MIND Technology (MIND)
Market Price (4/25/2026): $6.4 | Market Cap: $51.5 MilSector: Information Technology | Industry: Electronic Equipment & Instruments
MIND Technology (MIND)
Market Price (4/25/2026): $6.4Market Cap: $51.5 MilSector: Information TechnologyIndustry: Electronic Equipment & Instruments
Investment Highlights Why It Matters Detailed financial logic regarding cash flow yields vs trend-riding momentum.
Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 5.9%, FCF Yield is 9.9% Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -35% Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 13%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 11% Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Ocean Technology, and Offshore Energy Infrastructure. Themes include Marine Geophysical Survey, and Subsea Site Characterization. | Weak multi-year price returns3Y Excs Rtn is -161% | Weak revenue growthRev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -20% Key risksMIND key risks include [1] a drastically shrinking backlog in its Seamap business, Show more. |
| Attractive yieldTotal YieldTotal Yield = Earnings Yield + Dividend Yield, Earnings Yield = Net Income / Market Cap Dividend Yield = Total Dividends / Market Cap is 5.9%, FCF Yield is 9.9% |
| Cash is significant % of market capNet D/ENet Debt/Equity. Debt net of cash. Negative indicates net cash. Equity is taken as the Market Capitalization is -35% |
| Attractive cash flow generationCFO/Rev LTMCash Flow from Operations / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 13%, FCF/Rev LTMFree Cash Flow / Revenue (Sales), Last Twelve Months (LTM) is 11% |
| Megatrend and thematic driversMegatrends include Ocean Technology, and Offshore Energy Infrastructure. Themes include Marine Geophysical Survey, and Subsea Site Characterization. |
| Weak multi-year price returns3Y Excs Rtn is -161% |
| Weak revenue growthRev Chg QQuarterly Revenue Change % is -20% |
| Key risksMIND key risks include [1] a drastically shrinking backlog in its Seamap business, Show more. |
Qualitative Assessment
AI Analysis | Feedback
1. Poor Fiscal Year 2026 Fourth Quarter Results. The company reported a net loss of $271,000 and an earnings per share (EPS) of -$0.03 for Q4 FY2026, significantly missing the consensus estimate of $0.31. Furthermore, revenues for Q4 FY2026 declined by approximately 35% to $9.8 million compared to $15.0 million in Q4 FY2025, falling short of analysts' expectations of $14.65 million.
2. Negative Fiscal Year 2027 Revenue Guidance. Management projected lower revenues for fiscal year 2027 compared to the $40.9 million achieved in fiscal year 2026, contributing to investor concerns regarding future growth prospects.
Show more
Stock Movement Drivers
Fundamental Drivers
The -27.0% change in MIND stock from 12/31/2025 to 4/24/2026 was primarily driven by a -27.0% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 12312025 | 4242026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 8.79 | 6.42 | -27.0% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 46 | 46 | 0.0% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 6.6% | 6.6% | 0.0% |
| P/E Multiple | 23.2 | 16.9 | -27.0% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 8 | 8 | 0.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -27.0% |
Market Drivers
12/31/2025 to 4/24/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MIND | -27.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 4.2% | 25.1% |
| Sector (XLK) | 11.3% | 23.5% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -20.6% change in MIND stock from 9/30/2025 to 4/24/2026 was primarily driven by a -25.0% change in the company's Net Income Margin (%).| (LTM values as of) | 9302025 | 4242026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 8.09 | 6.42 | -20.6% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 49 | 46 | -5.0% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 8.8% | 6.6% | -25.0% |
| P/E Multiple | 15.1 | 16.9 | 12.4% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 8 | 8 | -1.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -20.6% |
Market Drivers
9/30/2025 to 4/24/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MIND | -20.6% | |
| Market (SPY) | 7.0% | 30.1% |
| Sector (XLK) | 13.9% | 27.9% |
Fundamental Drivers
