Stocks Trading At 52-Week Low

April 20th, 2026 by Trefis Team
SPY: State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust logo
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

As on Monday, April 20, 5 stocks from the Russell 3000 are trading at their 52-week lows. Among these stocks, Lucid (LCID) has corrected the most in the last one month, falling by 34% over this period.
 
Stocks At 52W Lows

Below is the complete list of these stocks, sorted by market capitalization – highlighting some the headwinds for these stocks across industries ranging from Packaged Foods & Meats and Health Care Equipment to Electronic Equipment & Instruments and Automobile Manufacturers:
 

Tickers Market
Cap		 1D
% Chg		 1W
% Chg		 1M
% Chg		 1Y
% Chg
BSX $90.4 Bil -5.0% -3.5% -12.7% -36.0%
PPC $7.8 Bil -2.6% -7.3% -7.4% -38.1%
MZTI $3.7 Bil -4.0% -7.0% -6.0% -25.5%
BMI $3.3 Bil -1.8% -29.6% -23.6% -37.8%
LCID $2.2 Bil -7.5% -26.9% -34.5% -70.8%

 

Trefis: RUA Stock Insights

What is the point? A 52-week low often reflects deep pessimism, but also potential opportunity. This price point can signal capitulation, setting the stage for mean reversion or contrarian entry. It is where risk and reward start to skew interestingly. But of course, a trade at this level requires deep conviction. Among the stocks above, we find Lucid (LCID) attractive

Relevant Articles
  1. 4 Catalysts to Monitor Over In The Next 2 Quarters For GOOGL Stock
  2. Cash Rich, Low Price – CDW Stock to Break Out?
  3. Years of Rewards: $34 Bil From Eli Lilly Stock
  4. Costco Wholesale Stock Capital Return Hits $20 Bil
  5. Arista Networks Stock Hits Key Support – Buying Opportunity?
  6. Humana Stock Near Crucial Support – Buy Signal?

Worried that these stocks could fall much more? You could take a look at the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming its benchmark that includes all 3 — the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 indices. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.