Nordic American Tankers (NAT)
Market Price (12/30/2025): $3.46 | Market Cap: $732.7 MilSector: Energy | Industry: Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Nordic American Tankers (NAT)
Market Price (12/30/2025): $3.46Market Cap: $732.7 MilSector: EnergyIndustry: Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 34% | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -49%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -24% | Expensive valuation multiplesP/CFOPrice/(Cash Flow from Operations). CFO is cash before capital expenditures. is 27x, P/EPrice/Earnings or Price/(Net Income) is 386x |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Global Energy Logistics, Future of Freight, and Energy Security & Geopolitics. Themes include Crude Oil Shipping, Show more. | Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -20%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -12% | |
| Not cash flow generativeFCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -37% | ||
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -3.9% | ||
| Key risksNAT key risks include [1] heavy reliance on the volatile spot market, Show more. |
| Low stock price volatilityVol 12M is 34% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Global Energy Logistics, Future of Freight, and Energy Security & Geopolitics. Themes include Crude Oil Shipping, Show more. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -49%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -24% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/CFOPrice/(Cash Flow from Operations). CFO is cash before capital expenditures. is 27x, P/EPrice/Earnings or Price/(Net Income) is 386x |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -20%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -12% |
| Not cash flow generativeFCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -37% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -3.9% |
| Key risksNAT key risks include [1] heavy reliance on the volatile spot market, Show more. |
Why The Stock Moved
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 17.1% change in NAT stock from 9/29/2025 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a 720.6% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| 9292025 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.97 | 3.48 | 17.06% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 301.17 | 294.82 | -2.11% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 4.44% | 0.65% | -85.43% |
| P/E Multiple | 47.07 | 386.21 | 720.57% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 211.75 | 211.75 | 0.00% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 17.06% |
Market Drivers
9/29/2025 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| NAT | 17.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.6% | 13.7% |
| Sector (XLE) | -1.2% | 14.6% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 41.4% change in NAT stock from 6/30/2025 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a 2555.7% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| 6302025 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.46 | 3.48 | 41.41% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 327.12 | 294.82 | -9.87% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 10.95% | 0.65% | -94.09% |
| P/E Multiple | 14.54 | 386.21 | 2555.66% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 211.75 | 211.75 | 0.00% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 41.41% |
Market Drivers
6/30/2025 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| NAT | 41.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 11.6% | 12.3% |
| Sector (XLE) | 6.1% | 19.0% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 58.3% change in NAT stock from 12/29/2024 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a 5187.2% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| 12292024 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.20 | 3.48 | 58.27% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 367.47 | 294.82 | -19.77% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 17.10% | 0.65% | -96.22% |
| P/E Multiple | 7.30 | 386.21 | 5187.24% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 208.80 | 211.75 | -1.41% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 58.24% |
Market Drivers
12/29/2024 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| NAT | 58.3% | |
| Market (SPY) | 16.6% | 17.9% |
| Sector (XLE) | 8.1% | 31.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 61.7% change in NAT stock from 12/30/2022 to 12/29/2025 was primarily driven by a 145.1% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| 12302022 | 12292025 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 2.15 | 3.48 | 61.73% |
| Change Contribution By | LTM | LTM | |
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 120.28 | 294.82 | 145.12% |
| P/S Multiple | 3.70 | 2.50 | -32.47% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 206.90 | 211.75 | -2.34% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 61.64% |
Market Drivers
12/30/2023 to 12/29/2025| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| NAT | 3.8% | |
| Market (SPY) | 47.9% | 18.4% |
| Sector (XLE) | 12.7% | 33.1% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| NAT Return | -33% | -41% | 88% | 56% | -34% | 54% | 18% |
| Peers Return | 16% | 38% | -12% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 151% |
| S&P 500 Return | 16% | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 17% | 114% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| NAT Win Rate | 42% | 50% | 67% | 50% | 25% | 75% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 52% | 65% | 42% | 68% | 57% | 52% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 58% | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 73% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| NAT Max Drawdown | -49% | -43% | -17% | -6% | -35% | -9% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -34% | -5% | -26% | -7% | -9% | -23% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -31% | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2020
[2] Peers: HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2025 data is for the year up to 12/29/2025 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | NAT | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -63.7% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 175.2% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 389 days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -60.6% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 154.0% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -81.7% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 447.4% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -41.4% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 70.7% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 1,480 days |
Compare to HPQ, HPE, IBM, CSCO, AAPL
In The Past
Nordic American Tankers's stock fell -63.7% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 3/26/2021. A -63.7% loss requires a 175.2% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth over time.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- A pipeline company for the world's oceans.
