Quantum X Labs (QXL)
Market Price (8/23/2026): $4.82 | Market Cap: $68.9 MilSector: Information Technology | Industry: IT Consulting & Other Services
Quantum X Labs (QXL)
Market Price (8/23/2026): $4.82Market Cap: $68.9 MilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: IT Consulting & Other Services
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 76% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Quantum Technologies. Themes include Quantum Computing, Quantum Communication, and Quantum Sensing. | Weak multi-year price returns3Y Excs Rtn is -18% | Very low revenueRev LTMTotal Revenue or Sales, Last Twelve Months is -2.8 Mil Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -1.4 Mil Weak revenue growthRev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -33%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -21% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -7.4% Key risksQXL key risks include [1] its high-risk strategic pivot into unproven quantum technology, Show more. |
| Strong revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 76% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Quantum Technologies. Themes include Quantum Computing, Quantum Communication, and Quantum Sensing. |
| Weak multi-year price returns3Y Excs Rtn is -18% |
| Very low revenueRev LTMTotal Revenue or Sales, Last Twelve Months is -2.8 Mil |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -1.4 Mil |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -33%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -21% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -7.4% |
| Key risksQXL key risks include [1] its high-risk strategic pivot into unproven quantum technology, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Quantum X Labs (QXL) stock has gained about 55% since 4/30/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Strategic Rebranding and Focus on Quantum Technology.
On April 30, 2026, Viewbix Inc. officially rebranded as Quantum X Labs Inc. (QXL) and changed its Nasdaq ticker, formalizing a strategic pivot towards quantum computing, quantum error correction, quantum simulations, and quantum sensing technologies. This shift followed the March 2026 acquisition of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Quantum X Labs Ltd., which brought a proprietary intellectual property portfolio, including a pending patent for AI-Quantum Error Correction.
2. Turnaround to Profitability in Fiscal Q2 2026.
Quantum X Labs reported a significant financial improvement for its fiscal second quarter ended June 30, 2026. The company posted a net income of $2.4 million, a notable reversal from a net loss of $12.4 million in the prior year's comparable quarter. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations reached $0.12, dramatically improving from a diluted loss per share of $1.61 reported a year ago.
Show more
Quantum X Labs (QXL) stock has gained about 55% since 4/30/2026 because of the following key factors:
1. Strategic Rebranding and Focus on Quantum Technology.
On April 30, 2026, Viewbix Inc. officially rebranded as Quantum X Labs Inc. (QXL) and changed its Nasdaq ticker, formalizing a strategic pivot towards quantum computing, quantum error correction, quantum simulations, and quantum sensing technologies. This shift followed the March 2026 acquisition of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Quantum X Labs Ltd., which brought a proprietary intellectual property portfolio, including a pending patent for AI-Quantum Error Correction.
2. Turnaround to Profitability in Fiscal Q2 2026.
Quantum X Labs reported a significant financial improvement for its fiscal second quarter ended June 30, 2026. The company posted a net income of $2.4 million, a notable reversal from a net loss of $12.4 million in the prior year's comparable quarter. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations reached $0.12, dramatically improving from a diluted loss per share of $1.61 reported a year ago.
3. Advancements and Validation in Quantum Error Correction.
In July 2026, Quantum X Labs announced significant progress in its AI-driven quantum error-correction program, successfully completing development steps within the NVIDIA CUDA-Q Ecosystem. The company's proprietary QECCT decoder demonstrated superior performance over the classical Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) decoder in specific simulated environments, validating key aspects of its quantum technology roadmap.
4. Significant Balance Sheet Improvement and Capital Infusion.
Quantum X Labs experienced substantial balance sheet growth, with total assets increasing to $31.2 million as of June 30, 2026, up from $10.8 million at December 31, 2025. Over the same period, total equity climbed to $25.8 million from $5 million. This improvement was supported by a $1.4 million private placement in March 2026 and $2.4 million from warrant exercises, enhancing the company's liquidity position.
