from META stock, but what about the risk?
META Historical Risk
Meta’s not immune to big drops. It fell about 43% in the 2018 correction, 35% during the Covid plunge, and took a hit of over 76% in the inflation shock. Even with strong fundamentals, when the market turns, Meta can dive hard. Solid companies don’t mean zero risk.
But the risk is not limited to major market crashes. Stocks fall even when markets are good – think events like earnings, business updates, and outlook changes. Read META Dip Buyer Analyses to see how the stock has recovered from sharp dips in the past.
The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming its benchmark that includes all 3 – the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 indices. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index, less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.