- A global railroad for crude oil on the seas.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Crude Oil Transportation: Providing seaborne transportation services for crude oil globally, primarily utilizing a fleet of Suezmax tankers.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Nordic American Tankers (NAT) sells primarily to other companies. According to their public filings, no single customer accounts for more than 10% of their consolidated revenues, meaning NAT does not have individually named 'major customers' that require specific disclosure. However, NAT's customer base generally comprises major players within the following categories. The companies listed below are examples of publicly traded companies that operate in the markets NAT serves and represent the types of customers NAT would typically engage with for their crude oil tanker services:
Major Customer Categories and Representative Companies:
-
1. Major International Oil Companies
These global energy giants often require large-scale transportation of crude oil from production sites to refineries and markets worldwide.
- ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)
- Chevron (NYSE: CVX)
- Shell plc (NYSE: SHEL)
- BP p.l.c. (NYSE: BP)
-
2. State-Owned Oil Companies
National oil companies control significant oil reserves and production, making them key charterers for crude oil tankers.
- Petrobras (NYSE: PBR)
- Equinor ASA (NYSE: EQNR)
- (Note: Many of the largest state-owned oil companies, such as Saudi Aramco, are not primarily listed on major U.S. exchanges or remain largely private, but are significant players in the market NAT serves.)
-
3. Refiners
Companies that process crude oil into refined products require its transport to their facilities.
- Marathon Petroleum Corporation (NYSE: MPC)
- Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE: VLO)
- Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX)
-
4. Oil Traders
Commodity trading houses buy and sell large volumes of crude oil and often charter tankers for their logistical needs.
- Glencore plc (LSE: GLEN) - (While primarily listed on the London Stock Exchange, Glencore is a major global commodity trader.)
- (Note: Many of the largest independent oil trading firms, such as Vitol and Trafigura, are privately held.)
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
```htmlHerbjørn Hansson, Founder, Chairman & CEO
Herbjørn Hansson founded Nordic American Tankers Ltd. (NAT) and serves as its Chairman and CEO. He is also the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Scandic American Shipping Ltd. Previously, he held positions as Executive Chairman of Nordic American Offshore Ltd., CEO of Ugland Nordic Shipping AS (which he founded in 1989), Chief Financial Officer of Anders Jahres Humanitære Stiftelse and Kosmos A/S, and Vice Chairman of Teekay Norway AS. The Hansson family, including Herbjørn, is the largest private shareholder group in Nordic American Tankers. He is recognized for NAT's consistent payment of dividends every quarter since 1997.
Bjørn Giæver, CFO & Company Secretary
Bjørn Giæver holds the positions of CFO and Company Secretary at Nordic American Tankers.
Alexander Hansson, Non-Executive Vice Chairman & Board Member
Alexander Hansson serves as a Board Member and Non-Executive Vice Chairman for Nordic American Tankers. He is the son of Herbjørn Hansson and a significant shareholder in the company, contributing to the Hansson family's status as the largest private shareholder group. He received his MBA from the Norwegian School of Economics & Business Administration.
Erik Tomstad, EVP Chartering
Erik Tomstad is the Executive Vice President (EVP) of Chartering at Nordic American Tankers. He is responsible for the day-to-day chartering activities of the fleet and is involved in the sale and purchase of vessels.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The public company Nordic American Tankers (NAT) faces several key business risks, primarily stemming from its operational model and financial strategy:
- High Exposure to Volatile Spot Market: Nordic American Tankers' business model is heavily reliant on chartering its Suezmax vessels in the spot market. This means the company is directly exposed to the significant and often turbulent fluctuations in oil tanker freight rates. The prevalence of spot charters implies that the company bears all the risk and reward of market spot rate changes, which can lead to inherent instability in its financial performance. A dramatic fall in Suezmax rates is identified as a clear and obvious risk.
