ProPetro (PUMP)
Market Price (5/12/2026): $16.42 | Market Cap: $1.9 BilSector: Energy | Industry: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
ProPetro (PUMP)
Market Price (5/12/2026): $16.42Market Cap: $1.9 BilSector: EnergyIndustry: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 15% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US Oilfield Technologies. | Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -9.5 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -0.8% Stock price has recently run up significantly12M Rtn12 month market price return is 206% Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -16%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -5.1%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -25% Valuation getting more expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is 111% Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -4.9% Key risksPUMP key risks include [1] its significant operational concentration in the Permian Basin, Show more. |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 15% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include US Energy Independence. Themes include US Oilfield Technologies. |
| Not profitable at operating income levelOp Inc LTMOperating Income, Last Twelve Months is -9.5 Mil, Op Mgn LTMOperating Margin = Operating Income / Revenue Reflects profitability before taxes and before impact of capital structure (interest payments). is -0.8% |
| Stock price has recently run up significantly12M Rtn12 month market price return is 206% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg LTMRevenue Change % Last Twelve Months (LTM) is -16%, Rev Chg 3Y AvgRevenue Change % averaged over trailing 3 years is -5.1%, Rev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -25% |
| Valuation getting more expensiveP/S 6M Chg %Price/Sales change over 6 months. Declining P/S indicates valuation has become less expensive. is 111% |
| Yield minus risk free rate is negativeERPEquity Risk Premium (ERP) = Total Yield - Risk Free Rate, Reflects the premium above risk free assets offered by the investment. is -4.9% |
| Key risksPUMP key risks include [1] its significant operational concentration in the Permian Basin, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Surging Oil Prices Driven by Geopolitical Tensions. Global oil markets experienced a dramatic shift, with Brent crude prices surging through March and April, briefly touching $126.4 per barrel in April-end. This was a significant increase from around $60 per barrel in January and was primarily attributed to escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly the intensifying conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran, which raised concerns about stable supplies.
2. Strategic Expansion and Increased Capital Expenditure for PROPWR. ProPetro demonstrated a strong commitment to growth in its PROPWR business and next-generation fleets. The company announced a strategic framework agreement with Caterpillar, aiming to expand its total expected PROPWR capacity to approximately 2.6 gigawatts by year-end 2031. To support this, ProPetro significantly raised its full-year 2026 capital expenditure guidance to between $540 million and $610 million, an increase from the $390 million to $435 million range previously highlighted, with approximately $400 million to $450 million allocated for PROPWR equipment.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The 44.9% change in PUMP stock from 1/31/2026 to 5/11/2026 was primarily driven by a 79.5% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 1312026 | 5112026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 11.49 | 16.65 | 44.9% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,300 | 1,180 | -9.2% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.9 | 1.6 | 79.5% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 104 | 117 | -11.1% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 44.9% |
Market Drivers
1/31/2026 to 5/11/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PUMP | 44.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 3.6% | -11.3% |
| Sector (XLE) | 12.7% | 49.0% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 60.4% change in PUMP stock from 10/31/2025 to 5/11/2026 was primarily driven by a 98.6% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 10312025 | 5112026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 10.38 | 16.65 | 60.4% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,300 | 1,180 | -9.2% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.8 | 1.6 | 98.6% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 104 | 117 | -11.1% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 60.4% |
Market Drivers
10/31/2025 to 5/11/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PUMP | 60.4% | |
| Market (SPY) | 5.5% | 9.5% |
| Sector (XLE) | 31.7% | 48.1% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 234.3% change in PUMP stock from 4/30/2025 to 5/11/2026 was primarily driven by a 364.6% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302025 | 5112026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 4.98 | 16.65 | 234.3% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,444 | 1,180 | -18.3% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.4 | 1.6 | 364.6% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 103 | 117 | -12.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 234.3% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2025 to 5/11/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PUMP | 234.3% | |