Show less
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 56.4% change in QXL stock from 4/30/2026 to 8/22/2026 was primarily driven by a 90.2% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302026 | 8222026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 3.11 | 4.87 | 56.4% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | -3 | -3 | 9.9% |
| P/S Multiple | -13.1 | -24.8 | 90.2% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 11 | 14 | -25.2% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 56.4% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2026 to 8/22/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| QXL | 56.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 6.5% | 24.6% |
| Sector (XLK) | 14.9% | 27.0% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 8/22/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| QXL | ||
| Market (SPY) | 11.0% | 24.6% |
| Sector (XLK) | 27.6% | 27.0% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
7/31/2025 to 8/22/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| QXL | ||
| Market (SPY) | 22.2% | 24.6% |
| Sector (XLK) | 40.1% | 27.0% |
Fundamental Drivers
nullnull
Market Drivers
7/31/2023 to 8/22/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| QXL | ||
| Market (SPY) | 73.2% | 24.6% |
| Sector (XLK) | 109.4% | 27.0% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| QXL Return | - | - | - | - | - | 44% | 44% |
| Peers Return | 83% | -78% | 54% | 1063% | 56% | -21% | 784% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 12% | 103% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| QXL Win Rate | - | - | - | - | - | 60% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 42% | 32% | 48% | 52% | 48% | 39% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| QXL Max Drawdown | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -65% | -74% | -69% | -62% | -68% | -54% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -5% | -25% | -10% | -8% | -19% | -9% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: INFQ, IONQ, QBTS, RGTI, QUBT.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 8/21/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
QXL has limited trading history. Below is the Information Technology sector ETF (XLK) in its place.
| Event | XLK | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -25.7% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 34.5% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 65 days | 79 days |
| 2024 Yen Carry Trade Unwind | ||
| % Loss | -17.0% | -7.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 20.4% | 8.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 92 days | 18 days |
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -10.0% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 11.2% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 15 days | 24 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -33.1% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 49.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 246 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -31.2% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 45.2% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 78 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -23.8% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.2% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 100 days | 105 days |
In The Past
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -25.7% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 34.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
QXL has limited trading history. Below is the Information Technology sector ETF (XLK) in its place.
| Event | XLK | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -25.7% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 34.5% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 65 days | 79 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -33.1% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 49.5% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 246 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -31.2% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 45.2% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 78 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -23.8% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 31.2% | 23.8% |
| Time to Breakeven | 100 days | 105 days |
| 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -51.5% | -53.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 106.2% | 114.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 797 days | 1085 days |
In The Past
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF's stock fell -25.7% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 34.5% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Quantum X Labs (QXL)
AI Analysis | Feedback
For Quantum X Labs (QXL):
- It's like Google Analytics for interactive video ads.
- Think of it as a Salesforce Marketing Cloud, but specifically for interactive video advertising.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Interactive Video Platform: A SaaS-based platform that allows users to embed interactive elements into video clips.
- Video Data Analytics: Services to collect and analyze user interaction data from interactive videos, providing insights into viewing habits.
- Advertising Optimization: Tools and features designed to help advertisers optimize real-time campaigns and increase the effectiveness of online and live video advertising.
- Managed Services: A full-service option where account managers analyze data, report results, and provide suggestions to clients.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Quantum X Labs (QXL), operating an interactive video technology and data platform, primarily sells to other companies. Based on the provided description, its major customers are:
- Advertisers: Companies seeking to run and optimize online and live video advertising campaigns, utilizing QXL's platform to add interactive elements, collect data, and analyze user viewing habits for increased effectiveness.
- Marketing and Advertising Agencies: Firms that manage advertising campaigns on behalf of their clients, using QXL's technology and data analytics to enhance their service offerings and provide detailed reporting and optimization suggestions to their clients.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
Amihay Hadad, Chief Executive Officer
Amihay Hadad has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Viewbix Inc. (operating as Quantum X Labs Inc.) since 2022, and earlier, since February 20, 2020. He was also the Chief Executive Officer at Gix Internet Ltd. until September 2022, and held the position of Chief Financial Officer at Gix Internet Ltd. until 2022. Prior to this, he served as the Chief Financial Officer at Ynet and Algomizer. Gix Internet Ltd. was formerly known as Algomizer Ltd. Amihay holds a graduate degree from Bar-Ilan University and an undergraduate degree and MBA from The College of Management Academic Studies.
Shahar Marom, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Shahar Marom assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer at Viewbix Inc. (operating as Quantum X Labs Inc.) on July 1, 2022. Before joining Viewbix, he was the Director of Finance at Raft Technologies Ltd. from 2018 to 2022. He also held various financial positions at Supercom Ltd. from 2013 to 2017, was a Vice Controller at 012 Smile Communications Ltd., and a Senior Auditor at KPMG Somekh Chaikin. Shahar is a certified public accountant and earned his B.A. in economics and accounting from Tel Aviv University.
Eliyahu Yoresh, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Eliyahu Yoresh serves as the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board for Viewbix Inc. (operating as Quantum X Labs Inc.) since 2025. He has a broad background, including serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Xylo Technologies Ltd., and Chairman of Gix Internet Ltd. since 2022. His experience also includes chairman roles at Rail Vision Ltd. from 2024, and past leadership positions such as Chairman at Tomcar Global Holdings Ltd. (2005-2008) and Independent Director at Nano Dimension Ltd. (2014-2020).