- Unsustainable Dividend Payout Ratio: NAT has historically maintained a policy of regular dividend payments, but its dividend payout ratio has been identified as unsustainable by multiple analyses. For instance, the payout ratio has been cited as high as 571.43% and even 2,600.00%, indicating that the company is distributing significantly more in dividends than its net income. This practice could strain the company's cash flow and liquidity, especially if market conditions for tanker rates decline, making the high dividend yield a near-term risk rather than a long-term guarantee.
- Aging Fleet and Future Capital Expenditure Requirements: The company operates a fleet that includes a notable number of older vessels, with some being over 20 years old. While NAT has engaged in fleet renewal efforts and vessel acquisitions, the need to replace these aging vessels in the near to medium term poses a future capital expenditure requirement. This ongoing need for investment to modernize the fleet could lead to increased debt levels and potentially impact the company's financial health, particularly as older vessels face stricter environmental regulations.
AI Analysis | Feedback
A clear emerging threat for Nordic American Tankers (NAT) is the global energy transition away from fossil fuels and the accelerating decarbonization mandates within the shipping industry.
This threat manifests in two primary ways:
Declining long-term demand for crude oil: As countries commit to reducing carbon emissions, there will be a sustained shift towards renewable energy sources and electric vehicles, potentially leading to a significant decrease in global crude oil consumption over the coming decades. This directly impacts the core business of NAT, which transports crude oil. While the exact timeline is uncertain, the direction is clear, posing a fundamental challenge to the long-term viability of crude oil tanker demand.
Increased regulatory pressure and technological disruption in shipping: The International Maritime Organization (IMO) and national bodies are continually tightening environmental regulations on vessel emissions (e.g., EEXI, CII, future greenhouse gas reduction targets). This necessitates significant investment in more fuel-efficient vessels, alternative propulsion systems, or the adoption of new, cleaner fuels (like ammonia, hydrogen, methanol, or LNG). NAT's current fleet primarily consists of conventionally-fueled Suezmax tankers, which may face increasing operational costs, competitive disadvantages, or even obsolescence if they cannot adapt to these rapidly evolving environmental standards and embrace new, costly technologies.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The addressable market for Nordic American Tankers (NAT) primarily revolves around the global crude oil tanker market, with a specific focus on the Suezmax segment due to their specialized fleet.
The global crude oil tankers market was valued at approximately USD 180 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 250 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5% during this period. Another estimate indicates the global crude oil carriers market size was USD 257.37 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow to nearly USD 357.68 billion by 2032, with a CAGR of 4.2% from 2025. In 2025, the global crude oil tanker market size is estimated to be approximately USD 179.86 billion, with a forecast to reach USD 244.71 billion by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of about 3.48% during this period. Another source reported the global crude oil tankers market size was USD 189.6 billion by the end of 2025 and is projected to become USD 254.532 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 3.75% from 2025 to 2033.
Nordic American Tankers specifically operates Suezmax crude oil tankers. The global Suezmax oil tanker market is a significant component of the international energy logistics infrastructure. This market is projected to reach an estimated size of USD 45 billion by 2025, with a CAGR of approximately 6.5% through 2033. Another estimate places the Suezmax oil tanker market size at USD 15 billion in 2025, with a projected CAGR of 5% for the period of 2025-2033. The Suezmax oil tanker market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 2.50% during the forecasted period (2025-2032).
AI Analysis | Feedback
Nordic American Tankers (NAT) is poised for potential revenue growth over the next two to three years, driven by a combination of strategic fleet expansion, favorable market dynamics in the Suezmax tanker sector, and global energy demand shifts.
-
Fleet Expansion and Modernization: NAT is actively expanding and renewing its fleet of Suezmax tankers. In March and April 2025, the company took delivery of two 2016-built Suezmax tankers, increasing its fleet to 21 vessels. These acquisitions are anticipated to boost the company's earnings and dividend capacity. Furthermore, in November 2025, NAT signed a letter of intent for two additional Suezmax tankers, slated for delivery in the second half of 2028, signaling a continued commitment to fleet growth and modernization. Management has indicated a strategy of acquiring new ships while selectively selling older units to maintain a well-maintained fleet.
