My Trefis
Join Trefis today!
Register to create your own "My Trefis" of stocks, news, and people that interest you.
FILTER BY COMPANY
- All Companies
- Edit My Portfolio
-
Add to watch list:You don't have any companies in your watch list yet.
- My Collection
-
- Accenture ACN
- Alaska Air... ALK
- Baidu BIDU
- Cisco CSCO
- Costco COST
- Dell DELL
- Delta Air L... DAL
- HP HPQ
- Intel INTC
- Lexmark LXK
- MetLife MET
- Microsoft MSFT
- Morgan Stan... MS
- NetApp NTAP
- Procter & G... PG
- Prudential... PRU
- Sina SINA
- Southwest A... LUV
- Target TGT
- Travelers TRV
- UnitedHealt... UNH
- VMware VMW
- Wal-Mart WMT
You don't have any items in your collection. Click next to an item to add it to your collection.
BY CONTRIBUTOR
BY CONTENT
Example question: Bloomberg reported that supply constraints are leading to iPhone shortages. Do Trefis analysts see a meaningful impact on AAPL?
Example comment: Competition will squeeze AMZN's operating margins from 4% to 2% meaning a 10% hit to the stock according to Trefis.
Name (Required)
Email (Required, but never displayed)
SUBMITSUBMIT
Insert Chart or Image...
* Companies:
I think there is a major misunderstanding about HANA'S performance improvements. There isn't anyone foolish to make a claim in either hardware or software that someting has improved 1,000,000,000 times faster than the old way of doing it.
The 1 million you are talking about is a TIME FACTOR. Probably the millionith of seconds. Stoarge Speed, and speed from storage to the CPU is usually broken down in the Macro, Milli, and now NANO seconds. If you can actually perform IN MEMORY COMPUTING you could be in the NANO second claim. But that doesn't mean you are 1,000,000,000 times faster than either the Hard Disk or an SSD. 1, 1000, to 10,000 is a better formula, 1 is HD, 1000 is SSD and 10,000 is IN MEMORY RAM.
Finally, HANA is a select product that will only work on select data and applications. It use compression algo's and the HOT DATA approach. It's also very expensive. You need a load of RAM to use it, [ less... ]
The 1 million you are talking about is a TIME FACTOR. Probably the millionith of seconds. Stoarge Speed, and speed from storage to the CPU is usually broken down in the Macro, Milli, and now NANO seconds. If you can actually perform IN MEMORY COMPUTING you could be in the NANO second claim. But that doesn't mean you are 1,000,000,000 times faster than either the Hard Disk or an SSD. 1, 1000, to 10,000 is a better formula, 1 is HD, 1000 is SSD and 10,000 is IN MEMORY RAM.
Finally, HANA is a select product that will only work on select data and applications. It use compression algo's and the HOT DATA approach. It's also very expensive. You need a load of RAM to use it, [ less... ]
I think there is a major misunderstanding about HANA'S performance improvements. There isn't anyone foolish to make a claim in either hardware or software that someting has improved 1,000,000,000 times faster than the old way of doing it.
The 1 million you are talking about is a TIME FACTOR. Probably the millionith of seconds. Stoarge Speed, and speed from storage to the CPU is usually broken down in the Macro, Milli, and now NANO seconds. If you can actually perform IN MEMORY COMPUTING you could be in the NANO second claim. But that doesn't mean you are 1,000,000,000 times faster than either the Hard Disk or an SSD. 1, 1000, to 10,000 is a better formula, 1 is HD, 1000 is SSD and 10,000 is IN MEMORY RAM.
Finally, HANA is a select product that will only work on select data and applications. It use compression algo's and the HOT DATA approach. It's also very expensive. You need a load of RAM to use it,