| Market (SPY) | 30.4% | 18.6% |
| Sector (XLE) | 46.6% | 44.7% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 139.9% change in PUMP stock from 4/30/2023 to 5/11/2026 was primarily driven by a 173.5% change in the company's P/S Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 4302023 | 5112026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 6.94 | 16.65 | 139.9% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 1,280 | 1,180 | -7.8% |
| P/S Multiple | 0.6 | 1.6 | 173.5% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 111 | 117 | -4.9% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 139.9% |
Market Drivers
4/30/2023 to 5/11/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| PUMP | 139.9% | |
| Market (SPY) | 78.7% | 35.2% |
| Sector (XLE) | 48.1% | 58.1% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| PUMP Return | 10% | 28% | -19% | 11% | 2% | 65% | 112% |
| Peers Return | 31% | 76% | -22% | -12% | -15% | 62% | 118% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 8% | 97% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| PUMP Win Rate | 50% | 50% | 25% | 58% | 33% | 80% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 54% | 66% | 33% | 47% | 43% | 72% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 60% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| PUMP Max Drawdown | -11% | -9% | -38% | -21% | -52% | -2% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -6% | -4% | -38% | -25% | -40% | -0% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | -7% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: LBRT, HAL, PTEN, RES, ACDC.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 5/11/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | PUMP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -45.2% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 82.6% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 204 days | 79 days |
| Summer-Fall 2023 Five Percent Yield Shock | ||
| % Loss | -19.3% | -9.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 23.9% | 10.5% |
| Time to Breakeven | 399 days | 24 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -36.0% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 56.3% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 77 days | 31 days |
| 2022 Inflation Shock & Fed Tightening | ||
| % Loss | -15.4% | -24.5% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 18.2% | 32.4% |
| Time to Breakeven | 8 days | 427 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -86.0% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 611.9% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 343 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -33.7% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 50.9% | 23.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 52 days | 105 days |
In The Past
ProPetro's stock fell -45.2% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 82.6% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
| Event | PUMP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 US Tariff Shock | ||
| % Loss | -45.2% | -18.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 82.6% | 23.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 204 days | 79 days |
| 2023 SVB Regional Banking Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -36.0% | -6.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 56.3% | 7.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | 77 days | 31 days |
| 2020 COVID-19 Crash | ||
| % Loss | -86.0% | -33.7% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 611.9% | 50.9% |
| Time to Breakeven | 343 days | 140 days |
| Q4 2018 Fed Policy Error / Growth Scare | ||
| % Loss | -33.7% | -19.2% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 50.9% | 23.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | 52 days | 105 days |
In The Past
ProPetro's stock fell -45.2% during the 2025 US Tariff Shock. Such a loss loss requires a 82.6% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About ProPetro (PUMP)
AI Analysis | Feedback
It's like Caterpillar for oil wells, providing the specialized heavy equipment and services to extract oil and gas.
It's like Foxconn for the oil patch, providing the essential extraction services for oil and gas companies.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Hydraulic Fracturing: This service involves pumping fluids at high pressure into a wellbore to create fractures in rock formations, facilitating the extraction of oil and natural gas.
- Cementing Services: ProPetro provides cementing operations to seal and support well casings, prevent fluid migration, and isolate different zones within a well.
- Acidizing Services: This involves injecting acid solutions into a well to dissolve rock and improve the flow of hydrocarbons by enhancing reservoir permeability.
- Coiled Tubing Services: The company offers coiled tubing interventions for various well operations, including cleaning, logging, and stimulating, without requiring a full drilling rig.