The 7.0% change in MIND stock from 3/31/2025 to 4/24/2026 was primarily driven by a 131.1% change in the company's P/E Multiple.| (LTM values as of) | 3312025 | 4242026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 6.00 | 6.42 | 7.0% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 45 | 46 | 2.2% |
| Net Income Margin (%) | 9.9% | 6.6% | -33.4% |
| P/E Multiple | 7.3 | 16.9 | 131.1% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 5 | 8 | -32.0% |
| Cumulative Contribution | 7.0% |
Market Drivers
3/31/2025 to 4/24/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MIND | 7.0% | |
| Market (SPY) | 28.1% | 30.9% |
| Sector (XLK) | 55.9% | 30.3% |
Fundamental Drivers
The -86.1% change in MIND stock from 3/31/2023 to 4/24/2026 was primarily driven by a -82.5% change in the company's Shares Outstanding (Mil).| (LTM values as of) | 3312023 | 4242026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Price ($) | 46.21 | 6.42 | -86.1% |
| Change Contribution By: | |||
| Total Revenues ($ Mil) | 25 | 46 | 87.8% |
| P/S Multiple | 2.6 | 1.1 | -57.7% |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 1 | 8 | -82.5% |
| Cumulative Contribution | -86.1% |
Market Drivers
3/31/2023 to 4/24/2026| Return | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| MIND | -86.1% | |
| Market (SPY) | 79.8% | 14.6% |
| Sector (XLK) | 116.4% | 13.3% |
Price Returns Compared
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Total [1] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||||||
| MIND Return | -25% | -73% | -86% | 20% | 11% | -29% | -97% |
| Peers Return | 8% | -15% | 41% | -0% | 31% | 24% | 110% |
| S&P 500 Return | 27% | -19% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 4% | 89% |
Monthly Win Rates [3] | |||||||
| MIND Win Rate | 42% | 8% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | |
| Peers Win Rate | 53% | 38% | 58% | 58% | 60% | 60% | |
| S&P 500 Win Rate | 75% | 42% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 50% | |
Max Drawdowns [4] | |||||||
| MIND Max Drawdown | -39% | -76% | -91% | -52% | -42% | -33% | |
| Peers Max Drawdown | -12% | -32% | -17% | -21% | -20% | -9% | |
| S&P 500 Max Drawdown | -1% | -25% | -1% | -2% | -15% | -7% | |
[1] Cumulative total returns since the beginning of 2021
[2] Peers: CODA, GEOS, TDY, LHX, DWSN. See MIND Returns vs. Peers.
[3] Win Rate = % of calendar months in which monthly returns were positive
[4] Max drawdown represents maximum peak-to-trough decline within a year
[5] 2026 data is for the year up to 4/24/2026 (YTD)
How Low Can It Go
| Event | MIND | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Inflation Shock | ||
| % Loss | -84.6% | -25.4% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 548.6% | 34.1% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 464 days |
| 2020 Covid Pandemic | ||
| % Loss | -78.0% | -33.9% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 354.7% | 51.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 148 days |
| 2018 Correction | ||
| % Loss | -53.7% | -19.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 116.2% | 24.7% |
| Time to Breakeven | Not Fully Recovered days | 120 days |
| 2008 Global Financial Crisis | ||
| % Loss | -89.0% | -56.8% |
| % Gain to Breakeven | 808.9% | 131.3% |
| Time to Breakeven | 1,017 days | 1,480 days |
Compare to CODA, GEOS, TDY, LHX, DWSN
In The Past
MIND Technology's stock fell -84.6% during the 2022 Inflation Shock from a high on 2/10/2021. A -84.6% loss requires a 548.6% gain to breakeven.
Preserve Wealth
Limiting losses and compounding gains is essential to preserving wealth.
Asset Allocation
Actively managed asset allocation strategies protect wealth. Learn more.
About MIND Technology (MIND)
AI Analysis | Feedback
Here are 1-3 brief analogies for MIND Technology:
- Like a specialized version of GE, but solely focused on marine technology products for underwater exploration and security.
- A specialized marine equipment provider for underwater exploration, similar to a Schlumberger or Halliburton for the seas.
- FLIR Systems, but for marine sensing and security technologies like sonar and water-side security systems.
AI Analysis | Feedback
- Specialized Marine Seismic Equipment: These products are designed and manufactured for conducting seismic surveys in marine environments.
- Side Scan Sonar: This technology is used for seafloor mapping and the detection of objects underwater.
