Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR)
Market Price (4/1/2026): $5.0 | Market Cap: $9.3 MilSector: Energy | Industry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR)
Market Price (4/1/2026): $5.0Market Cap: $9.3 MilSector: EnergyIndustry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 5.6% Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -23% Attractive operating marginsOp Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is 71% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US Natural Gas Production, and US Oilfield Technologies. | Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -75%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -129% | Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 15x Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -7.3%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -36% Key risksMTR key risks include [1] the trust's structural inability to reinvest or acquire new assets to offset its naturally depleting reserves and [2] a complete lack of operational control, Show more. |
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 5.6% |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -23% |
| Attractive operating marginsOp Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is 71% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US Natural Gas Production, and US Oilfield Technologies. |
| Weak multi-year price returns2Y Excs Rtn is -75%, 3Y Excs Rtn is -129% |
| Expensive valuation multiplesP/SPrice/Sales ratio is 15x |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -7.3%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -36% |
| Key risksMTR key risks include [1] the trust's structural inability to reinvest or acquire new assets to offset its naturally depleting reserves and [2] a complete lack of operational control, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Significant Surge in Global Oil and Gas Prices.
Global oil prices experienced a substantial increase during the period, largely driven by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, particularly a conflict in Iran that led to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude prices, which started January 2026 at approximately $60.90 per barrel, surged to $70.20 per barrel by February 25, a 15.27% increase. Following the outbreak of war in Iran on February 28, prices peaked at nearly a four-year high on March 9, with Brent topping $117.27 per barrel, representing a 92.56% jump from January levels. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude showed a similar trend, rising from $57.72 per barrel in January to $65.15 by February 25 (a 12.87% increase) and hitting $115.68 per barrel by March 9, a 100.41% increase from January. Since Mesa Royalty Trust's income is derived from overriding royalty interests in oil and gas properties, these elevated commodity prices directly and positively impacted its underlying asset value and potential future distributions.
2. Strong Fourth Quarter 2025 Financial Performance.
Mesa Royalty Trust reported robust financial results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, which were released on March 30, 2026. The trust experienced a 51.3% year-over-year increase in total revenue, reaching $141,462. Earnings per share (EPS) for Q4 2025 significantly improved by 133.2%, rising to $0.08 compared to $0.03 in Q4 2024. Net income also saw a substantial jump of 132.9%, reaching $145,197 from $62,334 in the prior year's comparable quarter. These strong financial results surpassed analyst expectations and indicated a positive operational trajectory for the trust.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 13.4% change in MTR stock from 12/31/2025 to 3/31/2026 was primarily driven by a 10.5% change in the company's Net Income Margin (%).| (LTM values as of) | 12312025 | 3312026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 4.31 | 4.89 | 13.4% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1 | 1 | 8.1% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 76.9% | 84.9% | 10.5% |
| P/E Multiple | 18.8 | 17.8 | -5.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 13.4% |
Market Drivers
12/31/2025 to 3/31/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MTR | 13.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | -5.4% | -7.7% |
| Sector (XLE) | 37.0% | 23.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -7.0% change in MTR stock from 9/30/2025 to 3/31/2026 was primarily driven by a -28.3% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 9302025 | 3312026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 5.26 | 4.89 | -7.0% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 0 | 1 | 22.3% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 80.1% | 84.9% | 6.0% |
| P/E Multiple | 24.9 | 17.8 | -28.3% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -7.0% |
Market Drivers
9/30/2025 to 3/31/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MTR | -7.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | -2.9% | -4.5% |
| Sector (XLE) | 38.3% | 25.8% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -18.2% change in MTR stock from 3/31/2025 to 3/31/2026 was primarily driven by a -25.8% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 3312025 | 3312026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 5.97 | 4.89 | -18.2% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1 | 1 | -7.3% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 71.3% | 84.9% | 19.0% |
| P/E Multiple | 24.1 | 17.8 | -25.8% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -18.2% |
Market Drivers
3/31/2025 to 3/31/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MTR | -18.2% | |
| Market (SPY) | 16.3% | 1.6% |