AI Analysis | Feedback
ProPetro Holding Corp. primarily sells its services to other companies. The specific names of ProPetro's major customers (those accounting for 10% or more of its total revenues) are not publicly disclosed in the company's SEC filings. However, ProPetro serves oil and gas exploration and production companies engaged in the exploration and production of North American oil and natural gas resources, particularly those operating in the Permian Basin.AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Sam Sledge, Chief Executive Officer Sam Sledge joined ProPetro in 2011 and has served in various capacities, including Frac Technical Specialist, Technical Operations Manager, Vice President of Finance, Corporate Development, Investor Relations, Chief Strategy and Administrative Officer, and President. He assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer in August 2021. Caleb Weatherl, Chief Financial Officer Caleb Weatherl joined ProPetro in 2025. Prior to his current role, he was the CEO of Garrison Energy. He also served as President and CFO of Stronghold Energy II before its assets were sold in 2022. Earlier in his career, he held positions at Desert Royalty Company, Stronghold Energy Partners, Weatherl Energy Investments, Bain Capital, and McKinsey & Company, indicating experience with private equity-backed companies. Adam Muñoz, President and Chief Operating Officer Adam Muñoz joined ProPetro in 2010 to establish its Permian pressure pumping operations. Before joining ProPetro, he held sales and operations roles at other service companies in the Permian Basin. His prior roles at ProPetro include Director of Business Development and Technical Services, and Vice President of Frac Services. Celina Davila, Chief Accounting Officer Celina Davila joined ProPetro in 2019 as the Hydraulic Fracturing Controller. She subsequently served as Director of Accounting and Corporate Controller, leading the accounting and financial reporting teams. Before ProPetro, she worked as an Accounting Manager at Pioneer Natural Resources Company and a Senior Auditor at Johnson, Miller & Co. Shelby Fietz, Chief Commercial Officer Shelby Fietz became part of ProPetro's Operations team in 2012. He has been instrumental in leading the company's commercial execution and maintaining key customer relationships as Vice President of Commercial. His responsibilities have also included leading the Business Development, Sales, Supply Chain, and Marketing teams.AI Analysis | Feedback
The key risks to ProPetro (PUMP) are:
- Market Risks and Cyclicality of the Oil and Natural Gas Industry: ProPetro's business and financial performance are highly dependent on the historically cyclical nature of the oil and natural gas industry, particularly the volatile prices of oil and natural gas. Fluctuations in these commodity prices directly impact the capital spending of exploration and production (E&P) companies, thereby affecting demand for ProPetro's hydraulic fracturing and other services, as well as its revenue and cash flows. Furthermore, the company's concentration of operations in the Permian Basin exposes it to regional supply and demand fluctuations and specific regulatory risks.
- Regulatory and Environmental Pressures / Energy Transition: ProPetro faces significant regulatory and environmental risks. There is increasing scrutiny and pressure related to environmental concerns, including potential climate-related regulations and initiatives aimed at reducing fossil fuel use. Changes in environmental regulations, potential restrictions on essential resources like water for hydraulic fracturing, and broader shifts towards a low-carbon economy (potentially accelerated by legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022) could decrease demand for the company's services, increase operational costs, and impact its long-term financial condition.
- Capital Requirements, Financial Health, and Competition: ProPetro requires substantial capital for maintaining and growing its operations, including investing in new technologies to remain competitive. Challenges in obtaining financing on favorable terms or increased interest rates could significantly strain the company's financial resources and ability to fund growth initiatives. The company operates in a highly competitive market, and a failure to keep pace with technological advancements or adapt to evolving customer demands for lower emissions equipment could lead to a loss of market share. Additionally, the company has exhibited negative profitability ratios and challenges in converting revenue into net profit and positive free cash flow, indicating operational inefficiencies and potential financial health concerns.
AI Analysis | Feedback
null
AI Analysis | Feedback
The addressable markets for ProPetro's main products and services in North America are as follows:
- Hydraulic Fracturing: The North American hydraulic fracturing market was approximately USD 48.60 billion in 2025.
- Coiled Tubing Services: The North American coiled tubing services market was valued at approximately USD 4.2 billion in 2025.