- Water-Side Security Systems: These systems provide enhanced security for waterfront areas and marine environments.
AI Analysis | Feedback
MIND Technology (symbol: MIND) sells specialized marine technology products primarily to other companies and governmental entities, operating on a Business-to-Business (B2B) model. The company does not publicly disclose the names of its major customers in its financial filings, nor does it typically have individual customers accounting for a substantial portion of its revenue. For example, in its fiscal year ended January 31, 2023, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of its consolidated net sales.
Based on the nature of its products (marine seismic equipment, side scan sonar, and water-side security systems), MIND Technology's customer base generally consists of the following categories of organizations:
- Energy Exploration Companies: Firms engaged in offshore oil and gas exploration, which utilize marine seismic equipment for subsea imaging and geological surveys.
- Governmental and Defense Agencies: Navies, coast guards, port authorities, and other national security or environmental agencies that require advanced sonar systems for applications such as maritime security, mine countermeasures, hydrographic surveys, and subsea asset protection.
- Marine Survey and Construction Firms: Companies providing specialized subsea surveying services for infrastructure projects (e.g., offshore wind farms, submarine cable laying, pipeline routing, port development) and environmental monitoring.
- Oceanographic and Scientific Research Institutions: Universities and research organizations conducting marine science studies, deep-sea exploration, and environmental assessments using sophisticated sonar and seismic instruments.
AI Analysis | Feedback
nullAI Analysis | Feedback
Robert P. Capps President & Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Capps was named President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2022, having previously served as Co-Chief Executive Officer since September 2015. He has been a member of MIND Technology's Board since July 2004. Mr. Capps brings over 35 years of financial experience, including more than 20 years as chief financial officer for several public companies. Prior to his current role, he was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2006. From July 1999 until May 2006, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TeraForce Technology Corporation, a publicly-held provider of defense electronics products. He also held the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Dynamex, Inc., a NASDAQ-listed supplier of same-day transportation services, from 1996 to 1999, and for Hadson Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange-listed energy company, from 1990 to 1995. Mr. Capps is a Certified Public Accountant and was formerly with Arthur Young & Co. He holds a Bachelor of Accountancy degree from the University of Oklahoma. He also serves as President & Director at Klein Marine Systems, Inc.
Mark B. Cox Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Cox was appointed Chief Financial Officer in January 2022, having served as Chief Accounting Officer since May 2017. He joined MIND Technology as Vice President Finance and Accounting in February 2017. Before joining MIND Technology, Mr. Cox was employed by Key Energy Services, Inc., where he served as Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer from March 2012 to October 2016, and Vice President, Tax, from October 2009 to March 2012. From December 2008 to September 2009, he served as Chief Financial Officer for Recon International, a privately-held company providing construction services to military and private organizations. Prior to that, Mr. Cox held a variety of positions with BJ Services Company from August 1990 through November 2008, including Tax Director and Middle East Region Controller. He began his career as a Tax Senior at Arthur Andersen in 1986. Mr. Cox completed his Bachelor of Finance degree at Houston Baptist University in 1986.
Guy M. Malden Executive Vice President, Marine Systems
Mr. Malden possesses over 35 years of experience in the geophysical industry. From 1993 to 2003, he served in various management capacities with several seismic equipment manufacturers, including Syntron, Inc. Prior to that, from 1975 to 1993, Mr. Malden held various field and management roles with Geophysical Service Inc./Halliburton Geophysical Services. He holds a degree in Marine Geology from Long Island University.
Mark Welker Vice President, Seamap
Mr. Welker was named Vice President – Seamap in July 2016 and has more than 25 years of experience in the manufacturing sector of the marine seismic industry. He began his career in 1982 with Syntron Inc (now Sercel Inc). From 1992 to 1996, as Managing Director of Syntron Asia Pte Ltd, Mr. Welker established a purpose-built streamer manufacturing and repair facility in Singapore. He then served as Vice President of Worldwide Manufacturing for Syntron Inc from 1996 to 1998, during which he also established and managed a joint venture cable factory in China. Mr. Welker returned to Singapore in 1998 as Managing Director of Sercel Singapore Pte Ltd, and in 2001, he became Managing Director of Seamap Pte Ltd, which MIND Technology acquired in 2005.