| Sector (XLE) | 34.4% | 16.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -65.5% change in MTR stock from 3/31/2023 to 3/31/2026 was primarily driven by a -85.4% change in the company's Total Revenues ($ Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 3312023 | 3312026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 14.19 | 4.89 | -65.5% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 4 | 1 | -85.4% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 89.4% | 84.9% | -5.0% |
| P/E Multiple | 7.2 | 17.8 | 148.4% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -65.5% |
Market Drivers
3/31/2023 to 3/31/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MTR | -65.5% | |
| Market (SPY) | 63.3% | -0.2% |
| Sector (XLE) | 62.0% | 16.0% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| MTR Return | 62% | 313% | -35% | -54% | -24% | 19% | 80% |
| Peers Return | 136% | 156% | -34% | -28% | 22% | 34% | 372% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | -7% | 69% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| MTR Win Rate | 50% | 83% | 42% | 25% | 33% | 67% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 58% | 67% | 46% | 42% | 46% | 100% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 33% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| MTR Max Drawdown | 0% | -0% | -44% | -56% | -27% | -4% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -4% | 0% | -44% | -35% | -22% | -1% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | -7% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: PBT, CRT.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 3/31/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | MTR | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -60.4% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 152.4% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 170 days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -58.2% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 139.2% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 487 days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -67.4% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 206.4% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 894 days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -78.4% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 364.0% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 1,480 days |
Compare to PBT, CRT
In The Past
Mesa Royalty Trust's stock fell -60.4% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 5/26/2022. A -60.4% loss requires a 152.4% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies for Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR):
- It's like McDonald's, but for oil and gas royalties instead of restaurant franchises.
- A Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), but for oil and gas royalties.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Oil and Natural Gas Royalties: Income derived from the ownership of net overriding royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties.
AI Analysis | Feedback
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) derives its revenue primarily from royalty payments made by oil and gas operating companies that produce from the properties in which MTR holds an interest. Therefore, its major "customers" are the operating companies making these payments.
Based on their latest SEC filings, the primary operators and thus the entities from which Mesa Royalty Trust receives its royalty income are:
- XTO Energy Inc., a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM)
- Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP, a subsidiary of ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP)
These companies are responsible for the extraction and sale of oil and gas from the properties located in the Hugoton field and the San Juan Basin, respectively, where Mesa Royalty Trust holds its overriding royalty interests.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) does not have a traditional management team, including a CEO or CFO, as it operates as a statutory trust. Its sole function is to collect and distribute royalty income from its oil and gas properties.
The Trust's administration is handled by a corporate trustee and a contact for administrative matters:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. - Corporate Trustee
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. is responsible for the administration, tax reporting, and distribution of net proceeds for Mesa Royalty Trust. This entity serves as the independent Trustee, overseeing the trust in accordance with its agreement and applicable regulations, and its role is primarily fiduciary and administrative.
Elaina Conley-Rodgers - Trust Administration Contact
Elaina Conley-Rodgers serves as a primary point of contact for unitholders and administrative matters related to the Trust, representing The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) are primarily tied to its nature as a passive royalty trust with interests in mature oil and gas properties.
- Volatility of Commodity Prices: The Trust's income and subsequent distributions are directly and significantly impacted by fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices. Declines in these commodity prices can lead to lower royalty income and reduced or eliminated distributions to unitholders.
- Depletion of Underlying Oil and Gas Reserves: Mesa Royalty Trust holds overriding royalty interests in aging oil and gas fields, such as the Hugoton field and the San Juan Basin. The reserves in these properties are steadily depleting, typically by 4-6% annually, and the Trust has no ability to acquire new assets to offset this decline. This inherent depletion leads to shrinking payouts over time.