- Cementing Services: The North American well cementing services market was valued at approximately USD 4.67 billion in 2025.
- Acidizing Services: Null
AI Analysis | Feedback
ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) is poised for future revenue growth over the next two to three years, driven by several strategic initiatives and its strong market positioning. The key drivers are centered on fleet modernization, diversification into new energy services, strategic acquisitions, and leveraging its established customer base in a crucial production region.
-
Expansion of Next-Generation Electric and Gas-Burning Fleets: ProPetro is significantly investing in and transitioning to its FORCE electric and Tier 4 dual-fuel hydraulic fracturing fleets. This modernization aims to meet evolving industry demands for more efficient and environmentally friendly equipment, securing long-term contracts and driving revenue through advanced service offerings. The company has invested approximately $1 billion over two years to upgrade over two-thirds of its fleet to these next-generation assets, with multiple FORCE electric fleets already under contract.
-
Growth of the PROPWR Division: The PROPWR division represents a "transformational new market" for ProPetro, focusing on power generation equipment. The company anticipates PROPWR will contribute meaningful earnings in the second half of 2026 and has set targets to deliver at least 750 megawatts by the end of 2028 and one gigawatt or more by 2030. This expansion into distributed microgrid contracts and data center opportunities provides a significant new revenue stream beyond traditional hydraulic fracturing services.
-
Strategic Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): ProPetro actively pursues value-accretive M&A initiatives to expand its operations and enhance free cash flow generation. Recent acquisitions, such as Par Five Energy Services and Silvertip, have broadened its service capabilities and geographic footprint within the Permian Basin, contributing to overall revenue growth through expanded market share and integrated offerings.
-
Leveraging Blue-Chip Customer Relationships and Permian Basin Focus: ProPetro maintains a strategic focus on its blue-chip customer base and operating density within the Permian Basin, a leading North American hydrocarbon production region. The company's ability to consistently execute and provide differentiated services to these key clients supports sustained demand for its hydraulic fracturing, wireline, and cementing services, forming a foundational driver for ongoing revenue.
AI Analysis | Feedback
```htmlShare Repurchases
- ProPetro expanded its share repurchase program to $200 million, extending the authorization until May 31, 2025, and further extended it to December 2026 in May 2025.
- As of April 2024, the company had repurchased approximately $74 million worth of common stock since the program's inception in May 2023.
- In the third quarter of 2025, ProPetro did not repurchase any shares, prioritizing the launch and scaling of its PROPWR business.
Share Issuance
- In January 2026, ProPetro completed a public offering of 15,000,000 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share.
- This offering raised approximately $163 million in net proceeds, intended for general corporate purposes, including growth capital for additional power generation equipment for the PROPWR segment.
- The underwriters fully exercised their option to purchase an additional 2,250,000 shares, contributing to the total net proceeds.
Inbound Investments
- ProPetro secured a financing arrangement with Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation for up to $157.3 million to support the purchase of natural gas-fueled power generation equipment.
- The company entered into a lease facility with Stonebriar Commercial Finance LLC for up to $350 million to fund power generator equipment purchases.
Capital Expenditures
- For the full year 2025, capital expenditures paid were $186 million, and capital expenditures incurred were $281 million.
- Anticipated capital expenditures for the full year 2026 are projected to be between $390 million and $435 million.