Asael Sharabi, Chief Operations Officer of Cortex
Asael Sharabi holds the position of Chief Operations Officer of Cortex within Quantum X Labs Inc. (operating as Viewbix Inc.).
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Intense Competition and Rapid Technological Obsolescence: Viewbix Inc. operates in the highly dynamic interactive video and ad technology market. The company faces significant competition from well-established industry giants and agile startups, all vying for market share with continually evolving platforms and solutions. A primary risk is the rapid pace of technological innovation, including advancements in AI-driven personalization and new advertising formats, which could quickly render Viewbix's platform less competitive or even obsolete without sustained and substantial investment in research and development to keep pace with or lead market trends.
- Data Privacy and Regulatory Compliance Risks: As a data platform company that collects and analyzes user viewing habits and interactive actions, Viewbix Inc. is highly exposed to the escalating landscape of global data privacy regulations, such as GDPR and CCPA, as well as emerging laws in other jurisdictions. Non-compliance with these complex and evolving regulations could lead to severe financial penalties, significant legal challenges, reputational damage, and erosion of client trust. Furthermore, increasing public and regulatory scrutiny over data collection practices by advertisers may restrict the types or amount of data Viewbix can ethically or legally collect and process, potentially diminishing the effectiveness and value proposition of its platform.
- Reliance on Advertising Market Volatility and Economic Downturns: Viewbix Inc.'s revenue generation is intrinsically linked to the health and spending patterns of the online and live video advertising market. This market is highly sensitive to macroeconomic conditions; during periods of economic slowdown or recession, advertising budgets are often among the first expenditures to be cut by businesses. This inherent dependence means that Viewbix Inc.'s financial performance and growth prospects could be materially impacted by fluctuations in advertising demand, potentially leading to reduced client spending, slower new client acquisition, or even declines in overall revenue.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Large social media platforms (e.g., Meta/Facebook, YouTube/Google) and ad tech giants integrating increasingly sophisticated interactive video advertising tools and granular analytics directly into their own platforms. These dominant players have direct access to vast user bases and advertisers, potentially reducing the need for third-party interactive video technology and data platforms like Viewbix by offering similar or superior capabilities as part of their core ad products, often at a lower or bundled cost.
AI Analysis | Feedback
AI Analysis | Feedback
For Quantum X Labs (QXL), previously known as Viewbix Inc., the expected drivers of future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years will largely stem from its strategic shift into quantum technologies, alongside the continued operation and growth of its legacy digital advertising business.
- Expansion into Quantum Technology Markets: A primary driver of future revenue growth is the company's recently announced evolution towards becoming a leading developer and owner of quantum computing technology, quantum error correction solutions, quantum simulations, and quantum sensing technologies. This strategic pivot into advanced quantum fields opens up significant new revenue streams in emerging high-growth markets.
- Commercialization of Proprietary Quantum Solutions: As Quantum X Labs focuses on developing and owning various quantum technologies, the successful commercialization and adoption of these new quantum computing, error correction, simulation, and sensing products and services will be a crucial driver of revenue.
- Growth and Enhanced Monetization of the Legacy Digital Advertising Segment: The company has stated it will continue its legacy digital advertising activities as a business segment. Revenue growth will be driven by the ongoing development, market penetration, and increased monetization of its interactive video technology and data platform, which allows advertisers to analyze user viewing habits and optimize campaigns.