Peter H. Blum Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Mr. Blum was elected Non-Executive Chairman of MIND Technology's Board on July 8, 2004. He currently serves as Vice Chairman of Lucid Capital Markets, LLC, an investment banking firm. From 2004 through April 2024, Mr. Blum was Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc., also an investment banking firm. Prior to 2004, he worked as a senior investment banker with various Wall Street firms. Mr. Blum began his career as a Certified Public Accountant with Arthur Young & Co. He received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
AI Analysis | Feedback
MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) faces several key business risks, primarily stemming from its reliance on cyclical industries and concentrated customer base.
- Volatility in Demand from Cyclical Industries: The company's revenue is heavily influenced by capital expenditure decisions in the energy and marine survey sectors, particularly concerning oil and natural gas exploration. Fluctuations in commodity prices directly impact customer budgets for marine seismic equipment. This sensitivity to market cycles can lead to significant shifts in demand and a diminished order backlog, as observed in recent periods. While MIND Technology also serves the defense and maritime security industries, the cyclical nature of its primary markets remains a significant risk factor.
- Customer Concentration: A substantial portion of MIND Technology's revenues is generated from a limited number of customers. In fiscal year 2025, the largest customer alone accounted for 36% of revenues, and the top five customers collectively represented approximately 73% of consolidated revenues. The loss of any significant customer could result in a substantial reduction in the company's revenue and profitability.
- Supply Chain and Operational Risks: MIND Technology depends on a limited number of suppliers for crucial components, which exposes the company to risks of supply chain disruptions, extended lead times, and increased component costs. Additionally, rising costs due to inflation and component shortages have necessitated price increases for its products, ranging from 5% to 10%. The company has also undertaken cost management initiatives, including reducing headcount, in response to these pressures.
AI Analysis | Feedback
The global transition away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy sources represents an emerging threat. This shift is leading to a long-term decline in investment and activity within the oil and gas exploration sector, which has historically been a significant market for MIND Technology's specialized marine seismic equipment.
AI Analysis | Feedback
```htmlMIND Technology, Inc. operates in several addressable markets related to marine technology products. The primary markets for their specialized marine seismic equipment, side scan sonar, and water-side security systems are sized as follows:
Specialized Marine Seismic Equipment
The global marine seismic equipment market was estimated to be approximately USD 4.51 billion in 2024. Other estimates for the broader marine seismic equipment and acquisition market indicate a size of around USD 4.05 billion in 2024, projected to grow to USD 4.97 billion by 2032. Another report values the global marine seismic equipment & acquisition market at approximately USD 5.3 billion in 2023, with projections to reach USD 7.9 billion by 2032.
- Global: The market for marine seismic equipment was USD 4.51 billion in 2024.
- North America: This region held over 40% of the global revenue for marine seismic equipment, with a market size of approximately USD 1.81 billion in 2024.
- Europe: Europe accounted for over 30% of the global revenue, with a market size of approximately USD 1.35 billion in 2024.
- Asia-Pacific: The Asia-Pacific region held around 23% of the global revenue, with a market size of approximately USD 1.04 billion in 2024.
Side Scan Sonar
The global side-scan sonar system market was valued at USD 492.7 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 872.9 million by 2033.
- Global: The side-scan sonar system market was USD 492.7 million in 2024.
- North America: This region accounted for approximately USD 172.5 million of the global market in 2024.
- Europe: Europe contributed nearly USD 140.8 million to the global market in 2024.
Water-Side Security Systems
This category encompasses both broader maritime security systems and more specialized underwater security systems.
Maritime Security Systems
The global maritime security systems market was valued at around USD 22.83 billion in 2023 and is predicted to grow to approximately USD 42.44 billion by 2032. Another report estimated the market at USD 25 billion in 2023, with a forecast to reach USD 45 billion by 2032.
- Global: The maritime security systems market was approximately USD 22.83 billion to USD 25 billion in 2023.
- North America: This region dominated the global maritime security market with a share of over 35% in 2023.
Underwater Security Systems
The global underwater security (systems and services) market size was valued at US$ 9.6 billion in 2021 and is estimated to reach US$ 16.6 billion by the end of 2031.