-
Strong Suezmax Tanker Market Rates Driven by Tight Supply: The Suezmax tanker market is currently experiencing robust rates, with average daily rates significantly higher in 2025 compared to late 2024. This strength is largely attributable to a tight supply-demand balance. The global order book for new Suezmax tankers is historically low, representing only 17% of the existing conventional fleet, which is below the historical average of 20%. This limited new supply, coupled with shipyards being occupied with building other vessel types like containerships and LNG carriers, is expected to keep tanker rates elevated for the foreseeable future. Additionally, a significant portion of the global Suezmax fleet is aging, with an estimated 27% projected to be over 20 years old by the end of 2027, potentially leading to further supply constraints as older vessels are phased out.
-
Increased Global Oil Demand and Geopolitical Factors: Forecasts indicate a strong demand for oil, especially from emerging economies, which will translate into a greater need for seaborne oil transportation. Geopolitical developments are also playing a crucial role by creating longer shipping routes and increasing overall transportation work for tanker operators. The growth of a "dark fleet" for sanctioned oil and potential future measures against it could redirect legitimate oil trade to reputable operators such as NAT, further boosting demand for their services. NAT explicitly states it does not carry Russian oil and avoids transit through the Suez Canal or trading in the Red Sea.
-
Operational Efficiency and Specialized Fleet: NAT's exclusive focus on Suezmax tankers contributes to operational efficiency by streamlining maintenance and operations. The company maintains a fleet of high-quality, well-maintained vessels, which is critical for securing contracts with major international oil companies that employ approximately 50% of NAT's fleet. With relatively low daily operating costs, estimated at around $9,000 per ship, NAT is positioned to achieve solid margins even with fluctuating charter rates.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Share Issuance
- Nordic American Tankers (NAT) entered into an "at market issuance sales agreement" in February 2022, allowing it to offer and sell common shares up to an aggregate offering price of $60.0 million.
- Subsequent to September 30, 2021, and through February 11, 2022, NAT issued 1,507,678 common shares for approximately $3.8 million under the 2020 ATM program and 19,987,095 common shares for about $36.7 million under the 2021 ATM program.
- In the first half of 2025, NAT filed a shelf statement indicating potential future offerings to raise capital.
Inbound Investments
- Texas investment firm Dimensional Fund Advisors became the largest institutional investor in Nordic American Tankers in Q4 2024 by opening a significant stake, acquiring shares at $3.67 each.
- In Q3 2025, NAT secured a five-year senior secured credit facility of $150 million with Beal Bank/CLMG, collateralized by seven Suezmax vessels, which also served to refinance existing vessels.
Capital Expenditures
- In November 2025, NAT signed a letter of intent for two Suezmax newbuilds from a South Korean shipyard, each valued at approximately $86 million, with deliveries anticipated in the second half of 2028.
- During the first five months of 2025, NAT acquired two 2016-built Suezmax vessels, Nordic Galaxy and Nordic Moon, for a combined price of $132 million, with 50% lease financing from Ocean Yield. Additionally, NAT acquired two 2018-built vessels from Ocean Yield lease agreements.
- The primary focus of capital expenditures is on fleet renewal and expansion through newbuilds and the acquisition of younger secondhand vessels, while simultaneously divesting older tonnage, such as the sale of two vessels built in 2003 and 2004 for a combined $45 million in the first half of 2025.