- Strategic Partnerships and Acquisitions: To accelerate its growth and market presence in both the nascent quantum technology space and its existing digital advertising sector, strategic partnerships and potential acquisitions of complementary technologies or companies are expected to drive revenue by expanding capabilities, market reach, and customer base.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Peer Outperformance in IT Consulting & Other Services
null| Industry | Names | 1Y med | 3Y med | 5Y med | Top 3 by 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic Manufacturing Services | 9 | 56.5% | 200.4% | 341.0% | FLEX 746% · TTMI 687% · JBL 432% |
| Semiconductor Materials & Equipment | 27 | 137.0% | 74.6% | 125.0% | AEHR 1645% · AXTI 677% · KLAC 488% |
| Technology Distributors | 9 | 21.8% | 61.4% | 77.5% | CLMB 340% · AVT 153% · SNX 113% |
| Electronic Components | 26 | 54.5% | 61.3% | 57.7% | CLS 3221% · BELFA 1309% · LPTH 617% |
| Communications Equipment | 35 | 29.8% | 82.4% | 42.0% | AAOI 1755% · LITE 905% · ANET 715% |
| Semiconductors | 54 | 31.6% | 30.5% | 31.0% | POET 1926% · MU 1282% · NVDA 881% |
| Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 22 | 31.2% | 76.3% | 22.5% | STX 976% · SMCI 936% · WDC 891% |
| Internet Services & Infrastructure | 6 | 13.9% | 38.3% | 15.1% | DOCN 109% · GDDY 36% · VRSN 34% |
| Electronic Equipment & Instruments | 27 | -7.9% | 17.2% | -3.6% | PI 215% · SOTK 138% · NSSC 125% |
| IT Consulting & Other Services ← | 28 | -25.2% | -7.3% | -18.3% | CHRN 627400% · APLD 1844% · TSSI 695% |
| Application Software | 123 | -19.6% | -10.4% | -42.5% | VIDA 394900% · INLX 5338% · PLTR 625% |
| Systems Software | 69 | -7.8% | 14.7% | -51.2% | QNC 845% · PANW 476% · PAYS 446% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 16.02 |
| Mkt Cap | 4.5 |
| Rev LTM | 13 |
| Op Inc LTM | -89 |
| FCF LTM | -70 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | -69 |
| CFO LTM | -52 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | -53 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 75.6% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 37.7% |
| Rev Chg Q | 124.2% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 24.2% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | -132.2% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | -48.9% |
| Op Mgn LTM | -727.6% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | -777.2% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 35.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | -438.3% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | -529.0% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | -524.0% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | -618.2% |
Segment Financials
Revenue by Segment| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search segment | 2 | 5 | 20 | 23 | |
| Adjustments and eliminations | 0 | -0 | 0 | ||
| Digital content segment | 22 | 59 | 74 | ||
| Enterprise subscriptions | 0 | ||||
| Individual subscriptions | 0 | ||||
| Total | 2 | 27 | 80 | 97 | 0 |
| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search segment | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Adjustments and eliminations | -3 | -12 | -10 | -4 |
| Digital content segment | -1 | 1 | 6 | |
| Total | -2 | -12 | -7 | 3 |
| $ Mil | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Single Segment | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
Price Behavior
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.81 | 1.11 | 1.03 | -0.73 | 0.48 | 0.59 |
| Up Beta | 6.69 | 4.94 | 4.44 | -1.22 | 0.82 | -1.30 |
| Down Beta | -0.58 | 0.62 | 1.88 | -0.30 | -0.18 | 2.88 |
| Up Capture | -214% | -11% | 60% | 25% | 11% | 1% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 11 | 22 | 35 | 67 | 138 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 6 | 16 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Down Capture | 156% | 55% | -134% | -69% | -46% | -26% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 11 | 21 | 28 | 59 | 114 | 326 |
| Stock -ve Days | 15 | 25 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with QXL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QXL | 56.7% | 88.3% | 2.02 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 41.9% | 26.0% | 1.31 | 27.0% |
| Equity (SPY) | 21.1% | 12.9% | 1.22 | 24.6% |
| Gold (GLD) | 37.5% | 28.8% | 1.10 | -4.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 43.2% | 20.2% | 1.66 | -10.5% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 12.9% | 13.8% | 0.64 | -10.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -31.6% | 44.1% | -0.73 | 9.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with QXL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QXL | 9.4% | 88.3% | 2.02 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 19.7% | 25.9% | 0.68 | 27.0% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.9% | 17.2% | 0.57 | 24.6% |
| Gold (GLD) | 20.6% | 18.6% | 0.90 | -4.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 10.4% | 19.6% | 0.41 | -10.5% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 2.3% | 18.9% | 0.02 | -10.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 10.4% | 52.8% | 0.38 | 9.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with QXL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QXL | 4.6% | 88.3% | 2.02 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 24.1% | 24.9% | 0.88 | 27.0% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.2% | 17.9% | 0.72 | 24.6% |
| Gold (GLD) | 12.7% | 16.2% | 0.64 | -4.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.0% | 18.0% | 0.36 | -10.5% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.0% | 20.7% | 0.20 | -10.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 63.1% | 66.1% | 1.03 | 9.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Earnings Returns History
Updated 6/2/2026| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Median Positive | |||
| Median Negative | |||
| Max Positive | |||
| Max Negative | |||
Industry Resources
| Information Technology Resources |
| TechCrunch |
| Wired |
| CIO |
| MIT Technology Review |
| Gartner Insights |
| Ars Technica |
| IT Consulting & Other Services Resources |
| IDC |
| Forrester |
| Consultancy.org |
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.