- The primary focus of capital expenditures for 2026 includes $140 million to $160 million for the completions business (including lease buyouts for electric fleet) and $250 million to $275 million for the PROPWR power generation business.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| DASHBOARDS | ||
| ProPetro Earnings Notes | 12/16/2025 | |
| Is ProPetro Stock Built to Withstand More Downside? | 10/17/2025 | |
| ProPetro (PUMP) Debt Comparison | 08/08/2025 | |
| ProPetro (PUMP) Net Income Comparison | 08/08/2025 | |
| ProPetro (PUMP) Operating Cash Flow Comparison | 08/08/2025 | |
| ProPetro (PUMP) Tax Expense Comparison | 08/08/2025 | |
| ProPetro (PUMP) EBITDA Comparison | 08/08/2025 | |
| ProPetro (PUMP) Revenue Comparison | 08/08/2025 | |
| ProPetro (PUMP) Operating Income Comparison | 08/08/2025 | |
| Why ProPetro Stock Moved: PUMP Stock Has Lost 13% Since 2022 Fiscal End, Primarily Due To Unfavorable Change In Price To Sales Multiple (P/S) | 08/08/2025 | |
| ARTICLES | ||
| Market Movers | Winners: CMBM, PUMP, ERNA | Losers: ADN, LRN, VRNS | 10/30/2025 |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to PUMP.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04172026 | VAL | Valaris | Quality | Q | Momentum | UpsideQuality Stocks with Momentum and UpsideBuying quality stocks with strong momentum but still having room to run | 15.2% | 15.2% | -0.9% |
| 03312026 | KGS | Kodiak Gas Services | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 16.3% | 16.3% | -0.7% |
| 03312026 | KOS | Kosmos Energy | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 10.8% | 10.8% | -10.8% |
| 12262025 | TPL | Texas Pacific Land | Dip Buy | DB | P/E OPMDip Buy with Low PE and High MarginBuying dips for companies with tame PE and meaningfully high operating margin | 54.5% | 54.5% | -2.1% |
| 12122025 | NOV | NOV | Insider | Insider Buys | Low D/EStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with strong insider buying in the last 1 month, positive operating income and reasonable debt / market cap | 25.4% | 25.4% | -6.5% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 14.25 |
| Mkt Cap | 3.2 |
| Rev LTM | 2,920 |
| Op Inc LTM | 22 |
| FCF LTM | 23 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 119 |
| CFO LTM | 309 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 524 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | -6.7% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | -1.7% |
| Rev Chg Q | -6.5% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | -1.7% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | -54.3% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | -45.7% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 0.5% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 4.8% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.6% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 11.9% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 17.9% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 1.3% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 5.5% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 3.2 |
| P/S | 1.2 |
| P/Op Inc | 2.6 |
| P/EBIT | 5.0 |
| P/E | 9.5 |
| P/CFO | 9.3 |
| Total Yield | 1.0% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.1% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | 7.2% |
| D/E | 0.3 |
| Net D/E | 0.2 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | 16.7% |
| 3M Rtn | 28.7% |
| 6M Rtn | 62.8% |
| 12M Rtn | 106.1% |
| 3Y Rtn | 41.3% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | 7.9% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | 22.3% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | 41.6% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | 78.5% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -44.4% |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $16.65 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 1.7 | |
| First Trading Date | 03/17/2017 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -8.5% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $14.67 | $9.75 |
| DMA Trend | up | up |
| Distance from DMA | 13.5% | 70.7% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 58.3% | 78.7% |
| Downside Capture | -0.88 | 0.37 |
| Upside Capture | 26.57 | 187.14 |
| Correlation (SPY) | -19.4% | 17.9% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | -2.30 | -1.17 | -0.43 | 0.41 | 1.18 | 1.46 |
| Up Beta | -1.72 | -2.03 | -1.62 | -1.02 | 0.28 | 1.17 |
| Down Beta | -15.62 | 0.29 | 1.25 | 1.96 | 1.80 | 2.42 |