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to NAT. For more, see Trefis Trade Ideas.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11212025 | WHD | Cactus | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 12.2% | 12.2% | 0.0% |
| 10172025 | OVV | Ovintiv | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 8.6% | 8.6% | 0.0% |
| 10102025 | COP | ConocoPhillips | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 6.7% | 6.7% | -2.3% |
| 10102025 | HAL | Halliburton | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 28.9% | 28.9% | -0.7% |
| 10102025 | OXY | Occidental Petroleum | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | -3.6% | -3.6% | -7.1% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons for Nordic American Tankers
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 51.06 |
| Mkt Cap | 159.0 |
| Rev LTM | 56,496 |
| Op Inc LTM | 7,584 |
| FCF LTM | 7,327 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 7,366 |
| CFO LTM | 8,590 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 8,697 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 5.2% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 3.2% |
| Rev Chg Q | 8.3% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 2.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 12.1% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 18.0% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 15.0% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 23.1% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 11.6% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 12.1% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $3.48 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.7 | |
| First Trading Date | 09/30/1997 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -7.6% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $3.51 | $2.84 |
| DMA Trend | up | up |
| Distance from DMA | -0.9% | 22.6% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 29.1% | 34.3% |
| Downside Capture | -9.90 | -14.76 |
| Upside Capture | 68.57 | 32.88 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 13.2% | 18.5% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.03 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.44 |
| Up Beta | 1.13 | 0.36 | 0.95 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.35 |
| Down Beta | 0.96 | 0.54 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.38 |
| Up Capture | -40% | 89% | 81% | 45% | 23% | 23% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 13 | 26 | 39 | 74 | 142 | 427 |
| Stock +ve Days | 10 | 22 | 30 | 64 | 117 | 354 |
| Down Capture | -36% | -6% | -7% | -79% | -11% | 78% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 7 | 16 | 24 | 52 | 107 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 16 | 27 | 54 | 121 | 359 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Comparison of NAT With Other Asset Classes (Last 1Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 57.6% | 8.9% | 16.7% | 65.4% | 7.5% | 4.2% | -7.3% |
| Annualized Volatility | 34.2% | 24.4% | 19.4% | 19.8% | 15.3% | 17.0% | 34.9% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.37 | 0.30 | 0.67 | 2.43 | 0.27 | 0.08 | -0.06 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 31.9% | 18.5% | 13.1% | 27.8% | 11.3% | 12.2% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Comparison of NAT With Other Asset Classes (Last 5Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | 10.0% | 22.4% | 14.8% | 17.7% | 11.2% | 5.1% | 30.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 52.6% | 26.7% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 18.7% | 18.9% | 48.6% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.38 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.57 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 35.8% | 19.1% | 9.9% | 24.8% | 15.0% | 14.6% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Comparison of NAT With Other Asset Classes (Last 10Y) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT | Sector ETF | Equity | Gold | Commodities | Real Estate | Bitcoin | |
| Annualized Return | -5.9% | 8.5% | 15.0% | 14.6% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 69.0% |
| Annualized Volatility | 57.9% | 29.8% | 18.0% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 55.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.14 | 0.33 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.89 |
| Correlation With Other Assets | 35.4% | 29.9% | 3.7% | 24.0% | 24.4% | 10.2% | |
ETFs used for asset classes: Sector ETF = XLE, Equity = SPY, Gold = GLD, Commodities = DBC, Real Estate = VNQ, and Bitcoin = BTCUSD
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2025 | 11/28/2025 | 6-K (09/30/2025) |
| 06/30/2025 | 09/03/2025 | 6-K (06/30/2025) |
| 03/31/2025 | 06/04/2025 | 6-K (03/31/2025) |
| 12/31/2024 | 04/29/2025 | 20-F (12/31/2024) |
| 09/30/2024 | 12/02/2024 | 6-K (09/30/2024) |
| 06/30/2024 | 09/30/2024 | 6-K (06/30/2024) |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/30/2024 | 6-K (03/31/2024) |
| 12/31/2023 | 04/29/2024 | 20-F (12/31/2023) |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/30/2023 | 6-K (09/30/2023) |
| 06/30/2023 | 09/29/2023 | 6-K (06/30/2023) |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/22/2023 | 6-K (03/31/2023) |
| 12/31/2022 | 04/27/2023 | 20-F (12/31/2022) |
| 09/30/2022 | 12/02/2022 | 6-K (09/30/2022) |
| 06/30/2022 | 09/30/2022 | 6-K (06/30/2022) |
| 03/31/2022 | 06/06/2022 | 6-K (03/31/2022) |
| 12/31/2021 | 05/11/2022 | 20-F (12/31/2021) |
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.