EMC Banks On Emerging Storage To Drive Growth As Storage Systems Market Remains Suppressed

+1.48%
Upside
26.16
Market
26.55
Trefis
EMC: EMC logo
EMC
EMC

Storage giant EMC (NYSE:EMC) has witnessed stagnation in its core information storage business over the last couple of years, with its smaller business segments contributing to top line growth. The growth in EMC’s net revenue has slowed down from over 21% in 2010 to 17.6% in 2011, 8.5% in 2012, 6.9% in 2013 and further to 5.2% in 2014. On similar lines, growth in revenues generated by the company’s information storage stood at over 15% in in 2010 and 2011, which has subsequently fallen to under 2% in 2014.

Taking into account the latest IDC report, worldwide spend on storage hardware declined by 0.4% in 2014 to $24.5 billion. [1] In this article, we take a look at EMC’s performance in the storage market through the year and how it fared against other storage systems providers such as IBM (NYSE:IBM), NetApp (NASDAQ:NTAP), Hitachi Data Systems and Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ). We have a $30 price estimate for EMC, which is about 10% higher than the current market price.

See our full analysis for EMC’s stock

Relevant Articles
  1. Dell-EMC Deal Finally Closes: A Look At How The Merger Could Impact HPE & IBM
  2. EMC Earnings Takeaways: Flash Array, VMware, Services Continue Growth
  3. EMC Earnings Preview: Storage Hardware Sales To Remain Suppressed, Services To Drive Growth
  4. Why You Should Take A Closer Look At EMC’s EPS Growth
  5. How A Worldwide Decline In Storage Systems Sales Impacts EMC
  6. How Valuable Is EMC’s Information Storage Business?

EMC’s Presence In The External Storage Systems Market

EMC’s information storage product and services revenues combined for 2014 were $16.5 billion, up from $16.2 billion in the previous year. Within information storage, services revenues grew by 4.2% to $5.7 billion while product revenues (hardware and software combined) stayed flat over the previous year at $10.8 billion. The company has been a clear leader in the external storage systems market over the last few years, with its share growing from under 23% in 2009 to over 31% in 2014. However, EMC lost market share in the external storage systems market through 2014, with its share declining by 30 basis points from 2013 levels of 31.3%. This was the first time since 2008 that EMC’s share in this market segment declined on a y-o-y basis. More worrying for EMC was the fact that its decline in revenues (about 1.5%) was higher than the industry-wide decline (0.4%) in storage hardware sales. This was evidenced across major storage systems providers including NetApp, IBM and Hitachi Data Systems. Some of the smaller storage vendors such as Pure Storage, Violin Memory, Nimbus Data and Solidfire gained share at the expense of these large companies. [2]

EMC’s Emerging Storage products, such as the all-flash array XtremIO, software-defined storage platform ViPR, scale-out network attached storage platform Isilon and converged storage infrastructure ScaleIO, were largely responsible for the growth in hardware sales during the year, with core storage offerings witnessing low sale volumes. Net revenues generated by the Emerging Storage sub-segment stood at $2.3 billion in 2014, up by 52% on a year-over-year basis. The company attributed the robust growth rate to a strong customer response for its new products. The company expects the growth in emerging storage to continue through 2015 and resulting revenues to rise by over 30% to $3 billion for the full year. [3] This would translate to about 12-13% of the company’s expected net revenues of about $25 billion. Comparatively, emerging storage contributed to only about 6-7% of net revenues in 2013.

How Competitors Fared Against EMC

HP was the only large company which gained share in the external storage market in 2014. Its revenues grew by 1.5% y-o-y to $2.3 billion while its share increased from 9.4% to 9.6% this year. Similarly, the company’s revenues in the total disk storage systems market (which includes internal storage as well) also increased by 2% to $5.2 billion for the full year. HP’s management projects growth in enterprise storage segments such as converged storage, software-defined networks and cloud infrastructure, where the company can potentially excel in the coming quarters. [4] Additionally, the company announced a revamped product line for its 3PAR midrange StorServ storage systesms in January this year, which could further expand the HP’s presence in the market. [5]

NetApp was one of the few large storage system vendors that did not witness a decline in market share through the first three quarters of 2014. However, the December quarter is typically a weak period for NetApp’s product sales. Consequently, its share in the external storage systems market for the full year was about 30 basis points lower than the previous year at 12.8%. Net revenues generated by storage hardware sales for the full year were slightly over $3.1 billion, compared to $3.2 billion in 2013. NetApp introduced a significant number of new products last year, including all-flash storage array FlashRay, the Data ONTAP 8.3 operating system, Cloud ONTAP software for usage in public clouds and the new range of products from the SteelStore acquisition. [6] We currently forecast NetApp’s external storage systems market share to gradually rise to over 15% through the end the decade.

Hitachi Data Systems’ (HDS) and IBM both witnessed a share decline similar to EMC and NetApp through the year. Hitachi’s share fell from 8.1% 2013 to 7.7% 2014. Hitachi’s Content Platform (HCP) uses a distributed object storage system, whereby  customers and cloud providers can store and retrieve unstructured data,  making up a single storage platform. While this is not different from content management platforms offered by other vendors, Hitachi has been the forerunner in this domain and leads the companies in data-driven storage. [7] More recently, the company announced the acquisition of business intelligence and analytics company Pentaho for about $500-$600 million. [8] This move will enable the IT giant to have consolidated storage and data analytics offerings to compete with storage companies that currently offer integrated solutions such as EMC and NetApp. On the other hand, IBM had a difficult year, which was partially attributable to weakness in IBM’s standalone external storage systems complemented by the termination of the IBM-NetApp deal in May 2014. Consequently, IBM’s share in the market fell from 12% in 2013 to 10.8% in 2014, with revenues declining by over 10% to $2.6 billion. Similarly, IBM’s combined revenues for internal and external storage systems declined by almost 15% to $3.6 billion.

Going forward, we forecast EMC’s share to fall by about 20 basis points for the full year, as competing companies catch up to EMC’s technology and integrated product offerings. However, we expect the company to maintain a share of over 30% through the end of our forecast period. You can modify the interactive chart below to gauge the effect a change in market share of external storage systems will have on our price estimate for EMC.

View Interactive Institutional Research (Powered by Trefis):
Global Large CapU.S. Mid & Small CapEuropean Large & Mid Cap
More Trefis Research

Notes:
  1. Worldwide Quarterly Disk Storage Systems Tracker Q4 2014, IDC Press Release, March 2015 []
  2. All-Flash Arrays Offer Strong Opportunity For NetApp Despite Competition, Forbes, June 2014 []
  3. EMC Earnings Call Transcript Q4 2014, Seeking Alpha, January 2015 []
  4. HP Servers, Storage Decline As Split Begins, Enterprise Tech, November 2014 []
  5. HP Refreshes Mid-Range 3PAR Storage, CRN, January 2015 []
  6. NetApp Helps Enterprises and Service Providers Build a Hybrid Cloud Foundation, NetApp Press Release, October 2014 []
  7. Hitachi Data Systems: Measuring Up to Transformational Trends, Infostor, August 2014 []
  8. ​Hitachi Data Systems to buy big data analytics firm Pentaho, ZDNet, February 2014 []