| Up Capture | -12% | 7% | 63% | 100% | 277% | 179% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 15 | 22 | 31 | 66 | 141 | 428 |
| Stock +ve Days | 13 | 23 | 35 | 64 | 124 | 378 |
| Down Capture | -1499% | -311% | -200% | -7% | 80% | 103% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 4 | 18 | 30 | 56 | 108 | 321 |
| Stock -ve Days | 9 | 20 | 28 | 58 | 122 | 361 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with PUMP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUMP | 222.3% | 79.1% | 1.79 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 44.8% | 20.2% | 1.72 | 44.2% |
| Equity (SPY) | 28.1% | 12.5% | 1.78 | 17.4% |
| Gold (GLD) | 42.9% | 26.9% | 1.30 | -9.6% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 48.6% | 18.0% | 2.14 | 27.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 13.6% | 13.5% | 0.70 | -5.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -22.4% | 41.7% | -0.50 | 10.3% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with PUMP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUMP | 10.6% | 62.2% | 0.41 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 22.1% | 26.1% | 0.76 | 66.1% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.9% | 17.1% | 0.59 | 34.0% |
| Gold (GLD) | 21.2% | 17.9% | 0.96 | 4.6% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 13.5% | 19.1% | 0.58 | 48.7% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 3.6% | 18.8% | 0.09 | 19.1% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 8.5% | 56.0% | 0.36 | 12.1% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with PUMP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUMP | 1.7% | 71.1% | 0.34 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLE) | 9.8% | 29.5% | 0.37 | 68.0% |
| Equity (SPY) | 15.0% | 17.9% | 0.72 | 38.1% |
| Gold (GLD) | 13.4% | 15.9% | 0.70 | 1.1% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 9.5% | 17.7% | 0.45 | 46.4% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.6% | 20.7% | 0.24 | 28.9% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 68.1% | 66.9% | 1.07 | 9.9% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 4/30/2026 | -3.0% | -9.2% | |
| 1/26/2026 | -3.3% | 6.4% | 4.8% |
| 10/29/2025 | -2.3% | -2.3% | -12.2% |
| 7/30/2025 | -4.5% | -14.8% | -10.3% |
| 2/19/2025 | 2.4% | -4.0% | -17.3% |
| 10/30/2024 | -4.2% | 16.9% | 16.5% |
| 7/31/2024 | -4.0% | -14.8% | -15.1% |
| 5/1/2024 | 2.6% | 6.0% | 7.3% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 6 | 10 | 10 |
| # Negative | 11 | 7 | 6 |
| Median Positive | 3.4% | 6.2% | 6.0% |
| Median Negative | -3.4% | -9.2% | -14.1% |
| Max Positive | 5.5% | 51.5% | 17.2% |
| Max Negative | -5.6% | -14.8% | -23.8% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2026 | 04/30/2026 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2025 | 02/19/2026 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2025 | 10/30/2025 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2025 | 07/31/2025 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2025 | 05/01/2025 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2024 | 02/20/2025 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2024 | 10/31/2024 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2024 | 08/01/2024 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2024 | 05/02/2024 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2023 | 03/13/2024 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2023 | 11/02/2023 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2023 | 08/03/2023 | 10-Q |
| 03/31/2023 | 05/04/2023 | 10-Q |
| 12/31/2022 | 02/23/2023 | 10-K |
| 09/30/2022 | 11/03/2022 | 10-Q |
| 06/30/2022 | 08/04/2022 | 10-Q |
Insider Activity
Expand for More| # | Owner | Title | Holding | Action | Filing Date | Price | Shares | Transacted Value | Value of Held Shares | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Munoz, Adam | President and COO | Direct | Sell | 11142025 | 10.14 | 17,230 | 174,712 | 721,420 | Form |
| 2 | Lawrence, G Larry | Direct | Sell | 11032025 | 10.84 | 27,000 | 292,680 | 388,408 | Form | |
| 3 | Vion, Michele | Direct | Sell | 11032025 | 10.64 | 6,916 | 73,586 | 479,109 | Form | |
| 4 | Sledge, Samuel D | Chief Executive Officer | Direct | Buy | 8072025 | 4.98 | 4,900 | 24,402 | 1,805,942 | Form |
| 5 | Munoz, Adam | President and COO | Direct | Sell | 8052025 | 4.87 | 75,000 | 365,250 | 430,391 | Form |
Industry Resources
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.