My Trefis
Join Trefis today!
Register to create your own "My Trefis" of stocks, news, and people that interest you.
FILTER BY COMPANY
- All Companies
- Edit My Portfolio
-
Add to watch list:You don't have any companies in your watch list yet.
- My Collection
-
- Abercrombie... ANF
- Aeropostale ARO
- AMD AMD
- American Ea... AEO
- Anadarko APC
- Apple AAPL
- Barrick Gol... ABX
- BlackBerry BBRY
- Broadcom BRCM
- Cisco CSCO
- Daimler AG DDAIF
- F5 Networks FFIV
- Ford F
- Freeport Mc... FCX
- Gap Inc. GPS
- General Mot... GM
- Honda HMC
- HP HPQ
- IBM IBM
- Intel INTC
- Microsoft MSFT
- NetApp NTAP
- Nokia NOK
- nVIDIA NVDA
- NYSE Eurone... NYX
- Oracle ORCL
- Silver Whea... SLW
- Toyota TM
- VMware VMW
You don't have any items in your collection. Click next to an item to add it to your collection.
BY CONTRIBUTOR
BY CONTENT
Example question: Bloomberg reported that supply constraints are leading to iPhone shortages. Do Trefis analysts see a meaningful impact on AAPL?
Example comment: Competition will squeeze AMZN's operating margins from 4% to 2% meaning a 10% hit to the stock according to Trefis.
Name (Required)
Email (Required, but never displayed)
SUBMITSUBMIT
Insert Chart or Image...
* Companies:
unless you are in China -- and this piece reads as though you may not be -- the word is "taking," not "bringing." also, if there was no ban per se that has been lifted as a result of the settlement, i for one would certainly appreciate an explanation. if there actually was a ban that has since been lifted, then the word "ban" should not appear in quotes in your article. really, though, in the end, the best policy is to just explain yourself and to not use scare quotes at all as scare quote, by definition, transfer the author's burden of conveying understanding to the reader. This is, obviously, a poor and lazy practice as an author.
Namaste, -c0nd3mn3d [ less... ]
Namaste, -c0nd3mn3d [ less... ]
unless you are in China -- and this piece reads as though you may not be -- the word is "taking," not "bringing." also, if there was no ban per se that has been lifted as a result of the settlement, i for one would certainly appreciate an explanation. if there actually was a ban that has since been lifted, then the word "ban" should not appear in quotes in your article. really, though, in the end, the best policy is to just explain yourself and to not use scare quotes at all as scare quote, by definition, transfer the author's burden of conveying understanding to the reader. This is, obviously, a poor and lazy practice as an author.
Namaste, -c0nd3mn3d