- Global: The underwater security (systems and services) market was US$ 9.6 billion in 2021.
- North America: This region is expected to hold 36.2% of the global underwater security (systems and services) market share during the forecast period. North America is also noted as the largest market, holding approximately 45% of the global share.
AI Analysis | Feedback
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MIND) is poised for future revenue growth over the next 2-3 years, driven by several key factors:
- Conversion of Robust Backlog and Order Pipeline: The company has consistently reported a significant and often record-breaking backlog of orders, alongside a healthy pipeline for future orders. This strong demand for its specialized marine seismic equipment and side-scan sonar systems is expected to translate directly into increased revenue as these orders are fulfilled over the coming fiscal years. For instance, MIND Technology entered fiscal 2025 with a backlog exceeding $38 million, representing a substantial increase over the previous year. Additionally, subsequent to October 31, 2025, the company received approximately $9.5 million in anticipated orders, which are expected to positively impact Q4 results for fiscal 2026.
- Favorable Macroeconomic Tailwinds and Growth in Global Subsea Capital Expenditure: MIND Technology is benefiting from positive industry trends and a growing market for its solutions. Management frequently highlights a favorable market environment and robust customer interest. A significant driver is the projected 10% compound annual growth rate in global capital expenditure on subsea facilities from 2024 to 2027, creating substantial opportunities for MIND's specialized marine technology solutions in exploration, survey, and defense applications.
- Expansion into Energy Transition Markets: The ongoing global energy transition is presenting MIND Technology with new revenue opportunities. The company is actively capitalizing on alternative revenue streams in emerging sectors such as carbon storage, geothermal energy, offshore wind projects, and deep-sea mining. This diversification into new applications beyond traditional oil and gas seismic activities broadens its addressable market.
- Growth in High-Margin Aftermarket Sales: The aftermarket business, which includes spare parts, repairs, and engineering services, has become an increasingly vital and higher-margin revenue stream for MIND Technology. This segment provides a more recurring and stable revenue base compared to large system sales. In the first nine months of fiscal 2026, aftermarket revenues constituted approximately 64% of total revenues, contributing significantly to improved gross margins.
AI Analysis | Feedback
MIND Technology (symbol: MIND) has made the following capital allocation decisions over the last 3-5 years:Share Repurchases
- The Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $4.0 million of the company's common stock on August 28, 2025, effective through August 31, 2027.
Share Issuance
- On August 28, 2025, MIND Technology entered into an equity distribution agreement to sell up to $25.0 million of common stock through an "at-the-market" program with Lucid Capital Markets LLC.
- Stockholders approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated Stock Awards Plan on July 17, 2025, increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance by 400,000 shares.
Capital Expenditures
- The company expanded its manufacturing and repair facility in Huntsville, Texas, by August 6, 2025, to facilitate anticipated higher levels of business.
- MIND Technology remains focused on increasing its operational capacity in anticipation of future orders.
Latest Trefis Analyses
| Title | |
|---|---|
| ARTICLES |
Trade Ideas
Select ideas related to MIND.