- Accumulated Excess Production Costs: Distributions to unitholders are made after operating and marketing costs are deducted by the working interest owners. When these production and development costs are substantial or exceed revenues, they can significantly decrease Trust distributions, and in some periods, result in no distributions at all.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The global energy transition towards renewable sources and away from fossil fuels represents a clear emerging threat. This systemic shift, driven by technological advancements, environmental policies, and changing consumer and investment preferences, threatens the long-term demand and economic viability of oil and gas producing properties. As renewable energy technologies become more cost-effective and widespread, and as policies push for decarbonization, the foundational assets from which Mesa Royalty Trust derives its income could face declining value and reduced production demand over time.
AI Analysis | Feedback
NULLAI Analysis | Feedback
For Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR), the expected drivers of future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years are primarily tied to external market forces and the operational performance of its underlying oil and gas properties.
- Increases in Oil and Natural Gas Prices: As a royalty trust, Mesa Royalty Trust's revenue is directly and highly dependent on the market prices of oil, natural gas, and other hydrocarbons. A sustained increase in commodity prices would lead to higher royalty income.
- Increased Production Volumes from Royalty Properties: Growth in the volumes of oil and natural gas produced from the Hugoton field in Kansas and the San Juan Basin properties in New Mexico and Colorado would directly translate into higher royalty income for the Trust.
- Recovery of Accumulated Excess Production Costs: Some of the Trust's properties, particularly in the Hugoton and San Juan Basin (Colorado), have accumulated substantial excess production costs. The full recovery of these costs would allow these properties to once again generate net proceeds, contributing to the Trust's distributable income and, consequently, its revenue.
AI Analysis | Feedback
No information is available for share repurchases, share issuances, inbound investments, or outbound investments for Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) over the last 3-5 years.
Capital Expenditures
- Mesa Royalty Trust has reported zero capital expenditures historically from 2020 to 2024.
- Projections for capital expenditures from 2025 to 2029 also indicate zero.
- The Trust holds passive royalty interests, and the operational activities and development costs of the underlying oil and gas properties are managed by third-party working interest owners.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| Mesa Royalty Trust Earnings Notes | 12/16/2025 | |
| With Mesa Royalty Trust Stock Surging, Have You Considered The Downside? | 10/17/2025 |
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to MTR.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12262025 | TPL | Texas Pacific Land | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 82.3% | 82.3% | -2.1% |
| 12122025 | NOV | NOV | Insider | Insider Buys | Low D/EStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with strong insider buying in the last 1 month, positive operating income and reasonable debt / market cap | 23.6% | 23.6% | -6.5% |
| 12122025 | RIG | Transocean | Insider | Insider Buys | Low D/EStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with strong insider buying in the last 1 month, positive operating income and reasonable debt / market cap | 56.9% | 56.9% | -7.0% |
| 11212025 | WHD | Cactus | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 31.6% | 31.6% | 0.0% |
| 10172025 | OVV | Ovintiv | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 41.7% | 41.7% | 0.0% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 10.58 |
| Mkt Cap | 0.1 |
| Rev LTM | 6 |
| Op Inc LTM | 4 |
| FCF LTM | - |
| FCF 3Y Avg | - |
| CFO LTM | - |
| CFO 3Y Avg | - |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | -12.6% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | -31.3% |
| Rev Chg Q | 11.4% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 3.0% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 77.4% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 85.5% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | 0.1% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | - |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | - |
| FCF/Rev LTM | - |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | - |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 0.1 |
| P/S | 15.1 |
| P/EBIT | 21.2 |
| P/E | 17.8 |
| P/CFO | - |
| Total Yield | 5.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | - |
| D/E | 0.0 |
| Net D/E | -0.0 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | 8.8% |
| 3M Rtn | 27.1% |
