Will The U.S. Treasury Department Rules, That Killed The Pfizer-Allergan Deal, Affect Johnson Controls-Tyco Merger?

by Trefis Team
Johnson Controls
Rate   |   votes   |   Share

Inversion deals, wherein the tax domicile of the new company is shifted to that of the foreign company, have received a lot of flak recently in the U.S.  Such deals are done mostly to take advantage of the lower tax rates in the foreign country, as the corporate tax rate in the U.S., of 35%, is among the highest in the world. Keeping this in mind, the U.S. Treasury Department issued new rules recently against corporate inversions. One of the new rules goes after “serial inverters” — companies that have indulged in multiple inversions in the past. As per the new rule, three years of past mergers with U.S. corporations are disregarded in order to determine the size of the foreign company. Therefore, by subtracting the value of U.S. assets that a foreign company has acquired, the foreign company would become smaller in relation to the U.S. company. The size of the company is taken into account to calculate the shareholding of the U.S. company in the combined firm. A foreign corporation is required to own at least 40% of the combined company in order to reap any significant tax benefits from an inversion. If, after the merger, the shareholders of the former U.S. company own at least 80% of the combined firm, the government treats the new combined firm as subject to U.S. taxes, eliminating the positives of the inversion. If they own at least 60%, some restrictions apply, but the company is still regarded as foreign. This has prompted companies to keep the level below 60%, leading the U.S. government to propose rulings halting such deals. As a result of this new rule, the Pfizer-Allergan deal could not move forward, as Allergan itself was a result of a number of inversions. However, Tyco has not made any significant acquisitions of U.S. based assets in the last three years, and therefore, the combined JCI-Tyco will not violate the new Treasury “three-year-look-back-rule.”  This merger is also not just about tax savings; the combination of highly complementary businesses facilitates the new company to offer comprehensive and innovative solutions to a wider market globally, across numerous end markets.

Screen Shot 2016-04-28 at 3.51.15 pm

Have more questions on Johnson Controls? See the links below:


1) The purpose of these analyses is to help readers focus on a few important things. We hope such lean communication sparks thinking, and encourages readers to comment and ask questions on the comment section, or email content@trefis.com
2) Figures mentioned are approximate values to help our readers remember the key concepts more intuitively. For precise figures, please refer to our complete analysis for Johnson Controls.
Rate   |   votes   |   Share


Name (Required)
Email (Required, but never displayed)
Be the first to comment!