| Date | Ticker | Company | Category | Trade Strategy | 6M Fwd Rtn | 12M Fwd Rtn | 12M Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03312026 | PANW | Palo Alto Networks | Insider | Insider Buys | Low D/EStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with strong insider buying in the last 1 month, positive operating income and reasonable debt / market cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 03312026 | ALKT | Alkami Technology | Insider | Insider Buys 45DStrong Insider BuyingCompanies with multiple insider buys in the last 45 days | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 03272026 | DBX | Dropbox | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 2.6% | 2.6% | 0.0% |
| 03272026 | DLB | Dolby Laboratories | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 3.5% | 3.5% | 0.0% |
| 03272026 | PTC | PTC | Dip Buy | DB | FCFY OPMDip Buy with High FCF Yield and High MarginBuying dips for companies with high FCF yield and meaningfully high operating margin | 3.5% | 3.5% | 0.0% |
Research & Analysis
Invest in Strategies
Wealth Management
Peer Comparisons
| Peers to compare with: |
Financials
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Price | 11.21 |
| Mkt Cap | 0.1 |
| Rev LTM | 87 |
| Op Inc LTM | 6 |
| FCF LTM | 7 |
| FCF 3Y Avg | 2 |
| CFO LTM | 11 |
| CFO 3Y Avg | 4 |
Growth & Margins
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Rev Chg LTM | 2.4% |
| Rev Chg 3Y Avg | 9.6% |
| Rev Chg Q | 4.8% |
| QoQ Delta Rev Chg LTM | 1.2% |
| Op Inc Chg LTM | 8.5% |
| Op Inc Chg 3Y Avg | 15.4% |
| Op Mgn LTM | 10.9% |
| Op Mgn 3Y Avg | 8.5% |
| QoQ Delta Op Mgn LTM | -0.4% |
| CFO/Rev LTM | 16.3% |
| CFO/Rev 3Y Avg | 9.0% |
| FCF/Rev LTM | 11.7% |
| FCF/Rev 3Y Avg | 5.5% |
Valuation
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Mkt Cap | 0.1 |
| P/S | 2.0 |
| P/Op Inc | 17.3 |
| P/EBIT | 16.4 |
| P/E | 25.1 |
| P/CFO | 13.0 |
| Total Yield | 3.0% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield 3Y Avg | -0.2% |
| D/E | 0.1 |
| Net D/E | 0.0 |
Returns
| Median | |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| 1M Rtn | -3.6% |
| 3M Rtn | -2.0% |
| 6M Rtn | 15.5% |
| 12M Rtn | 57.2% |
| 3Y Rtn | 54.7% |
| 1M Excs Rtn | -12.3% |
| 3M Excs Rtn | -5.6% |
| 6M Excs Rtn | 8.1% |
| 12M Excs Rtn | 25.8% |
| 3Y Excs Rtn | -19.6% |
Comparison Analyses
Segment Financials
Revenue by Segment| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seamap Marine Products | 37 | 25 | 17 | ||
| Corporate Expenses | 0 | 0 | |||
| Eliminations | -0 | ||||
| Klein Marine Products | 6 | ||||
| Klein | 4 | 7 | |||
| Seamap | 17 | 22 | |||
| Seismic Asia Pacific Pty Ltd (SAP) | 0 | ||||
| Total | 37 | 25 | 23 | 21 | 30 |
| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seamap Marine Products | 7 | -4 | |||
| Corporate Expenses | -7 | -5 | |||
| Eliminations | 0 | ||||
| Klein Marine Products | -5 | ||||
| Total | 1 | -15 |
| $ Mil | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seamap Marine Products | 33 | 24 | |||
| Corporate | 1 | 1 | |||
| Klein Marine Products | 9 | ||||
| Other | 8 | ||||
| Total | 33 | 42 |
Price Behavior
| Market Price | $6.42 | |
| Market Cap ($ Bil) | 0.1 | |
| First Trading Date | 12/29/2006 | |
| Distance from 52W High | -55.1% | |
| 50 Days | 200 Days | |
| DMA Price | $8.00 | $9.14 |
| DMA Trend | up | down |
| Distance from DMA | -19.7% | -29.8% |
| 3M | 1YR | |
| Volatility | 91.9% | 90.0% |
| Downside Capture | 1.55 | 1.09 |
| Upside Capture | 37.36 | 134.39 |
| Correlation (SPY) | 29.2% | 28.2% |
| 1M | 2M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.52 | 1.68 | 1.29 | 2.10 | 1.47 | 0.95 |
| Up Beta | 0.66 | 1.71 | 1.28 | 1.10 | 1.27 | 0.85 |
| Down Beta | 0.93 | 0.70 | 1.08 | 2.34 | 1.50 | 1.34 |
| Up Capture | 486% | 277% | 168% | 310% | 258% | 3% |
| Bmk +ve Days | 7 | 16 | 27 | 65 | 139 | 424 |
| Stock +ve Days | 10 | 18 | 29 | 64 | 122 | 352 |
| Down Capture | 38% | 162% | 116% | 164% | 128% | 97% |
| Bmk -ve Days | 12 | 23 | 33 | 58 | 110 | 323 |
| Stock -ve Days | 11 | 23 | 33 | 60 | 126 | 375 |
[1] Upside and downside betas calculated using positive and negative benchmark daily returns respectively