| 6M Rtn | 18.8% |
| 12M Rtn | -14.5% |
| 3Y Rtn | -28.8% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | 11.0% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | 31.5% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | 23.2% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | -24.5% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -83.3% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $4.89 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.0 | |
| First Trading Date | 12/30/1987 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -42.4% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $4.96 | $5.06 |
| DMA Trend | indeterminate | up |
| Distance from DMA | -1.5% | -3.4% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 53.3% | 71.4% |
| Downside Capture | -0.31 | 0.03 |
| Upside Capture | 8.59 | -17.83 |
| Correlation (SPY) | -7.8% | 1.7% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.92 | -0.29 | -0.32 | -0.17 | 0.06 | -0.01 |
| Up Beta | -1.74 | 0.52 | -0.65 | -0.68 | -0.03 | -0.22 |
| Down Beta | -2.06 | -1.15 | -0.03 | 0.11 | 0.50 | 0.47 |
| Up Capture | -41% | -13% | 8% | -20% | -9% | -4% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 7 | 16 | 27 | 65 | 139 | 424 |
| Stock +ve Days | 9 | 18 | 29 | 54 | 108 | 347 |
| Down Capture | -14% | -4% | -102% | -21% | -3% | 9% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 12 | 23 | 33 | 58 | 110 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 12 | 23 | 33 | 70 | 131 | 382 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with MTR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTR | -15.8% | 71.4% | 0.05 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 36.1% | 25.0% | 1.19 | 16.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 17.2% | 18.9% | 0.72 | 1.7% |
| Gold (GLD) | 52.7% | 27.9% | 1.51 | 6.6% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 17.9% | 17.6% | 0.86 | 26.6% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 2.8% | 16.5% | -0.00 | 10.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -20.8% | 44.1% | -0.40 | 7.5% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with MTR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTR | 8.9% | 73.5% | 0.44 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 24.5% | 26.0% | 0.84 | 28.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.1% | 17.0% | 0.55 | 3.8% |
| Gold (GLD) | 21.7% | 17.8% | 1.00 | 8.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 11.6% | 18.8% | 0.50 | 30.1% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 3.6% | 18.8% | 0.10 | 2.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 4.9% | 56.6% | 0.31 | -1.1% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with MTR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTR | 3.6% | 69.9% | 0.35 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 11.2% | 29.5% | 0.42 | 24.5% |
| Equity (SPY) | 14.0% | 17.9% | 0.67 | 10.3% |
| Gold (GLD) | 13.8% | 15.9% | 0.72 | 5.2% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 8.1% | 17.6% | 0.38 | 23.3% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.0% | 20.7% | 0.21 | 11.0% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 66.1% | 66.8% | 1.05 | 1.6% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 3/20/2026 | -2.1% | -4.3% | |
| 12/19/2025 | -5.7% | -3.4% | -4.8% |
| 9/16/2025 | 0.2% | 0.2% | -10.2% |
| 6/18/2025 | -32.8% | -38.7% | -36.1% |
| 3/21/2025 | 0.3% | -2.1% | -13.6% |
| 12/18/2024 | -4.2% | -2.6% | 12.7% |
| 9/20/2024 | 0.0% | -2.4% | 1.6% |
| 6/18/2024 | -2.6% | 0.1% | -2.2% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 9 | 11 | 15 |
| # Negative | 16 | 14 | 9 |
| Median Positive | 4.0% | 11.0% | 10.3% |
| Median Negative | -3.5% | -6.1% | -11.9% |
| Max Positive | 13.6% | 47.2% | 53.8% |
| Max Negative | -32.8% | -38.7% | -36.1% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 12/31/2025 | 03/30/2026 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2025 | 11/13/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 08/14/2025 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/15/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 03/31/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 11/14/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/14/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/15/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 04/01/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/15/2023 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2022 | 03/23/2023 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/14/2022 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/15/2022 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2022 | 05/16/2022 | 10-Q |
Recent Forward Guidance [BETA]
Latest: Q1 2026 Earnings Reported 3/20/2026
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| 2026 Cash Reserves Target | 2.00 Mil | 0 | Affirmed | Guidance: 2.00 Mil for 2026 | |||
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.