Based On 1-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with MIND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIND | -2.1% | 90.0% | 0.38 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 62.8% | 20.7% | 2.25 | 24.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 34.0% | 12.6% | 2.05 | 28.0% |
| Gold (GLD) | 42.9% | 27.2% | 1.29 | 11.7% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 46.4% | 18.0% | 1.97 | 1.2% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 14.2% | 13.3% | 0.74 | 15.8% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | -16.6% | 42.1% | -0.32 | 20.4% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 5-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with MIND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIND | -22.5% | 83.7% | 0.06 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 18.5% | 24.8% | 0.67 | 16.7% |
| Equity (SPY) | 12.7% | 17.1% | 0.58 | 18.8% |
| Gold (GLD) | 21.2% | 17.8% | 0.97 | 6.2% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 14.5% | 19.1% | 0.62 | 8.7% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 3.7% | 18.8% | 0.10 | 9.9% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 7.0% | 56.3% | 0.34 | 12.6% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Based On 10-Year Data
| Annualized Return | Annualized Volatility | Sharpe Ratio | Correlation with MIND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIND | -13.6% | 77.9% | 0.15 | - |
| Sector ETF (XLK) | 23.2% | 24.4% | 0.87 | 14.6% |
| Equity (SPY) | 14.9% | 17.9% | 0.71 | 17.8% |
| Gold (GLD) | 13.9% | 15.9% | 0.73 | 1.8% |
| Commodities (DBC) | 10.1% | 17.8% | 0.47 | 11.6% |
| Real Estate (VNQ) | 5.4% | 20.7% | 0.23 | 14.3% |
| Bitcoin (BTCUSD) | 68.3% | 66.9% | 1.07 | 6.4% |
Smart multi-asset allocation framework can stack odds in your favor. Learn How
Returns Analyses
Earnings Returns History
Expand for More| Forward Returns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Date | 1D Returns | 5D Returns | 21D Returns |
| 4/15/2026 | -28.5% | -27.7% | |
| 12/9/2025 | -24.1% | -25.4% | -5.5% |
| 9/9/2025 | -14.5% | -11.8% | 5.5% |
| 4/22/2025 | 26.5% | 17.5% | 18.2% |
| 12/10/2024 | 42.3% | 69.7% | 83.9% |
| 9/11/2024 | 5.2% | 4.7% | 4.4% |
| 4/29/2024 | 29.0% | 23.5% | -7.4% |
| 12/13/2023 | -17.0% | 0.0% | -4.3% |
| ... | |||
| SUMMARY STATS | |||
| # Positive | 9 | 7 | 7 |
| # Negative | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| Median Positive | 11.3% | 17.5% | 15.0% |
| Median Negative | -13.4% | -12.1% | -9.6% |
| Max Positive | 42.3% | 69.7% | 83.9% |
| Max Negative | -28.5% | -29.1% | -36.9% |
SEC Filings
Expand for More| Report Date | Filing Date | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2025 | 12/11/2025 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2025 | 09/10/2025 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2025 | 06/11/2025 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2025 | 04/25/2025 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2024 | 12/12/2024 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2024 | 09/12/2024 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2024 | 06/11/2024 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2024 | 04/30/2024 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2023 | 12/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2023 | 09/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2023 | 06/14/2023 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2023 | 05/01/2023 | 10-K |
| 10/31/2022 | 12/14/2022 | 10-Q |
| 07/31/2022 | 09/13/2022 | 10-Q |
| 04/30/2022 | 06/09/2022 | 10-Q |
| 01/31/2022 | 04/29/2022 | 10-K |
Recent Forward Guidance [BETA]
Latest: Q4 2026 Earnings Reported 4/15/2026
| Forward Guidance | Guidance Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Low | Mid | High | % Chg | % Delta | Change | Prior |
| 2027 Cash on Hand | 19.10 Mil | ||||||
External Quote Links
| Y Finance | Barrons |
| TradingView | Morningstar |
| SeekingAlpha | ValueLine |
| Motley Fool | Robinhood |
| CNBC | Etrade |
| MarketWatch | Unusual Whales |
| YCharts | Perplexity Finance |
| FinViz |
Prefer one of these to Trefis? Tell us why.